East Midlands
Planning in Ashfield
Ashfield · District. Approval rates, decision timelines, local plan status, policies and CIL — sourced from government data, free to read.
Performance
Approval rate
83.8%
Decisions on time
87.06%
Applications / year
420
Housing Delivery Test (2023)
MHCLG has not yet measured this LPA.
Standard-method LHN: 446 dwellings / year
Source: MHCLG PS1/PS2 + HDT 2023.
Local plan
Plan PDF link not yet curated for this council.
Policies
Community
| RC4 | New Formal Open Space LAND WILL BE PROVIDED FOR NEW FORMAL OPEN SPACE IN ASSOCIATION WITH ADJACENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ALLOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP AT:- Hucknall Ha PAPPLEWICK LANE 7.5 Kirkby-in-Ashfield Ka SOUTH OF KINGSWAY PARK 1.2 A PLANNING CONDITION WILL BE IMPOSED OR PLANNING OBLIGATION NEGOTIATED, AS APPROPRIATE TO SECURE THE PROVISION OF THESE AREAS. |
| RC5 | Allotments DEVELOPMENT ON ALLOTMENT LAND WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) IT IS DEMONSTRATED THAT THE ALLOTMENTS ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED, OR b) APPROPRIATE ALTERNATIVE PROVISION IS MADE WITHIN THE LOCALITY. Protected Allotments are listed below and shown on the Proposals Map:- Hucknall Ha RUFFS FARM Hb BUTLERS HILL Hc LONG HILL RISE Hd WOOD LANE/A611 He WIGWAM LANE Hf LINBY ROAD EAST Hg ST. MARY'S WAY Hh WIGHAY Hi WASHDYKE LANE Kirkby-in-Ashfield Ka FOREST ROAD Kb WESLEY STREET Kc SHERWOOD RISE Kd KINGSWAY Ke FORSTER STREET Kf SUTTON ROAD Kg DIAMOND AVENUE Sutton-in-Ashfield Sa CALLADINE LANE Sb JUBILEE GARDENS Sc MILL LANE, HUTHWAITE Sd MILLDALE WALK Se LANE END Sf BRAND LANE, STANTON HILL Sg WHARF ROAD, STANTON HILL Sh NEW LANE, STANTON HILL Named Settlements Selston Na MANSFIELD ROAD Underwood Nb CORDY LANE Rural Area Ra LIME TREE ROAD, HUCKNALL Rb PLAINSPOT ROAD, BRINSLEY Rc SCHOOL ROAD, BAGTHORPE Rd WESTWOOD GARDENS, WESTWOOD Re NOTTINGHAM ROAD, SELSTON Rf CHURCH GARDENS, KIRKBY Rg CALIFORNIA, KIRKBY Rh GARDEN GAP, HUTHWAITE Ri MAIN STREET, HUTHWAITE |
| RC6 | LAND SAFEGUARDED FOR INDOOR LEISURE FACILITIES LAND IS SAFEGUARDED FOR INDOOR LEISURE FACILITIES AT:- Kirkby-in-Ashfield Hectares Ka ADJACENT FESTIVAL HALL, LINDLEYS LANE 0.4 |
| RC7 | INDOOR LEISURE FACILITIES OUTSIDE DISTRICT SHOPPING CENTRES INDOOR LEISURE FACILITIES OUTSIDE DISTRICT SHOPPING WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE: a) THE SITE CAN BE DEMONSTRATED TO BE ACCEPTABLE USING THE SEQUENTIAL APPROACH, b) DEVELOPMENT WOULD NOT DIRECTLY, OR WHEN CONSIDERED TOGETHER WITH ANY OTHER COMMITTED SCHEMES LIKELY TO BE DEVELOPED IN THE SHORT TERM, SERIOUSLY AFFECT THE VITALITY AND VIABILITY OF ANY EXISTING NEARBY DISTRICT SHOPPING CENTRES, c) IT WOULD BE ACCESSIBLE BY A CHOICE OF MEANS OF TRANSPORT, d) IT WOULD BE WELL RELATED TO THE MAIN ROAD NETWORK, e) IT WOULD NOT GIVE RISE TO UNACCEPTABLE VEHICULAR AND/OR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC CONDITIONS, f) PARKING PROVISION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH COUNCIL STANDARDS, AS OUTLINED IN APPENDIX 7, AND g) IT WOULD NOT LEAD TO UNACCEPTABLE INCREASES IN JOURNEYS BY PRIVATE CAR. |
| RC9 | COMMUNITY SERVICES DEVELOPMENT FOR ALTERNATIVE USES OF SITES REQUIRED FOR EDUCATIONAL, SOCIAL, HEALTH, COMMUNITY AND RELIGIOUS FACILITIES WILL NOT BE PERMITTED UNLESS ADEQUATE REPLACEMENT PROVISION IS MADE OR THERE IS NO LONGER A NEED FOR THE FACILITY. |
Design
| ST1 | DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) IT WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH OTHER POLICIES IN THIS LOCAL PLAN, b) IT WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CHARACTER, QUALITY, AMENITY OR SAFETY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, c) IT WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT HIGHWAY SAFETY, OR THE CAPACITY OF THE TRANSPORT SYSTEM, d) IT WILL NOT PREJUDICE THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF AN AREA, e) IT WILL NOT CONFLICT WITH AN ADJOINING OR NEARBY LAND USE. |
Employment
| EM1 | EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ROAD-RELATED DEVELOPMENT WHERE INDICATED EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ROAD-RELATED DEVELOPMENT WHERE INDICATED, WILL BE PERMITTED ON THE SITES LISTED BELOW AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP:- Hucknall Ha ROLLS ROYCE, WATNALL ROAD 13.0 Hb WATNALL ROAD 0.8 Hc FORMER HUCKNALL NO.1 COLLIERY/WATNALL ROAD* 3.0 Hd NORTH A611/WATNALL ROAD 0.6 He BUTLERS HILL 3.2 Hf BAKER BROOK INDUSTRIAL ESTATE* 3.5 Hg WIGWAM LANE CENTRAL 1.0 Hh AMBER BUSINESS PARK (former Hucknall Colliery) 1.1 Hi FORMER LINBY COLLIERY 0.9 Hj ANNESLEY ROAD/A611 2.3 Hk DANIELS WAY/WATNALL ROAD* 1.4 Kirkby-in-Ashfield Kb LOWMOOR ROAD INDUSTRIAL ESTATE 2.6 Kc WELSH CROFT CLOSE NORTH/PORTLAND IND. EST. 4.1 Kd WOLSEY DRIVE NORTH* 0.8 Ke KINGS MILL ROAD EAST/ODDICROFT LANE# 6.3 Kf ODDICROFT LANE WEST* 2.6 Kg ODDICROFT LANE EAST 3.1 Sutton-in-Ashfield Sa PINXTON LANE + 28.0 Sb WEST OF FULWOOD* 21.2 Sc OFF FULWOOD RISE/A38/FULWOOD IND. EST. 1.7 Sd WEST OF ROOKERY LANE/FULWOOD IND. EST. 1.0 Se COMMON ROAD FARM/FULWOOD IND. EST.* 2.7 Sf FULWOOD ROAD NORTH/FULWOOD IND. EST. 1.6 Si NUNN BROOK ROAD EAST/COUNTY IND. EST. 3.0 Sj MIDLAND ROAD/STATION ROAD* 0.6 Sk SHEEPWASH LANE/COXMOOR ROAD# 3.3 Sl NORTH OF HAMILTON ROAD 3.7 Sm COXMOOR ROAD/KINGS MILL 1.2 Sn BRIERLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK* 4.4 Named Settlement Na LAND AT BESTWOOD ROAD* 0.5 Rural Area Ra BLENHEIM LANE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE + 13.6 Rb SHERWOOD BUSINESS PARK* 18.5 Rc ANNESLEY COLLIERY 9.0 Rd BENTINCK COLLIERY 6.5 Re SOUTH WEST OAKHAM BUSINESS PARK + 23.5 |
| EM1Ra | Employment Site Brief - Blenheim Lane Industrial Estate, Hucknall A. STRATEGIC/LOCATION 1. This site is well located to take advantage of existing infrastructure provided for the Blenheim Lane Industrial Estate and has relatively quick and direct access to junction 26 of the M1. The site is a logical and self contained extension to the existing industrial area. B. ENVIRONMENT 1. This site lies directly adjacent to Bulwell Wood SSSI and Sites of Interest for Nature Conservation (SINC) to the east and to the north. The latter site comprises of a watercourse and ponds. The following measures are therefore proposed to avoid significant adverse effects on these areas of nature conservation interest and the links between them:- 2. The site should be self contained with vehicular and pedestrian access only from the existing industrial area to avoid human disturbance to those areas of nature conservation interest. 3. Hedges on all external site boundaries should be protected. 4. A tree planted buffer zone of a least 15 metres should be established on the northern and eastern site boundaries as they adjoin the stream valley and nature conservation sites. This will also assist in screening the site to the north. 5. A buffer zone of at least 25 metres should be established adjacent to Bulwell Wood SSSI. This should be managed as a mixture of grassland shrub and trees. 6. New tree planting to the south west of the site should be retained. 7. Tree and shrub species native to this area should be used in the buffer zones and within the development area itself. 8. Any development should be designed and constructed to avoid any adverse effects of drainage and run-off to the adjacent stream and ponds to the north. 9. A detailed ecological and landscape study should be carried out to ensure the above measures are carried out to best effect to minimise effects on adjoining nature conservation areas. C. TRANSPORT 1. Access to this site will be from the existing industrial estate as shown on the above plan. 2. A detailed transport assessment will be required for this site, in particular to assess the need for the following off-site, and any other on or off-site highway improvements. A number of off-site highway improvements may be necessary including contributions to the improvement of the Low Wood Road/Sellars Wood Road roundabout (including the pelican crossing) and improvements to the mini roundabout at Sellars Wood Road/Coventry Road. Improvements would also be required to a short length of Blenheim Lane, from an upgraded Camberley Road/Blenheim Lane roundabout, to connect to Bannerley Road and provide a second access route to the Industrial Estate. Contributions may also be required towards improvement of Nuthall Roundabout. 3. The site should be fully accessible for buses, pedestrians and cyclists. 4. Contributions towards transport will be required in accordance with Local Plan policy TR6. D. SERVICES 1. Reinforcements to water supply may be required due to low pressure. E. OTHER 1. Raised land to the south of the site is understood to be imported material. Any disturbance to this raised land will necessitate a contamination survey to assess the need for remedial measures to be taken. 2. The proposed layout and height of buildings on this site should not prejudice the take off and landing safety area for aeroplanes from the Rolls Royce flying club to the north of this site. |
| EM1Rc | Employment Site Brief - Annesley Colliery A. STRATEGIC/LOCATION 1. This site is located in close proximity to the M1 with access via the A608. The Colliery site was closed in early 2000 and this allocation for employment use will assist in the redevelopment and re-use of a previously used ('brownfield') site. |
| EM1Sa | Employment Site Brief - Pinxton Lane, Sutton-in-Ashfield A. STRATEGIC/LOCATION 1. This site is well located to take advantage of the excellent links via the A38 to the M1. A regular bus service and footpaths/cycleways also exist on the A38 which could be readily utilised to maximise non car access to the site. B. ENVIRONMENT 1. The Site of Interest for Nature Conservation (SINC) is centrally located on the site at the former railway line. This should be retained within any development proposal. An appropriate landscaped buffer zone should be established either side of the SINC site. A landscaped corridor of similar width, incorporating the proposed trail referred to in Section C, part 7 below, should be continued from the SINC site to Pinxton Lane. 2. Existing trees and hedges should be protected where possible and in particular on external site boundaries. 3. Major structural tree planting using native species will be required on higher ground to the east of the site and on the southern and southwestern site boundaries to minimise visual intrusion. 4. The design and layout of any scheme will be required to avoid any adverse impacts on watercourses. Any proposed water balancing area should be located adjacent to the nature conservation area in the centre of the site. This should be designed to enhance this nature conservation area. 5. The Eastern limit of built development will be required to be identified in detail taking into account existing and proposed levels, proposed building design and in particular heights, existing and proposed, landscaping and subsequently an overall assessment of the visual impact of the proposal. C. TRANSPORT 1. A detailed transport assessment will be required for this site which should include reference to the issues indicated below and any other on or off site requirements to provide a safe and convenient means of access to this site. 2. Access to the site should be provided from the A38 for vehicles, including public transport, cyclists and pedestrians. 3. Access from the site to the A38 should be combined with an improved Pinxton Lane as it meets the A38. The junction with the A38 would require upgrading and signals provided. 4. Emergency access should be provided form the site to the access road serving the factory retail outlet centre to the west of the site. This should also include a cycle and pedestrian link. 5. Design of the highway layout should facilitate bus access and turning. Ideally this should be through access utilising the emergency access referred to in 4 above. 6. The layout of the site should be pedestrian and cycle friendly including links to adjoining routes. These routes may require upgrading, particularly the cycle route on the A38. 7. A new landscaped path link for pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders should be established on the route of the old railway line which passes under the A38 and links to Pinxton Lane. The new route should link directly to the bridleway to the south of Pinxton Lane. Safe provisions should be made for crossing the roads. 8. The bridleway to the east of the site may need relocating to coincide with the proposed tree planted area to provide a safe and attractive new route. 9. A 'Green Transport Plan' must be submitted with any planning application for this site to demonstrate how the integration of public transport, cycling and pedestrian provision in the development will minimise travel to work by car and parking requirements. Car parking provision should be made within the maximum Council standards. Improvements will be required to public transport in the area to ensure this site is served by buses. The level of non car based provision, i.e. bus, cycle and pedestrian access, may allow a negotiated reduction in parking provision. 10. Contributions towards transport improvements will be required in accordance with Local Plan Policy TR6. 11. Consultation will need to be undertaken with the Highways Agency regarding the need to contribute towards potential improvements to junction 28 of M1. D. SERVICES 1. Possible off-site gas reinforcement required 2. Overhead power lines may need relocating. Major new electricity infrastructure works will be required including a new sub-station 3. Foul water will need to be taken to Common Road and a pumping station may be required. 4. On site surface water balancing is likely to be required. E. OTHER 1. Three potential areas of landfill are shown on the above plan. This will require further investigation to assess levels of contamination and identify any remedial measures required. |
| EM2 | Open Air Testing Zone at Rolls Royce IN THE OPEN AIR TESTING ZONE AT ROLLS ROYCE, HUCKNALL, AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, ONLY TESTING FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES SPECIFICALLY REQUIRING AN OPEN AIR LOCATION WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE THEY CANNOT BE DEVELOPED IN THE MAIN URBAN AREA FOR TECHNICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL REASONS. |
| EM3 | Other Employment Development in the Main Urban Areas and Named Settlements IN THE MAIN URBAN AREAS AND NAMED SETTLEMENTS, EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT ON LAND NOT ALLOCATED OR SAFEGUARDED FOR OTHER PURPOSES WILL BE PERMITTED |
| EM4 | Protection of Employment Land Allocations PROPOSALS FOR ALTERNATIVE USES OF ALLOCATED EMPLOYMENT SITES WILL NOT BE PERMITTED |
| EM5 | Protection of Existing Employment Sites and Buildings PROPOSALS WHICH WOULD CAUSE THE LOSS OF EXISTING EMPLOYMENT SITES OR BUILDINGS WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) RETENTION OF EMPLOYMENT USES WOULD CAUSE UNACCEPTABLE ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; OR b) THE BUILDING OR SITE IS NO LONGER CAPABLE OF PROVIDING AN ACCEPTABLE STANDARD OF ACCOMMODATION FOR EMPLOYMENT PURPOSES AND THIS CAN BE DEMONSTRATED BY A LACK OF DEMAND |
| EM6 | EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) THE AMENITY OF NEIGHBOURING PROPERTIES IS PROTECTED, b) ITS DESIGN IS ACCEPTABLE IN TERMS OF APPEARANCE, SCALE AND SITING, c) BOUNDARY TREATMENT PROVIDES EFFECTIVE SCREENING AND IS ACCEPTABLE IN TERMS OF VISUAL AMENITY, d) LANDSCAPING COMPLEMENTS AND ENHANCES ITS APPEARANCE, e) ACCESS FOR VEHICLES, IS SAFE AND CONVENIENT, f) ACCESS FOR PEDESTRIANS, CYCLISTS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT, WHERE APPROPRIATE, IS SAFE, CONVENIENT AND INTEGRATED WITH EXISTING PROVISION, g) PARKING FACILITIES ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADOPTED COUNCIL STANDARDS AS OUTLINED IN APPENDIX 7. |
| EM7 | BUSINESS ACTIVITIES WITHIN RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND PROPERTIES BUSINESS ACTIVITIES WITHIN RESIDENTIAL AREAS OR IN RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE THEY WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT AMENITY, BY REASON OF NOISE OR OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION OR BY DISTURBANCE FROM VISITS TO THE SITE. |
Energy
| EV18 | Development of Renewable Energy Sources DEVELOPMENT OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE THERE WOULD BE NO ADVERSE EFFECT INDIVIDUALLY OR CUMULATIVELY ON: a) THE CHARACTER OR APPEARANCE OF THE AREA; OR, b) AREAS OF NATURAL, CULTURAL, HISTORIC OR ARCHAEOLOGICAL INTEREST, AS DEFINED ON THE PROPOSALS MAP; OR c) THE AMENITIES OF NEARBY RESIDENTS OR THE OPERATION OF OTHER ESTABLISHED USES IN THE VICINITY DUE TO VISUAL DOMINANCE, NOISE, DISTURBANCE, VIBRATION, SMELL, FUMES, DUST, REFLECTED LIGHT, SHADOW FLICKER OR OTHER FORMS OF POLLUTION. IN ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, ACCOUNT WILL BE TAKEN OF THE POSSIBILITY OF INCLUDING MITIGATING MEASURES AND OF THE WIDER ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS. |
Environment
| EV15 | Derelict and Contaminated Land Reclamation PROPOSALS WHICH ASSIST IN THE RECLAMATION OF DERELICT AND CONTAMINATED LAND TO APPROPRIATE USES WILL BE PERMITTED. |
| EV16 | Water Quality and Flood Protection DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) IT WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE QUALITY OF SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER, b) IT WOULD NOT INCREASE THE RISK OF FLOODING, c) IT WOULD NOT BE AT RISK FROM FLOODING ITSELF, d) ADEQUATE PROVISION IS MADE FOR ACCESS TO WATERCOURSES FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE. PLANNING CONDITIONS WILL BE IMPOSED OR A PLANNING OBLIGATION WILL BE NEGOTIATED AS APPROPRIATE TO SECURE COMPENSATORY MEASURES TO OFFSET ANY POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NEW DEVELOPMENT ON THE WATER ENVIRONMENT AND ASSOCIATED LANDS. |
| EV2 | Development in the Countryside EV2(d): New buildings will be restricted in the Countryside (outside villages) to cases where it is essential for an appropriate Countryside use and the need for the proposed location has been established. Any new building should be at a scale which preserves the openness of the Countryside. One of the few circumstances in which isolated residential development in the Green Belt/Countryside may be justified is when accommodation is required to enable those employed in agriculture, or forestry to live at or in the immediate vicinity of their place of work. In such cases the local planning authority will require a functional test to satisfy itself that a dwelling is essential, and a financial test to ensure that the enterprise is economically viable, in accordance with the guidance in PPG7, Annex 1. EV2(e): To reflect PPG7, this policy does not restrict the nature of the new use to which existing buildings can be put. However, preference will be given where the re-use of a building would assist with the diversification of the rural economy for employment, recreational or tourism purposes. The re-use of a building for residential purposes may be acceptable if it is not possible to find an alternative appropriate use. To be acceptable any such proposal would need to be strictly sympathetic with the character of the Countryside, in particular its openness. EV2(f): Proposals to replace, alter or extend buildings can be acceptable where the form, bulk and general design is in keeping with the original building, where retained, and its surroundings. Replacement buildings should not be materially larger than the original building it replaces and should be designed in keeping with its surroundings. Extensions or alterations should not be disproportionate to the size of the original building. EV2(g): New dwellings will not normally be permitted in the open Countryside, although in some cases sensitive infilling may be acceptable within small settlements and hamlets. Infill will normally comprise one or two dwellings in a small gap in existing development. Not all small gaps are appropriate for infilling where, for example, they contribute towards the openness of the Countryside. Regard should also be made to the scale and character of the area when assessing a development. The above principles may also apply to infill for commercial, industrial, recreational or tourist purposes providing this would be in keeping and with the scale character of the area and would not adversely affect residential amenity. EV2(h): Fackley and Teversal are the only villages within the Countryside and are considered suitable for small scale infill development where appropriate. Teversal, however, is designated as a Conservation Area and part of the character of Teversal is made up of gardens, open spaces and open breaks between buildings. Whilst new development will generally be resisted in Teversal, some limited scope exists for the re-use of certain existing farm buildings within the village. |
| EV3 | The Re-use of Buildings within the Green Belt or the Countryside THE RE-USE OF BUILDINGS WITHIN THE GREEN BELT OR THE COUNTRYSIDE WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) THEIR FORM, BULK AND GENERAL DESIGN ARE IN KEEPING WITH THE SURROUNDINGS, b) THE CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING IS RETAINED, c) THE BUILDING IS OF PERMANENT AND SUBSTANTIAL CONSTRUCTION AND IS CAPABLE OF CONVERSION WITHOUT MAJOR OR COMPLETE RECONSTRUCTION, d) THE PROVISION OF A CURTILAGE WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE OPEN CHARACTER OF THE GREEN BELT OR COUNTRYSIDE, e) IT WOULD NOT RESULT IN AN UNACCEPTABLE PROLIFERATION OF REPLACEMENT FARM BUILDINGS. |
| EV4 | Mature Landscape Areas DEVELOPMENT WHICH DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CHARACTER AND QUALITY OF MATURE LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL BE PERMITTED. |
| EV5 | Sites of Special Scientific Interest PROPOSALS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN, OR LIKELY TO AFFECT, SITES OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST (SSSI) WILL BE SUBJECT TO SPECIAL SCRUTINY. WHERE SUCH DEVELOPMENT MAY HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ON THE SSSI IT WILL NOT BE PERMITTED UNLESS THE REASONS FOR DEVELOPMENT CLEARLY OUTWEIGH THE NATURE CONSERVATION VALUE OF THE SITE ITSELF AND THE NATIONAL POLICY TO SAFEGUARD THE NATIONAL NETWORK OF SUCH SITES. WHERE DEVELOPMENT IS PERMITTED, CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO THE USE OF PLANNING CONDITIONS OR PLANNING OBLIGATIONS TO ENSURE THE PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT OF THE SITE'S NATURE CONSERVATION INTEREST. |
| EV6 | Local Nature Reserves and Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation and Geological Significance DEVELOPMENT WHICH ADVERSELY LOCAL NATURE RESERVES OR SITES OF IMPORTANCE FOR NATURE CONSERVATION OR GEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) PROVISION IS MADE WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF FEATURES OF NATURE CONSERVATION OR GEOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE, OR b) THE DEVELOPMENT CANNOT BE LOCATED ELSEWHERE. IN THE CASE OF NATURE CONSERVATION FEATURES ADEQUATE PROVISION IS MADE FOR THE CREATION OF SIMILAR HABITATS, WHERE FEASIBLE, PREFERABLY IN THE LOCALITY, NEGOTIATED AND SECURED BY A PLANNING CONDITION OR PLANNING OBLIGATION. |
| EV7 | Sites/Buildings Supporting Species Protected by Law DEVELOPMENT WHICH WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT SITES OR BUILDINGS SUPPORTING SPECIES PROTECTED BY LAW WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) PROVISION IS MADE WITHIN THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO AVOID OR MINIMISE DISTURBANCE TO THE SPECIES, OR b) PROVISION IS MADE FOR THE CREATION OF SIMILAR HABITATS, WHERE FEASIBLE, PREFERABLY WITHIN THE LOCALITY, NEGOTIATED AND SECURED BY A PLANNING OBLIGATION. |
| EV8 | Trees and Woodlands DEVELOPMENT WHICH ADVERSELY AFFECTS TREES WORTHY OF RETENTION, INCLUDING WOODLAND AND INDIVIDUAL TREES, WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. WHERE TREES ARE LOST AS A RESULT OF DEVELOPMENT, REPLACEMENT OR MITIGATING PLANTING WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| EV9 | Agricultural Land DEVELOPMENT OF THE BEST AND MOST VERSATILE AGRICULTURAL LAND (GRADES 1, 2 AND 3a) WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) THERE ARE NO REALISTIC OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACCOMMODATING THE DEVELOPMENT ON PREVIOUSLY-DEVELOPED SITES AND ON LAND WITHIN EXISTING URBAN AREAS; AND b) THERE ARE NO REALISTIC OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACCOMMODATING THE DEVELOPMENT ON POORER QUALITY AGRICULTURAL LAND (EXCEPT WHERE OTHER SUSTAINABILITY CONSIDERATIONS INDICATE OTHERWISE). |
| Policy EV1 | Development in the Green Belt EV1(a): Appropriate development within the Green Belt can include engineering, mining or other operations and uses of land which preserves the openness of the Green Belt and do not conflict with the purpose of including land in it. EV1(b) i: Many agricultural and forestry buildings are covered by The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 and are permitted development. Where new buildings require planning permission, they should be restricted to cases where they are essential and where the need for the proposed location has been established. EV1(b) ii: Essential facilities for outdoor sport and outdoor recreation, for cemeteries and other uses of land should be genuinely required for uses which preserve the openness of the Green Belt and do not conflict with purposes of including land in it. EV1(b) iii: Proposed extensions or alterations should not be disproportionate to the size of the original building. Proposals should also respect the form, bulk and general design of the original building and not adversely affect its surroundings. Replacement buildings should not be materially larger than the original building it replaces and should be designed in keeping with its surroundings. Where an existing building is derelict or is structurally unsound, permission will not be granted for its replacement unless this has resulted from accidental damage, for example by fire, or subsidence, and in the case of replacement for residential purposes, it can be demonstrated that the residential use has not been abandoned. EV1(b) iv: It is not always desirable to preclude the implementation of certain infill proposals within villages in the Green Belt. The only villages 'washed over' by Green Belt are Bagthorpe, including Lower Bagthorpe, Middlebrook and New Bagthorpe, New Westwood, Jubilee and New Selston. Other smaller hamlets and outlying isolated settlements or extensions of other settlements within the Green Belt are not regarded as villages for the purpose of policy EV1(b)iv. EV1(c): Proposals to re-use existing buildings in the Green Belt may be acceptable, particularly where the resultant use is appropriate to the Green Belt such as for agriculture or forestry. Preference will be given where the re-use of a building would assist in the diversification of the rural economy through the provision of employment, recreational or tourism uses. The re-use of a building for residential purposes may be acceptable if it is not possible to find an alternative appropriate use. Proposed new uses should not have a materially harmful impact on the openness of the Green Belt particularly through their extension or the associated uses of surrounding land, for example, extensive hardstanding, car parking, boundary walling/fencing or extensive external storage. |
| Policy EV2 | Development in the Countryside IN THE COUNTRYSIDE PERMISSION WILL ONLY BE GIVEN FOR APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT. DEVELOPMENT MUST BE LOCATED AND DESIGNED SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CHARACTER OF THE COUNTRYSIDE, IN PARTICULAR ITS OPENNESS. APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT COMPRISES: a) RURAL USES, INCLUDING AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, MINERAL EXTRACTION AND WASTE DISPOSAL TO RECLAIM MINERAL WORKINGS, b) OUTDOOR SPORT, OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL AND TOURISM USES, c) CEMETERIES AND UTILITY INSTALLATIONS REQUIRING A RURAL LOCATION, d) NEW BUILDINGS WHICH ARE ESSENTIAL FOR USES APPROPRIATE TO THE COUNTRYSIDE AND THE NEED FOR THE PROPOSED LOCATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, e) RE-USE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS, f) REPLACEMENT, ALTERATION OR EXTENSION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS WHERE THE RESULTANT FORM, BULK AND GENERAL DESIGN IS IN KEEPING WITH THE BUILDING, WHERE RETAINED, AND ITS SURROUNDINGS, g) INFILL DEVELOPMENT WHICH DOES NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE SCALE AND CHARACTER OF THE AREA, h) WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF FACKLEY AND TEVERSAL, DEVELOPMENT WHICH DOES NOT HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE CHARACTER OF THE VILLAGE. |
| Policy RC1 | NEW INFORMAL OPEN SPACE LAND WILL BE PROVIDED FOR NEW INFORMAL OPEN SPACE IN ASSOCIATION WITH ADJACENT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ALLOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP AT:- Hucknall Ha PAPPLEWICK LANE/RIVER LEEN Kirkby-in-Ashfield Ka LINDLEYS LANE/PORTLAND COUNTRY PARK A PLANNING CONDITION WILL BE IMPOSED OR PLANNING OBLIGATIONS NEGOTIATED, AS APPROPRIATE, TO SECURE THE PROVISION OF THESE AREAS. |
| Policy RC2 | OPEN AREAS IN MAIN URBAN AREAS AND NAMED SETTLEMENTS DEVELOPMENT IN OPEN AREAS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED EXCEPT FOR ASSOCIATED RECREATIONAL USES WHICH MAINTAIN THE OPEN CHARACTER OF THE AREA. |
| Policy RC3 | Development Which Would Lead to the Loss of Formal Open Space DEVELOPMENT WHICH WOULD LEAD TO THE LOSS OF FORMAL OPEN SPACE WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) IT IS ANCILLARY TO THE RECREATIONAL USE, OR b) IT WOULD ASSIST IN THE RETENTION AND ENHANCEMENT OF THE RECREATIONAL USE OF THE SITE, OR c) ADEQUATE REPLACEMENT PROVISION OF NEW FORMAL OPEN SPACE IS PROVIDED IN THE LOCALITY, OR d) IT IS PROPOSED TO MAKE A SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT TO THE OVERALL QUALITY OF RECREATION PROVISION IN THE LOCALITY, OR e) IN THE CASE OF SCHOOL PLAYING FIELDS THE DEVELOPMENT IS REQUIRED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. A PLANNING CONDITION WILL BE IMPOSED OR PLANNING OBLIGATION NEGOTIATED, AS APPROPRIATE, TO SECURE OFF SITE PROVISION OF FORMAL OPEN SPACE OR OTHER FACILITIES. |
| RC8 | RECREATIONAL ROUTES DEVELOPMENT ON EXISTING FOOTPATHS, CYCLEWAYS AND BRIDLEWAYS AND ON DISUSED RAILWAY LINES AND OTHER CORRIDORS OF LAND WITH POTENTIAL FOR RECREATIONAL ROUTES WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) AN ACCEPTABLE ACCESS CORRIDOR ALONG THE ORIGINAL ROUTE IS RETAINED, OR b) A SUITABLE DIRECT ALTERNATIVE ROUTE IS PROVIDED. |
Heritage
| EV10 | Development in Conservation Areas DEVELOPMENT IN CONSERVATION AREAS WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) IT PRESERVES OR ENHANCES THE CHARACTER OR APPEARANCE OF THE AREA, OR ITS SETTING. b) IN THE CASE OF DEMOLITION OR PARTIAL DEMOLITION IT CAN ALSO BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THE BUILDING IS BEYOND ECONOMIC REPAIR, VIABLE ALTERNATIVE USES CANNOT BE FOUND, OR REDEVELOPMENT WOULD PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL BENEFITS FOR THE COMMUNITY THAT WOULD OUTWEIGH THE BUILDING'S LOSS. c) REDEVELOPMENT FOLLOWING DEMOLITION IS UNDERTAKEN WITHIN AN AGREED TIMESCALE. |
| EV11 | Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites DEVELOPMENT AFFECTING ANCIENT MONUMENTS OR OTHER SITES OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL INTEREST WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE:- In the case of an Ancient Monument: a) IT WOULD PRESERVE A SCHEDULED ANCIENT MONUMENT OR OTHER NATIONALLY IMPORTANT MONUMENT AND/OR ITS SETTING, In the case of other sites of archaeological interest: b) IN-SITU PRESERVATION IS MERITED, IT WOULD NOT INVOLVE SIGNIFICANT ALTERATION OR CAUSE DAMAGE OR WOULD HAVE A MAJOR ADVERSE IMPACT ON ITS SETTING, OR c) IN-SITU PRESERVATION IS NOT POSSIBLE AND THE NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OUTWEIGHS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REMAINS AND ARRANGEMENTS ARE IN PLACE FOR THE SITE TO BE SURVEYED, EXCAVATED AND RECORDED PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT. |
| EV12 | Development Involving the Alteration, Extension or Re-Use of a Listed Building DEVELOPMENT INVOLVING THE ALTERATION, EXTENSION OR RE-USE OF A LISTED BUILDING WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) IT PRESERVES THE CHARACTER OF THE LISTED BUILDING AND ITS SETTING, b) IT RESPECTS THE SCALE, DESIGN AND MATERIALS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING, c) REDEVELOPMENT FOLLOWING DEMOLITION IS UNDERTAKEN WITHIN AN AGREED TIMESCALE. IN THE CASE OF DEMOLITION OR PARTIAL DEMOLITION IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT THE BUILDING IS BEYOND ECONOMIC REPAIR, VIABLE ALTERNATIVE USES CANNOT BE FOUND OR REDEVELOPMENT WOULD PRODUCE SUBSTANTIAL PLANNING BENEFITS FOR THE COMMUNITY THAT WOULD OUTWEIGH THE BUILDING'S LOSS. |
| EV13 | Setting of Listed Buildings DEVELOPMENT WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE THROUGH ITS SITING, SCALE OR DESIGN, IT PRESERVES THE SETTING OF A LISTED BUILDING. |
| EV14 | Historic Parks and Gardens DEVELOPMENT WHICH WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT HISTORIC PARKS AND GARDENS OR THEIR SETTING WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. |
Housing
| HG1 | HOUSING LAND ALLOCATIONS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED ON THE SITES LISTED BELOW AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP:- Hucknall Ha EAST OF NOTTINGHAM ROAD 5.4 Hb BROOMHILL FARM 11.8 Hc LIME TREE AVENUE/FARLEYS LANE 2.7 Hd POLPERRO WAY 0.6 He HIGH LEYS ROAD* 1.1 Hf WATNALL ROAD 0.9 Hh THE BRICKYARD 0.7 Hi PORTLAND ROAD (former Hucknall Colliery)* 5.1 Hj GARDEN ROAD 7.0 Hn OGLE STREET 0.2 Ho SOUTH OF PAPPLEWICK LANE 22.1 Hp LINBY ROAD 0.6 Hr HOLBECK ROAD/LINBY WALK 0.9 Ht PARK DRIVE* 3.1 Hu BYRON STREET 0.8 Hv STATION TERRACE 0.2 Hw BROOMHILL COURT, BROOMHILL ROAD* 0.2 Kirkby-in-Ashfield Ka LINDLEYS LANE 13.9 Kd BEECH AVENUE 0.7 Kf OCCUPATION LANE 0.7 Kh LANE END* 1.5 Ki DIAMOND AVENUE 2.1 Kj EDWARD STREET/ASHWOOD AVENUE* 1.5 Kk LOWMOOR ROAD/MARLBOROUGH ROAD* 0.7 Kn CAVENDISH CLOSE 1.4 Ko CROMFORD ROAD 0.5 Kp MAIN ROAD 1.7 Kq SKEGBY ROAD 1.7 Kr BIRDS LANE 2.6 Sutton-in-Ashfield Sa ALFRETON ROAD/CALLADINE PARK* 8.0 Sb OFF CROWTREES DRIVE* 0.4 Sd CALLADINE PARK – CENTRAL* 2.6 Se HILLSBOROUGH AVENUE 4.8 Sf OFF THE AVENUE 0.7 Sh ALFRETON ROAD SOUTH 1.4 Si JEPHSON ROAD 1.1 Sj KIRKBY FOLLY ROAD* 0.7 Sl MOWLANDS CLOSE/ SHEEPWASH LANE 3.1 So THE TWITCHELL 0.4 Sp STONEY STREET 0.9 Sq CARSIC LANE/DAVIES AVENUE 0.4 Sr ASHFORD RISE 0.7 Ss STONEYFORD ROAD/MOUNT PLEASANT 1.2 Sx STONEYFORD ROAD 1.0 Sy NORTH CARSIC ROAD 0.5 Sab MEDEN BANK/BRAND LANE* 0.6 Saf OFF CROSS LANE, HUTHWAITE* 4.8 Sag COLUMBIA STREET/MILL LANE 1.3 Saj COMMON ROAD - NORTH 1.3 Sak BLACKWELL ROAD/LITTLE LANE* 1.3 Sal HUTHWAITE ROAD 1.3 Sam SKEGBY ROAD, HUTHWAITE* 0.4 San KINGS MILL ROAD EAST 2.8 Named Settlements Selston Na INKERMAN STREET/ALMA ROAD* 0.9 Ne MANITOBA WAY* 1.4 Nl ALFRETON ROAD* 0.5 Jacksdale Nf WESTDALE RD/RUTLAND RD 0.9 Ng WESTDALE ROAD 2.1 New Annesley Ni MOSELEY ROAD* 0.8 Bestwood Nj OLD MILL CLOSE (WEST) 0.7 Nk OLD MILL CLOSE (EAST)* 1.6 Rural Area Ra ANNESLEY HALL* 3.8 Rc HARLOW WOOD - SOUTH* 4.5 Rd FACKLEY ROAD, TEVERSAL* 0.5 *All or part of site with planning permission at 30th November 2000 DETAILED SITE REQUIREMENTS IN THE SUPPORTING TEXT AND SITE BRIEFS IN APPENDIX SIX WILL BE NEGOTIATED AND SECURED, AS APPROPRIATE, BY PLANNING CONDITIONS OR A PLANNING OBLIGATION. |
| HG7 | EXTENSIONS OR ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES EXTENSIONS OR ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE THEY WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT:- a) THE VISUAL AMENITY OF THE LOCALITY, b) THE RESIDENTIAL AMENITY OF NEIGHBOURING PROPERTIES, AND c) HIGHWAY SAFETY. |
| HG8 | DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL CARE HOMES, HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION, BEDSITS, FLATS AND HOSTELS DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL CARE HOMES, HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION, BEDSITS, FLATS AND HOSTELS WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) THE AMENITY OF NEIGHBOURING PROPERTIES IS PROTECTED, b) ITS DESIGN IS ACCEPTABLE IN TERMS OF APPEARANCE, SCALE AND SITING, c) IN THE CASE OF RESIDENTIAL CARE HOMES THE OUTLOOK FROM BEDROOMS AND COMMUNAL ROOMS IS ADEQUATE, d) ADEQUATE PRIVATE GARDEN IS PROVIDED, e) BOUNDARY TREATMENT PROVIDES AN ACCEPTABLE STANDARD OF PRIVACY AND VISUAL AMENITY, f) ACCESS FOR VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS INCLUDING DISABLED PEOPLE, IS SAFE AND CONVENIENT, g) PARKING FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COUNCIL STANDARDS, AS OUTLINED IN APPENDIX 7, AND h) LANDSCAPING COMPLEMENTS AND ENHANCES ITS APPEARANCE. |
| HG9 | GYPSY CARAVAN SITES AND SITES FOR TRAVELLING SHOW PEOPLE OUTSIDE THE GREEN BELT, PROPOSALS FOR GYPSY CARAVAN SITES AND SITES FOR TRAVELLING SHOW PEOPLE WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) THE NEED FOR A SITE IS ESTABLISHED, b) THE SITE IS REASONABLY ACCESSIBLE TO COMMUNITY SERVICES AND FACILITIES, c) THE SITE IS LOCATED SO AS TO MINIMISE THE POTENTIAL FOR NOISE AND OTHER DISTURBANCE THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE USE OF THE SITE FOR BUSINESS ACTIVITIES, d) THE SITE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE VISUAL AMENITIES OF THE AREA, AND e) ADEQUATE LANDSCAPING MEASURES ARE INCLUDED. |
| Policy HG2 | Other Residential Development in the Main Urban Areas and Named Settlements IN THE MAIN URBAN AREAS AND NAMED SETTLEMENTS, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON LAND NOT ALLOCATED OR SAFEGUARDED FOR OTHER PURPOSES WILL BE PERMITTED. |
| Policy HG3 | Housing Density PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON SITES OF 0.4 HECTARES AND GREATER WITHIN THE WALKING DISTANCES INDICATED BELOW FROM DISTRICT SHOPPING CENTRES, ROBIN HOOD LINE STATIONS OR NOTTINGHAM EXPRESS TRANSIT RAIL STOPS WILL BE PERMITTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM NET DENSITY REQUIREMENTS. a) 40 DWELLINGS PER HECTARE WITHIN 400 M. b) 34 DWELLINGS PER HECTARE WITHIN 1 KM. c) 30 DWELLINGS PER HECTARE ELSEWHERE |
| Policy HG4 | Affordable Housing ON HOUSING DEVELOPMENT SITES OF ONE HECTARE OR MORE, OR 25 DWELLINGS OR MORE, THE COUNCIL WILL NEGOTIATE THE PROVISION OF A PROPORTION OF AFFORDABLE DWELLINGS ON THE SITE TO CONTRIBUTE TOWARDS THE OVERALL TARGETS FOR THE AREAS SPECIFIED BELOW In Hucknall (South Notts. Sub Area) 18.5% OF DWELLINGS In the Rest of the District (West Notts. Sub Area) 6% OF DWELLINGS AFFORDABLE HOUSING WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE: a) DEVELOPMENT OF DWELLINGS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD OR THE COUNCIL. b) SHARED OWNERSHIP SCHEMES. c) PROPERTIES FOR SALE OR RENTAL AT AN AGREED SIZE MEASURED BY FLOORSPACE. d) A FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION NEGOTIATED AND SECURED BY A PLANNING OBLIGATION TOWARDS THE OFF SITE PROVISION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AT AN AGREED LOCATION. |
| Policy HG5 | Residential Development RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE: a) THE AMENITY OF NEIGHBOURING PROPERTIES IS PROTECTED, b) THE DESIGN AND LAYOUT OF DWELLINGS MINIMISES POTENTIAL OVERLOOKING AND PROVIDES A REASONABLE DEGREE OF PRIVACY AND SECURITY, c) ADEQUATE PRIVATE GARDEN SPACE IS PROVIDED, d) BOUNDARY TREATMENT PROVIDES AN ACCEPTABLE STANDARD OF PRIVACY AND VISUAL AMENITY, e) ACCESS FOR VEHICLES, PEDESTRIANS AND CYCLISTS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT WHERE APPROPRIATE, IS SAFE AND CONVENIENT AND INTEGRATED WITH EXISTING PROVISION, f) PARKING FACILITIES ARE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COUNCIL STANDARDS, AS OUTLINED IN APPENDIX 7. g) ITS DESIGN IS ACCEPTABLE IN TERMS OF APPEARANCE, SCALE AND SITING, AND h) LANDSCAPING COMPLEMENTS AND ENHANCES ITS APPEARANCE. |
| Policy HG6 | Public Open Space in New Residential Developments RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE OPEN SPACE IS PROVIDED TO MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:- a) ON SITES OF TWO HECTARES AND ABOVE, A MINIMUM OF 10% OF THE GROSS HOUSING AREA WILL BE PROVIDED AS OPEN SPACE, b) ON SITES OF LESS THAN TWO HECTARES AND MORE THAN FIVE DWELLINGS THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE REQUIRED WILL BE ASSESSED BY TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE TYPE OF HOUSING PROPOSED AND THE EXTENT OF, AND ACCESSIBILITY OF THE SITE TO EXISTING OPEN SPACE IN THE LOCALITY. WHERE IT IS NOT APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE OPEN SPACE WITHIN A SITE BOUNDARY, A PLANNING OBLIGATION WILL BE NEGOTIATED TO ALLOW A SUM TO BE PAID TOWARDS: i) EXISTING OPEN SPACE PROVISION TO BE IMPROVED, OR ii) NEW OPEN SPACE TO BE PROVIDED ELSEWHERE, OR iii) COMMUNITY WOODLAND PLANTING OR APPROPRIATE NATURAL HABITAT CREATION SCHEMES TO BE UNDERTAKEN. |
Infrastructure
| EV17 | Telecommunications DEVELOPMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION INSTALLATIONS WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE, SUBJECT TO TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON SITING:- a) THERE ARE NO SATISFACTORY ALTERNATIVE SITES OR THERE IS NO REASONABLE POSSIBILITY OF SHARING EXISTING FACILITIES, b) IN THE CASE OF RADIO MASTS, THERE IS NO REASONABLE POSSIBILITY OF ERECTING ANTENNAE ON EXISTING BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES. c) THEY ARE SITED AND DESIGNED, INCLUDING ANY LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS, SO AS TO MINIMISE ITS VISUAL IMPACT ON THE AMENITY OF THE AREA, WITHOUT INHIBITING OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY. |
Other
| Policy ST2 | Development Will Be Concentrated Within the Main Urban Areas DEVELOPMENT WILL BE CONCENTRATED WITHIN THE MAIN URBAN AREAS OF HUCKNALL, KIRKBY-IN-ASHFIELD AND SUTTON-IN-ASHFIELD AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP. |
| Policy ST3 | Limited Development Within Named Settlements LIMITED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE NAMED SETTLEMENTS OF JACKSDALE, SELSTON, UNDERWOOD, BESTWOOD, BRINSLEY AND NEW ANNESLEY AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP. |
| Policy ST4 | Development Outside Main Urban Areas and Named Settlements OUTSIDE THE MAIN URBAN AREAS AND NAMED SETTLEMENTS PERMISSION WILL ONLY BE GIVEN FOR:- a) SITES ALLOCATED FOR DEVELOPMENT, b) DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATE TO THE GREEN BELT OR THE COUNTRYSIDE AS SET OUT IN POLICIES EV1 AND EV2. |
| SH 10 | Kingsmill Road, East/Mansfield Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield A. STRATEGIC/LOCATION 1. The site lies within the urban area of Sutton-in-Ashfield and occupies a key location in respect of the strategic highway network, public transport, cycleways and footpaths. B. ENVIRONMENT 1. The site does not contain any protected nature conservation or landscape features. 2. Mature trees adjacent to Mansfield Road should be retained. C. PROPOSED USES 1. This site is suitable for a comprehensive development of non food retail for bulky goods only for a single user where suitable alternatives are not available, housing, open space and road related uses including hotel and potentially restaurant facilities. D. TRANSPORT 1. A transport assessment will be required for this site which should include reference to any on or off site requirements. 2. The site access will be from Mansfield Road and there should be no direct vehicular access to the A6075. E. OPEN SPACE 1. The site partly comprises land formerly used as a running track by Sutton Harriers and land occupied by CV. Apparel Ltd. for Sports and Social Club activities. 2. A comprehensive approach to developing this site will require the relocation of the existing sports and social club and associated pitches and alternative provision for the athletics club |
Retail
| Policy SH10 | SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE: KINGS MILL ROAD EAST/MANSFIELD ROAD, SUTTON-IN-ASHFIELD AT THE SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE AT KINGS MILL ROAD EAST/MANSFIELD ROAD, AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP, DEVELOPMENT FOR THE FOLLOWING USES WILL BE PERMITTED:- a) NON FOOD RETAIL FOR BULKY GOODS FOR A SINGLE USER WHERE SUITABLE ALTERNATIVES ARE NOT AVAILABLE (3.9 hectares) b) HOUSING (2.8 hectares) c) ROAD RELATED INCLUDING HOTEL (0.8 hectares) d) OPEN SPACE (1.2 hectares) THE ABOVE WILL BE SUBJECT TO:- i) RELOCATION OF THE EXISTING SOCIAL CLUB, PLAYING PITCHES AND CHANGING FACILITIES, ii) PROVISION OF 1.2 HECTARES OF OPEN SPACE ADJACENT TO THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE, iii) THE PROVISION OF A REPLACEMENT ALL WEATHER SURFACE ATHLETICS TRACK WITH ASSOCIATED FACILITIES. DETAILED SITE REQUIREMENTS IN THE SUPPORTING TEXT AND SITE BRIEF IN APPENDIX 8 WILL BE NEGOTIATED AND SECURED, AS APPROPRIATE, BY PLANNING CONDITIONS OR PLANNING OBLIGATIONS |
| Policy SH3 | Major Retail Development Outside District Shopping Centres MAJOR RETAIL DEVELOPMENT OUTSIDE DISTRICT SHOPPING CENTRES WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) THE SITE CAN BE DEMONSTRATED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEQUENTIAL APPROACH, b) THE NEED FOR SUCH DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, c) DEVELOPMENT WOULD NOT DIRECTLY, OR WHEN CONSIDERED TOGETHER WITH ANY OTHER COMMITTED SCHEMES LIKELY TO BE DEVELOPED, ADVERSELY AFFECT THE VITALITY AND VIABILITY OF ANY EXISTING NEARBY DISTRICT OR LOCAL SHOPPING CENTRES, d) IT WOULD BE ACCESSIBLE BY A CHOICE OF MEANS OF TRANSPORT, e) IT WOULD BE WELL RELATED TO THE MAIN ROAD NETWORK, f) IT WOULD NOT GIVE RISE TO UNACCEPTABLE VEHICULAR AND/OR PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC CONDITIONS, g) PARKING PROVISION IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH COUNCIL STANDARDS AS OUTLINED IN APPENDIX 7 AND, h) IT WOULD NOT LEAD TO UNACCEPTABLE INCREASES IN JOURNEYS BY PRIVATE CAR. ON SITES CONSIDERED TO BE ACCEPTABLE UNDER THIS POLICY CONDITIONS MAY BE IMPOSED TO CONTROL THE SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT, MINIMUM UNIT SIZES AND THE RANGE AND TYPE OF GOODS TO BE SOLD |
| Policy SH4 | Local Shopping Centres RETAIL DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE PERMITTED WHICH ARE IN SCALE AND CHARACTER WITH THE AREAS LISTED BELOW AND AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSALS MAP:- Hucknall Ha ANNESLEY ROAD. Hb WATNALL ROAD. Sutton-in-Ashfield Sa OUTRAM STREET. Sb HUTHWAITE MARKET PLACE AREA. Sc HIGH STREET, STANTON HILL. Named Settlements Jacksdale Na VILLAGE CENTRE. |
| Policy SH5 | Minor Shopping Centres and Single Shops RETAIL DEVELOPMENT TO MEET LOCAL SHOPPING NEEDS WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) IT PRIMARILY INVOLVES THE SALE OF CONVENIENCE GOODS, AND b) NET RETAIL FLOORSPACE IS UNDER 500 SQ. METRES. |
| Policy SH6 | Factory Shops THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FACTORY SHOP WITHIN THE CURTILAGE OF AN EXISTING FACTORY WILL BE PERMITTED PROVIDED THE PRODUCTS TO BE RETAILED ARE MANUFACTURED BY THAT COMPANY |
| Policy SH7 | FARM SHOPS PROPOSALS FOR FARM SHOPS ASSOCIATED WITH ESTABLISHED AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS WILL BE PERMITTED PROVIDED THEY:- a) PRIMARILY SELL AGRICULTURAL GOODS PRODUCED LOCALLY, b) REPRESENT A NECESSARY ELEMENT OF FARM DIVERSIFICATION, AND c) DO NOT SERIOUSLY AFFECT THE VIABILITY OF NEARBY VILLAGE SHOPS |
| Policy SH8 | COMMERCIAL/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE:- a) ITS DESIGN IS ACCEPTABLE IN TERMS OF APPEARANCE, SCALE AND SITING, b) SIGNAGE IS ACCEPTABLE IN TERMS OF SIZE, POSITION, MATERIALS AND ILLUMINATION, c) PARKING IS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COUNCIL STANDARDS, AS OUTLINED IN APPENDIX 7, d) ACCESS FOR VEHICLES, IS SAFE AND CONVENIENT, e) ACCESS FOR PEDESTRIANS, CYCLISTS AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT, WHERE APPROPRIATE, IS SAFE, CONVENIENT AND INTEGRATED WITH EXISTING PROVISION, f) LANDSCAPING COMPLEMENTS AND ENHANCES ITS APPEARANCE, AND g) SECURITY MEASURES DO NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CHARACTER OR APPEARANCE OF THE AREA. |
| Policy SH9 | HOT FOOD SHOPS DEVELOPMENT OF HOT FOOD SHOPS WILL BE PERMITTED PROVIDED THAT: a) THERE WOULD BE NO ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE AMENITY OF NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIERS THROUGH NOISE, ODOURS OR LITTER, AND b) OPENING HOURS ARE RESTRICTED WHERE RESIDENTIAL AMENITY COULD OTHERWISE SUFFER. |
| SH1 | DISTRICT SHOPPING CENTRES IN THE DISTRICT SHOPPING CENTRES OF HUCKNALL, KIRKBY IN ASHFIELD AND SUTTON IN ASHFIELD, AS DEFINED ON THE PROPOSALS MAP THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE PERMITTED a) DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT FOR SHOPPING PURPOSES, b) COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS APPROPRIATE TO A TOWN CENTRE, c) RESIDENTIAL AND EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, d) TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT/SERVICING SCHEMES, e) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEMES, f) PARKING FACILITIES PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNCIL'S STANDARDS, AS OUTLINED IN APPENDIX 7, g) MEASURES TO IMPROVE ACCESSIBILITY BY PUBLIC TRANSPORT, AND h) IMPROVEMENT OF FACILITIES FOR CYCLISTS, PEDESTRIANS AND THE DISABLED. |
| SH2 | RETAIL DEVELOPMENT RETAIL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE PERMITTED FOR THE USES SPECIFIED ON THE SITES LISTED BELOW AS SHOWN IN THE PROPOSALS MAP:- Hucknall Ha LAND WITHIN THE FORMER HUCKNALL COLLIERY FRONTING STATION ROAD FOR CONVENIENCE OR DURABLE GOODS. (3.7 hectares) Sutton-in-Ashfield Sa LAND ADJACENT TO NORTHERN BRIDGE, OUTRAM STREET, FOR CONVENIENCE OR DURABLE RETAIL OR OTHER COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. (1.3 hectares) Sb LAND FRONTING HIGH PAVEMENT AND STATION ROAD FOR CONVENIENCE OR DURABLE GOODS. (2.3 hectares) |
Transport
| Policy TR1 | THE NOTTINGHAM EXPRESS TRANSIT SYSTEM - SAFEGUARDED LAND THE FOLLOWING LAND REQUIRED FOR THE NOTTINGHAM EXPRESS TRANSIT SYSTEM WILL BE SAFEGUARDED FROM DEVELOPMENT:- Hucknall Ha - THE ROUTE OF THE RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM FROM THE BOUNDARY WITH NOTTINGHAM CITY TO STATION ROAD. Hb - OFF BATHS LANE, FOR ADDITIONAL CAR PARKING. Hc - AN EXTENSION OF THE ROUTE OF THE RAPID TRANSPORT SYSTEM FROM HUCKNALL STATION TO THE BOUNDARY WITH GEDLING BOROUGH. |
| Policy TR2 | CYCLING PROVISION IN NEW DEVELOPMENTS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS TO WHICH CYCLISTS WOULD REASONABLY EXPECT TO HAVE ACCESS WILL BE PERMITTED WHERE PROVISION IS MADE FOR:- a) SAFE AND CONVENIENT CYCLE ACCESS, b) LINKS WITH EXISTING OR PROPOSED CYCLE ROUTES WHERE APPROPRIATE, c) CYCLE PARKING FACILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISION IDENTIFIED IN APPENDIX 7 |
| Policy TR3 | PEDESTRIANS AND PEOPLE WITH LIMITED MOBILITY DEVELOPMENT TO WHICH THE PUBLIC WOULD REASONABLY EXPECT TO ENJOY ACCESS WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED WHERE SUITABLE PROVISION IS MADE IN THE DESIGN OF THE EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT FOR SAFE AND CONVENIENT ACCESS BY PEDESTRIANS AND PEOPLE WITH LIMITED MOBILITY. |
| Policy TR4 | PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY SCHEMES A PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY SCHEME WILL BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE FOLLOWING AREA:- Hucknall Ha - HIGH STREET FROM STATION ROAD TO THE MARKET PLACE AND BAKER STREET FROM ITS JUNCTION WITH HIGH STREET TO OGLE STREET. |
| TR4 | PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY SCHEMES A PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY SCHEME WILL BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE FOLLOWING AREA:- Hucknall Ha HIGHSTREET FROM STATION ROAD TO THE MARKET PLACE AND BAKER STREET FROM ITS JUNCTION WITH HIGH STREET TO OGLE STREET. |
| TR5 | COUNTY COUNCIL HIGHWAY SCHEMES LAND REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING COUNTY COUNCIL HIGHWAY SCHEMES WILL BE SAFEGUARDED FROM DEVELOPMENT:- Hucknall Ha INNER RELIEF ROAD. Kirkby-in-Ashfield Ka A611 JUNCTION WITH ANNESLEY CUTTING. Kb A611/B6021 SHOULDER OF MUTTON HILL JUNCTION IMPROVEMENT. Kd B6021 LOWMOOR ROAD IMPROVEMENT - SOUTHWELL LANE TO ODDICROFT LANE. Named Settlements Bestwood Na MOOR ROAD, BESTWOOD. Rural Area Ra HAMILTON ROAD IMPROVEMENT (COXMOOR ROAD TO OAKHAM BUSINESS PARK). Rb MANSFIELD ASHFIELD REGENERATION ROUTE (PHASES 2 & 3). |
| TR6 | DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS TO TRANSPORT IMPROVEMENTS WHERE A DEVELOPMENT PLACES ADDITIONAL DEMANDS ON TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCURE, PLANNING OBLIGATIONS WILL BE NEGOTIATED TO ALLOW A SUM TO BE PAID TOWARDS ANY OF THE IMPROVEMENTS LISTED BELOW: Hucknall (South Notts. Sub-Area) a) HUCKNALL INNER RELIEF ROAD. b) BROOMHILL FARM TO BY-PASS - BUS LANE. c) HUCKNALL BY-PASS SOUTHERN ROUNDABOUT BUS/CYCLE PRIORITY MEASURES. d) OTHER SCHEMES WITHIN THE HUCKNALL – NOTTINGHAM TRANSPORT CORRIDOR. Sites Across the Whole District e) IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDING: i) BUS PRIORITY MEASURES. ii) BUS STOP FACILITIES. iii) RAIL FACILITIES. iv) ASSOCIATED HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT PUBLIC TRANSPORT MODES. f) IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CYCLING NETWORK. g) IMPROVEMENTS TO PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES. h) PARK AND RIDE SITES. SUCH PLANNING OBLIGATIONS WILL BE NEGOTIATED WHERE A DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDS THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM THRESHOLDS: 0.4Ha. OR 50 BEDROOMS, WHICHEVER IS THE LOWER, FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. 1,000 M2 GROSS FLOORSPACE FOR RETAIL DEVELOPMENT. 2,500 M2 GROSS FLOORSPACE FOR OFFICE USES AND. 5,000 M2 GROSS FLOORSPACE FOR EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT. FOR COMMERCIAL, LEISURE, TOURISM, HEALTH AND EDUCATION USES, OBLIGATIONS WILL BE DETERMINED LOCALLY WHERE TRANSPORT IMPACT IS SIGNIFICANT. |