London
Planning in Barking & Dagenham
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham · London Borough. Approval rates, decision timelines, local plan status, policies and CIL — sourced from government data, free to read.
Performance
Approval rate
64.1%
Decisions on time
100%
Applications / year
702
Housing Delivery Test (2023)
MHCLG has not yet measured this LPA.
Standard-method LHN: 2,979 dwellings / year
Source: MHCLG PS1/PS2 + HDT 2023.
Local plan
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Local Plan 2020-2037 (2024)
Open plan documentPolicies
Community
| Policy DME 4 | Visitor accommodation 1. Proposals for new visitor accommodation will be supported where they accord with Policy DME 3, and where they meet the following criteria: a) accord with principal land uses and not compromise regeneration visions (see the Local Plan Place Policies in Chapter 3) b) the size, scale and nature of the proposal is proportionate to its location c) it does not create an over-concentration of such accommodation, taking account of other proposals and unimplemented consents in the local area d) it does not have significant adverse impact on surrounding amenity or local character. 2. Applications for serviced apartments must demonstrate that they meet the criteria stated in Part (1) of this policy and will be managed appropriately as short-term accommodation (i.e. accommodation for up to 90 days in any 365 day period). |
| Policy DMS 1 | Protecting and enhancing existing facilities 1. Development proposals involving the net loss of existing social and community facilities (excluding sports facilities, playing fields, and recreational buildings and land) will be resisted, unless: a) the existing facility is being re-provided, whether on site or in a nearby location, that would continue to provide for and enhance the needs of existing local users b) there is no longer an identified need or demand for the existing use of the facility or use. In such circumstances, the applicant must provide robust documented evidence to demonstrate: i. the loss of the facility or use would not lead to a shortfall in provision for the specified use for the community that it serves, and ii. active marketing has occurred over a period of not less than 12 months for its continuous use at a realistic price/rent which is supported by the Council, or iii. if the facility can be refurbished or used by multi occupiers to prevent the loss. c) development proposals where the loss of social infrastructure is part of a wider public sector transformation programme are excluded from the requirements set out in Part a, and Part b clause ii and iii (and further detailed in clause 2 below). 2. The Council will expect applicants to submit competitive marketing evidence in accordance with Part 1 b), which should: a) outline where and how marketing has been undertaken, with details also provided to demonstrate that the asking rent has been at a realistic rate for the type, size and condition of the property or unit b) submit a report detailing the level of interest in the property over the agreed marketing period, details of any viewings and offers and details of why any interest had not been taken forward. 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Part 1 of this policy, development proposals that would result in the net loss of sports and recreational buildings and land, including playing fields will not be considered acceptable, unless it meets the requirements set out in the NPPF (or its updated equivalent) and by Policy DMNE 1 of this Local Plan. The Council will consult with Sport England where required on any proposed loss of facilities. 4. Extensions to existing schools should demonstrate there is an identified need to support the expansion and that it would not result in any shortfall of child play space overall. |
| Policy DMS 3 | Public houses 1. The Council will generally resist the change of use of public houses within the borough in accordance with London Plan 2021 Policy HC 7: protecting public houses. 2. Where a public house is replaced or re-provided, the new development: a) should make an equal or greater contribution to preserve or enhance local character b) where appropriate, incorporates a community use in the redevelopment or contribute towards enhancing community facilities in the local area c) where applicable would be subject to a sequential site assessment if the public house is re-provided off-site, to establish that the public house will continue to serve the original community d) must provide adequate floor space to ensure the continued viability of the public house, demonstrate that all reasonable efforts have been taken to preserve the facility as a public house, including evidence of appropriate maintenance and upkeep and efforts to diversify the business. 3. Where the public house is considered to be a heritage asset (see policy DMD4 'Heritage Assets and Archaeology Remains') or to make a valued contribution to the borough's history and its loss is considered justified, the applicant will be required to send significant architectural and historic components relating to the building's use for archiving or public display to the Council, in line with Historic England's guidance. |
Design
| GSR and Gill Sites 18 | GSR and Gill Sites 18. The Council will support development in this location which: a) delivers outstanding design and makes a positive contribution to the local character and neighbourhood b) improves links with the site to the north and Stamping Plant and new public realm and accessibility to the station to the south as well as the roads to the north and west c) delivers improvements to the overall quality of the greenway |
| Policy 10 | Harts Lane Estate, Hertford Road Industrial Estate and Wickes a) Planning for a comprehensive mixed-use development of commercial and community uses alongside residential development. This will be supported by a broad range of social infrastructure, including schools, open spaces, community centre, health care facilities, places of worship and a new river crossing. b) Deliver high quality design, amenity space and improvements to the public realm by working collaboratively with other developers and landowners from adjacent sites to form a north-south link along the river path. c) The scale and massing of development should contribute to the creation of a new coherent townscape which responds positively to its existing and emerging context. d) Provide riverside towers and gateway blocks facing the Northern Relief Road (A124). e) Create a green link at the heart of Harts Lane to link the River Roding to Barking Park with new civic space on the river front. f) Create a new legible hierarchy of pedestrian, vehicular and cycle routes into the existing fabric to connect the neighbourhood with an additional access from the Northern Relief Road (A124). g) Create a new pedestrian bridge across the River Roding to link the sites together and improve accessibility. h) Enhancement of existing social infrastructure including an opportunity to expand existing schools. |
| Policy 9 | Gascoigne Estate a) Locating community buildings in strategic places to create points of attraction and more active street frontages. b) Restoring the historic grid pattern in Gascoigne Estate through more legible connections and fine grain permeability that allows ease of movement and creates a more walkable environment. c) Establishing a clearly defined hierarchy of public, private and semi-private outdoor spaces, which are tailored to fit well in the context of the fine grain permeability and promotes activity and play. d) Enhancing biodiversity value throughout the area, including tree planting in appropriate locations and retention of the existing London Plane trees that line and characterise Abbey Road. e) Deliver an integrated nature-based blue and green strategy, providing flood mitigation and adaptation measures to comply with Policies DMNE4 and DMSI6. f) Creation of new high-quality places through a clearly defined hierarchy of spaces, homes and articulated architecture to strengthen the identity of the place; the massing and typology should be varied across the site to allow for a different silhouette and scale depending on view. |
| Policy DMD 1 | Securing high-quality design 1. The Council will support development proposals that make a positive contribution to the character of the surrounding area, have regard to the National Design Guide and/or its updated equivalent, design codes developed in accordance with the National Model Design Code and other local guidance. 2. All development proposals will be expected: a) where appropriate, to be required to use mechanisms such as Section 106 agreements and planning conditions to ensure that design quality is carried through into the detailed design and construction of the development. Amendments to the design of major applications may be subject to appropriate Section 106 monitoring contributions if the original architects or landscape architects are not retained for the detailed design stage b) to demonstrate high-quality design and to work with Planning Officers and, where recommended, with the Barking and Dagenham Quality Review Panel (QRP) in accordance with its Terms of Reference, or its equivalent c) to enable active lifestyle by designing for walkable neighbourhoods with attractive public realm and supporting infrastructure for walking and cycling, taking inspiration from Barking Riverside, London's first healthy new town; and Active Design Principles and guidance (or its updated equivalent) d) to be creative and innovative, recognising that existing local character and accommodating change is not mutually exclusive. Architecture should be responsive, inclusive, authentic, engaging, and have an enduring appeal e) to seek to maximise opportunities for urban greening and biodiversity, and demonstrate that appropriate measures have been taken to protect or enhance the natural environment in accordance with Policies: DME 2: providing flexible, affordable workspace and DME 3: encouraging vibrant, resilient and characterful town centres f) to consider the impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties g) to take a coordinated approach to development by respecting existing site constraints including utilities situated within sites h) using the required Archaeological Priority Areas Appraisal (or its updated equivalent) and best practice guidance to explore archaeological heritage as a cue for design, interpretation and presentation opportunities in a successful design of a development proposal j) to demonstrate how avoidance or minimisation of harm to the local character, heritage assets and their heritage significance, as well as to broader townscape character has been achieved through design and or mitigation; and agree appropriate mitigation with the Council. 3. Major and strategic development proposals (including estate regeneration schemes) must: a) provide a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) in the design process to identify opportunities for maximising potential health gains, minimising harm, and addressing health inequalities and detail the measures taken to achieve these b) clearly demonstrate consideration of the individual and cumulative impact on amenity, neighbouring buildings, skyline, infrastructure and the natural and historic environments, provision of public realm and amenity space (private, communal and child play space) c) provide publicly accessible open spaces that promote biodiversity, safety, health and well-being. Where on site contributions cannot be delivered, a financial contribution towards off-site provision of infrastructure elsewhere or a commuted sum may be accepted, to be determined in discussion with the Council d) seek to achieve the highest standards of construction (e.g. MMC), and adhere to Policy DMSI 1: sustainable design and construction. |
| Policy DMD 2 | Tall buildings 1. Tall Buildings in the borough are buildings that are taller than six storeys (or 18 metres) measured from ground to the floor level of the uppermost storey, as defined in Policy D9 of the London Plan 2021. The area specific policies define appropriate building heights for their respective areas, with SPP1-SPP6 having Tall Building Locations within them (as shown on the Policies Map). 2. Development of Tall Buildings will be directed towards appropriate Tall Building Locations (as shown on the Policies Map) and must accord with latest relevant national policy, London Plan policies and relevant policies within Chapter 3 of the Local Plan. 3. Any proposals that include Tall Buildings will be assessed on their own merits and will need to respond appropriately to identified sensitive locations including natural and built heritage assets. 4. Developments that include Tall Buildings must demonstrate how they: a) will deliver benefits for the surrounding area and communities, including delivering high quality and accessible public realm, as well as promoting legibility and wayfinding b) will create mixed and integrated communities and aim to appear "tenure blind" c) do not constrain development potential on adjoining sites including sites within adjoining boroughs. Specific consideration should be given to the impacts on the amenity of existing residential neighbourhoods and publicly accessible and private open spaces. d) Incorporate mitigation measures to help prevent suicide and accidental falls for example anti-climb methods, fences, barriers and rails. These will be well designed and should be integrated into the overall design of the building e) address visual impacts of Tall Buildings, consistent with Policy D9 Tall Buildings of the London Plan 2021. 5. Development proposals that include Tall Buildings should be supported by: i. an appropriate townscape analysis (including verified views to demonstrate how they positively contribute to the skyline) and must involve an assessment of impact upon the significance (including setting) of nearby heritage assets which demonstrates how any adverse impacts have been addressed, and ii. a compatible modelling tool in agreement with the Council, which provides an accurate visual representation of what the change will look like, and the cumulative effect for the borough and surrounding areas. |
| Policy DMD 5 | Householder extensions and alterations 1. Proposals must not significantly impact on quality of life for neighbouring residents. All development proposals for extensions and alterations will need to be designed in a sensitive and appropriate manner, and must respect and complement the character of the area in which they are located and the appearance of the original house and the group of buildings of which it forms a part. The Council will expect that: a) any proposed extension or alteration to a property should be sympathetic and subordinate to the design of the original dwelling with regards to scale, form, materials and detailing b) an extension should not cause harmful visual impact upon the street scene, for example, the space between properties should be considered and any loss of such spaces should be avoided c) extensions should be designed to be respectful of neighbouring privacy, considering the impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties d) extensions should take into account the positive aspects of the existing roofscape of the area and seek to apply the same style as the roof of the original property including the pitch, eaves treatment and materials used e) an extension should be well laid out, bright, spacious and accessible for all f) where practicable, any extension or alteration should be energy efficient and incorporate renewable energy sources. |
| Policy DMD 6 | Advertisements and signage 1. Proposals for advertisements and signage are required to: a) avoid adverse impacts on amenity, including visual and aural, being appropriate to the character of the area b) avoid adverse effects arising from an accumulation of advertisements in a location c) consider any visual amenity impact on the natural environment, and on any conservation areas, listed buildings or other heritage assets d) for fascias and projecting signs, to be sensitively designed of an appropriate size and depth in relation to the host building and to respect its architectural features e) be designed for public safety relevant to the safe use and operation of any form of traffic or transport for all users. 2. For illuminated displays (including LEDs), the illumination levels of advertisements should be in accordance with the guidance set by the Institute of Lighting Engineers PLG05 The Brightness of Illuminated Advertisements or its updated equivalent. The Council will resist the illumination of hoardings where it is a nuisance or out of character with the area. 3. All advertisements are expected to be of high quality, well suited to the building or street for which it is proposed and makes a positive contribution to the appearance and character of an area; and to comply with the standard conditions outlined in the DCLG's Outdoor Advertisements and Signs: A Guide of Advertisers (2007), or its updated equivalent. 4. Free-standing signs, such as 'A' boards on the public highway (which includes the pavement) will require a separate consent under the Highways Act for any temporary or permanent obstruction on the highway. 5. Proposals for new or replacement shop fronts must ensure that: a) signage location and design are sensitive and not overly dominant to the shop fronts and the surrounding area, and b) out of hours lighting is incorporated to enhance a well-lit, safe and secure streetscape. |
| Policy DMSI 1 | Sustainable design and construction 1. All development will be required to incorporate sustainable design and construction, relating to the scale, nature, orientation, layout and form of the proposal. 2. Major development proposals must demonstrate, in a supporting sustainability statement, how sustainable principles, standards, and materials and low carbon technologies are integral to the design, construction and operation of the development; and be accompanied by a pre-assessment, demonstrating how the following standards, or any future replacement standards, will be met: a) all new non-residential development over 500 sqm floor space (gross) must be designed and built to meet or exceed a BREEAM non-domestic refurbishment and Fit-out (FRO) 'Excellent' rating (or updated equivalent) b) all non-residential refurbishment of existing buildings and conversions (including change of use) over 500sqm floor space (gross) must be designed and built to meet or exceed a BREEAM Refurbishment and Fit-out 'Excellent' rating (or updated equivalent) c) all residential refurbishment development of 10 dwellings or more must be designed and built to meet or exceed a BREEAM Domestic Refurbishment 'Excellent' rating (or updated equivalent). 3. All new major residential development is strongly encouraged to meet a Home Quality Mark 3-star rating (or updated equivalent). |
| SP2 | Delivering a well-designed, high-quality and resilient built environment The Council will promote high-quality design, providing safe, convenient, accessible and healthy inclusive developments and interesting public spaces for all through: a) adopting a design-led approach to optimising density and site potential by responding sensitively to local distinctiveness b) ensuring that developments relate to their local context, incorporating and interpreting local character and, where applicable, using this to inform detail, materials and landscape, which will reinvent the borough as a distinctive |
| SPP4 6 | Tall Building Locations - Chadwell Heath and Marks Gate 6. In Tall Building Locations (as identified on the Policies Map), heights up to 50 metres may be appropriate. This is in line with other Tall Building Locations in the borough located outside of Barking Town Centre. |
| SPP6 | Becontree and Heathway All development (including any extensions) must integrate with the existing character of the area and enable preservation and restoration of the historic fabric of the estate. A detailed design code is being prepared to support the delivery of the Local Plan to supplement this Policy. The Council will also support development that contributes to: a) inclusion of the urban 'set pieces' and street types that are unique to the area b) improvements to the public realm, including regreening and tree planting, street furniture, signage and lighting c) improvements to Parsloes Park, including the expansion of sports facilities d) rationalised car-parking and improved cycle links to the new Elizabeth Line connection at Chadwell Heath e) retention of local shops and services unless applications are able to justify that they no longer meet a community need f) improvements to shopfronts and reintroduction of awnings g) contributions to the green infrastructure network, including the east-west green grid route (Porters Avenue and Parsloes Avenue) h) improvements to transport and connectivity, including Becontree Station access improvements i) creation of liveable or low-traffic neighbourhoods, with measures to improve safety, health and air quality including measures to reduce speeding and rat-running j) digital infrastructure improvements e.g. fast broadband k) early years facilities, primary and secondary school places l) special education needs school provision m) parks and open spaces n) indoor and outdoor sports facilities o) community centres and faith spaces p) children's play and youth facilities. Development proposals will be expected to demonstrate how they deliver comprehensive and co-ordinated redevelopment and accord with Area Policy SPP6, having regard to any relevant supplementary planning document for the area. Development proposals should include a statement setting out how they align with the strategy for the area. h) minimise car parking in the location in line with Policy DMT2 to create liveable or low-traffic neighbourhoods, with measures to improve safety, health and air quality. |
| STRATEGIC POLICY SP2 | Delivering a high quality and resilient built environment 1. The Council will promote high-quality design, providing safe, convenient, accessible and healthy inclusive developments and interesting public spaces for all through: a) adopting a design-led approach to optimising density and site potential by responding sensitively to local distinctiveness b) ensuring that developments relate to their local context, incorporating and interpreting local character and, where applicable, using this to inform detail, materials and landscape, which will reinvent the borough as a distinctive place in its own right c) ensuring developments create well-designed homes that are accessible and flexible enough to accommodate different ways of living d) supporting development that aims to create attractive, engaging spaces which are more likely to be well-used and resilient for the future e) supporting development that improves and facilitates active lifestyles, and improves the wellbeing of new and existing communities f) supporting development that harnesses the potential for improved quality and innovative Modern Methods of Construction (MMC), and adheres to Policy DMSI 1: sustainable design and construction g) adopting the Circular Economy principles in the design of developments, demonstrating actions taken to reduce resource use and embodied carbon throughout the building lifecycle and aiming to achieve net zero-waste in line with the principles and requirements of the London Plan 2021 Policy SI 7: reducing waste and supporting the circular economy h) preserving or enhancing the borough's heritage such as Eastbury Manor House, Valence House Museum, the Abbey Ruins and Dagenham Village, as well as conservation areas, and both designated and non-designated heritage assets in accordance with the Policy DMD 4: Heritage assets and archaeological remains. |
Employment
| Policy DME 1 | Utilising the borough's employment land more efficiently 1. SIL/LSIS Land release will only be considered in accordance with London Plan 2021 Policy E7: industrial intensification, co-location and substitution. 2. Over the course of the Plan period, it is the Council's intention to only release three parcels of SIL. These are within Thames Road, which is located within the River Road Employment Area. Proposed industrial land designations are clearly illustrated in Figure 17 and on the Policies Map. The clusters are listed in Table 3 as RR8, RR9 and RR10 and these will be clearly defined on an interactive policies map. Part of RR8 will be de-designated from SIL to LSIS and part will be intensified as SIL. RR9 will be de-designated from SIL to LSIS and RR10 will be released completely for residential. The reconfiguration of this industrial land will result in a loss of 21.6ha of SIL. 3. Development proposals must minimise noise impacts and/or neighbour amenity issues in line with London Plan 2021 Policy and must not jeopardise the functioning of any remaining or re-provided industrial uses, including those incorporated within the redevelopment. 4. Any development on-site or surrounding SIL, LSIS or Non-Designated Industrial Sites must not compromise their continued efficient function, access, service arrangements and days/hours of operation, in line with Policies E5 and E7 of the London Plan 2021. Particular regard should be made to the design of residential development adjacent to SILs to ensure that existing or potential industrial activities within these locations are not compromised or curtailed. 5. The Council will ensure that there will be no deficit of industrial capacity through a regular process of planning, monitoring and reviewing industrial development throughout the Plan period. The Council will monitor the capacity of LSIS and SIL land and floor space as well as undesignated industrial land within the Borough and review this annually through the Authority Monitoring Report (KPI 12). The Council is committed to sharing this monitoring information with the GLA to support decision making when considering proposals which affect industrial designations and in particular any which affect SIL. Monitoring of the borough's industrial capacity will help to ensure that industrial need is identified, reviewed and met ahead of any planned release. It will help facilitate the effective operation of the Plan's industrial policies. 6. The Council may prepare master plan supplementary planning documents (SPDs) to guide development. Where adopted, development proposals must have regard to any relevant SPD. 7. SIL provides strategic protection and intensification for warehousing and logistics uses, which often require larger spaces, in line with Policies E4 and E5 of the London Plan 2021. 8. Industrial intensification may involve placing smaller industrial units above or alongside larger warehouses in multi-use accommodated at higher plot ratios to deliver additional capacity. 9. Proposals for residential elements will be refused. Planning conditions or legal agreements may be required to prevent subsequent conversion of SIL sites to residential use. 10. The Council will protect local business' needs, and support development that is in accordance with this Local Plan or an adopted localised planning framework. 11. The Council will support co-location of industrial and non-industrial land uses (including employment and residential uses) where appropriate and where this would meet the requirements of Policy E7 of the London Plan 2021. This could involve a mix of industrial and residential and/or other uses on the same site, either side-by-side or through vertical stacking. 12. On Locally Significant Industrial Sites, Classes B2, B8 and E(g)iii uses and relation functions, including ancillary facilities, will be permitted and safeguarded. 13. For both SIL and LSIS, applicants must clearly demonstrate that the proposal: a) contributes to meeting the indicative future floor space capacity targets (as set out in Table 3 and Appendix 5). The Council will seek to exceed the indicative future floor space capacity where appropriate. b) can deliver at least 50 per cent affordable housing where the scheme includes residential uses and would result in a net loss of industrial capacity (as required by London Plan 2021 Policies H4 and H5) c) can provide a mix of unit sizes and adequate servicing and delivery space in accordance with Policy DMT4: deliveries, servicing and construction d) are well designed for their intended purpose in accordance with DMD1: securing high quality design, having regard to providing flexibility for incorporating innovative typologies, such as smaller scale, cleaner type industrial uses that are more compatible with residential uses. 14. Outside designated SIL or LSIS, the Council will direct industrial or warehousing uses towards areas of the borough that are designated for SIL or LSIS. Development proposals that would result in the net loss of viable employment floor space outside of SIL or LSIS areas will be required (in accordance with London Plan 2021 Policy E7: industrial intensification, co-location and substitution) to demonstrate that the site has 'no reasonable prospect' for industrial related purposes and will be required to comply with London Plan 2021 Policies H4 and H5 in respect of affordable housing. 15. The Council will facilitate the delivery of the identified intensification potential to meet all its identified industrial need through a focus on publicly owned land and work with landowners as well as particular details proposed as part of individual site allocations and through Master plans at Thames Road and Chadwell Heath. 16. In line with key performance indicator 12 of Appendix 3 of this Plan, the Council will monitor the capacity of LSIS and SIL land within the borough. |
| Policy DME 2 | Providing flexible, affordable workspace 1. Development creating 1,000 sqm employment floor space or greater will be required to incorporate an appropriate provision of affordable workspace on-site, offered at below market rate, for shared workspace or small business units through Section 106 agreements, subject to development viability. This must meet the needs of local start-ups, small-to-medium enterprises and creative industries. The applicant should establish robust management links with registered workspace providers agreed by the Council and be able to: a) demonstrate that there is sufficient critical mass to ensure the sustainability of any provision b) provide units in turnkey form which are accepted by the Council or the registered workspace provider following completion. To be considered as acceptable turnkey spaces, the Council will expect the workspace units to be secure, vacant, and fully glazed, with smooth sealed concrete finishes to ceiling and walls, functional lighting, running water, sanitary facilities, and having capped essential services such as electricity and gas, as well as access provision of wired and wireless broadband technologies delivering the highest speeds to provide a wide range of services. These works will avoid substantial fit out costs for potential occupiers and enable the workspace to be more affordable for smaller businesses. 2. In circumstances where it is not practicable or viable to meet Part 1 of the policy, a payment in lieu will be required to support delivery of affordable workspace in other parts of the borough, focusing primarily in identified Transformation Areas (see Chapter 3: Transforming Barking and Dagenham). |
| SP5 | Promoting inclusive economic growth 1. The Council will focus on growing a thriving and productive enterprise and small business economy, alongside new business investment, and ensuring the delivery of around 20,000 new jobs and a wider employment base. 2. The Council will protect office floor space in accordance with London Plan 2021 Policy E1: Offices. 3. The Council will meet its identified additional demand of circa 203,000sqm. of industrial floor space over the Plan period (as identified in the Industrial Land Strategy) and protect, strengthen and intensify land within the designated Strategic Industrial Location (SIL) and Locally Significant Industrial Sites (LSIS) boundaries through: a) retention of suitable locations (see illustrative Figure 17 within the policy justification text) to accommodate future growth including supply of suitable industrial capacity to meet identified need b) promoting efficient use of industrial land to support economic growth sectors through managed renewal and intensification of industrial sites, alongside plan-led managed release and reprovision, and within LSIS co-location of existing industrial land with other sympathetic and appropriate uses c) promoting efficient use of industrial land to support strategic sectors, including: Transport & Logistics, Advanced Manufacturing, Green Technology and Digital Cultural Creative Industries etc. |
| SPP4 10 | Employment Space Delivery - Chadwell Heath and Marks Gate 10. The Council is committed to delivering employment space alongside new homes. Development proposals will be expected to demonstrate how they deliver a comprehensive and co-ordinated delivery strategy that accords with Area Policy SPP4 (having regard to any supplementary planning document for the area), Policy DME1 and London Plan 2021 Policy E4. Development proposals should include a statement setting out how they align with the strategy for the area. |
| SPP4 11 | Industrial Floorspace - Chadwell Heath and Marks Gate 11. Proposals resulting in the net loss of industrial floor space across the Transformation Area will only be supported in accordance with Policy DME1, and will be expected to robustly demonstrate why this is justified through, for example, reprovision elsewhere in the borough, a significant demonstrable uplift in the number and quality of jobs, and/or other significant material benefits that demonstrably meet the Council's regeneration aspirations as set out in this Local Plan. |
| Thames Freeport in Dagenham 14 | Thames Freeport in Dagenham 14. Development of an open access international intermodal rail terminal will be supported and any development proposals on the Ford site will need to demonstrate they do not prejudice the potential for delivery of such a rail terminal. |
Energy
| Policy DMSI 2 | Energy, heat and carbon emissions Carbon dioxide emissions 1. The Council will expect major development to contribute to, and where possible exceed, the borough's target of becoming carbon neutral by 2050 by maximising energy efficiency and carbon reduction on-site. Major development will need to demonstrate the achievement of net-zero carbon buildings and neighbourhoods. 2. Major development proposals are required to submit a detailed Energy Assessment, which provides information on measures that have been put in place to minimise energy demand and carbon savings that can be achieved. Energy Assessments should be consistent with, the most recent guidance from the GLA, demonstrating how the development has been designed in accordance with the energy hierarchy and relevant policies set out in Policy SI 2 of the London Plan 2021. Minor development proposals should also submit an Energy Strategy that is proportionate to the proposal, determined in consultation with the Council. 3. Where it is clearly demonstrated that the zero-carbon target cannot be achieved on-site and there is a well-justified shortfall, applicants will be expected to make a financial contribution in agreement with the Council, either through a cash in lieu contribution to the Council's Carbon Offset Fund, or agreement of sufficient alternative offsetting arrangements within the borough via planning obligations. Connection to district energy networks 4. All development proposals will be expected to: a) address an area's energy infrastructure requirements, as identified in the Council's latest Infrastructure Delivery Plan b) prioritise decentralised energy. 5. All new major development proposals located within Heat Network Priority Areas, as set out by the GLA's London Heat Map (or updated equivalent), are expected to adhere to the London Plan's heating hierarchy, prioritising connection to local existing or planned heat networks in accordance with London Plan 2021 Policy SI 3. Low carbon and renewable energy technologies 6. Development proposals will be expected to maximise potential from low carbon and renewable energy technologies with minimal impact on the environment, amenity, affordability/operational costs and human health and wellbeing. They must demonstrate that the most appropriate and well-performing technologies are incorporated into new development and that any adverse effects on human health or the environment are avoided, or otherwise appropriately mitigated, including in respect of managing overheating risk and end user affordability. Overheating risk 7. All development proposals should minimise adverse impacts on the urban heat island effect through design, layout, orientation, materials and the incorporation of green infrastructure. 8. All major development proposals will be expected to mitigate overheating risk (for example through orientation, shading, insulation, solar-controlled glazing, natural ventilation and efficient mechanical ventilation with heat recovery) and submit an Overheating Assessment in accordance with the requirements of policy SI 4 of the London Plan 2021 and the cooling hierarchy. |
| Strategic Policy SP7 | Securing a clean, green and sustainable borough 1. The Council will: a) encourage innovative approaches to tackling climate change, reducing air pollution, managing flood risk, heat risk and nuisance, and promoting sustainable infrastructure b) expect major development to be net zero carbon and employ low carbon technologies in line with London Plan 2021 Policy SI 2: minimising greenhouse gas emissions, and work with developers, landowners and other key stakeholders to ensure, where appropriate, development supports and connects into the borough's strategic District Energy Networks and associated infrastructure, utilising low or zero carbon energy sources and heat recovery c) expect all development to minimise the risk of internal overheating in line with London Plan 2021 Policy SI 4: managing heat risk d) ensure all development manages nuisance (such as noise, vibration, artificial light, odour, fumes and dust pollution) during both construction and operation through appropriate design, planning and mitigation e) improve the borough's air quality in line with the Council's Air Quality Action Plan; requiring new development to accord with policy SI 1 of the London Plan 2021; and promoting sustainable transport and green infrastructure f) expect development and large-scale regeneration to facilitate the remediation of land affected by contamination g) work with developers and key stakeholders to reduce flood risk (including through the use of Sustainable Drainage Systems), improve wastewater infrastructure in line with the Council's Infrastructure Delivery Plan, and reduce mains water consumption h) co-operate with other boroughs to jointly address cross-boundary flood risk issues i) meet the borough-level apportionment target of household, commercial and industrial waste set out in Policy SI 8 of the London Plan 2021 within an updated joint waste development plan j) seek to maintain an appropriate landbank as per the apportionment for the borough set out in the London Plan 2021 and review the approach through the new Joint Waste Plan k) reduce waste and promote the circular economy principles as set out in policy SI 7 of the London Plan 2021, including through adopting a retrofit-first approach, where any substantial demolition proposed has a robust justification l) meet the municipal waste recycling target by 65 per cent by 2050 m) ensure that zero biodegradable or recyclable waste goes to landfill by 2026 n) seek to deliver secure, affordable and low carbon utilities and physical infrastructure. |
Environment
| Flood defences | Flood defences 6. Development proposals along the Thames and tidal River Roding will be expected to: a) maintain, repair, enhance or replace flood defence walls, banks and flood control structures to provide adequate protection for the lifetime of the development b) protect land adjacent to, and set buildings back from, flood defences to allow future replacement of defences and provision of public amenity and biodiversity, having regard to the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan c) seek opportunities to raise existing tidal flood defences having regard to the required levels in the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan (or updated equivalent) in preparation for future climate change impacts, or demonstrate how defences can be raised to the required levels in the future through submission of plans and cross-sections of the proposed raising d) demonstrate the provision of improved access to existing defences, or where opportunities exist to realign or set back defences e) provide landscape, amenity and habitat improvements, where appropriate, in line with the riverside strategy approach f) safeguard land for future defence raising g) secure financial contributions from partners in order to enable flood defence works. |
| Policy DMNE 1 | Parks, open spaces and play space 1. The Council will protect and enhance the borough's parks, public open spaces and playing fields, working closely with a range of stakeholders to address deficiencies in quantity, quality and access. Public open spaces should be safe and easily accessible through walking, cycling, and public transport for all users, and supportive infrastructure such as crossings, cycle parking, bus stops and clear signage should be provided appropriately near the entrance of open spaces. To reduce car dominance, these should be provided in proximity to residential, commercial and social infrastructure. 2. The Council will prevent inappropriate development within open spaces and other sites identified in the Parks and Open Space Strategy. Development should not come forward on Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) or within the Green Belt except in very special circumstances, in line with the NPPF and Policy G3 of the London Plan 2021, or where exceptional circumstances for changes to the Green Belt boundary have come forward as part of the Local Plan process (as is the case with the release of a small amount of Green Belt land to allow for future delivery of the Gypsy and Traveller site extension in Eastbrookend Country Park). 3. Existing open space, sports and recreational buildings and land, including playing fields, should not be built on unless the requirements outlined in national policy are met. 4. Major residential development which falls within the 3 km to 6.2 km Recreational Pressure 'Zone of Influence' (ZoI) around the Epping Forest SAC (as shown on the Policies Map) may be required to complete a project level Habitat Regulations Assessment to address recreational impacts on the SAC, and may be required to mitigate the impacts of recreational pressure upon the SAC. Any development which would cause an adverse impact upon the integrity of Epping Forest SAC will not be supported. 5. Development on open space not shown on the Policies Map, including amenity greens and amenity spaces with limited public access, will generally not be supported, except where proposals accord with an agreed Council regeneration strategy, or include replacement space of higher quality to the open space that would be lost. 6. Development should not rely upon existing publicly accessible open space to contribute towards on-site communal amenity space and child play space. All major and strategic development should contribute to the delivery of sufficient new publicly accessible open space on-site which should: a) meet the needs of current and any future residents b) be of a high-quality that is accessible to all c) provide multiple benefits, including recreation, food growing, SuDS, improvements to biodiversity and links to green infrastructure, as well as any blue infrastructure, on and adjacent to the development site d) consider taking the form of new parks (including pocket parks), allotments or play space developed with regard to guidance as set out in the Parks and Open Spaces Strategy, the Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Strategy, the Planning Obligations SPD (emerging) and any relevant park master plans and their updated equivalents e) comply with Policy G4 of the London Plan 2021 and the Council's guidance in the design of new open space. In exceptional circumstances, where on-site provision cannot be adequately accommodated, the Council may agree a financial contribution towards improvements to existing or new open spaces within the borough via planning obligations. 7. Major development proposals for schemes that are likely to be used by children and young people should increase opportunities for play and informal recreation in line with Policy S4 of the London Plan 2021. 8. Proposals for new playing fields should be developed in accordance with Policy DMS1, the Council's Playing Pitch Strategy (or updated equivalent) and in consultation with Sport England. |
| Policy DMNE 2 | Urban greening 1. Development proposals will be supported where they: a) maximise opportunities for urban greening, including landscaping, street trees, green and brown roofs, green walls, food growing, rain gardens and nature-based sustainable drainage b) contribute to the All London Green Grid, the Council's Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Strategy and the Council's Parks and Open Spaces Strategy. 2. Major development proposals are expected to calculate the site's Urban Greening Factor (UGF) in line with Policy G5 of the London Plan 2021, to demonstrate that the proposal will positively contribute to the greening of the borough. A target score of 0.4 should be achieved for developments that are predominately residential, and a target score of 0.3 should be achieved for commercial development (excluding B2 and B8 uses, which have no target but are required to quantify the UGF score and demonstrate measures to achieve urban greening on site). 3. Where major development does not meet the relevant UGF target score and a review confirms that the target score cannot be met (as set out in section 3.6 of the 2023 London Plan Urban Greening Factor guidance), development should provide robust justification to the Council regarding constraints to delivery, and work with the Council to identify suitable alternative offsite measures. |
| Policy DMNE 3 | Nature conservation and biodiversity 1. Development should not lead to adverse effects on the integrity of Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation (SAC) in line with Policy DMNE 1, or loss or degradation of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs), including local nature reserves. All existing SINC boundaries are shown on the Policies Map. 2. All development proposals are required to: a) minimise the impacts of development on biodiversity and nature in accordance with the mitigation hierarchy set out in Policy G6 of the London Plan 2021 b) demonstrate a minimum of 10% biodiversity net gain, even where development proposals do not result in biodiversity loss using the Biodiversity Metric 4.0 (or updated equivalent) in accordance with the Environment Act 2021 and associated regulations (or updated equivalent). Applications for material change of use applications, alterations to buildings, and house extensions, are excluded from this requirement. In the event that Biodiversity Net Gain cannot be delivered on site, developers should work with the Council to deliver net gain off-site but within the borough c) prepare a long-term monitoring and management plan of biodiversity net gain sites for a period of 30 years, preferably within the development area d) provide wider environmental benefits where possible. 3. The Council's Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Strategy identifies opportunities for habitat creation, wildlife corridors and Green Design Codes for different parts of the borough, which should be used to inform net gain proposals. 4. Major development proposals are required to: a) contribute to the strategic network of green and blue spaces, as identified in the Council's Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Strategy (or updated equivalent) and in accordance with Policy G1 of the London Plan 2021 b) contribute to improving local access to nature, in accordance with national and London Plan 2021 requirements |
| Policy DMNE 4 | Water environment Rivers, waterways and watercourses 1. Development proposals within and adjacent to rivers and waterways will be required to: a) contribute to achieving the objectives of the Thames River Basin Management Plan, Water Framework Directive or updated equivalent and catchment partnership local measures b) protect and enhance biodiversity and geomorphology in and along watercourses, banks and waterways, adjacent terrestrial habitats, the foreshore and the floodplain c) improve water quality, including reducing or minimising pollution from adjacent land and roads (e.g. by using oil interceptors in car parks) and improve the ecological status of waterbodies (e.g. by investigating and rectifying misconnections, retrofitting sustainable urban drainage systems, fitting hydrocarbon interceptors and creating and restoring wetlands) d) conserve the waterways and consider them as part of a cohesive place-making strategy tailored to local context e) avoid harm or negative impacts on navigation and use of existing waterways f) conserve and enhance the existing character of the waterway and its setting g) provide open space for recreation, habitat provision and increasing the blue space network, which can also be used to store excess floodwater, where appropriate h) provide a naturalised buffer zone between the proposed development and the top of bank of any nearby watercourse, landward extent of a flood defence, and its underground structures (including tie rods and anchors) or body of water as follows: i. at least 16m for tidal watercourses ii. at least 8m for fluvial main watercourses iii. at least 8m for an ordinary watercourse iv. at least 5m buffer around ponds or other standing water bodies v. buffer zones should not include development, hard standing, paths or lighting, or be used for storage of materials. Land adjacent to flood defences should also be protected in line with Policy DMSI 5. Buffer zones should be designed to be dark (less than 1.0 lux) to protect their function as wildlife corridors; open up river corridors, making space for water through the creation of natural buffer zones adjacent to water courses, and increasing floodplain connectivity vi. improve safe, public access to waterways and provide opportunities for enjoyment and understanding of the waterways; development will be expected to provide appropriate riparian lifesaving equipment (e.g. grab chains, access ladders and life buoys) alongside the river side areas to a standard recommended in the 1991 Hayes Report on the Inquiry into River Safety vii. encourage active travel (walking and cycling) through the provision of cycle and foot paths adjacent to the waterway (but outside of the buffer zone) viii. have regard to the HM Government's UK Marine Policy Statement (2011) or updated equivalent and the South East Marine Plan, which applies to the River Thames and the River Roding ix. identify and deliver natural flood management opportunities to help alleviate fluvial and surface water flooding, as well as measures to prevent litter entering waterways. On sites with culverted watercourses, proposals for new development will be expected to investigate and secure the implementation of measures to restore sections of the watercourse, with clear and robust justification provided, if considered unachievable x. maximise the use of the river for freight, including for the transportation of construction materials to, and waste from a development site either directly to and from the site or through the supply chain. Thames Policy Area 2. The Thames Policy Area, including the River Roding, is designated on the Policies Map. Within this area, development will be supported where it meets the requirements above and it: a) improves public access to and along the River Thames b) protects and enhances views towards and along the River Thames c) has regard to the recommendations of the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan (or updated equivalent) for Action Zone 454 (which focuses on to taking further action to keep up with climate and land use change so that flood risk does not increase), within which the borough lies d) protects safeguarded wharves and jetties from any development that would prejudice their future use for river transport in accordance with policy SP5. |
| Policy DMNE 5 | Trees 1. Development proposals should retain existing trees and shrubs where possible unless it can be demonstrated that their removal would provide substantial public benefit or if they are considered unsuitable for retention (e.g., have a serious structural defect, are deceased, infected or showing signs of irreversible decline). 2. Trees, shrubs or vegetation must be retained where one or more of the criteria below are met: a) it is considered to be of significant value, including ecological value, as per an agreed appropriate arboriculture valuation system (such as i-tree or CAVAT) and subject to consultation with the Council b) it makes a significant contribution to amenity or local character c) it is of special character, age, or has scope for screening other properties or features. 3. If existing trees and vegetation of value cannot be retained, a robust justification must be provided and they should be replaced by species of at least equivalent value with a preference for on-site planting. 4. Where it is agreed with the Council that it is not possible to provide adequate replacement trees as part of a development, the applicant will be required to make a financial contribution to the Council's tree planting and maintenance programme dependent on the specific development and the value of the trees. 5. Major development is expected to incorporate planting including trees, shrubs and vegetation over and above any existing provision. Planting should use trees, shrubs and vegetation that are appropriate to the context and location of the development site and provide complementary habitat. 6. Applicants will be expected to demonstrate how a development has been designed to allow trees and other vegetation to grow and thrive, including during construction. This includes ensuring that urban planting allows tree roots to grow sufficiently, allows water filtration and avoids soil compaction around street planting. 7. When identifying locations for new trees, it is vital that eventual root and branch growth of a tree are taken into account when determining how much space will be needed in the future. This is to ensure the tree survives and thrives, and to prevent damage to existing properties and structures. 8. All trees and vegetation planted in close proximity to flood defences and within the 'buffer zone' must have appropriate root containment systems installed, to prevent future tree root growth negatively affecting flood defence structures. |
| Policy DMNE 6 | Local food growing including allotments Existing allotments 1. Redevelopment of existing allotments will only be permitted in exceptional circumstances where it can be demonstrated that they are no longer needed by the community or existing allotment users are relocated to an alternative allotment that is within reasonable proximity to their homes and of a comparable quality. Creation of new food growing opportunities 2. Proposals for community food growing and gardening will be encouraged in line with Policy G8 of the London Plan 2021, particularly where this forms part of the overall landscaping and open space strategy for residential development or as part of a school, playground or recreational area. Innovative food growing solutions, such as edible landscaping, rooftop growing, vertical and hydroponic and indoor growing will be strongly encouraged. 3. Major residential-led developments should consider community food growing opportunities and provide a strategy for the ongoing management of this. 4. Proposals for new allotments will be supported where there is a local need, demonstrated through appropriate engagement with key stakeholders and the local community, and where this does not prejudice alternative land uses from coming forward, including residential use. 5. All new community food growing areas should include access for disabled residents, access to water and irrigation and access to composting facilities. 6. Food growing is also encouraged as a meanwhile use on vacant or under-utilised sites. |
| Policy DMSI 3 | Nuisance 1. All development proposals are required to: a) have regard to the Agent of Change principle (Policy D13 of the London Plan 2021) b) manage nuisance resulting from development in areas where industrial and residential land uses are co-located the onus should be on the new development to manage conflicts without placing unreasonable restrictions on existing noise-generating uses c) manage and mitigate the impacts of nuisance generated through the operation of development (such as noise, vibration, artificial light, odour, fumes and dust pollution) on people and the built and natural environment over the life of the development d) ensure noise-sensitive and air quality-sensitive development is directed to appropriate locations, and protect these against any existing and proposed sources of noise and air pollution through careful design, layout and use of materials and adequate insulation e) work with the Council to manage and mitigate adverse noise by identifying and protecting areas that have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are valued for their recreational and amenity value for this reason. 2. Major development proposals, and other development proposals that are likely to result in a nuisance, are required to: a) submit a noise and vibration assessment to reduce any adverse impacts to an acceptable level using the most appropriate layout, orientation, design and use of buildings. This assessment must have regard to the overheating assessment in terms of managing both overheating risk and acoustics b) submit and implement a Construction Environmental Management Plan in order to avoid, minimise and mitigate significant adverse demolition and construction (such as noise, vibration, artificial light, odour, fumes and dust pollution) on people and the built and natural environment through the development. 3. Development proposals which generate unacceptable levels of nuisance, either individually or cumulatively, will be resisted. |
| Policy DMSI 4 | Air quality 1. All major development will be required to provide an Air Quality Assessment as part of the planning application in accordance with the requirements of Policy SI 1 of the London Plan 2021: improving air quality. Large-scale development, as defined in the London Plan Air Quality Positive guidance, should also submit an Air Quality Positive Statement as set out in guidance. 2. Major development proposals must achieve or improve upon the 'air quality neutral' benchmark (in line with Policy SI 1 of the London Plan 2021, and LBBD's latest Air Quality Action Plan and Air Quality Positive guidance) by avoiding people's exposure to poor air quality. This should be achieved through: a) effective design solutions b) appropriate plant, machinery and technology c) facilitating the use of low or zero emission transport and reducing the reliance on private motor vehicles, while promoting walking and cycling d) improving traffic management e) providing new green infrastructure in line with the Council's Infrastructure Delivery Plan and Green Infrastructure & Biodiversity Strategy (or updated equivalents). 3. Development located within the borough's designated Air Quality Focus areas will be closely scrutinised as to the approach to air quality and should demonstrate that design measures have been used to minimise exposure, in accordance with Policy SI 1 of the London Plan 2021. 4. Where proposals do not achieve the air quality neutral benchmark, applicants will be expected to make a financial contribution in agreement with the Council, either through the Air Quality Fund, or through off-site measures within the borough, agreed via planning obligations. During demolition and construction, all developments must adhere to the requirements of the GLA's Control of Dust and Emissions during Construction and Demolition SPG 2014 (or updated equivalent) including the emissions standards set for all Non-Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) used on-site. |
| Policy DMSI 5 | Land contamination 1. All development proposals on, or adjacent to land potentially affected by previous contaminative land use will be required to apply the latest government guidance on land contamination. 2. Developers should consult with the Council to discuss land contamination issues at an early stage of the planning process. 3. Remediation proposals to deal with contamination must be agreed with the Council prior to the commencement of any works. 4. Development proposals must: a) ensure safe transportation, storage, and use of hazardous substances b) protect neighbouring occupiers and the natural environment from remediation impacts c) consult the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and the Environment Agency (EA) on proposals involving hazardous substances where required. 5. Hazardous substances are to be located where they would not cause potential health and safety risks to neighbouring uses or to the environment. Other uses should be prevented from being located near potentially polluting substances where future users could be at risk. |
| Policy DMSI 6 | Flood risk and defences Flood risk 1. Development should seek to deliver a neutral impact or reduction in flood risk from any source, on and off-site, by demonstrably giving sufficient consideration from the outset of the design, and during pre-application discussions with the Environment Agency (EA) and Thames Water and the Council. 2. Development is required to undertake Flood Risk Assessments for schemes meeting the thresholds set out in DEFRA and EA guidance. Developments should adapt to climate change by planning for future flood risk. If a site is not currently shown to be within Flood Zone 2 or 3, but detailed modelling from the Environment Agency shows it is expected to be impacted once climate change is assessed, then the same design considerations should be applied as if it was within the present-day Flood Zone. 3. Development proposals must comply with flood risk policy as set out in national policy and guidance. 4. All development within sites at risk of flooding should be guided towards areas of lowest risk within the site and development should be designed in strict accordance with the Development Control recommendations set out in Section 7 of the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) Level 1 Report. 5. Basements, and any development not classified as water compatible, are not considered appropriate in Flood Zone 3b, and there are restrictions on their use and design within Flood Zones 2 and 3a with the Development Control recommendations set out in Section 7 of the SFRA Level 1 Report. Flood defences 6. Development proposals along the Thames and tidal River Roding will be expected to: a) maintain, repair, enhance or replace flood defence walls, banks and flood control structures to provide adequate protection for the lifetime of the development b) protect land adjacent to, and set buildings back from, flood defences to allow future replacement of defences and provision of public amenity and biodiversity, having regard to the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan c) seek opportunities to raise existing tidal flood defences having regard to the required levels in the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan (or updated equivalent) in preparation for future climate change impacts, or demonstrate how defences can be raised to the required levels in the future through submission of plans and cross-sections of the proposed raising d) demonstrate the provision of improved access to existing defences, or where opportunities exist to realign or set back defences e) provide landscape, amenity and habitat improvements, where appropriate, in line with the river side strategy approach f) safeguard land for future defence raising g) secure financial contributions from partners in order to enable flood defence works. 7. Where appropriate the Council will require proposals to include a condition survey of existing flood defences and watercourse infrastructure to demonstrate that it will adequately function for the lifetime of the development, and if necessary, make provision for repairs or improvements or replacement. |
| Policy DMSI 7 | Water management Surface water management 1. As a minimum all development must: a) utilise permeable surfaces (including on areas of public realm and on small surfaces such as front gardens and driveways) unless they can be shown to be unavoidable b) have regard to advice from the Council as the Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) as to their preference and guidance on Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS). 2. Development proposals should aim to achieve greenfield run-off rates and ensure that surface water run-off is managed as close to its source as possible in line with Policy SI 13 of the London Plan 2021 and the drainage hierarchy. All major development must incorporate SuDS into proposals, where appropriate, having regard to the government's latest Non-Statutory Technical Standards for Sustainable Drainage Systems and the Council's latest Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). 3. Minor developments are also expected to incorporate SuDS, where feasible. SuDS should provide multiple benefits and integrate with the Council's green infrastructure network. 4. Proposals for SuDS will also need to include a long-term SuDS Management and Maintenance Plan, including details of who is responsible for maintenance. Water infrastructure 5. All new development is required to minimise the use of mains water, water supplies and resources in residential and non-residential development in line with Policy SI 5 of the London Plan 2021: Water Infrastructure and the Optional Requirement of the Building Regulations (residential development). The use of rainwater and grey water to minimise the use of mains water will be encouraged. 6. The Council will support development proposals where they: a) consider the net increase in mains water and wastewater demand to serve their developments and engage with Thames Water through the free pre-planning service at an early stage to confirm that there is adequate capacity to serve the development. The outputs of the communication can be included as evidence to support a planning application. |
| Policy DMSI 8 | Demolition, construction and operational waste Demolition and construction waste 1. Prior to demolition and construction, major development proposals will be expected to: a) develop an appropriate construction waste management plan in order to reduce, reuse, recycle and recover waste and to mitigate environmental impact in accordance with Policy DMSI 1, and Policy SI 7 of the London Plan 2021 b) where appropriate, consider the use of the river for freight, including for the transportation of waste, from a development site either directly to and from the site or through the supply chain in line with Policy DMNE 4: Water Environment. Operational waste 2. All new and refurbishment development proposals must submit a strategy for the minimisation and collection of waste and recycling and include sufficient and accessible space in their design and layout for waste storage and collection within developments, in accordance with the London Waste Recycling Board's (LWARB) latest guidance on recycling and storage. As a minimum, appropriate facilities must be provided, both within individual units and for the building as a whole, in order to separate and store dry recyclables (card, paper, mixed plastics, metals, glass), organic and residual waste. |
| Policy SP6 | Green and blue infrastructure 1. The Council will protect and enhance the quality of the natural environment (including the borough's parks, public open spaces and playing fields) and will work with a range of stakeholders to maximise the creation of new and improved green and blue infrastructure and address deficiencies in quantity, quality and access. This will be achieved through: a) protecting and enhancing the borough's Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) to maintain its function, quality and openness. Any release of Green Belt land will only occur in exceptional circumstances and come forward as part of the Local Plan process, as is the case with the release of a small amount of Green Belt land to allow for future delivery of the proposed Gypsy and Traveller site extension at Eastbrookend Country Park. b) the delivery of a maximum of 12 pitches by expanding the existing public site at Eastbrookend Country Park will require the release of Green Belt land, and therefore compensatory improvements to the surrounding Green Belt land will need to be provided for this site in line with the NPPF, and could include the delivery of improvements to the existing green infrastructure, additional woodland planting, wider biodiversity improvements and new and enhanced walking and cycling routes. c) ensuring development protects and enhances significant ecological features, achieves biodiversity net gain, and maximises opportunities for urban greening through appropriate landscaping schemes, green roofs and the planting of street trees d) working with local partners, the Environment Agency, Natural England and other key stakeholders including the Wildlife Sites Board officers to resurvey and review SINCs, ecological corridors and areas of biodiversity (as shown on the Policies Map) every 5 to 10 years. This will ensure development contributes as appropriate to the borough's overall biodiversity and environmental quality e) improving the quality, character, value and accessibility of existing publicly accessible open space across the borough, in line with the Council's Parks and Open Spaces Strategy, Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Strategy and has regard to Sport England's Active Design Guidance (or updated equivalent) f) maximising the opportunity to deliver an improved network of green grid links to enhance access through walking, cycling and public transport to key destination points such as town centres, community facilities and publicly accessible open spaces, and along rivers and waterways g) protecting, improving and enhancing blue spaces, to create a coherent blue network, improving walking and cycling accessibility to the water environment and improving the relationship with the river (including public realm, habitats and waste heat energy sources). Where possible, opportunities should be sought to 'naturalise' riverbanks and water features by removing hard engineered walls and introducing new habitats and sustainable flood management h) protecting and enhancing the existing residential moorings located on the River Roding and explore opportunities for part of the River Roding in the borough, north of the existing safeguarded wharves as a potential residential mooring opportunity zone in line with local and regional planning policies i) maximising opportunities to create and increase publicly accessible open space (including playing fields and ancillary sporting facilities) with a range of sizes and for a range of users, particularly in locations which experience the highest level of open space deficiency within the borough (as shown on the Policies Map) j) protecting and enhancing the borough's habitat and wildlife, including linking green spaces with coherent ecological corridors, protecting species and habitats identified in the London Biodiversity Action Plan or updated equivalent, and creating new nesting and roosting sites k) supporting community food growing through protection of existing allotments, provision of space for urban agriculture in new developments and as a meanwhile use, and building partnerships with social enterprise and voluntary organisations that have already started working in the borough; and supporting communities that aspire to designate important local open spaces as local green spaces l) working with strategic partners, developers and the community to position the natural environment at the heart of estate regeneration and development, having regard to any relevant Council park master plans. |
Heritage
| Policy DMD 4 | Heritage assets and archaeological remains 1. The borough's designated heritage assets, conservation areas and Archaeological Priority Area (APA) are identified on the Policies Map. 2. Other heritage assets and the wider historic environment will be identified, celebrated and promoted where relevant through the Council's heritage strategy (or its updated equivalent). 3. The Council will seek to ensure that new development sustains and enhances the significance of the borough's historic environment, taking into account the wider social, cultural, economic and environmental benefits that the historic environment can bring. Developments should make a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness while recognising the role of the historic environment to the character of the place. 4. Development proposals affecting designated and non-designated heritage assets of local significance should, where appropriate: a) describe the significance of any heritage assets affected and set out how the application accords with the latest relevant national guidance and London Plan policies b) demonstrate that the proposed development is appropriate in terms of height, scale and massing, form, materiality and detailing and its relationship to the surrounding context c) preserve the setting of the asset/s and its historic significance, and include hard and soft landscape proposals, where appropriate, that respect the character and appearance of the heritage asset d) demonstrate that the proposed use is the optimum viable use, which mitigates any harm to the significance of the asset and its setting, unless clear and convincing justification is provided, and secures its long-term viability e) seek to remove heritage assets from the Heritage at Risk Register in collaboration with Historic England and other relevant stakeholders. 5. Development proposals that affect the significance of any heritage assets must be accompanied by a Built Heritage Statement. |
Housing
| Beam Park Transformation Area 15 | Beam Park Transformation Area 15. The Council will continue to support the comprehensive redevelopment of Beam Park by working collaboratively with the Greater London Authority, London Borough of Havering and other stakeholders to support development that contributes to the delivery of a thriving, mixed-use residential neighbourhood supported by health, education and other community infrastructure in line with the Council's latest Infrastructure Delivery Plan. The Council will support development that delivers: a) new affordable family homes with low rise housing terraces b) two new primary schools and a new medical centre c) a station square to provide a new retail and commercial focus to the area, integrated with the planned new transport interchange – Beam Park Station d) new park and community meeting spaces in an open space and parkland setting to form a natural meeting place for the neighbourhood e) new hierarchy of routes for safe connections within and between neighbourhoods f) a landscape identity that creates clear wayfinding links to and from the park; visible verdant environments that can double for amenity and ecological value g) a green corridor providing a pedestrian connection to the station and enhancements to the pedestrian and cycle network across the area h) a strengthened relationship with adjacent land/areas, including Dagenham Dock and Castle Green Transformation Areas and Merrielands Crescent i) flood mitigation and adaptation measures to comply with Policies DME4 and DMSI 6. |
| Chadwell Heath Transformation Area 9 | Chadwell Heath Transformation Area 9. Development proposals should be consistent with the following principles: a) comprehensive delivery of a new liveable mixed-use neighbourhood is planned – optimising the development potential arising from the Elizabeth Line – to deliver new homes and jobs that are integrated with existing neighbourhoods b) intensification and modernisation of industrial activities and integration of these with, potentially, new media, film and gaming uses as part of a mixed-use neighbourhood including residential. Innovative new typologies that enable the co-location of industrial and residential uses will be encouraged and supported in the appropriate locations c) new homes supported by expanded social infrastructure, including two primary schools and one secondary school d) development that is seamlessly woven into the surrounding context with an appropriate massing strategy that responds to the existing context and urban grain through: i. focusing larger-scale development, including buildings significantly taller than prevailing heights scaling upwards to the heart of the area ii. focusing smaller, lower-scale buildings on the perimeter to respond to the existing terraced housing. e) establishing a 'sense of place' and local identity through the creation of distinctive character areas across the neighbourhood, each defined by location, density, form and materiality f) improvements to Freshwater Road and Selina's Lane for vehicular access and public transport g) improvements to the pedestrian environment and connections throughout the area, including markers for intuitive wayfinding and links into the existing surrounding neighbourhoods h) improvements to the green infrastructure network, including a green spine through the area connected to a variety of public realm spaces including parks and squares which are pedestrian and cycle friendly and integrated with existing street and movement patterns i) enhancement and refurbishment of buildings with local heritage value. |
| DMH 1 | Affordable housing 1. All development with the capacity to provide 10 or more self-contained units, or which have a gross internal residenti |
| Ford Stamping Plant 16 | Ford Stamping Plant 16. The Council will support development in this location which: a) provides a comprehensive residential-led mixed-use development including flexible community and commercial floor space b) provides new supportive social infrastructure including a 10-form intake secondary school, cultural facilities and open space c) creates a coherent townscape which responds positively to its existing and emerging context, including amenity space and improved public realm d) assists the integration of improved public transport links including new accessible bus stops and improved accessibility to Dagenham Dock station e) creates an improved walking environment to allow access to employment sites, retail hubs and the proposed secondary school. |
| Merrielands 17 | Merrielands 17. The Council will support development in this location which: a) strengthens the relationship with adjacent land/areas including Merrielands Crescent One and the Transformation Areas at Beam Park and Dagenham Dock (as shown on the Policies Map) b) provides flood mitigation and adaptation measures in line with Policies DMNE4 and DMSI6 c) promotes sustainable modes of transport and incorporates car free and car lite principles. |
| Policy DMH 1 | Affordable housing 1. All development with the capacity to provide 10 or more self-contained units, or which have a gross internal residential floor space of more than 1,000 sqm, will be required to provide affordable housing (measured in habitable rooms) in accordance with Part 2 a) of Policy SP3: delivering homes that meet people's needs as follows: a) applying the threshold approach to viability in accordance with the London Plan 2021 Policy H5: threshold approach to applications, and/or guidance b) providing early and advanced stage review mechanisms in line with Mayoral guidance to applications taking the Viability Tested Route (VTR) and those schemes where an agreed level of progress has not been reached in a specified time for Fast Track Route (FTR) applications, to maximise the delivery of affordable housing where development viability improves c) maximising the delivery of affordable housing on-site and where appropriate, ensuring that all new dwellings contribute to the delivery of a range of housing tenures in accordance with the tenure split as shown in Figure 13 (or in any subsequent updates on affordable housing products) d) as set out in Figure 14, affordable housing should be genuinely affordable for the people they are intended for. Applicants will be required to include homes that are affordable to households on a range of incomes, including the local average income levels in the borough. Applicants will also be required to demonstrate, through their Affordable Housing Statement, how the affordability of the proposed tenure mix compares to average income levels in the borough. 2. Off-site affordable housing or payments in-lieu will only be acceptable in exceptional circumstances where: a) it can be robustly demonstrated that affordable housing cannot be delivered on-site and other sites may be more appropriate to provide affordable housing than the site of the proposed development to better deliver mixed and inclusive communities. If a suitable site cannot be found, a cash in lieu contribution towards the off-site provision of affordable housing may be accepted. The target for schemes delivering off-site affordable housing or in lieu contributions is 50% provided across the main site and any linked sites when considered as a whole. The applicant will need to clearly demonstrate that: i. it is not practical to deliver affordable housing on-site and off-site options have been explored but are not acceptable, ii. it must result in additional affordable homes and all sites are expected to deliver at least the threshold level of affordable housing and any cash in lieu or off-site contribution should deliver units in addition to this, iii. agreements for off-site provision or in lieu contributions should provide no financial benefit to the applicant relative to on-site provision and should include review mechanisms in line with the Viability Tested Route, iv. it will not result in an over-concentration of a particular size of unit in any one local area, and v. it can provide a greater yield of family sized affordable rent product subject to individual site characteristics, viability and location. 3. As per point 1 above, Affordable Housing will not generally be sought on housing schemes of under 10 units. Exceptions to this are: • where additional homes are proposed through amended planning applications within four years of the commencement of the original planning permission, affordable housing requirements will apply to the total number of net new homes), and • where development sites are split, or separate proposals are brought forward on neighbouring or nearby sites which are physically or functionally linked, affordable housing requirements will be assessed on the total number of net residential units proposed across all related sites. |
| Policy DMH 2 | Housing mix 1. Development proposals will be required to provide a range of unit sizes (including family housing) having regard to the Council's preferred housing size mix table below, or in any future subsequent affordable housing needs evidence, and Policy H10 of the London Plan. 2. The Council will only consider a different housing mix, where a developer demonstrates: a) that the proposal meets the tenure split requirements outlined in Policy DMH 1: affordable housing, and b) the applicant provides up-to-date evidence of housing needs by taking account of the Council's latest local evidence identified by the LBBD Strategic Housing Market Assessment along with the local Housing Register. |
| Policy DMH 3 | Specialist older persons housing 1. Existing specialist older persons housing will be protected. Loss of existing supported and specialist housing will be resisted unless re-provided elsewhere in the borough with at least the equivalent number of bed spaces, and would result in improved standards and quality of accommodation, or where it can be demonstrated that there is no local need for its retention in current or refurbished format. 2. Development proposals for specialist older person housing should: a) meet the relevant London Plan 2021 (Policy H13) indicative benchmark of 70 new homes a year and criteria for new accessible or adapted housing (Policy D7 and H14), or its updated equivalent b) deliver affordable housing in accordance with Policy DMH 1: affordable housing c) meet an identified need within the borough based on an up-to-date evidence base, through providing a diverse range of tenures to meet varying needs, including opportunities to rent and buy, as well as schemes with varying levels of support and care (e.g. specialist support for mental health needs in Extra Care provision) d) be co-designed with service users and their families and other key stakeholders to satisfy user requirements e) be supported by a legal agreement for occupation by a relevant operator where appropriate. |
| Policy DMH 4 | Large-scale Purpose-built shared housing 1. The Council will support new large-scale purpose-built shared housing schemes where they: a) meet the London Plan 2021 Policy H16: large-scale purpose-built shared living and London Plan guidance for this form of accommodation, and London Plan 2021 Policy D6: space standards requirements alongside any GLA guidance on this matter b) meet an identified need within the borough based on up-to-date evidence base by taking account of the Council's latest local evidence identified by the LBBD Strategic Housing Market Assessment, and along with the local Housing Register c) are located within transformation areas as identified in SPDG 1 and shown on the Policies Map d) do not undermine the supply of self-contained housing |
| Policy DMH 5 | Houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) 1. New houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) will only be supported where they: a) meet an identified need b) do not result in the loss of housing capable of accommodating families with children c) do not result in the loss of character or amenity to the area as a consequence of increased traffic, noise or general disturbance d) are located in an area of high transport accessibility e) comply with relevant standards, including those set out in the East London HMO Guidance and satisfy the housing space standards outlined in the London Plan 2021 Policy D6: housing quality and standards, and/or its relevant guidance. 2. Proposals for conversions or loss of dwelling houses capable of accommodating a family with children will be resisted. |
| Policy DMH 6 | Gypsy and Traveller accommodation 1. The Council will endeavour to meet the identified current and future accommodation needs of Gypsies and Travellers and Travelling Showpeople in Barking and Dagenham by: a) retaining and protecting the existing Gypsy and Traveller sites at Eastbrookend Country Park b) delivering a maximum of 12 pitches by expanding the existing public site at Eastbrookend Country Park within the first five years of the Plan period. This will require the release of Green Belt land, and therefore compensatory improvements to the surrounding Green Belt land will need to be provided for this site in line with the NPPF, and could include the delivery of improvements to the existing green infrastructure, additional woodland planting, wider biodiversity improvements, and new and enhanced walking and cycling routes. c) delivering a Gypsy and Traveller site in the wider Castle Green area. A more specific location within the site should come forward as part of a wider master plan process for the area. 2. The Council acknowledges it is currently unable to meet the site accommodation needs of the borough's Gypsy and Traveller community, and it encourages unallocated Gypsy and Traveller sites to come forward to help address this need. Development of a site to provide additional short-stay (including temporary sites which could help meet the unmet need in the short-term)/or permanent Gypsy and Traveller accommodation to meet the long-term needs of these communities will be supported where: a) the site is able to accommodate the number of pitches identified in an up to date and robust needs assessment b) the site is accessible to public transport, safe, convenient walking and cycling environment, essential services and facilities (e.g. water, power, sewerage and waste disposal) |
| SP3 | Delivering homes that meet peoples' needs 1. In line with Policy SPDG 1, the Council's housing requirement is 38,864 new homes between 2020 and 2037. The housing requirement for each year of the Plan period is: 2020/21-2028/29: 2,121 2029/30-2033/34: 2,876 2034/35-2036/37: 2,085 2. This housing requirement will be met through: a) focusing the majority of new housing in the identified Transformation Areas and site allocations, as set out in the Place policies (see Chapter 3: Transforming Barking and Dagenham) b) building council homes by developing residential-led schemes on council-owned land, and ensuring that these council-led schemes can also deliver the highest design standards in accordance with the Council's design guidelines c) supporting planning applications for self-build and custom-build, as well as purpose built shared housing through innovative approaches, subject to proposals adhering to other relevant Local Plan policies d) continuing to actively promote development of Build to Rent in accordance with London Plan 2021 Policy H11: Build to Rent e) continuing to monitor housing delivery effectively to resolve any anticipated shortfalls with the Mayor of London, and publish an annual update on housing trajectories. 3. In order to address the borough's specific housing needs, the Council will: a) seek a 50% strategic target for affordable housing on all housing schemes (in line with Policy H4 in the London Plan 2021) b) prioritise self-contained family housing, followed by PRS, and then other forms of housing, to ensure that new residential development does not limit the supply of self-contained housing, in particular family housing c) require development which impacts on delivery of the most needed forms of housing (as set out by priority in criterion b above) to thoroughly demonstrate a need for this type of housing and align with other Local Plan policies d) require provision of wheelchair accessible accommodation across all tenures in conformity with the requirements of Policy D7 of the London Plan 2021 e) support planning applications that are in line with other policies in this Local Plan and meet the needs of specific communities, including older people, disabled and vulnerable people, the LGBTQ+ community, students, families and private rented sector s (PRS) f) support planning applications that help to meet the accommodation needs of the Gypsy and Traveller community, in line with the accommodation needs assessment and criteria set out in DMH 6 g) encourage community groups and local organisations to take on leading roles in the delivery of new homes through the Council's programme of housing innovation, taking the opportunity to test and trial innovations around sustainability and construction h) work proactively with developers to ensure that proposals demonstrate how they will benefit people who live and work in Barking and Dagenham. This could be, for example, through providing homes for local people and services and infrastructure that benefit the local community i) seek to deliver the London Plan 2021 target of 70 homes a year for specialist older persons housing by collaborating with providers to identify suitable sites, in conformity with Policy H13 of the London Plan 2021 j) seek to meet the borough's small sites target through the identification of small infill sites, vacant garage sites and Council-owned land, including the exploration of areawide housing design. |
| SPP1 | Barking and the River Roding In this area there is indicative capacity for 15,609 new homes in the Plan period. Buildings that are up to 95 metres in height could be appropriate in the Tall Building Location, as shown on the Policies Map. Outside of the Tall Building Location, buildings in this area taller than 18m are not generally appropriate. This policy allocates the following sites as identified on the Policies Map (with further details and requirements for individual sites available in the site proformas in Appendix 2 and in the Housing Trajectory in Appendix 4): [Housing and Housing-Led Mixed Use Allocations and Economic Sites as listed in the table] To deliver our vision, development proposals should be consistent with the principles listed below: a) Planning for a comprehensive mixed-use development of retail, cultural and community uses alongside office and residential development. This will be supported by a broad range of social infrastructure, including schools, childcare facilities, heath services, places of worship, libraries, youth facilities, sport and leisure facilities, all of which contribute to the quality of life and well-being of the population. b) Renewal of Barking Station by working with the rail industry to upgrade access and capacity in line with Network Rail's increased passenger projections. c) Any proposed buildings taller than prevailing heights must recognise the historic quality of the existing environment and local character and respond appropriately to realise the potential to increase its capacity and provide a fitting gateway to the town centre and the borough as a whole. d) Conserving and enhancing heritage and cultural assets, having regard to the Council's latest guidance on Barking Town Centre and Abbey Conservation Area. Development proposals must conserve or enhance the significance, including any contribution to that significance by its setting, of Barking Abbey, a scheduled monument. e) Working with existing operators to retain and develop Barking's street markets role as a commercial and community offer area in their current location. f) Continued improvements to the public realm between key buildings, the introduction of urban greening and the creation of a lively street culture and safe environment in East Street, reinforcing the role of this area as an important social asset for the borough. g) Continued improvements to the public realm around Barking Station, addressing anti-social behaviour, including trials to make the Station Parade area safer with pedestrian, taxi and bus only. Improving public transport and cycle access to the town centre, and promoting car-free developments near the station. h) Reducing the perceived separation between the High Street, Abbey Green and the River Roding, repositioning Town Quay and Abbey Green as a focal point of the Town Centre and strengthening pedestrian and cycle routes and way-finding in the entire area, opening up access to and attracting visitors to the River Roding. i) Promoting further measures to improve access across the Town Centre, in line with the Barking Town Centre Movement Strategy. |
| SPP4 | Chadwell Heath and Marks Gate 1. Chadwell Heath is one of the biggest remaining regeneration opportunities at a Crossrail station. Within the Chadwell Heath and Marks Gate Policy Area as identified on the Policies Map, the industrial estate will be comprehensively redeveloped to create new homes as well as improved and intensified industrial space. This will see new homes stitched into the existing residential neighbourhoods, adding new services and social infrastructure, improvements to local transport and the renewal of the whole public realm. 2. North of Chadwell Heath, Marks Gate will be sensitively improved to deliver more and better homes with further work to review the existing flatted parts of the estate and improvements to wider infrastructure necessary for any further expansion, including the impact of the development of the neighbouring de-designated Green Belt land in Redbridge. The Council will work in partnership with the London Borough of Redbridge to ensure proposals complement housing development to the west of Marks Gate in terms of sustainable transport connections and community infrastructure. |
| SPP4 7 | Building Heights and Housing Capacity - Chadwell Heath and Marks Gate 7. In this area, there is indicative capacity for 4,750 new homes in the Plan period. Within the Tall Building Location identified on the Policies Map, heights up to 50 metres may be appropriate. Outside of the Tall Building Location, development taller than 18 metres would not generally be appropriate due to the low density and sensitivity of the area. The redevelopment of the area is also a good opportunity to work collaboratively with the London Borough of Redbridge to discuss the opportunity for a potential public realm strategy. |
| SPP7 | Becontree Heath and Rush Green Becontree Heath is home to Coventry University London and provides a thriving community and commercial hub. Within the Becontree Heath and Rush Green Policy Area (as identified on the Policies Map), this will be strengthened with spot redevelopment interventions delivered as part of a programme to identify opportunities to deliver more and better homes. Becontree Heath is also home to the borough's only Gypsy and Traveller site. A small amount of Green Belt land is being released to allow for future delivery of a proposed extension to the current site to help meet the needs of our Gypsy and Traveller community (see also Policies DMH 6, SP 6 and DMNE 1). This Plan makes provisions for the extension of the existing Gypsy and Traveller site (see 'Eastbrookend Country Park' proforma in Appendix 2). A total of 33 Gypsy and Traveller pitches are needed over the Plan period (as set out in DMH 6), with the extension at the Eastbrookend Country Park allocation catering to 12 of these pitches. There are no Tall Building Locations in this area due to the low density of the area. This means buildings taller than 18 metres would not generally be appropriate. The Council will support environmental and connectivity improvements across the area and build on the successful integration of Coventry University's new campus by expanding education and other social infrastructure. The Council will also support development that contributes to: a) development of new homes (including infill) that are well-integrated with the existing area b) improvements to pedestrian routes through the area including strengthening east-west walking and cycle links c) a continuous walking or cycling route, running through the green belt edge and waterways that follow the eastern edge through to Hainaut Country Park d) restoration and improvements that preserve or reinstate original features in existing 1930's suburban homes that are characteristic of the northern part of Rush Green e) active ground floors in development that comes forward on Dagenham Road and public realm improvements throughout the area, in particular Rainham Road and the area of Dagenham Civic Centre and other key points of interest in this area f) improvements to the Green Infrastructure Network, including a new Green Infrastructure grid route at Wood Lane and Rainham Road North and improved linkages to Thames Chase Community Forest g) compensatory improvements to the remaining Green Belt Land in-line with Policy DMH 6. Infrastructure that is required to support sustainable development, identified in the Infrastructure Delivery Plan will be supported, including: a) transport and connectivity improvements, for example, Wood Lane roundabout b) improvements to bus services and connections to ensure good public transport access c) digital infrastructure improvements d) fire and rescue service e) early years facilities, primary and secondary schools f) parks and open space g) community centres and faith spaces h) children's play and youth facilities. |
Infrastructure
| DMM 1 | Planning obligations (Section 106) 1. The Council will use planning obligations to address a development's impacts and to ensure it aligns with the Development Plan for the borough, in line with the requirements set out in the rest of this Local Plan, having regard to the Planning Obligations SPD and any other relevant SPDs. The list below shows what types of Planning Obligations are likely to be covered, but is not exhaustive: a) affordable housing on-site or, if acceptable, an off-site financial contribution in place of this b) carbon offset payment, where policy requirements are not met on-site c) air quality measures off-site or a financial contribution if development does not meet the 'air quality neutral' benchmark d) measures or payment to increase biodiversity where net gain is not feasible on-site e) contributions to new green infrastructure and ecological resilience f) highways works or payments towards addressing any impacts as a result of the development g) other transport (including public transport, walking and cycling infrastructure) requirements arising from transport assessments, travel plans and growth projections. This will also include use of the waterways h) construction-phase employment and procurement targets i) occupation-stage employment and procurement targets j) delivery of on-site social or physical infrastructure or payments necessary to mitigate the specific impacts of the development k) affordable workspace, where required, or a payment in lieu l) fees associated with the monitoring of any planning obligation secured which are separate and additional to any legal fees required to be paid to the Council for the preparation of the legal agreement or undertaking. 2. Other planning obligations may also be sought, where necessary, to mitigate the specific impacts of the development and where these cannot be secured by planning condition(s). Requirements for planning obligations will be assessed on a case-by-case basis and used where they meet the legal tests set out in Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations. |
| Policy DMS 2 | Planning for new facilities 1. Development that is within, or part of, a site allocation is expected to accommodate supporting infrastructure requirements alongside the identified land uses and other development principles, or where appropriate contribute to provision or expansion off site (as part of an agreed strategy). 2. New facilities will be located across the borough, to support growth in each sub-area (see Chapter 3: Transforming Barking and Dagenham). 3. Development proposals for residential and mixed-use development including provision of social, community and cultural facilities will need to submit a community needs strategy to accompany the planning application, demonstrating how the community space needs generated by the development have been met. 4. Development proposals should deliver high-quality design that: a) is accessible and inclusive to all sections of the community b) adheres to the latest national, regional and local design guidelines c) provides opportunities to make space multipurpose and open to different sections of the community. 5. Development proposals for faith facilities in employment and industrial areas will only be permitted if they are in accordance with other policies of the Local Plan, and where conflicts between employment and industrial use and faith use can be avoided (i.e. meeting the other policies of the Local Plan, with regards to increased traffic and parking issues, congregations of people, and noise; and the safety of users or workers will not be compromised). Applicants will be expected to engage in pre application discussions with the Council before making a formal planning application. 6. Development proposals that provide for improved leisure and sports facilities (including any essential ancillary facilities) will be acceptable subject to other Local Plan policies and discussions with Sport England. |
| Policy DMSI 9: Smart utilities | Smart utilities 1. Development proposals should accord with the London Plan 2021 Policy SI 6: digital connectivity infrastructure, and will be supported where they directly provide, and demonstrate in their design the flexibility and adaptability to: a) incorporate smart technologies and approaches that enable resources, space, systems and materials to be monitored and managed efficiently, as well as support the balancing of the grid b) adopt protocols and systems that are compatible with others used in the borough and London, such as the local planning authorities, statutory undertakers, independent distribution network operators, social infrastructure providers and other organisations that are responsible for managing the public realm and supply vital services to the area, in order to allow for the safe sharing of information and efficient service provision c) ensure access to wired and wireless broadband technologies delivering the highest speeds to provide a wide range of services d) work proactively with the Council to plan, deliver and manage development that supports economic growth and responds to community needs e) engage with telecommunications operators to communicate infrastructure needs and to provide joined-up and efficient services that respond to customer needs. 2. Development should prioritise connecting to strategic area-wide telecommunications networks when and where they are available. 3. Telecommunications development should be sited and designed to minimise the impact on the surrounding area. The adverse impacts of telecommunications development should be balanced with the benefits of infrastructure to economic growth and community need, and the Council will support high-quality telecommunications developments where: a) the siting is not unacceptably intrusive in the street scene b) the design is of a scale, height and appearance which does not disrupt the character of an area c) the equipment has been designed to keep the size of the installation to the technical minimum and sited, so far as practicable, to minimise the impact on the environment d) screening of equipment housing and other visually intrusive development associated with the proposal is provided e) applicants have considered the need to include additional structural capacity to take account of the growing demands for network development, including that of other operators f) the applicant has certified that the development will operate within the latest (ICNIRP) guidelines for public exposure. |
| Policy SPP2 | Thames Riverside Barking Riverside Transformation Area: a) A comprehensive and co-ordinated residential-led redevelopment of Barking Riverside, by working collaboratively with Barking Riverside Limited and Transport for London to provide significant transport infrastructure including: i. the extension of London Overground services; ii. the extension of Thames Clipper services; iii. significant investment in bus services; iv. on-site walking and cycling infrastructure; and v. potential river crossing with the London Borough of Bexley b) Intensifying residential, commercial and leisure development in the new District Centre. c) On-site social infrastructure projects that create capacity for additional new homes and accelerate delivery, enabling new primary school provision. d) Sustainable places that create a new local identity and distinctive character within the area, each defined by location, density, form and materiality. Provide a sensitive design response to the riverside and focus on higher density development and taller building forms within the new District Centre and elsewhere where appropriate. e) Strengthening the relationship with the adjacent Transformation Areas to ensure a comprehensive and joined-up delivery approach, particularly for infrastructure schemes such as school provision. f) A central boulevard to create a central spine through the area with a dedicated bus-only route. g) High-quality, new open space across the entire site, divided between public parks and a more natural landscape. h) East-west green links connecting existing green infrastructure assets and: i. linking Barking Riverside to River Road; ii. removing physical and perceptual barriers between Barking Riverside and Thames View Estate; and, iii. prioritising access to the Riverside by opening up 2km of riverfront to walkways and cycle ways. i) High-quality design that reflects the 10 'Healthy New Town Principles' in development. |
| SP9 | Managing development 1. The Council encourages development proposals to come forward as early as possible to support the regeneration of the borough and which secure: a) coordinated and comprehensive development b) delivery of key infrastructure to ensure development is sustainable and encourages active travel and public transport usage. 2. Proposals which do not provide comprehensive and coordinated development should not undermine the wider delivery objectives and should have regard to any relevant SPD. In the absence of a relevant area SPD, all major developments (and minor developments where relevant and requested by planning officers) should include an indicative master plan to show how development would not prejudice adjacent sites. This should be set out within the design and access statement. 3. The Council will work with private sector and public sector partners including Homes England, registered providers and, on cross boundary issues, neighbouring authorities, to front-load infrastructure investment and delivery and unlock development especially in the Transformation Areas identified in Chapter 3 of this Local Plan: 'Transforming Barking and Dagenham'. 4. The Council's Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP), which will be periodically reviewed, identifies the infrastructure necessary to support development and to connect it to its surroundings and integrate new and existing communities. 5. The Council and developers will be expected to proactively engage with residents and local businesses, using communications that best suit the communities, to ensure continued opportunity for local communities to inform and shape development in their area. 6. The Council will use planning tools, including preparation of master plans and design codes, to support the delivery of the Local Plan and secure delivery of key community priorities, highlighted in the Barking Town Centre Transport Strategy and the borough-wide Transport Strategy. 7. The Council may also use compulsory purchase powers to facilitate land assembly and the acquisition of all necessary rights to carry out development to enable delivery, including key infrastructure, as set out in this Local Plan and detailed in the latest IDP. 8. The Council will monitor the implementation of this Local Plan to assess whether growth targets and development outcomes are aligned and promote sustainability. A framework identifying the key indicators that will be monitored is included in Appendix 3. 9. The Council is committed to undertaking a full or partial update of the Local Plan every 5 years, in line with national policy. However, we will continue to track our progress through the Annual Monitoring Report (which will assess our progress against the Key Performance Indicators set out in Appendix 3). Where this suggests our policies are not being successfully implemented, we will consider whether an early review is necessary or whether other strategies (including the production of additional supplementary planning documents and guidance, and greater collaboration with developers and other key stakeholders), may be more appropriate to addressing the relevant area of concern, with recommendations to Cabinet where appropriate. |
| Strategic Policy SP4 | Delivering social and cultural infrastructure facilities in the right locations 1. The Council will seek to ensure that a range of new high-quality social and cultural infrastructure facilities for existing and new residents, visitors and workers are provided in appropriate locations throughout the borough, and that existing social facilities are safeguarded, by: a) protecting existing social and cultural infrastructure facilities in accordance with Policy DMS1 Protecting and Enhancing Existing Facilities b) securing the delivery of, or contributions towards, enhanced or new social and cultural infrastructure facilities to meet the needs arising from development, including affordable or no cost spaces, and including projects that: i. promote the growth and expansion of educational facilities (early years, mainstream and special needs) to meet an identified need and demand. Any development on a playing field should have regard to the requirements of Sport England's Playing Field Policy, and ii. improve sustainable connectivity through walking, cycling and public transport, and iii. work in partnership with health authorities and other key stakeholders to improve healthcare access and support people's overall health and well-being, and iv. utilise innovative approaches to the delivery and operation of social infrastructure; for example creating multi-functional spaces, or v. make provisions for playspace and open space. c) working with service providers and other stakeholders to identify funding sources for the long-term management and maintenance of both new and existing social and cultural infrastructure d) supporting proposals for new and enhanced social and cultural infrastructure facilities where they: i. meet an identified need in line with the Council's latest Infrastructure Delivery Plan, taking account of the needs of the future local community, and ii. contribute to the capacity, quality, usability, sustainability and accessibility of existing and enhanced facilities and services, particularly where development will increase demand, and iii. are delivered in advance to support new development, where possible. |
Other
| Policy SPP3 | Dagenham Dock and Freeport Within the Dagenham Dock and Freeport Policy Area as identified on the Policies Map, there is indicative capacity for 7,240 new homes and approximately 776,852 sq.m additional industrial floor space in the Plan period. Buildings up to 50 metres in height could be appropriate in this area. This policy allocates the following sites as identified on the Policies Map (with further details and requirements for individual sites available in the site proformas in Appendix 2 and in the Housing Trajectory in Appendix 4): Housing and Housing-Led Allocation: AC - Merrielands Crescent Two - 324 AE - Beam Park (South Dagenham East) - 3,119 WA - Former Dagenham Job Centre Chequers Lane - 90 XJ - Former Ford Stamping Plant - 3,000 ZZ - GSR and Gill Sites, Land on the West side of Chequers Lane, Dagenham - 707 Economic Allocation: E014 - Barking Reach Power Station - 237,946 sq.m 'Sui Generis' E015 - Plot 62 SEGRO Park - Contributing to Dagenham Dock SIL 647,636 sq.m E016 - Plot 63 SEGRO Park - Contributing to Dagenham Dock SIL 647,636 sq.m E017 - Plot 64 SEGRO Park - Contributing to Dagenham Dock SIL 647,636 sq.m E018 - Plot 65 SEGRO Park - Contributing to Dagenham Dock SIL 647,636 sq.m E019 - Plot 67 SEGRO Park - Contributing to Dagenham Dock SIL 647,636 sq.m E020 - Plot 70 SEGRO Park - Contributing to Dagenham Dock SIL 647,636 sq.m E052 - Dagenham Dock - 647,636 sqm (floorspace) School Allocation: ED1 - Polar Ford Special Education Needs School - N/A f) enhance the development of existing rail, maritime and river transport infrastructure to be utilised within the wider area and the Thames Estuary as a whole g) deliver a new secondary school to the north of the area, at the Ford Stamping Plant site; and a new primary school at the GSR & Gill site h) strengthening links to Dagenham Dock Sta |
| Policy SPP4 | Chadwell Heath and Marks Gate Not applicable - passage contains reference to SPP4 and associated text but SPP4's formal operative wording is not included in the passage provided. |
| Policy SPP5 | Dagenham East 1. Within the Dagenham East Policy Area as identified on the Policies Map, Dagenham East is now developing a new life as the centre of London's ever-growing film sector. Other businesses are also beginning to wrap the film studio site including University College London's transport research facility (PEARL), a tech business hub and the data industry. We will turn Dagenham East into a centre for modern media and research-based business. 2. We are seeking to reopen the adjoining mainline station to provide faster connections to central London and the Thurrock Freeports. We will develop the area around the station into a gateway to provide new homes and a hotel. In the wider area we will support future intensification of industrial uses and residential areas will be sensitively improved and enhanced, bringing village character to post war suburban development. This will provide more and better homes and a great place for people to live. 3. In Tall Building Locations (as identified on the Polices Map), heights up to 50 metres may be appropriate. This is in line with other Tall Building Locations in the borough located outside of Barking Town Centre. 4. In this area there is indicative capacity for 1,123 new homes and approximately 57,293 sqm additional industrial floor space in the Plan period. Within the Tall Building Location identified on the Policies Map, heights up to 50 metres may be appropriate. Outside of the Tall Building Location, development taller than 18 metres would not generally be appropriate due to the low density and sensitivity of the area. 5. This policy allocates the following sites as identified on the Policies Map (with further details and requirements for individual sites available in the site proformas in Appendix 2 and in the Housing Trajectory in Appendix 4): [Sites table as listed] 6. To deliver our vision, development proposals should be consistent with the principles listed below: a) A residential-led mixed-use development at Ibscott Close Estate and highways land at Rainham Road South/Ballards Road (site allocation XE) which should aim to deliver outstanding design and have regard to its local context, making a positive contribution to the local character and neighbourhood b) A new media, science and technology cluster is planned alongside the expanded development of new homes that are well integrated with existing residential neighbourhoods c) London's newest and largest film studios and surrounding ancillary uses d) Special education needs school provision e) Improvements to the environmental quality and public realm in the district centre f) Improvements to the green infrastructure network including: i. new green infrastructure grid route – Wood Lane and Rainham Road North, ii. Reede Road, Rainham Road and Foxlands Crescent, and iii. linkages to Thames Chase Community Forest c) digital infrastructure enhancements including telecommunications and fast broadband d) healthcare facilities (e.g. new primary care hub) e) early years facilities f) parks and open spaces g) community centres and faith spaces h) children's play and youth facilities. 7. Dagenham Village is the historic heart of Dagenham, and the design will need to respond to this unique and sensitive development context. Development proposals must comply with Local Plan policies and have regard to the Dagenham Village Conservation Area Character Appraisal (or its updated equivalent) to preserve or enhance the borough's historic environment. 8. The Council will support and enable the delivery of infrastructure to support communities in Dagenham East and Village to ensure development is sustainable. The Council will also support development that contributes to: a) flood defences including measures to reduce flood risk at Dagenham East Station and numerous defence structures along the Wantz Stream b) transport and connectivity improvements, including the new C2C station at Dagenham East and Dagenham East Station Accessibility Scheme |
| Policy SPP6 | Dagenham Heathway and Becontree 1. Dagenham Heathway is a popular district centre despite its modest size, serving the wider Becontree area. Our plan is to reinvigorate the Heathway as the heart of the Becontree and Dagenham community, and build on its gateway connection on the District Line. 2. Within the Dagenham Heathway and Becontree Policy Area as identified on the Policies Map, we will pursue the redevelopment of the shopping centre and make it fit for the 21st century, including options to provide new dwellings above the centre. 3. The historic Becontree Estate will see the least development in the borough in order to protect its existing character. We will support light touch interventions to help it thrive into the future. 4. In Tall Building Locations (as identified on the Policies Map), heights up to 50 metres may be appropriate. This is in line with other Tall Building Locations in the borough located outside of Barking Town Centre. 5. A Master plan for Dagenham Heathway is proposed and will provide further details to shape proposals for this part of the Transformation Area including the approach to the design and delivery of the required supporting infrastructure. 6. A Design Code is currently under development for the Becontree Estate. This will help preserve the area as a non-designated heritage asset. 7. In this area there is indicative capacity for 1,990 new homes in the Plan period. Within the Tall Building Locations identified on the Policies Map, buildings up to 50 metres may be appropriate. Outside of these locations, developments over 18 metres would not generally be appropriate due to the low density and sensitivity of this area. 8. This policy allocates the following sites as identified on the Policies Map (with further details and requirements for individual sites available in the site proformas in Appendix 2 and in the Housing Trajectory in Appendix 4): [Sites table as listed] 9. To deliver our vision, development proposals should be consistent with the following principles: a) a comprehensive mixed-use redevelopment of Dagenham Heathway shopping centre to comprise of modern retail accommodation which better services the needs of local residents b) ensure that the redevelopment of the shopping centre provides continuity of trade by encouraging the retention of existing retailers in the new scheme c) improved public realm and permeability of the shopping centre to provide a more accessible and pedestrian friendly environment d) deliver a coordinated approach with the surrounding area, including incorporation of the Lidl store, Iceland store and BT locations e) improvements to transport and connectivity, with new cycle lanes, improved bus priority and improved road junctions including Gale Street and Reede Road f) Dagenham Heathway station access improvements g) deliver outstanding design and have regard to its context, making a positive contribution to local character within its neighbourhood h) minimise car parking in the location in line with Policy DMT 2 to create liveable or low-traffic neighbourhoods, with measures to improve safety, health and air quality. 10. All development (including any extensions) must integrate with the existing character of the area and enable preservation and restoration of the historic fabric of the estate. 11. Development proposals will be expected to demonstrate how they deliver comprehensive and co-ordinated redevelopment and accord with Area Policy SPP6, having regard to any relevant supplementary planning document for the area. Development proposals should include a statement setting out how they align with the strategy for the area. |
| SPDG 1 | Delivering growth in Barking and Dagenham 1. The Council will take a positive approach to development and will work with the local community, landowners, developers and other key stakeholders to proactively deliver the borough's development vision and objectives. 2. Policies from the main body of the Plan should be read in conjunction with the specific policy requirements for each site as set out in the individual proformas in Appendix 2. 3. The Plan establishes a housing requirement of 38,864 over the Plan period (2020/21-2036/37). This is intended to be met (and exceeded) through the sites allocated within the Plan which indicate a supply of over 40,000 new homes. 4. The Council will support the development of a minimum of 38,864 new homes across the Plan period, with ambitions to exceed this where possible, together with some 20,000 new jobs across the borough. This will be largely achieved through: a) concentrating the existing industrial floor space capacity and jobs to the south of the borough as employment land and floor space b) focus on intensifying existing sites south of the A13 and Dagenham Dock (including the Thames Freeport in Dagenham) plus other locations such as Dagenham East and Chadwell Heath c) releasing some industrial sites as set out in SP5, balanced by reprovision and intensification of the borough's industrial floor space capacity elsewhere d) where appropriate, co-location of industrial activities with other uses, including residential and other commercial activities. |
| SPP3 | Dagenham Dock, Thames Freeport, Beam Park, Ford Stamping Plant, Merrielands and GSR and Gill Sites 13. To deliver our vision, development proposals should be consistent with the followng principles: a) enable redevelopment of the area, incorporating sustainable and green industries and building on the location's logistics, food and energy operations b) capitalise on the extensive road, rail and river infrastructure connections, which provide national and international connections, including a rail hub as part of the proposed Freeport c) enable the expansion and intensification of employment floor space enabling wider regeneration opportunities for the Thames Freeport in Dagenham (also see below) d) have full regard to the consented scheme at Barking Riverside and to engage with Barking Riverside Limited in the common interest of securing the benefits and comprehensive regeneration of London Riverside and Strategic Opportunity Area (e.g., through attending the existing Barking Riverside Steering Group) e) align with plans for the successful relocation and co-location of London's three wholesale city markets – Billingsgate, Smithfield and New Spitalfields, enabling development that will support its operation within the borough f) enhance the development of existing rail, maritime and river transport infrastructure to be utilised within the wider area and the Thames Estuary as a whole g) deliver a new secondary school to the north of the area, at the Ford Stamping Plant site; and a new primary school at the GSR & Gill site h) strengthening links to Dagenham Dock Station with a clear hierarchy of movement routes through the site up to New Road. There will be a strong focus on improved visual connections, including new bus cycle walking links incorporating enhanced green infrastructure i) improve connectivity along Chequers Lane and Kent Avenue to improve access along and between the Freeport and the City Markets |
Retail
| AREA POLICY SPP1 | Barking Town Centre a) Planning for a comprehensive mixed-use development of retail, cultural and community uses alongside office and residential development. This will be supported by a broad range of social infrastructure, including schools, childcare facilities, heath services, places of worship, libraries, youth facilities, sport and leisure facilities, all of which contribute to the quality of life and well-being of the population. b) Renewal of Barking Station by working with the rail industry to upgrade access and capacity in line with Network Rail's increased passenger projections. i) Promoting further measures to improve access across the Town Centre, in line with the Barking Town Centre Movement Strategy. |
| Policy 11 | Vicarage Field Shopping Centre a) Work collaboratively with key stakeholders to improve and transform the site as an important gateway opposite Barking Station, enhancing the immediate environment and creating new housing and employment opportunities. b) Deliver co-ordinated and comprehensive redevelopment of the Shopping Centre as a high-quality and high-density mixed-use development, which responds to the existing built form. c) Contribute to the vitality of the centre and reinstate it as a natural part of the pedestrian network with new routes connecting with existing streets and movement patterns. |
| Policy DMD 3 | Development in town centres 1. Proposals for development within town centres (designated boundaries are shown on the Policies Map) should, where relevant and appropriate: a) respect the building lines of the existing urban environment and, where appropriate, build up to the edge of the curtilage b) co-ordinate and consolidate elements of street furniture, such as seating, bins, bollards, cycle stands and lighting, to streamline the appearance of the public realm and avoid visual clutter c) avoid the creation of inactive frontages and contribute positively to the street scene and public realm to coordinate the design of development around town centres consider street widths, crossings locations; integration of bus stands along with other public realm elements (as mentioned in b) above) and focus on reducing vehicle dominance along with promoting a safe walking and cycling environment d) provide clearly defined public and private space, placing servicing away from street frontages, for example at the rear of the building e) provide level access and ensure new development is fully accessible. 2. New or replacement shop fronts are required to be robust and well-designed. Proposals must ensure that: a) they retain or restore traditional shop fronts and existing architectural and heritage features b) active shop fronts are well maintained in order to contribute positively to the building, street-scene and public realm c) a sensitive relationship is maintained between the shop front and the upper floors, with neighbouring shop fronts and surrounding buildings d) the use of materials is appropriate to and enhances the local character and value of existing architectural and historic features e) the use of external mounted shutters or solid roller shutters are avoided. |
| Policy DME 3 | Encouraging vibrant, resilient, and characterful town centres 1. The location of town, district and neighbourhood centres are defined on the Policies Map, with the Town Centre Hierarchy also shown in the table below. The boundaries clearly relate to the application of the sequential and impact tests, which seek to direct main town centre uses to town centres, and proposals for large retail development in edge, or out of town centre locations to be considered against the sequential approach in accordance with the most up to date NPPF. 2. Development proposals should seek to deliver and maintain active ground floor frontages. This includes, but is not limited to, shops, markets, community, cultural and civic uses. 3. When considering applications for town centre uses the applicants are expected to take account of the flexibility which may be required to meet changing needs in terms of what contribution the new development will make to the success of our town centres. This could include the potential need for temporary or 'meanwhile or interim' space to support the creative industries or serve needs in the early phases of a business. 4. 'Meanwhile' uses of buildings in designated town centres must not have an unacceptable impact on residential amenity or prevent development sites from being brought forward for development in a timely fashion. Meanwhile use of sites for housing uses should be consistent with other Local Plan policies in relation to the residential amenity. 5. Outside the designated town centres, development proposals for retail and leisure development exceeding 500sq.m gross (or its updated equivalent) will be required to submit an impact assessment in accordance with the NPPF and NPPG. 6. Development proposals for a new local shopping centre outside Barking Town Centre and the borough's district and neighbourhood centres (as shown on the Policies Map) must seek to meet the needs of local residents based on up to date documental evidence. The applicant should submit information which considers factors including: a) the relative size of a local parade and the range of shops and services each centre can offer b) the proximity of other town centres, local centres and 'standalone' shops, which may mean that local need may be met at an alternative location within walking distance and local needs are therefore still being met c) the quality of the shopping centre or parade, in terms of its environment, type and range of retailers, affecting how it is perceived and used by local residents d) the relative accessibility of each centre since this is an important factor in how local people use the local shops and services. The reasonable and maximum walking distances as prescribed in GLA's Town Centre SPG and its equivalent update should be considered in the statement or assessment e) Demonstration that the design of the walking route(s) are safe and wide, and include greenery and rest areas, where possible, to enable convenient walking for all ages and abilities. 7. Development proposals for new hot food takeaways (sui generis), new betting shops, casinos and amusement arcades (sui generis) and pay day loan shops (sui generis) within the designated town centres should be discussed with the Council in advance of any application, must accord with Policy DMD1: securing high quality design, and where appropriate, be supported by: a) a cumulative impact assessment of other existing uses of hot food takeaway, or betting shop or pay day loan shop (including extant but unimplemented planning permissions) b) a health impact assessment (HIA) to demonstrate how the proposal mitigates its impacts to acceptable levels and contributes to reducing health inequalities as far as reasonably possible |
| Policy DME 5 | Evening economy 1. The Council will support development that contributes to the vitality of the borough, and supports a balanced and socially inclusive evening and night-time economy, subject to the following considerations: a) cumulative impact – in areas where a concentration of night-time uses may be detrimental to the character or vitality and viability of the centre, there will be a presumption against further facilities. For example, the existing number of similar establishments in the immediate area and their proximity to each other; and the potential impacts of the proposal on the wider community b) residential amenity – the proposed use should not create an unacceptable impact on neighbouring uses in terms of noise, traffic and disturbance. For example, the type and characteristics of other uses, such as housing, shops and public houses; any known unresolved amenity, traffic or safety issues arising from existing uses in the area c) balance – new uses in centres should support both the day-time and evening and night-time economies whilst not undermining the role and function of the designated town centres in accordance with DME3 Encouraging Vibrant, Resilient, and Characterful Town Centres. |
Transport
| DMT 3 | Cycle parking 1. All developments must adopt the minimum London Plan cycle parking standards (see Policy T5: cycling of the London Plan 2021). Any developments proposing a more generous provision of cycle parking and supporting infrastructure (e.g. changing rooms, maintenance facilities, lockers and shower facilities) will be supported, and this is actively encouraged. 2. The design and layout of cycle parking should be in accordance with the guidance contained in the London Cycling Design Standards, supported by appropriate on-site security measures. Accessible cycle parking should also be considered and designed for meeting minimum requirements as set out in the London Plan. 3. Where it is considered that proposed developments cannot accommodate sufficient cycle parking provision, developers will be obligated to work with borough officers to propose alternative solutions which meet the standards. These may include options such as providing spaces in secure on-street parking facilities such as cycle hangers or providing contributions to accessible Cycle Hubs in key areas identified in the Cycling and Walking Strategy. Developers in this situation should engage with the Council early in the planning process to discuss appropriate levels of provision and potential solutions. |
| DMT 4 | Deliveries, servicing and construction 1. All major development proposals must explore the use of alternative delivery and servicing practices and emerging technologies, including: freight consolidation and re-timing of deliveries; freight movements by water (see Policy DMNE 4 Water Environment), the use of cargo bikes, cycle freight, electric and low or zero-emission vehicles; and the use of delivery lockers in residential developments. 2. Where appropriate, all developments should maximise the use of the river for freight including the proposed freeport at Dagenham Dock. This includes operational needs as well as for the transportation of construction materials and waste to/from a development site, either directly via the site or through the supply chain. 3. All developments which may have construction impact will have to submit a Construction Logistics Plan (CLP) and Delivery and Servicing plan (DSP) as part of the planning process, having regard to relevant TfL guidance. 4. All construction, demolition and major logistic activities within the borough will be required to work with the Council in developing the scope and impact of their operations. In order to mitigate the impact of any additional traffic or potential disruption to the network, careful planning and co-ordination with the Council is required to ensure the smooth operation of the highway network. |
| Policy DMT 1 | Making better connected neighbourhoods 1. Strategic and major development proposals should be located where employment, housing and supporting facilities and services are within easy reach of each other by sustainable modes, reducing the need to travel and ensuring people are connected to places by, and with, high-quality, safe and attractive cycling and walking routes, both new and existing. 2. Active travel routes, which support walking and cycling, should connect to areas of Green and Blue Infrastructure as well as transport hubs around the borough, where possible. Walking routes must be suitable for wheelchairs, pushchairs and other users with limited mobility and must include places to stop and rest, with suitable and sufficient safe crossing points, where required, to reduce severance. 3. All proposals for new walking and cycling measures should be developed with an explicit understanding of how they promote use by women, children, elderly people, families, people from different ethnic backgrounds, and other people with protected characteristics as set out in the Equality Act. 4. Cycle routes should, where possible, be fully protected from road transport and walkways, following the best current design guidance (currently LTN 1/20 and LCDS). Routes should be attractive for users of all ages, and be designed for both leisure and commuter travel. 5. Active travel infrastructure proposals should demonstrate how they meet the Mayor's Healthy Streets approach in line with TfL's guidance. Emerging schemes in the borough include: the Heathway Regeneration and Valence Avenue Healthy Streets, High Road Proposals, and Thames Road Regeneration. 6. Expanding the School Streets Programme will be considered in areas with low active travel to school mode shares. 7. Development proposals should seek to reduce the dominance of vehicles on London's streets whether stationary or moving, in line with the Mayor's Transport Strategy. 8. Any development which is likely to have a significant impact on the borough's transport network will be required to submit a robust Transport Assessment (TA) or Transport Statement (TS) and a Travel Plan, in accordance with Policy T4 of the London Plan 2021: assessing and mitigating transport impacts. 9. TA/TSs should be submitted with the development proposals outlined and ensure that any potential capacity effects on the transport network (including the walking and cycling network, public transport and road network) are fully assessed, in line with available best practice guidance for London. TAs / TSs should demonstrate how they accord with the Mayor's 'Healthy Streets' approach. 10. Developments likely to generate significant amounts of movement should be supported by a Travel Plan (TP) as part of a planning application so that it can be considered in parallel to development proposals and readily integrated into the design and occupation of the new site, rather than retrofitted after occupation. TPs should include clear, measurable targets with a key focus on ongoing monitoring and evaluation of its effectiveness. 11. Applicants should also ensure they engage early with relevant stakeholders, including the borough, in order to establish the likely transport impacts and agree the assessment parameters and appropriate mitigation measures. 12. All developments will be required to demonstrate how they contribute to promoting sustainable modes of travel and limiting car use, particularly for short, local journeys. 13. Any development that will have an adverse impact on the highway and transportation network (for example, demonstrable disbenefits on congestion, safety, air quality and noise), as well as the operation of public transport (including crowding levels and journey times) will be required to contribute and deliver appropriate transport infrastructure or effective mitigation measures, including a reduction in vehicular parking spaces (in line with the London Plan 2021). 14. Where appropriate, conditions will be imposed or planning obligations secured through a Section 106 or S278 agreement. CIL contributions will also be expected, where appropriate, to fund larger schemes of a wider benefit such as improving the A13. 15. Developments in transformation areas as denoted by the Local Plan will be expected to contribute towards delivering the spatial strategies developed for that specific area, for instance the Barking Town Centre Movement Strategy. 16. Strategic developments should provide bus access and safeguard the land required for bus standing, which is vital for ensuring new services are operable. Developments should also design and implement new junctions and road connections to allow buses to travel through the site. The borough will also seek cycle facilities and local cycle routes to be provided within individual development sites to form a series of routes which would integrate locally into the borough and National Cycle Network (NCN). This will improve the borough's permeability, removing severance by connecting people with places and helping to create one cohesive transport network through sustainable movement. 17. Development proposals will be required to include the installation of electric vehicle charging points and supporting infrastructure, in line with the London Plan 2021 Policy T6: car parking, Policy T6.1: residential parking, T6.2: office parking, T6.3: retail parking and T6.4 hotel and leisure parking. |
| Policy DMT 2 | Car parking 1. All developments will be required to demonstrate how they contribute to promoting active, efficient and sustainable modes of travel and reducing car use by complying with the car parking standards set out in the London Plan 2021. 2. Car-free developments should be the starting point for all development proposals on sites that are (or are planned to be) well-connected to amenities by public transport, walking and cycling. Car-free development will have no general parking but should still provide disabled persons parking in line with the London Plan. Developments in areas that are less well-connected will be required to provide the minimum necessary car parking ('car-lite') and a high-quality public realm that encourages walking, cycling and public transport use. Early engagement with the Council to discuss appropriate car parking levels that reflect policy is recommended. 3. Residential developments in the borough will be expected to adhere to the London Plan's maximum car parking standards. Developers are required to provide clear justification when proposing the maximum permitted parking provision in less-well-connected areas. On larger strategic schemes early engagement with the Council and TFL is necessary. 4. Where parking is provided in a development it will be expected to: a) provide a parking design and management plan, which follows the guidance provided by TfL's best practice guidance on parking design and management, detailing mechanisms for leasing spaces, providing disabled parking to meet future demand and activating passive electric charge points b) be utilised by the development users and should have strategies to convert car parking spaces to appropriate non-car parking uses, including pocket gardens, parklets, public realm spaces or cycle parking. Over time developme |
| Strategic Policy SP8 | Planning for integrated and sustainable transport 1. The Council will continue to follow the Mayor's Transport Strategy through delivery of its Local Implementation Plan (LIP) and supporting programmes. This will be achieved by: a) seeking improvements to and, where necessary, safeguarding existing land and buildings used for active travel (walking and cycling), public transport or related support functions critical for delivering the borough's strategy for improving the transport network and services, as set out in the Local Implementation Plan and borough-wide Transport Strategy b) We recognise the borough's unique position as a rail freight hub containing several areas with rail freight infrastructure and excellent links to the continent and nationally. We will support the enhancement of these freight facilities and safeguard existing sites to promote modal shift of freight from road to rail or river. The proposed Dagenham Freeport and the City Markets relocation at Dagenham Dock are key opportunities to do this. The rail sites at Castle Green also allow for future growth opportunities c) seeking to adopt a multifaceted approach to sustainable transport which recognises the inter-relationship between successful placemaking, health and wellbeing, and the environment. We will develop an integrated, joined-up system that allows people to travel easily both within the borough and between other inner and outer London boroughs, prioritising active travel on key desire lines connected to new and existing public transport hubs d) exploring the feasibility and business case of wider strategic schemes to improve the A13 and a potential future link across the River Roding that aim to reduce severance and improve environmental conditions e) improving public transport access across the borough and into the town centres in respect of Policy DMD3: Development of Town Centres. This will include identifying locations for new bus priority infrastructure as well as the upgrading of existing services to meet future growth aspirations f) supporting for consolidation of deliveries in town centres, logistics hubs and in new master plans, with low or zero emission last-mile deliveries g) working with rail operators, river freight operators, TfL and other partners to improve the operation and capacity of all stations, and maximising the use of rail sites, as well as safeguarded wharves in respect of Policy SP5: Promoting Inclusive Economic Growth h) expanding the borough's network of 'School Streets' where all motor vehicles, except those belonging to residents and school staff, are restricted from the immediate area during school drop-off and pick-up. 2. The Council will work to support the delivery of the Mayor's two strategic targets by 2041: a) 75% of all trips (based on the citywide target of 80%) in Outer London to be made by walking, cycling or public transport b) the Mayor's Vision Zero ambition to eliminate all deaths and serious injuries on the roads. 3. In order to support the borough's growth, the Council will seek schemes which are car-free or provide the minimum necessary level of parking provision in line with the London Plan 2021 parking standards. This will be supported by further development of local public transport networks and sustainable modes of travel such as wider footpaths, good cycling infrastructure and well-designed public realm walking and cycling routes. 4. We will also support developments to include the installation of electric vehicle charging points and supporting infrastructure, in line with London Plan 2021 targets. This will be further supported by the borough's emerging EV vision. 5. In line with the borough's Walking and Cycling Strategy the Council will support new and planned schemes such as Cycle Route CFR10, and the Barking to Chadwell Heath cycle route, which will reduce severance and improve connectivity across the borough. The Walking and Cycling Strategy also identifies existing routes to be upgraded, ensuring routes follow the Healthy Streets approach and are along key desire lines, which feed other transport modes. 6. The Council will seek a sustainable approach to freight by working with developers, local businesses, river and rail freight operators, and other partners to reduce highway congestion and environmental impacts. This will include the development of a Freeport on the River Thames to support planned industrial intensification and promote the enhancement and intensification of existing rail served sites within the borough. |
CIL charging schedule
Schedule adopted April 2015. Headline residential rate £104.59 / m².
Per-use-class rates are set out in the linked charging schedule.
Open charging schedule