South East

Planning in Gravesham

Gravesham · District. Approval rates, decision timelines, local plan status, policies and CIL — sourced from government data, free to read.

E60000258NPPF

Performance

Approval rate

74.8%

Decisions on time

95.48%

Applications / year

638

Housing Delivery Test (2023)

MHCLG has not yet measured this LPA.

Standard-method LHN: 661 dwellings / year

Source: MHCLG PS1/PS2 + HDT 2023.

Local plan

No plan

Plan PDF link not yet curated for this council.

Policies

Community

Policy LT1

General Policy for Leisure Provision

Suitable facilities for formal and informal recreation will be permitted at appropriate locations in the urban area and in the villages having regard to an identified need for such facilities and subject to compliance with other policies of the Plan. Suitable facilities for informal recreation and formal outdoor recreation will be permitted in the countryside where it can be demonstrated that this would be compatible with Green Belt and Countryside Conservation Policies. In the case of facilities for indoor or primarily indoor recreation in the open countryside, Policy TR11 of the Approved Kent Structure Plan will be applied.

Policy LT2

Policy for Existing Open Space

Planning permission will not normally be granted for proposals which would involve the loss of open space. In the context of this policy, open space includes public open space, public parks and woods and public or private allotments, but does not include playing fields to which Policy LT3 will apply. Such proposals may be acceptable where it can be demonstrated that:- (i) There is no deficiency of open space in the area (and that no deficiency will arise from the loss of the open space in question), taking into account the recreation and amenity value of such open space. (ii) The loss of the open space would not be detrimental to the wider urban area or to the whole village. Where appropriate, the Borough Council will seek to protect the open space by refusing planning permission and through acquisition by itself or by a suitable protective body such as an amenity trust or will seek to enter into planning agreements to protect the open space

Policy LT4

Dual Use of Educational and Public Recreational Facilities

The Borough Council will support the use of educational playing fields and sports facilities by the general public and the use of public recreation facilities by schools, subject to suitable timing and management arrangements.

Policy TR10

Sports and Formal Recreation Facilities

Development of an appropriate range and standard of facilities for sports and formal recreation will be permitted or provided at suitable sites with easy access to centres of population, with particular emphasis on remedying deficiencies in provision. Preference will be given, where appropriate, to urban sites.

Policy TR11

Indoor Recreation in the Countryside

Facilities for indoor or primarily indoor recreation will not be permitted in the open countryside unless small in scale, ancillary to an existing use and appropriately grouped with other buildings.

Policy TR12

Water Recreation Facilities

Water recreation facilities of an appropriate range or standard will be permitted or provided at suitable sites, with priority for areas of regional significance for such recreation, provided there is no material conflict with the conservation of significant countryside resources and the built environment.

Policy TR13

Multiple Use of Inland Water Areas

The dual or multiple use of inland water areas for different types of water recreation will be permitted wherever appropriate, particularly in areas with a deficit of such facilities, or to accommodate activities which create conflicts at the coast.

Policy TR8

Informal Recreation Facilities

Suitable facilities for informal recreation will be provided or permitted at appropriate locations in the countryside or at the coast. In the application of this Policy, Policies CC1 to 11 will be taken into account.

Policy TR9

Recreational Open Spaces and Amenity Land

In towns and smaller settlements existing recreational open spaces and amenity land will be safeguarded and where appropriate new areas provided or permitted.

Proposal PM5

The Canal Basin, Gordon Promenade and Gardens, Gravesend

The role of the Canal Basin, Gordon Promenade and Gardens as public open spaces and associated recreational facilities related to the riverside will be safeguarded and further recreational facilities developed. The Borough Council will also encourage the provision of improved facilities for craft at and around the Canal Basin, possibly in the form of a marine development. The Borough Council proposes to see the site of the former open air swimming pool retained for public open space and/or playing field purposes (see Proposal PLT1). The Borough Council will also seek to secure further enviornmental improvements to the land east of Milton Place and ensure that the provision of car parking is maintained, either for Town Centre car parking or parking associated with recreational use.

U3

Hospital Facilities

The Borough Council supports an increase in the number of hospital beds provided in Gravesham and the retention of a sufficient range of hospital facilities to cater for the needs of the area. It would support the further consolidation of facilities on the present site of the Gravesend and North Kent Hospital, as shown on the Proposals Map.

Design

Policy AP17

Land South of Hever Court Road

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council is not opposed in principle to development but because of the noise and visual intrusion associated with the A2 trunk road, it will be necessary for development proposals to demonstrate that a satisfactory standard of amenity can be achieved, both in relation to the A2 and the residential uses to the north.

Policy AP21

Commercial Wharf

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will encourage redevelopment of the riverside by a mixture of residential, office and entertainment related uses of appropriate scale and design but will seek opportunities to secure increased public accessibility to, and views of, the River Thames.

Policy BE1

Built Environment - Town Centres

In town centres, there will be a presumption in favour of development which reflects a high standard of visual and architectural design, and complements or enhances the historic or architectural character, the retail and leisure function, and vitality of established shopping centres. Development which would be detrimental to these aspects should not normally be permitted.

Policy BE2

Built Environment - Environmental Improvement

The improvement of areas of poor or deteriorating built environment, including environmental enhancement, traffic management and the restoration or re-use of derelict or despoiled land and buildings, will be encouraged and where possible supported, and will be given priority where most needed to promote growth in the local economy.

Policy RS1

Rural Settlements - General Principles

All development permitted at villages and small rural towns and in the open countryside should be well designed; appropriate in location, scale, density and appearance to its surroundings; acceptable in highway and infrastructure terms; have particular regard to countryside conservation policies; and preserve and where possible enhance the character, amenity and functioning of settlements and the countryside and in the Green Belt will be subject to Policy MGB2.

Policy S5

Built Environment Conservation and Enhancement

The character, quality and functioning of Kent's built environment will be conserved and enhanced. Development at the urban areas and rural settlements should be well designed and in sympathy with its setting, and there will be a presumption against development which would be incompatible with the conservation or enhancement of the character of a settlement, or detrimental to its amenity or functioning.

Policy TC1

Design of New Developments

The Borough Council will not normally permit proposals for new development which cause harm to interests of acknowledged importance. Applications will be considered in accordance with the following design principles:- (i) The scale and massing of the buildings should normally be in keeping with their surroundings. (ii) The design of new developments should accord with the principles of the Kent Design Guide and in the case of residential development, with Housing Policies H2 and H3 of this Plan. (iii) The design of any alteration or extension shall respect the character and appearance of the existing building and safeguard the privacy and amenity of adjoining residents. (iv) Materials used should be of good quality and sympathetic to the area concerned.

Policy TC12

Policy for Vacant Sites

The Borough Council will encourage the use of vacant and underused buildings and sites, on a temporary basis, until a permanent user arises. It will also seek to have vacant buildings and sites maintained in a condition where they make a positive contribution to the visual environment.

Policy TC8

Advertisement Control

All applications for advertisement consent will be examined in the light of the Borough Council's adopted policy guidelines for advertisement control and displays which are detrimental to public safety or to amenity will be resisted. The Guidelines are published as supplementary planning guidance.

Policy TC9

Shopfronts

The Borough Council will resist developments which would result in:- (i) Existing Shopfronts of traditional design and materials being lost. (ii) The installation of security grills and shutters on the exterior of Shopfronts. In the case of (ii), the Borough Council is aware that the need to preserve amenity must be balanced with measures to prevent crime. Particular shops in certain areas may require the installation of security measures to prevent burglary and vandalism taking place and this will be a material consideration. However, wherever possible, the Borough Council will seek to achieve such measures in a form which is not detrimental to amenity.

Employment

AP11

Pelham Road

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will support Kent County Council's proposals to provide further accommodation for the Gravesend Grammar School for Girls. In the remainder of the site the Borough Council would not oppose redevelopment or change of use to offices and services. However, such employment uses should not adversely affect residential properties and ideally the Victorian buildings of townscape value should remain.

AP13

Grove Road and College Road, Northfleet

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will not oppose in principle partial redevelopment for a commercial or mixed development, provided this is consistent with the amenity of adjacent residential properties and results in a substantial improvement in the environment of the area. The Borough Council will seek the preparation of a planning brief.

C15

Policy for Businesses in the Villages and the Countryside

Applications for the establishment or expansion of industrial, office and other small businesses in the countryside and the villages will be the subject of the Approved Kent Structure Plan Policies RS1, RS4 and RS5. In the case of applications for farmshops and garden centres, the Borough Council will be particularly concerned to ensure that there is no detriment to highway safety and rural amenity.

Policy E0

General Employment Policy

The Borough Council will make provision for:- (i) A range of industrial and commercial development, taking into account the guidelines set out in the Approved Kent Structure Plan. (ii) The improvement and modernisation of existing employment areas. (iii) An increase in the quantity of job opportunities within the Borough.

Policy E1

Existing Industrial Areas

In the existing industrial areas shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will give priority to the need for employment. In these areas, proposals which will generate additional employment of all types, whether industrial or not, will normally be permitted except where such proposals would be in conflict with Policy S1. All proposals will be expected to take into account the requirements relating to design, environmental protection and parking set out elsewhere in this Written Statement.

Policy E2

Improvement of Industrial Areas

The Borough Council will survey its industrial areas to determine if any have scope for improvement and will, as funds allow, carry out such improvement in co-operation with the private sector.

Policy E3

Non-conforming Users

Existing long established non-conforming users will generally be allowed to remain. In those cases where they are causing significant amenity problems on their present sites, the Borough Council will, in the first instance, use every endeavour to encourage the firm to operate in a manner which reduces the amenity problems. If this cannot be achieved, the firm will be encouraged to relocate to more suitable premises. In the most difficult cases, the Borough Council may take action even where this might precipitate closure of the firm.

Policy E4

Policy for Main Car Dealerships

The Borough Council will have no objection in principle to the location or relocation of main car dealerships at the sites listed below and indicated on the Proposals Map. Thames Way (west of Vale Road), Northfleet (See PM10) Vale Road, Northfleet. Imperial Business Estate, Thames Way, Northfleet (See PM6) Dover Road Pit, Northfleet Power Station (See PM12)

Policy E5

Policy for Change of Use to Offices

In certain areas as indicated on the Proposals Map, the change of use of existing buildings to office uses will normally be permitted where it can be demonstrated that this would assist in maintaining the fabric of buildings and the townscape quality. The areas where this policy will apply are:- Stone Street (part) Wrotham Road (part) Windmill Street (part) Parrock Street (part) Milton Road (part) The Grove (part) Harmer Street (part) In the case of offices within B1, the Borough Council will seek agreements to restrict the use to offices. In addition some parts of Central Gravesend referred to in the Area Policies (Chapter 16) also offer scope for change of use to offices. These are:- Parrock Street AP2 Overcliffe AP5 Windmill Street AP6 Milton Road AP7 Harmer Street AP10 Pelham Road AP11

Policy ED1

Economic Development Provision

(a) Provision of land for economic development will be made primarily at the urban areas in accordance with Policy S1 and the following criteria: (i) the current employment situation in each area, the structure of the local labour market and projected changes in labour supply; (ii) the market demand for particular types of business, industrial warehousing land; (iii) the availability of suitable buildings and land, having regard to the varying requirements of industry and commerce; (iv) the potential for using land within urban areas and for using derelict or despoiled sites before taking fresh land for such development; (v) the availability of sufficient land for housing to meet any demand generated by the proposals; (vi) the degree to which proposals meet other Structure Plan policies, particularly those relating to the Green Belt, countryside conservation and traffic generation. (b) The following tables provide a broad indication of the overall level of development which it is envisaged will be provided. The figures are indicative pending a further review to take account of the Use Classes Order 1987.

Policy ED2

Economic Development

(a) Allocations of land for economic development in local plans will be made following a detailed assessment of the availability and quality of commitments in the area of coverage. Existing poor quality or constrained sites may be replaced by better allocations of more attractive and well-located sites, provided this does not conflict with other Structure Plan policies. (b) Environmental upgrading schemes will be encouraged to improve the attractiveness of partly-developed or undeveloped existing sites, where this is a main reason for lack of investment interest. (c) Specific reservations of land will be made in local plans for 'bad-neighbour' businesses where circumstances warrant. (d) Suitable high quality sites not in conflict with the Green Belt or established countryside conservation policies will be identified in appropriate local plans solely to meet the specific needs for multi-use campus type developments, such as certain combinations of research, production and offices provided for by Class B1 of the 1987 Use Classes Order. Such sites will normally not be available for retail development, distribution or other incompatible uses.

Policy ED3

Transhipment, Warehousing and Distribution

Land to accommodate transhipment, major warehousing and wholesale distribution development will be provided at the following locations in Kent: (a) Stone Marshes, Dartford, East of the Thames crossings and making full use of the port opportunities; (b) Ashford, to the south east of the town, associated particularly with the proposed road freight Inland Clearance Depot to serve principally the Channel Tunnel; (c) Dover, associated with the A2 route to the port; (d) Paddock Wood, to allow for the growth of the road/rail interchanges, subject to the prior provision of satisfactory improvements to provide adequate access to the trunk road and motorway network; and will take into account access, infrastructure and environmental considerations.

Policy ED4

Small Firms

Sites and buildings to meet the specific needs of small firms in Kent, both for industrial and office use will be provided particularly through: (a) new development schemes on small infill sites within urban areas and, in accordance with Policy RS4, at appropriate rural settlements; (b) the conversion of suitable redundant buildings in urban areas and, in accordance with Policy RS5, at rural locations; (c) the use of parts of larger industrial estates.

Policy ED5

West Malling Airfield Business Park

The former West Malling Airfield is intended, on completion of the West Malling Bypass, for the development of a substantial campus-style business park of high environmental quality. Companies specialising in technological innovation and new technology production, and manufacturing and office/service firms using high technology systems will be particularly encouraged to locate there. Some housing is also envisaged.

Policy ED6

Dartford Northern Bypass Development

Land to the north east of Dartford, to the west of the Dartford Tunnel, which is not essential to the Green Belt, is intended for a mixed use comprehensive development in conjunction with the proposed Dartford Northern Bypass, involving principally high quality business park, office, research, leisure and recreational uses. Some of this land will not be required before the year 2001.

Policy ED7

Ashford Economic Development

The south east sector of Ashford will be the main location of new economic development at the growth point, and will provide in particular for distribution and manufacturing activities deriving from cross-Channel transport. This development will be in conjunction with the provision of new access roads, and the comprehensive planning for the long term in the review of the local plan.

Policy P10

Kent Wharves Port Traffic

The expansion of port traffic at wharves in Kent including Rochester, Ridham Dock, Whitstable Harbour and Richborough will be supported subject to traffic and other environmental considerations.

Policy P11

New Ports and Wharves

The development of new ports and wharves on sites not currently used or approved for this purpose will not be permitted outside urban areas, unless a strong justification can be shown, having regard to infrastructure costs, economic impact and environmental considerations.

Policy P4

Port Ramsgate Development

The growth of cross-Channel traffic through Port Ramsgate, based on the present extent of port operational land, will be supported. Subject to completion of a new access, further expansion of the port operational area and suitable diversification of the port will be accepted, subject to environmental considerations and nature conservation constraints.

Policy P6

Folkestone Port Development

The growth of cross-Channel traffic through Folkestone based on the present extent of port operational land will be supported, and proposals for further expansion will be assessed in the context of their demands on infrastructure and in the light of Structure Plan conservation and environmental policies. If cross-Channel services cannot continue, with or without completion of the Channel tunnel, development of the port area including commercial, tourist and leisure uses will be encouraged, subject to access.

Policy P7

Sheerness Port Expansion

The expansion of Sheerness port to facilitate the growth of cross-Channel traffic and deep sea trade will be supported. The necessary improvements to the A249 will be encouraged as part of this expansion.

Policy P8

Dartford International Ferry Terminal

The further development of Dartford International Ferry Terminal will be supported, and the provision of a rail link into the site encouraged.

Policy P9

Chatham Cross-Channel Traffic

The growth of cross-Channel traffic at Chatham will be supported subject to access, traffic and environmental considerations.

Policy RS4

Rural Settlements - Business Development

Small scale businesses will normally be permitted in and adjoining the built-up area of villages and small rural towns where these are appropriate to the scale of the settlement and without undue detriment to the amenity and character of the settlement or its setting. Other business development will normally be permitted in and adjoining villages and small rural towns, either where justified by the employment needs of the particular locality, or where it essentially demands a rural settlement location. All business development permissible within the terms of this policy will be subject to Policy RS1 and to the restriction of subsequent inappropriate expansion contrary to Policy RS1.

Policy RS5

Rural Settlements - Business Uses in Rural Kent

In rural Kent small scale businesses including tourist facilities will be permitted where this would primarily comprise an acceptable change of use of sound and redundant buildings, or the change of use of existing built properties in large grounds to appropriate business uses. All such business development permissible within the terms of this policy will be subject to Policy RS1, and to the restriction of subsequent inappropriate expansion contrary to Policy RS1.

Policy S1

<UNKNOWN>

It is strategic policy to stimulate and strengthen the expansion of economic activity and employment in Kent through the growth of existing industry and commerce and the attraction of new firms, by the provision of land and sites for industrial, warehousing and office uses in accordance with the criteria set out in Policy ED1, and the availability of a wide range of different types of attractive sites. Requirements in this respect and the role of each part of Kent and their constituent urban areas in making provisions for new economic development and investment are set out below. All such provision must be consistent with the Green Belt and Policies S5 and S6.

Proposal PE1

Sites for Employment Use - Classes B2 or B8

The following sites are shown for employment use on the Proposals Map but are likely to be most suitable for development falling within Class B2 (General Industrial Use) or Class B8 (Warehousing). Sites for development starting in the period up to mid 1996 East of Canal Road, Denton* (1.33 hectares) (3.3 acres) Denton Wharf, Mark Lane, Denton* (4.0 hectares) (10.0 acres) Lennox Road Pit, Northfleet (4.4 hectares) (10.8 acres) East of KSB Engineering, Wharf Road, Denton* (0.5 hectares) (1.2 acres) North of Comma Oil (See PM9)* (1.7 hectares) (4.2 acres) Sites for development starting in the period mid 1996 to mid 2001 Northfleet Power Station, Northfleet (See PM12) (13.5 hectares) (33.3 acres) North East Gravesend (See PM9)* (6.0 hectares) (15.0 acres)

Proposal PE2

Sites for Employment Use - Class B1

The following sites are shown for employment use falling within Class B1 (Business Use). For environmental or amenity reasons these sites are not considered suitable for general or special industrial use or for warehousing. The Borough Council will seek to achieve qualitative improvements in employment areas in terms of appropriate siting, design, layout and landscaping. Before granting permission for B1 use, the Borough Council will seek further information as to the likely occupiers and activities and may, where appropriate, seek planning agreements to regulate the use, in relation to vehicle parking standards and other matters. Sites for development starting in the period up to mid 1996 Grove Road, Northfleet (0.80 hectares) (2.0 acres) Horn Yard/Bull Yard, Gravesend (See PM1)+ (1.1 hectares) (2.8 acres) Vale Road and Springhead Road, Northfleet (See PM10) (2.6 hectares) (6.5 acres) Land West of Wrotham Road, Northfleet (See PM8) (2.6 hectares) (6.4 acres) Wingfield Bank Farm, Northfleet (0.9 hectares) (2.3 acres) 1-5 Wrotham Road, Gravesend+ (0.2 hectares) (0.42 acres) Canal Road/Norfolk Road, Denton (0.39 hectares) (0.9 acres) Sites for development starting in the period mid 1996 to mid 2001 Barrack Row, Gravesend (See PM3) (0.36 hectares) (0.89 acres) East of Canal Basin, Gravesend (See PM11) (3.9 hectares) (9.7 acres) Parrock Street and Lord Street, Gravesend (See PM4)+ (2.5 hectares) (6.2 acres) Dover Road Pit, Northfleet Power Station (See PM12) (4.45 hectares) (11.0 acres) Stonebridge Road, Northfleet (2.3 hectares) (5.8 acres)

Proposal PM12

Northfleet Power Station

The Borough Council will not oppose in principle the redevelopment of the Northfleet Power Station site, to provide the following:- (i) Employment uses (in the case of Dover Road Pit, the Borough Council will expect these to be compatible with adjacent residential uses). (ii) Continuation of wharfage facilities on the River Thames frontage. The Borough Council will expect a development brief or briefs to be prepared to provide fuller guidance for this important site. Particular attention will need to be given to the mix of development between and within Use Classes, the protection of residential amenity, ground conditions and the existence of fill material. The Borough Council will also expect the redevelopment to contain a high proportion of industrial uses in Use Classes B2 or B8 and will wish to restrict the proportion of the development used for Class B1 (other than light industry). In addition the Borough Council will enter into an agreement with developers to control these matters.

Proposal PM6

Imperial Business Estate

Following the cessation of the Enterprise Zone on 31st October 1993, the following policies will apply:- Retail Area: The Borough Council will safeguard the use of the existing retail premises and associated car parking, specifically to provide facilities for the car-borne shopper in the convenience and bulky comparison goods sectors. Any additional convenience floorspace will not normally be permitted. B1 Area: The Borough Council will resist the loss of such areas from employment uses and any change of use to retail. River Frontage: The Borough Council will seek the retention of current wharfage facilities, in accordance with Policy R1. Otherwise Policy R3 will apply.

Proposal PM7

Springhead Enterprise Park

After cessation of Enterprise Zone status on 31st October 1993, the Borough Council will encourage the continued use of the site to provide employment within Use Classes B1 and B8.

Energy

Policy MWD7

Exploratory Wells for Oil and Natural Gas

(a) There will be a presumption in favour of proposals to drill exploratory wells for oil and natural gas where appropriate pursuant to the locational consideration of Policy MWD1. This is subject to the County Council being satisfied that satisfactory provision has been made for restoration and aftercare in the event of the well proving to be 'dry', or subsequent appraisal not being permitted. (b) In the event of hydrocarbons being found at approved wells the County Council will, when considering proposals for oil or gas appraisal and pursuant to the locational considerations of Policy MWD1, assess the environmental impact of the further work involved at the site, including proposals for vehicular access and for transporting oil and gas from the well for testing, and any measures proposed to ameliorate that impact. This policy and Policy 7(a) will also be applied to any additional wells proposed for the appraisal of the same field. The County Council will refuse to permit appraisal where it considers the environmental impact to be unacceptable. (c) Before permitting any production of on-shore oil and gas, which would require a gathering station, export terminal or distribution network, the County Council will require pursuant to Policy MWD1 to be satisfied that any material agricultural, landscape, conservation or environmental interests have been taken into account. Permission will only be given if there are adequate proposals for: (i) the screening, landscaping and design of production well sit gatheringstation and export terminals; (ii) access and routeing for vehicular traffic; (iii) avoiding noise nuisance to any sensitive development in the vicinity; (iv) transport of oil and gas within the County (for which there will be a presumption in favour of rail transport and/or underground pipelines or far as this is practicable); (v) any flaring or other means of testing or disposal of gas; (vi) the clearance of plant, equipment and buildings and the restoration and aftercare of all areas affected by the production operations at the end of the permitted period. There will be a presumption against the siting of gathering stations and export terminals in Areas of Special Significance for Countryside Conservation or in locations close to substantial built development, unless it can be shown that there is no suitable alternative location.

Environment

AP14(a)

Land West of Springhead Road

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council wishes to see the existing open character of the area retained during the Plan period. In the longer term, beyond the Plan period, it is recognised that this area may have potential for built development, which could include commercial and recreational uses. However, such development would need to be associated with major infrastructure improvements and to take account of nature conservation interests. The Borough Council is willing to participate in studies to examine the development potential of this area in more detail and to join with others to prepare comprehensive plans for the use, development and management of the area as a whole. In the meantime, proposals likely to be prejudicial to longer-term development considerations will be resisted. Additionally, the Borough Council will support a co-ordinated programme of environmental improvements in the short term, designed in a manner not prejudicial to the longer term development potential.

AP14(b)

Land West of Springhead Road

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council wishes to see the open existing character of the area retained during the plan period. Particular importance will be attached to protecting the landscape of the Ebbsfleet Valley and related pedestrian links, both during the Plan period and in the longer term. In the longer term, beyond the Plan period, it is recognised that parts of the area may have potential for built development which could include residential, commercial and recreational uses. However, such development would need to be associated with major infrastructure improvements. The Borough Council is willing to participate in studies to examine the development potential of this area in more detail and to join with others to prepare comprehensive plans for the use, development and management of the area as a whole. In the meantime, proposals likely to be prejudicial to such future considerations will be resisted. Additionally, the Borough Council will support a co-ordinated programme of environmental improvements in the short term, designed in a manner not prejudicial to the longer term development potential.

AP15

Botany and Broadness Marshes

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council wishes to see the existing open character retained during the Plan period. In the longer term, beyond the Plan period, it is recognised that this area may have potential for built development. However, such development would need to be associated with major infrastructure improvements. The Borough Council is willing to participate in early studies to examine such development potential

C16

Policy for Leisure Plots and Land Fragmentation

The Borough Council will resist development on fragmented land and leisure plots and it will reinforce existing planning controls on such land as appropriate to the circumstances in each case, in order to restrain the damaging effects on the countryside.

C17

Policy for the Use of Land for Horse-riding and the Erection of Stables

Proposals for the recreational use of land in the countryside for horse-riding, riding schools and the erection of stables will only be permitted if they are compatible with the agricultural, landscape and transport policies of this Plan. Where proposals are acceptable in principle, the Borough Council will expect stables and horse shelters to be properly designed and constructed of sound materials appropriate to the countryside and to be in an acceptable location within the site.

C18

Incorporation of Additional Land into Residential Gardens

The incorporation of productive or potentially productive farmland and woodlands in the countryside into residential gardens will be resisted. Where appropriate, the Borough Council will seek to minimise the environmental effects by the making of Article 4 Directions and Tree Preservation Orders on affected land.

C8

Policy for Sites of Nature Conservation Interest

Policy CC10 of the Approved Kent Structure Plan, which deals generally with the protection of habitats or features which have importance for nature conservation, will be applied:-(A) In the Sites of Nature Conservation Interest indicated on the Proposals Map and listed below:-(i) Court Wood, Shorne (ii) Pasture south of Istead Rise, Northfleet (iii) Henley Wood and Pasture, Luddesdown (iv) Ebbsfleet Marshes, Northfleet (v) Strawberry Hill pasture and woodland, Meopham (vi) Pasture and woods, south of Luddesdown (vii) Luxon Wood, Great Buckland (viii) Nurstead & Cozendon Woods, Nash Street (part Meopham, part Northfleet) (ix) Part of Happy Valley, Meopham (x) Pasture, Great Buckland (xi) Cliffe Pools, Cliffe (part in Gravesham Borough) (xii) Elbows Wood, Meopham (xiii) Whitehorse Wood and Holly Hill, Trottiscliffe (part in Gravesham Borough) (xiv) Grassland and scrub, Istead Rise (xv) Telegraph Hill, Higham (xvi) Pasture, Shorne (B) To other sites and features of nature conservation value not formally protected where development is proposed.

C9

Policy where Countryside Zones Overlap

Within the areas delineated in this Plan as both ASSA's and SLA's, the Local Planning Authority will give priority to the landscape elements which are important to the essential character of the area and which should be conserved. In such areas which are also identified as Sites of Nature Conservation Interest, the needs of nature conservation will be paramount.

Policy AP15

Botany and Broadness Marshes

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council wishes to see the existing open character retained during the Plan period. In the longer term, beyond the Plan period, it is recognised that this area may have potential for built development. However, such development would need to be associated with major infrastructure improvements. The Borough Council is willing to participate in early studies to examine such development potential in more detail and to join with others to prepare comprehensive plans for the use, development and management of the area as a whole. In the meantime, proposals likely to be prejudicial to such future considerations will be resisted. Additionally, the Borough Council will support a co-ordinated programme of environmental improvements in the short term, designed in a manner not prejudicial to the longer term development potential.

Policy AP16

Mid Kent Golf Course

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the existing golf course use is expected to remain. The Borough Council will oppose proposals which would reduce the open aspect of the land and reduce its value as an important physical break between the built-up areas of Gravesend and Northfleet. However it would not be opposed in principle to the use of the land for another open recreation use.

Policy AP18

Land adjoining Medway Towns Northern Relief Road

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the general policies of this Plan shall prevail and the Borough Council will resist all inappropriate developments. At the same time, the Borough Council will also press for the implementation of substantial environmental improvements in the form of both on-site and off-site landscape works for the road scheme and broader countryside initiatives. Their aim would be to minimise the impact of the road, enhance the local landscape and residential amenity and soften the appearance of the urban edge of the Medway Towns.

Policy AP19

Great Clane Lane Marshes

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council expects that existing uses will remain for the most part undisturbed and will resist proposals for built forms of development.

Policy C0

General Countryside Policy

The Borough Council will give priority to conserving and enhancing the character and quality of the countryside. The development of "fresh land" will not normally be permitted in the countryside, most of which is designated Metropolitan Green Belt. Emphasis will be placed on the redevelopment of land and the husbanding of undeveloped land in the urban area for residential and employment uses in order to reduce pressures for development in the countryside.

Policy C1

Policy for Areas of Special Significance for Agriculture

Policy CC3 of the Approved Kent Structure Plan, which defines Areas of Special Significance for Agriculture, will be applied to the areas delineated in this Plan. The Borough Council will give long term protection to these areas and will give priority to the needs of agriculture over other planning considerations.

Policy C18

Incorporation of Additional Land into Residential Gardens

The incorporation of productive or potentially productive farmland and woodlands in the countryside into residential gardens will be resisted. Where appropriate, the Borough Council will seek to minimise the environmental effects by the making of Article 4 Directions and Tree Preservation Orders on affected land.

Policy C19

Policy for Non-agricultural Open Uses in the Countryside

Non-agricultural pursuits will be permitted in the open countryside where it can be demonstrated that there will be no damage to features of acknowledged importance, including areas subject to countryside protection policies, the local residential environment and traffic safety. Environmental enhancement will be encouraged.

Policy C2

Policy for Other Agricultural Land

The Borough Council will have regard to Policies CC1 and CC2 of the Approved Kent Structure Plan and will resist developments which will cause a loss of productive or potentially productive agricultural land or reduce the viability of farm holdings, unless it can be demonstrated that the need for the development overrides agricultural considerations and no alternative site on non-agricultural land is available. This policy will be applied with particular force to Grade 1 and 2 land and the better Grade 3 land.

Policy C3

Policy for Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty

In Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, the Borough Council will expect all applications to contain sufficient details to enable the impact of the development to be assessed. Proposals which do not make a positive contribution to the environment will not normally be permitted. In particular, a high standard of design and the careful siting of buildings will be expected.

Policy C4

Policy for Special Landscape Areas

Policy CC7 of the Approved Kent Structure Plan, which defines Special Landscape Areas, will be applied to the areas delineated in this Plan. The Borough Council will give long term protection to these areas (which incorporate that part of the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty which falls within the Borough) and will normally give priority to their landscape over other planning considerations.

Policy C5

Policy for Areas of Local Landscape Significance

In the following areas of local landscape significance delineated on the Proposals Map, development which will adversely affect the landscape quality of the area will be resisted, unless it can be demonstrated that there is no other suitable location: (i) The North Kent Marshes (east of Denton as far as the eastern boundary of the Borough) (ii) Ebbsfleet Valley, Northfleet (iii) The dry valley feature, west of Wrotham Road, Gravesend (iv) Mid Kent Golf Course, Gravesend (v) The dry valley feature south of the village of Higham Upshire (between the ridge carrying Hermitage Road and the Dillywood Lane area)

Policy C6

Policy for Areas of High Nature Conservation Value

Policy CC9 of the Approved Kent Structure Plan, which defines areas of High Nature Conservation Value will be applied to the areas delineated in this Plan. Within these areas, development harmful to the maintenance of scarce and potentially vulnerable wildlife habitats will not be permitted.

Policy C7

Policy for Development Affecting Sites of Special Scientific Interest and Nature Reserves

Where development proposals affect National Nature Reserves, Local Nature Reserves or Sites of Special Scientific Interest directly or indirectly, the Borough Council will not permit such development, in accordance with Policy CC8 of the Approved Kent Structure Plan, unless it can be shown that the proposals will not materially harm the maintenance of the scientific interest. Those Sites of Special Scientific Interest notified to the Borough Council before this Plan was prepared are shown on the Proposals Map and listed below: (i) Cobham Woods (ii) Great Crabbles Wood (iii) Halling to Trottiscliffe Downs (part) (iv) South Thames Estuary and Marshes (part) (v) Shorne and Ashenbank Woods The policy will be applied to other such areas as and when they become known.

Policy CC1

Countryside Conservation - Agricultural Land

Development which will cause a loss of productive or potentially productive agricultural land, or reduce the viability of farm holdings, will not be permitted, unless it can be demonstrated that the need for the development overrides agricultural considerations and no alternative site on non-agricultural land is available.

Policy CC10

Loss of Nature Conservation Habitats

In areas to which Policies CC8 and CC9 do not apply development will not be permitted if it is likely to cause a loss of habitats or features which have importance for nature conservation, unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the local planning authorities that the need for the development overrides the nature conservation interest and no appropriate alternative site is available.

Policy CC11

Undeveloped Coastline Protection

Development, particularly urban or industrial development, will not be permitted if it materially detracts from the unspoilt scenic quality or scientific value of the undeveloped coastline, whether such development is on the coast or in the adjoining countryside.

Policy CC2

Countryside Conservation - High Grade Agricultural Land

Policy CC1 will be applied with particular force in respect of land classified as Grade 1 and 2 (as defined by the MAFF land classification system) or on the better Grade 3 land, where there will be a presumption against development, other than for the purposes of agriculture.

Policy CC3

Countryside Conservation - Areas of Special Significance for Agriculture

Seven Areas of Special Significance for Agriculture are defined: North West Kent Market Garden Belt Hoo Peninsula North Kent Horticultural Belt North East Kent Ightham to Pluckley North East of Ashford Romney Marsh The local planning authorities will give long term protection to these areas and will give priority to the needs of agriculture over other planning considerations.

Policy CC4

Agricultural Industry Development in the Countryside

Development related to the agricultural industry, but not part of a farm business, which will be intrusive in the countryside by reason of scale and character, or which will create disturbance or a high level of traffic generation, will only be permitted if it can be demonstrated that the site chosen is the best available (including those in towns and villages) and the design and landscape treatment are of a high standard. It is the policy not to allow such development in special landscape areas (see Policy CC7).

Policy CC5

Trees and Woodlands Conservation

(i) In considering proposals for development or for tree felling in the countryside existing trees and woodlands will wherever practicable be conserved when they contribute significantly to the wildlife, the landscape or the appearance of a site or its locality. (ii) The County Council will plant trees or grant aid tree planting in the countryside, where this will significantly improve the landscape, with priority given to areas seriously affected by Dutch Elm Disease. (iii) Tree Preservation Orders will be made to protect trees and woodlands as necessary if their loss would seriously impair wildlife or the landscape.

Policy CC6

Loss of Landscape Areas and Features

Development will normally not be permitted if it is likely to cause a loss of, or material damage to, landscape areas and features which are: (i) representative of the Kent countryside by reason of their physiographic character or vegetation cover, with particular regard being paid to those areas of rare or possibly unique scenic quality; or (ii) of historic interest; or (iii) of an unspoilt quality free from urban intrusion.

Policy CC7

Special Landscape Areas

Special Landscape Areas are defined as follows: North Downs : including the scarp and crest Greensand Ridge : from Westerham to Ightham : south of Maidstone High Weald Old Romney Shoreline North Kent Marshes Sandwich Bay/Pegwell Bay Dungeness, and Blean Woods The local planning authorities will give long term protection to these areas, which incorporate the Kent Downs and proposed High Weald AsONB, and will normally give priority to their landscape over other planning considerations.

Policy CC8

Nature Reserves and Sites of Special Scientific Interest

Development will not be permitted at or near nature reserves or Sites of Special Scientific Interest, unless it can be shown that the proposals will not materially harm the maintenance of the scientific interest.

Policy CC9

Areas of High Nature Conservation Value

In the following areas of high nature conservation value, the policy is not to permit development harmful to the maintenance of scarce and potentially vulnerable wildlife habitats: North Kent Marshes North Downs Scarp and Crest Dungeness Sandwich Bay/Pegwell Bay Blean Woods

Policy GB1

Policy for the Green Belt in Gravesham

Green Belt policies, as set out in the Approved Kent Structure Plan (See Appendix 3), will be applied in the areas indicated on the Proposals Map.

Policy GB2

Policy for development in the Green Belt

There will be a strong presumption against permitting new development in areas subject to Green Belt policies, other than in accordance with Approved Kent Structure Plan Policy MGB2.

Policy LT3

Playing Fields Protection

Planning permission will not normally be granted for proposals which involve the loss of playing fields, whether that land consists of public or private playing fields, or playing fields used for educational purposes unless:- (a) sports and recreation facilities can best be retained and enhanced through the redevelopment of a small part of the site; or (b) alternative provision of equivalent community benefit will be quickly made available; or (c) there is an excess of sports pitch provision and public open space in the area, taking account of the recreation and amenity value of such provision, including the contribution of the playing fields to the quality of the local environment.

Policy LT5

Additional Open Space and Playing Fields

The Borough Council has assessed which parts of the urban area are deficient in open space provision, including public open space and playing fields and will seek to bring land forward to reduce such deficiencies. Some opportunities to reduce deficiencies by the allocation of sites for open space have already been identified and these are shown on the Proposals Map.

Policy M1

Policy for the Restoration of Derelict Land

In seeking derelict land grants, the Borough Council will concentrate its efforts (where necessary in conjunction with other agencies or private developers) on schemes which will reclaim and bring into use sites within the Borough, particularly where this would increase employment and on schemes which would result in significant environmental improvements. In considering proposals the Borough Council will have regard to the protection of the wildlife value of derelict sites. The following sites, as indicated on the Proposals Map, are considered to be the priorities for concerted action to create employment or recreational facilities, using derelict land grants as necessary:- (i) Land at College Road, Northfleet (ii) Land at Grove Road, Northfleet (iii) Thames and Medway Canal (See Proposal PLT3) (iv) The former Gravesend West Railway Line (See Proposal PLT2) (v) Pit south of Dover Road, Northfleet (vi) Campbell Road Pit, Northfleet

Policy M2

Development On or Near Sites Used for the Deposit of Refuse or Waste

The Borough Council will notify the Kent County Council, as Waste Disposal Authority, of all applications for development which is on land which has within the past 30 years been used for the deposit of refuse or waste or is within 250 metres of such a site. Where appropriate, such applications will be refused or schemes will be required for the management of landfill gas and for appropriate construction methods, to give protection against potential landfill gas hazards.

Policy MGB1

Metropolitan Green Belt - Extent

The Metropolitan Green Belt will generally extend for a depth of about 15 miles from the edge of the built up area of Greater London, that is, to the east of Gravesend, to the west of Rochester, to the west of West Malling, and to the east of Wateringbury and Nettlestead, but, exceptionally, extending to the west of Paddock Wood and east of Tunbridge Wells.

Policy MGB2

Metropolitan Green Belt - Development Control

Within the Green Belt, there will be a strong presumption against permitting new development outside the presently defined extent of urban areas and the present built-up extent of any village, unless it conforms with the open recreation functions of the Green Belt or is directly related to agriculture or other uses appropriate to a rural area. Any development approved within the Metropolitan Green Belt will be required to be sited and designed so as to maintain the open character of the area.

Policy MGB3

Metropolitan Green Belt - Boundary Review

Green Belt boundaries established in the original Kent Development Plan to the north-east of Dartford in different social and economic circumstances should be reviewed in the Local Plan, and adjusted to new edges, which will endure for the long term. Such adjustments will allow for identified future development needs, in particular for high quality business uses and to meet housing requirements. A similar adjustment to the Green Belt boundaries in North West Kent would also be justified to allow for a regional shopping centre in that area.

Policy MWD10

Restoration of Derelict and Despoiled Land

The County Council, subject to financial constraints, will restore derelict and despoiled land and eyesores to an appropriate after-use, and encourage other bodies to do the same.

Policy MWD11

Landscaping of Derelict and Despoiled Land

Where clearance of eyesores and restoration of derelict and despoiled land is impractical or likely to be long delayed, the local planning authorities will require or undertake landscaping or other cosmetic treatment to improve the visual appearance of the site and merge it into the countryside.

Policy MWD12

Priority Areas for Restoration

The County Council will itself give priority to restoring derelict land and clearing eyesores in AsONB, special landscape areas, and areas of high nature conservation value.

Policy MWD13

Priority Areas for Despoiled Land Restoration

The County Council will itself give priority to restoring despoiled land in the following areas which have a significant concentration of such land: Thames-side Stour Valley Darent Valley Borough Green Medway Valley

Policy MWD8

Waste Disposal

There will be a presumption in favour of proposals for waste disposal, together with associated plant and buildings, to cater for all waste arising in the County. To be acceptable proposals must make appropriate provision for: (i) vehicular access; (ii) controlling operations on the site; (iii) protecting natural resources (such as water resources and nature conservation interests) and the local environment; (iv) landscaping the site and restoring it to an appropriate after-use, including removal of all plant and buildings. Priority will be given to meeting the waste disposal needs of Kent.

Policy MWD9

Restoration of Mineral Workings

In areas where suitable mineral workings in need of restoration by filling are available, priority will be given to using these pits rather than other potential landfill sites, subject always to the provisions of Policy MWD8 being met.

Policy R1

The Commercial Riverside - Maintenance of the River Frontage for Water Transport

In the commercial riverside, as shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will have a preference for development adjacent to the river which requires a riverside location and makes use of the river as a means of transport. Any new buildings will need to be set back sufficiently from the water's edge, to enable access to be achieved to the river for wharfage purposes. Where appropriate and consistent with safety, a public riverside walkway or riverside access will be expected.

Policy R2

The Commercial Riverside – Wharves

Applications for the expansion of port traffic at the existing wharves fronting the commercial riverside and the development of new wharves on sites fronting the commercial riverside, will be supported in principle, subject in each case to the surrounding road system being adequate to deal with additional traffic. The Borough Council will resist the development of new wharves elsewhere in Gravesham.

Policy R3

The Town Centre Riverside

Along the Town Centre riverside, proposals which do not make a positive contribution to the riverside setting will not normally be permitted. The Borough Council will expect all applications to be accompanied by sufficient detail to enable the impact of the development to be assessed, whether or not the proposal falls within a conservation area and to protect important vistas. The Borough Council will also seek to extend the areas of public access to the river and its frontage, as opportunities arise and will encourage the development of recreational facilities.

Policy R4

The Rural Riverside

Policy CC11 of the Approved Kent Structure Plan, which relates to the undeveloped coast, will be applied to the riverside east of Denton, as shown on the Proposals Map.

Policy RS6

Rural Settlements - Development in Rural Kent

Development will not normally be permitted in rural Kent other than at the villages and small rural towns unless: (i) it is demonstrated to be necessary to agriculture, forestry, the winning or import of materials or other land use essentially demanding a rural location; or (ii) it relates to an acceptable change of use of redundant buildings, where the change would provide the best reasonable means of conserving the character, appearance, fabric and setting of buildings which are of architectural or historic interest, or whose loss would be detrimental to the character of the countryside; or (iii) it consists of the acceptable re-use or redevelopment of the existing built area of redundant institutional complexes; or (iv) it relates to the acceptable rebuilding or modest extension of a dwelling currently in residential use in an appropriate location; or (v) it is the provision of public or institutional uses for which the rural location is justified; or (vi) it is for businesses provided for under Policy RS5. All such development will also be subject to Policy RS1.

Policy TC10

Landscaping

In new developments, the Borough Council will normally require the submission of details of the landscaping proposed and will use its powers to ensure that such landscaping is implemented. Developments will not normally be permitted which would result in the destruction of:- (i) Protected trees and woodlands. (ii) Other important landscape features. (iii) Habitats of nature conservation value, particularly where species protected under Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended by the Wildlife and Countryside [Amendments] Act 1985) would be adversely affected.

Proposal PC1

Landscape Strategy

Within its financial capabilities, the Borough Council will undertake significant landscaping to remedy storm losses and to help blend infrastructure into the landscape. Other bodies will also be encouraged to implement landscaping schemes.

Heritage

Policy BE3

Built Environment - Conservation Areas

In conservation areas the primary planning policy will be the conservation and enhancement of special character (including buildings, related spaces, topography and vegetation).

Policy BE4

Built Environment - Historic Monuments and Buildings

In the control of development and through policies and proposals in local plans: (i) the archaeological, architectural and historic integrity of ancient monuments and of buildings of special architectural or historic interest, and the character of their settings will be protected and enhanced; (ii) changes of use will normally be permitted where these would provide the best reasonable means of conserving the character, appearance, fabric, integrity and setting of ancient monuments and buildings of special architectural or historic interest; (iii) important archaeological sites and their setting will normally be protected. Where development would lead to the destruction or sterilisation of archaeological sites, appropriate arrangements will be required for investigation and recording by a recognised archaeological team.

Policy TC0

General Townscape, Conservation and Design Policy

The Borough Council will give priority to conserving and enhancing the built environment in both the urban area and the countryside. Particular importance will be attached to:- (i) The design of new development. (ii) The safeguarding and enhancing of conservation areas. (iii) Environmental improvement schemes. (iv) The preparation of a landscape strategy for the Borough.

Policy TC2

Policy for Listed Buildings

The Borough Council will adopt the following approach to applications affecting listed buildings:- (i) Proposals which involve the demolition of listed buildings will not be granted consent unless the applicant is able to demonstrate substantial and overriding reasons why such consent should be forthcoming. In those few cases where the Borough Council is satisfied that there is no alternative but to grant consent for such demolition, all available means will be used to secure early and appropriate redevelopment. (ii) In the case of applications for development involving alterations or extensions to listed buildings or affecting the setting of listed buildings, the primary consideration of the Borough Council will be the maintenance of the integrity of the original listed building. Proposals will also need to be sympathetic to the listed building in terms of massing, scale, appearance and materials. (iii) Applications for the change of use of listed buildings will be considered on their merits, in relation to the land use policies set out in this Written Statement. A major consideration will be whether the character or appearance of the listed buildings will suffer as a result.

Policy TC3

Development Affecting Conservation Areas

The Borough Council will adopt the following approach to applications for development within or affecting conservation areas:- (i) Where development is acceptable in relation to other policies in this Plan, it will be carefully judged for its impact and will be expected to make a positive contribution to the conservation area. The Borough Council will expect applications to contain sufficient details to enable the impact of the proposal upon the conservation area to be assessed. (ii) The demolition of unlisted buildings will be resisted unless the Borough Council is satisfied that the existing building is harmful to the conservation area and that the proposals for redevelopment or other use of the site will be beneficial. To this end, the Borough Council may, in suitable cases, require an agreement for the replacement of the building or other suitable treatment of the site, prior to the granting of conservation area consent for demolition.

Policy TC4

Improvements to Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas

The Borough Council will, within the limits of available resources, continue to carry out studies and make available funds to assist:- (i) In the maintenance and improvement of listed buildings. (ii) In the environmental improvement of the Borough and particularly of its conservation areas.

Policy TC5

Archaeological Sites

The Borough Council will promote the identification, recording, protection and enhancement of archaeological sites, ancient monuments and historic landscape features and will seek to encourage and develop their educational, recreational and tourist potential through management and interpretation.

Policy TC6

Scheduled Ancient Monuments

Proposals for development on, or near, the site of a Scheduled Ancient Monument which damages or destroys its setting will be normally refused.

Policy TC7

Other Archaeological Sites

Throughout the Borough Plan Review area, development on important archaeological sites will not normally be permitted. On archaeological sites where permanent preservation is not warranted, applications will normally be refused unless arrangements have been made by the developer to ensure that time and resources are available to allow satisfactory archaeological investigation and recording of, by an approved archaeological body to take place in advance of or during development. The specification and programme of work for the archaeological investigation, including its relationship to the programme of development are to be submitted to and approved by the Borough Council. In order to determine a planning application the Borough Council may require the developer to provide additional information, in the form of an assessment of the archaeological or historic importance of the site in question and the likely impact of development. In certain cases, such an assessment may involve an evaluation excavation. Planning permission may be refused without adequate assessment of the archaeological implications.

Policy V3

Conservation Importance in Villages

The village of Cobham and those parts of the villages of Hook Green, Meopham Green, Shorne and Shorne Ridgeway which are designated as conservation areas, are identified as being of exceptional conservation importance. The primary planning policy towards all new development, including residential development, will be conservation and enhancement of their special character. In addition, developments should be small-scale and will be expected to accord with Policy V2. Some rural conservation areas or parts of them lie outside the boundaries of villages, as defined in this Borough Plan Review, and in those cases Green Belt policies and other countryside restraint policies apply.

Housing

C10

Agricultural Dwellings

The Borough Council will only give favourable consideration to applications for agricultural dwellings, where an overriding case can be demonstrated and when no satisfactory alternative means of provision is available. Such applications will be considered against the advice contained within PPG7 (Annexe E), other Government advice effective at the time and the following criteria:-(i) The agricultural unit must be commercially viable of itself at the time of the application. (ii) Where the Borough Council's agricultural adviser indicates that an existing and established agricultural unit is capable of becoming commercially viable, the siting of a caravan for a limited period may be considered. (iii) It must be necessary rather than just convenient for an agricultural worker to be resident on the agricultural unit. (iv) The Borough Council will need to be satisfied that there is no suitable housing available in the vicinity of the site. (v) Care must be taken to select the most suitable site for the dwelling on the agricultural unit, in order to achieve a good relationship with existing farm buildings and the point of access and to minimise impact by making use of natural features. (vi) The dwelling should be of a modest size and of a design appropriate to its Green Belt and countryside location.

C12

Policy for Replacement Dwellings in the Countryside

There will be a strong presumption against allowing the replacement of existing dwellings which will only be set aside if the following criteria are satisfied:-(i) The existing dwelling must be an "original dwelling" in permanent use as a dwelling. Proposals for the replacement of dwellings which are not "original" but which have gained immunity from the enforcement of planning control will be considered on their individual merits, having regard to their origins, their location and the nature of the accommodation they currently provide. (ii) The existing dwelling must be in an appropriate location, meaning that it must be well related to existing roads and to essential services and must be in or close to an established rural settlement. The only exception to this criterion will be where the proposed replacement dwelling is required on the site for an agricultural worker, where the standard agricultural occupancy condition will be imposed. (iii) The replacement dwelling must be of similar scale and mass to the existing dwelling and must be no larger than the existing dwelling, unless it can be demonstrated that modest enlargement is required to allow the provision of essential basic amenities such as a bathroom, toilet or kitchen, which currently do not exist or are clearly inadequate or to meet the special needs of the occupants. (iv) The internal layout of the replacement dwelling shall not be such as to facilitate its later subdivision. (v) The replacement dwelling should normally occupy the same site as the existing dwelling. Where it is agreed that the replacement dwelling may be located elsewhere on the plot, adequate safeguards will be required to ensure the demolition of the existing dwelling. (vi) The existing or proposed means of access, including access for fire fighting appliances, must be satisfactory. (vii) The existing or proposed site drainage and means of soil and waste disposal must be satisfactory.

C13

Extensions to dwellings will be considered on their merits

(i) The existing dwelling must be an "original dwelling"* in permanent use as a dwelling. (ii) There will be an overall limit of one third of the gross floor area of the original dwelling (measured externally) prior to any later extension or alteration, unless the increased floorspace has no overall effect on the existing bulk and appearance of the dwelling. (iii) Those extensions which provide essential basic amenities such as a bathroom, toilet or kitchen, which are currently not available or are clearly inadequate, will normally be permitted. (iv) The extension shall not be in a form which would facilitate the future formation of a separate residential curtilage. (v) The dwelling to be enlarged must have sufficient curtilage to accommodate the extension without undue visual intrusion into the open countryside. (vi) The appearance, massing, scale, form and materials of any extension shall be appropriate to the existing dwelling and the Green Belt setting. (vii) Proposals for domestic garages and for other outbuildings will be considered on their individual merits but will be required to be well designed, discreetly sited and subservient to the scale of the main dwelling on the plot.

C14

Culverstone Valley Area

(i) New weekend and holiday chalets and caravans will not be permitted. (ii) Proposals for the replacement of existing authorised chalets and caravans*, or the extension of existing authorised chalets*, on occupied plots will be considered on their individual merits but the Borough Council will expect the following criteria to be satisfied:- (A) The existing caravan or chalet must be "authorised"* and must be neither derelict or abandoned at the time of the application nor have been so for a substantial period prior to the receipt of the pending planning application. (B) The chalet or caravan to be replaced must be demolished or removed from the site before any replacement structure is first occupied. (C) Replacement accommodation will be for permanent occupation but will be limited to bungalows of not more than 1,000 sq. feet (92.9 sq. metres) of gross area (measured externally) and of a design appropriate to a rural area. (D) That not more than one unit of accommodation will be allowed on each plot.** (iii) Redevelopment will be limited to plots in appropriate areas. In particular, redevelopment will not be permitted on plots which are inaccessible to the normal range of service or emergency vehicles nor on plots where the existing water supply or means of soil and waste disposal are unsatisfactory. Bulk gas storage tanks will be permitted only where the Kent Fire Brigade raise no objection. (iv) Controls will be placed on the construction of new and additional outbuildings and related structures to ensure that their number, size and design, do not conflict with the open rural qualities of the area.

Policy H0

General Housing Policy

The Borough Council will make provision for: (i) Sufficient housing to meet the requirements of the Approved Kent Structure Plan and will restrain housing development on "fresh land", in order to protect the Metropolitan Green Belt and the countryside. (ii) A range of house types including affordable housing, to meet the needs of all sections of the community. (iii) The improvement and modernisation of the existing housing stock and the local environment within which it is situated.

Policy H1

Policy to Protect Housing Areas

In the "Housing Areas" indicated on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will seek to consolidate and enhance the residential character and will resist the change of use of premises or new developments which would be detrimental to amenity. In this connection: (i) Proposals for community facilities which serve the Housing Area will be considered on their individual merits as regards this policy. (ii) Proposals for the introduction of small-scale new businesses and the expansion of existing businesses in Housing Areas will be considered in the light of Government advice appertaining at the time. However, the integrity of the Housing Area will always be the paramount consideration. (iii) The widespread demolition of existing housing in Housing Areas will not normally be permitted but this will not be taken to exclude proposals which involve small-scale redevelopment, where this would be acceptable and beneficial to the residential environment. (iv) Proposals for such redevelopment will be considered in relation to Policy H3.

Policy H2

Application of Residential Design Guidance

In considering proposals for residential development, whether for new development or for the conversion of existing buildings, the Borough Council will have regard to its adopted Residential Layout Guidelines, the Kent Design Guide, the importance of minimising the opportunities for crime and the special requirements of disabled people.

Policy H3

Character of Housing Areas

In respect of proposals for infill, rear garden or backland development and also for the redevelopment of sites within housing areas, while all proposals will be considered on their merits, the Borough Council will have regard to the Statements of Housing Types and Area Character and to the Residential Layout Guidelines and will seek to protect the essential character of that area.

Policy H4

Improvement of the Housing Stock

Proposals which will result in the improvement and maintenance of the existing housing stock will be acceptable in principle, particularly in the older established housing areas.

Policy H5

Conversion of Existing Properties

In considering proposals for the conversion of existing properties to provide flats, maisonettes, bedsitters, hostels, homes and other forms of multiple occupancy, the Borough Council will have regard to the following criteria:- (i) The building shall be in an appropriate area for conversion to flats, maisonettes, bedsitters and multiple occupancy. Unless there are special or overriding circumstances, conversions will not normally be permitted in an area comprised for the most part of single family dwellings. Conversely, conversions will not normally be permitted in areas which are environmentally unsuitable for young families and which already demonstrate a predominance of multiple occupation. (ii) The building shall be of such a size and arrangement as to be generally unsuitable for single family occupation. (iii) The proposal shall have regard to the Borough Council's Residential Layout Guidelines, as set out in supplementary planning guidance. (iv) The adopted Vehicle Parking Standards must be achieved wherever feasible.

Policy H6

Provision to Meet Special Housing Needs

The Borough Council will in principle support proposals in appropriate locations by Housing Associations, the private sector and other organisations which incorporate:- (i) A proportion of dwellings which will be suitable for and affordable by those on low incomes, whether for rent or for purchase. In particular, when considering schemes for development on larger sites (in excess of one acre), the Borough Council will encourage developers to incorporate such proposals wherever possible. (ii) Provision for meeting special housing needs for those who by reason of age, infirmity or disability have special requirements for location and dwelling design. The Borough Council is especially keen to encourage such developments in Central Gravesend, the Perry Street area of Northfleet and in the rural area, particularly Meopham and Higham. (iii) With regard to proposals for residential hostels and homes, whether by new build or by conversion, the Borough Council will take particular care to ensure that these do not cluster together and harm the overall character of the area.

Policy HD1

Housing Provision

Provision for housing will be made in accordance with the following quantities for the periods 1986/91, 1991/96 and, subject to review, for 1996/2001 (all periods are mid-year to mid-year). 1986-1991: Maidstone Borough 3,400; Sevenoaks District 1,600; Tonbridge & Malling Borough 2,100; Tunbridge Wells Borough 1,800; Dartford Borough 1,300; Gravesham Borough 1,000; Medway Towns 5,800; Swale District 2,800; Ashford Borough 3,000; Canterbury District 2,800; Dover District 1,500; Shepway District 2,400; Thanet District 2,500; Kent 32,000. 1991-1996: Maidstone Borough 2,700; Sevenoaks District 1,000; Tonbridge & Malling Borough 1,700; Tunbridge Wells Borough 1,600; Dartford Borough 1,500; Gravesham Borough 1,000; Medway Towns 4,200; Swale District 2,200; Ashford Borough 4,000; Canterbury District 2,500; Dover District 1,900; Shepway District 2,500; Thanet District 1,500; Kent 28,300. 1996-2001: Maidstone & Malling Area 4,500; Sevenoaks Area 500; Swanley Area 300; Tonbridge Area 300; Tunbridge Wells Borough 1,200; Dartford Borough 1,500; Gravesham Borough 1,000; Medway Towns 4,000; Faversham Area 400; Sheppey 700; Sittingbourne Area 1,000; Ashford Borough 4,000; Canterbury Planning Area 1,300; Herne Bay/Whitstable Area 2,000; Dover Area 500; Deal Area 1,200; Folkestone/Hythe Area 1,800; Romney Marsh Area 700; Thanet District 1,500; Kent 28,400. 1986-2001: Maidstone & Malling Area 13,500; Sevenoaks Area 1,800; Swanley Area 1,600; Tonbridge Area 1,200; Tunbridge Wells Borough 4,600; Dartford Borough 4,300; Gravesham Borough 3,000; Medway Towns 14,000; Faversham Area 1,200; Sheppey 2,500; Sittingbourne Area 3,400; Ashford Borough 11,000; Canterbury Planning Area 3,600; Herne Bay/Whitstable Area 5,000; Dover Area 1,800; Deal Area 3,300; Folkestone/Hythe Area 5,300; Romney Marsh Area 2,100; Thanet District 5,500; Kent 88,700. 'Provision' will be taken to mean planning permissions and allocations in previously approved or adopted development plans which were outstanding at mid-1986 (including dwellings then under construction), plus land subsequently released or to be released for development through allocations and planning permissions in the specified periods.

Policy HD2

Housing Development Types

In meeting the provisions set out in Policy HD1, and subject to the environmental principles contained in Policy S3, priority will be given to the types of development set out in (a) to (c) below, with particular regard to meeting the housing needs of small households including those of the elderly, before taking fresh land for development: (a) the maintenance, renovation and adaptation of the existing housing stock; (b) the use of land and buildings within the confines of existing built-up areas, including derelict land and changes of use to housing, compatible with an attractive urban environment; (c) outside the built confines of urban areas, the re-use or redevelopment of the existing built-up area of redundant institutional complexes, in accordance with the provisions of Policy RS6. The meeting of the housing provisions, as set out in Policy HD1, will not constitute a reason for preventing further developments, including "windfall" developments, of the types set out in (a) to (c) above.

Policy HD3

Housing - Fresh Land Release

Where, after taking full account of Policies S3 and HD2, a significant release of fresh land is necessary to provide for the housing requirements set out in Policy HD1: (a) The fresh land releases should be identified in Local Plans as peripheral urban developments or at locations where conflict with the Structure Plan's built environment, countryside conservation and Green Belt policies is minimised and efficient use and provision of infrastructure are made. (b) The following locations or larger rural settlements are regarded as strategically suitable for fresh land release, subject to examination through the Local Plan process: · Ashford, requiring the examination of the several possible options available; · East bank of the Medway in the Maidstone/Malling Planning Area, subject to a new crossing of the river and concentrating on damaged land; · West Malling Airfield in the Maidstone/Malling Planning Area; · Hoo and Halling in the Medway Towns Planning Area; · Aylesham (East Kent Coalfield); · Paddock Wood in the Tunbridge Wells Planning Area; · Hawkinge in the Folkestone/Hythe Planning Area; · Edenbridge in the Sevenoaks Planning Area;

Policy LT6

Open Space and Play Space in New Housing Development

Proposals for new housing development will be expected to make provision for open space and play space appropriate to the scale of development and type of housing proposed, having regard to the provision of and proximity to existing open space in the locality.

Policy RS2

Rural Settlements - New Residential Development

New residential development at villages and small rural towns will be subject to Policy RS1 and will be restricted to minor redevelopment or to minor development such as infilling (which is the completion of an otherwise substantially built-up frontage by the filling of a narrow gap capable usually of taking one or two dwellings only) in suitable locations within their built confines, except where specified in a Local Plan or, exceptionally, where there is a special local justification (such as a specific local housing need for particular types of accommodation which cannot reasonably be met in other ways).

Policy RS3

Rural Settlements - Exception Villages

District Councils will through local plans identify those villages and small rural towns in their districts which should be treated as exceptions to Policy RS2, as: (a) having potential within or adjoining the built confines for new residential development in excess of minor development or redevelopment. The District Councils should specify the location and quantity of the development appropriate; and/or (b) being of such exceptional conservation or tourism importance that the primary planning policy towards all new residential development, including minor development or redevelopment, will be conservation and enhancement of the special character.

Policy S3

Housing Provision

(a) Housing provision will allow the best possible choice of housing to meet the needs of businesses and people living in Kent, consistent with the highest possible quality of environment; provision will be concentrated at the 18 urban areas of Kent (identified on the Key Diagram), but the rural settlements have a role to play in providing this choice. (b) Housing provision will make the best use of land and buildings at appropriate locations in existing built-up areas, particularly for small households who will benefit from being close to urban amenities, and the most effective use of redundant institutional land or buildings, consistent with preservation of the character, amenity and functioning of these areas. (c) Where the provision of fresh land for new housing is justified in accordance with Policy HD3, all such provision must be consistent with the Green Belt and Policy S6. (d) In areas where existing provisions are adequate in accordance with the requirements of Policy HD1, there will be a general presumption against the release of fresh land for housing. (e) In all areas the separate identity of existing settlements will be protected. (f) Housing development will be provided in each Planning Area as follows: (i) at Ashford as the County's growth point, to meet the projected requirements and to match the economic development potential of the Channel Tunnel and associated infrastructure improvements; (ii) to meet the requirements identified in Maidstone/Malling, so as to capitalise on its employment prospects, so far as this is possible without seriously breaching environmental constraints; (iii) generally to meet the requirements in the Tunbridge Wells, Tonbridge and Sevenoaks areas, compatible with Green Belt, countryside and environmental policies; (iv) in excess of the projected housing requirements in the Dartford, Sittingbourne, Sheppey and Thanet areas, consonant with the scale of land opportunities there provided it does not conflict with the Green Belt or countryside conservation policies and subject to marketing feasibility, employment prospects and travel-to-work considerations; (v) to meet the requirements in the Gravesham, Medway Towns, Herne Bay/Whitstable, Dover, Deal, Folkestone/Hythe and Romney Marsh areas, to the extent consistent with countryside and infrastructure constraints; (vi) to restrain provisions below projected requirements in the Swanley, Faversham and Canterbury areas, where there are strong Green Belt, conservation or infrastructure constraints, or where employment prospects appear unlikely to match the resultant growth of labour supply.

Proposal PM8

Land West of Wrotham Road, Gravesend

The Borough Council supports in principle the development of the land West of Wrotham Road to provide the following:- (i) High quality business development to the south of Coldharbour Road (See Proposal PE2), between the Safeway Foodstore and Wrotham Road (A227). (ii) Residential development of the upper valley slope to the east of Marks Square and Lanes Avenue (see Proposal PH2). (iii) A hospice. (iv) Retention and upgrading of the lower valley slopes to form a major landscaped open space.

Proposal PM9

Land at North East Gravesend

The Borough Council supports in principle the development of land at North East Gravesend, as shown on the Proposals Map, within constraints, to provide a mixed development containing the following elements:- (i) Road access to the A226 at Lion Roundabout. (ii) Residential development (see Proposal PH2). (iii) Development within Use Class B2 or B8, (see Proposal PE1). (iv) Public open space. (v) Additional facilities for North West Kent College. (vi) Adequate measures to counteract effects of possible flooding. The Borough Council will expect a development brief to be prepared to provide fuller guidance for this important site and will seek to enter into an agreement with developers to control the form of development, its timing and phasing and the provision of infrastructure. The intention is to ensure that all elements are provided, that development respects the proximity of the designated SSSI and that the open space is taken into a protective form of ownership.

Infrastructure

Policy P2

Channel Tunnel Land Safeguarding

Land will be safeguarded in Kent for building the Channel Tunnel as follows: (a) between the M20 and the North Downs, to the north of Folkestone, for Channel Tunnel terminal purposes only; there is a strong presumption against the location of terminal facilities between Ashford and Folkestone; (b) at the top and foot of Shakespeare Cliff near Dover for construction and maintenance purposes; (c) in south east Ashford for use as an inland clearance depot for handling freight vehicles. The proposed International Passenger Station adjacent to the present Ashford Station will be expected to achieve a full integration between domestic and international rail services, the location of major car parking, and the realisation of development opportunities especially in the centre of the town.

Policy S2

New Development and Infrastructure

New development should take place where it can take maximum advantage of spare capacity in existing infrastructure. It should also aim to enable derelict or despoiled sites, especially in North Kent and the East Kent coalfield, to be redeveloped for a productive new use. Where additional infrastructure and services are needed to bring forward land particularly for economic development purposes: (a) the County Council will seek to ensure that relevant programmes for the provision of infrastructure closely match the priorities of the Plan set out in Policy S1; (b) planning authorities will not normally permit development unless the infrastructure which is directly required to service the development can be made available at the appropriate time.

Policy U1

Utilities

Development will not normally be permitted before the relevant planning authority is satisfied that the capital works directly required to service the development are provided or will be provided.

U2

Telecommunications

The Borough Council recognises the importance of new telecommunications development and will consider any such proposals for development having regard to the advice contained in PPG8. In cases where there is a conflict with policies to protect the environment, planning permission will only be given where there is no overiding amenity objection and:- (i) the applicant has demonstrated that no reasonable alternative site exists; (ii) the applicant has proved that there is no reasonable possibility of sharing existing facilities with another operator.

Other

C11

Policy for Change of Use of Redundant Buildings in the Countryside

Conversion of farm buildings to other uses will be permitted where:-(i) It can be demonstrated that the building was originally erected as an agricultural building but is no longer needed for farming. (ii) The building is a substantial one, of permanent construction and is in an appropriate location in relation to roads and services. (iii) The building is attractive, in having some architectural, historic or landscape interest or being of a type representative of the Kent Countryside and the proposed alterations preserve that interest. (iv) The proposed use will diversify the rural economy and not result in the longer term dilution of farm viability. (v) The curtilage is confined to the minimum necessary to operate the use. (vi) The nature and intensity of the proposed use is not detrimental to amenity or traffic safety.

Policy AP1

Wrotham Road

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the conversion of existing dwellings to commercial uses will not normally be permitted. Proposals which maintain the broad mix of housing and commercial uses serving the surrounding residential areas or provide community facilities will generally be acceptable, provided that they respect the scale of existing development and do not adversely affect the amenity of residential properties, traffic safety and the free flow of vehicles in Wrotham Road. An opportunity for re-use of the Wrotham Road School site may arise but will be restricted to a low traffic-generating use which reflects the adjoining conservation area, such as community facilities or sheltered housing.

Policy LT7

Golf Courses

Proposals for golf facilities will be considered on their merits, taking full account of the policies in this plan relating to the Green Belt, Countryside, Leisure and Tourism, and Transport and also the detailed guidelines produced for golf prepared by the Kent Planning Officers' Group. However, within the Green Belt, there will be a strong presumption against ancillary development not directly related to the playing of golf.

Policy MWD1

Mineral Extraction and Associated Development

Before permitting any mineral extraction or associated plant and buildings, the County Council will require to be satisfied that there is a need for such development which would override a material agricultural, landscape, conservation or environmental interest. Further, permission will only be granted if there are adequate access proposals, measures to minimise disruption to the landscape and local environment, to landscape the site, to remove plant or buildings after workings have ceased and to restore the land to an appropriate after-use, normally as working progresses. Wherever appropriate a period of aftercare will also be required. Steps will be taken to prevent the sterilisation of known resources.

Policy MWD2

Construction Aggregate Supply

In order to ensure the continuing provision of minerals to meet the needs of Kent's construction industry, and to extend the life of Kent's land won sand and gravel resources, the County Council will encourage the import of construction aggregate, the use of substitute materials and the development of acceptable alternative local sources of supply. In respect of the latter, subject to Policy MWD1, the County Council will give favourable consideration to proposals for limestone mining in East Kent; when assessing Kent's land won construction aggregate requirements, no account will be taken of this project until production is assured.

Policy MWD3

Marine Terminals, Wharves and Rail Depots

Pursuant to Policy MWD2 there will be a presumption in favour of proposals for marine terminals and wharves and rail depots, to receive and process imports of marine dredged aggregate, drystone and other aggregates on appropriate sites. In assessing whether a site is appropriate the County Council will consider all material planning interests, including those relating to agriculture, landscape, conservation, environment and access.

Policy MWD4

Land Bank of Sand, Gravel and Ragstone

The County Council will seek to maintain a land bank of permitted reserves of sand and gravel and ragstone sufficient for at least 10 years' production at 1985 levels. There will be a presumption in favour of proposals for the extraction of sand and gravel and ragstone at appropriate locations pursuant to Policy MWD1, that would release additional land to enable a level of production from land-won workings of about 2.0 million tonnes per annum of gravel and concreting sand, about 1.9 million tonnes per annum of building sand, about 0.25 million tonnes per annum of industrial sand and about 0.6 million tonnes per annum of ragstone, to be maintained countywide.

Policy MWD5

Brickearth Extraction

There will be a presumption in favour of proposals for the extraction of brickearth at appropriate locations pursuant to Policy MWD1, which enable each stock-brick works to be maintained with at least 15 years' reserves of brickearth. All proposals for brickearth extraction must provide for the site to be progressively restored to land of high agricultural quality. The objective of restoration and aftercare must be to ensure that the physical characteristics of the land are, so far as is practicable, the same as existed when the land was last used for agriculture.

Policy MWD6

Chalk and Clay Extraction

There will be a presumption in favour of proposals for the extraction of chalk and clay at appropriate locations pursuant to Policy MWD1, which enable: (i) Kent's cement industry to be maintained with up to 25 years' reserves of chalk and clay; (ii) clay brick industry to be maintained with 15 years' reserves of clay; (iii) reserves of agricultural chalk to be maintained with a 10 years' supply; (iv) engineering or other specific requirements for chalk and clay to be met.

Policy V1

Villages

The settlements listed below are villages and their built confines are shown on the Proposals Map:- Cobham* Sole Street Culverstone Green Hook Green* Meopham Green* Vigo Village Istead Rise Higham Upshire Lower Higham Three Crutches Shorne* Shorne Ridgeway* Lower Shorne

Policy V2

Development in Villages

New development within the built confines of the villages in Policy V1 shall:- (i) be restricted to minor redevelopment or to minor development (as amplified in paragraph 8.6) in suitable locations. (ii) observe the requirements of Approved Kent Structure Plan Policy RS1 (see Paragraph 8.5). (iii) have regard to the Statements of Parish and Village Character set out in Appendix 2. (iv) not encroach upon nor adversely affect any valuable amenity open spaces.

Proposal PM10

Vale Road and Springhead Road, Northfleet

The Borough Council will promote the development of land at Vale Road and Springhead Road, Northfleet, to provide the following:- (i) Public open space, including sports pitches and facilities. (ii) Housing development. (iii) Employment development - including car showroom facilities (see Policy E4). The Borough Council will prepare a development brief to provide fuller guidance for this important site and will seek to enter into an agreement with developers to control the form of development, its timing and phasing, the mix of uses, the provision of infrastructure, the design of foundations and any necessary remedial measures to deal with landfill gas. The intention is to ensure that all elements are provided and that the areas of open space remain in a form of protective ownership.

Proposal PM11

East of the Canal Basin, Gravesend

The Borough Council will carry out a study of the land east of the Canal Basin, Gravesend which will investigate the scope for:- (i) Improvements to the highway, other infrastructure and the environment of the area. (ii) A public riverside walkway and recreational facilities and access to the river itself for leisure purposes. (iii) A mixed use redevelopment of parts of the area complementary to the role of the Canal Basin and Gordon Promenade as recreation areas. The mixture of uses may contain all or some of the following:- Offices, Industrial development, Residential, Hotel, Recreation facilities. Account will need to be taken of the proposals for site PM5 adjacent, including improved facilities for craft and a possible marina and the Borough Council will seek to protect the line of the former Thames and Medway Canal from built development.

Proposal PM13

Ferry Motors Site

The Borough Council will encourage the early development of this site for office purposes but will require that the design of any buildings is of a high standard, commensurate with a site of considerable townscape importance.

Proposal PM2

Land between Church Street and West Street

The Borough Council will consider proposals for the site in the context of its prominent location and adjacent redevelopments and, if alternative car parking can be made available elsewhere, may promote the site as a major landscaped public space.

Proposal PM3

Barrack Row, Gravesend

Proposals for commercial redevelopment of the site will be considered on their merits, with particular regard to the employment, townscape and conservation policies of this Written Statement and the effect of proposals on the availability of public car parking in the vicinity of Gravesend Railway Station and the ability of the local road system to cope with the additional traffic generated by the development.

Proposal PM4

Parrock Street and Lord Street, Gravesend

The land at Lord Street and Parrock Street will remain as publicly available car parking in the short term. If the general provision of car parking in Central Gravesend is found to be inadequate, the site may need to remain in public car parking use. If surface car parking is to remain in the longer term, the Borough Council intends to carry out environmental improvements to the site, with particular regard to boundary treatments and landscaping. If general provision of car parking is adequate (for example, by alternative provision elsewhere) and it is shown that the local road system can cope with the additional traffic generated by the proposal, the site will be considered for development uses in the context of a development brief. This will examine the site's potential for office development, within Use Class B1 or for retail development or for housing development or a mixture of these uses.

Retail

AP12

West of Stuart Road (Northern End)

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will encourage redevelopment of the riverside by a mixture of residential, office and entertainment related uses of appropriate scale and design but will seek opportunities to secure increased public accessibility to, and views of, the River Thames.

Policy AP10

Harmer Street

In the Harmer Street area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council's principal aim is to ensure the conservation and restoration of the buildings and their continued use. A mixture of commercial uses will be appropriate, including offices and small retail units. Residential conversions, particularly of upper floors, will be welcomed provided they comply with the Borough Council's Residential Layout Guidelines, details of which are available as supplementary planning guidance.

Policy AP2

Parrock Street

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, proposals which continue to provide small low overhead premises for shops and non-office services will be acceptable in principle along the frontage of Parrock Street, provided they do not adversely affect residential properties or traffic conditions in Parrock Street. Offices will generally be acceptable on upper floors but will be resisted at ground floor level, unless there is a serious decline in the use of shopping premises in this area.

Policy AP20

West of Stuart Road (Southern End)

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will give encouragement to business developments which strengthen the links between the Town Centre and the Imperial Business Estate.

Policy AP3

Northern End of High Street

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will continue to give high priority to its efforts to restore confidence and prosperity and improve the condition of buildings by a programme of environmental improvements and repairs. The Borough Council will generally be sympathetic to proposals which make good use of the existing buildings in the High Street, respect their character and bring more life into the area. In order that the High Street may be better integrated with the St George's Centre, proposals will be encouraged for units which have a frontage on both High Street and Princes Street.

Policy AP4

Queen Street

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will encourage small-scale retail redevelopment and conversion which retains the shopping character and is sympathetic to the conservation area. Any additional car parking required may be provided by means of the commuted car parking payments scheme. However, proposals that would require direct access by significant volumes of traffic in Queen Street will be resisted.

Policy AP5

Overcliffe

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will resist the demolition of existing buildings and will encourage their use for purposes such as hotels, restaurants, guest houses, educational facilities and offices which require large premises.

Policy AP6

Windmill Street

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will resist the demolition of buildings and will seek to ensure that the commercial character is retained. Changes of use of buildings to shops, non-office services and offices (particularly offices requiring a "shop window" frontage) at ground floor level, and to non-office services and offices above ground floor level, will generally be acceptable in principle.

Policy AP7

Milton Road

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will maintain a flexible attitude to development proposals, particularly where it can be demonstrated that shopping is no longer a viable use. Non-office services and offices requiring a "shop window" frontage will generally be acceptable in this area.

Policy AP8

Western End of New Road

In the area shown on the Proposals Map, changes of use to shopping and non-office services will generally be acceptable, provided that no disturbance is caused to the adjacent hospital.

Policy AP9

Manor Road

In the area north of the railway on the Proposals Map, the Borough Council will encourage small-scale change of use and redevelopment which retains the shopping character and is sympathetic to the conservation area. Any additional car parking required may be dealt with by means of the commuted car parking payments scheme. However, proposals that would require direct access by significant volumes of traffic in Manor Road will be resisted. In the area south of the railway, encouragement will be given to the inclusion of retail and office uses in the proposals to extend car parking in this area.

Policy RD1

Retail Development - Town Centres

Proposals for development at town centres will be permitted which either: (a) enhance the shopping functions of existing town centres in terms of the quality, range and choice of their retailing facilities; or (b) expand and diversify opportunities for service, business and leisure activities and residential accommodation appropriate to the vitality of towncentres; provided that development under (a) and (b) above both: · improve the quality of their visual and functional environments related to Policy BE1; · accommodate traffic in a way which enhances the attractions of the town centre in terms of user convenience and environment.

Policy RD2

Retail Development - Large Food Stores

Established town or district centres are the preferred location for large food stores (superstores or large supermarkets) subject to environmental and traffic considerations. Where such sites are not available and/or traffic considerations indicate, large food stores should be accommodated on sites which are accessible to both car-borne shoppers and those using public transport, well related to the primary road network, located preferably within existing urban confines, or able to secure the reclamation of derelict or despoiled land, not having serious implications for the provision of other major land uses, particularly the supply of housing and industrial land, and not in conflict with other land use or countryside conservation policies or the Green Belt. These circumstances may apply where: (a) the development could not be accommodated in or on the periphery of an existing centre due to its: site and floorspace requirements; adverse environmental impact; unacceptable levels of traffic generation and/or pressure on car parking provisions; inadequate servicing arrangements; and (b) individually or cumulatively with other out-of-centre developments, recent or proposed, the development would not affect the vitality and viability of any existing town centre as a whole.

Policy RD3

Retail Development - Retail Warehousing

There will be a general presumption in favour of new retail warehousing in the bulky goods trades, on sites which are well related to the primary road network and within existing urban built-up areas, subject to environmental and traffic considerations and to there being no serious implications for the provision of other major land uses, particularly the supply of housing and industrial land. Provision will be made in Local Plans for multi-unit retail warehouse parks where the likely scale of provision justifies this.

Policy RD4

Retail Development - Comparison Goods

Retail developments dealing primarily with comparison goods will normally be accommodated in existing town centres in accordance with Policies S4 and RD1. However, in very exceptional circumstances, new free-standing shopping developments based on extensive catchment potentials may be permitted where this would complement existing town centres.

Policy S0

General Policies for Shopping

The Borough Council will not normally permit new retail development outside established centres, unless such proposals can be justified as an exception when considered against the criteria set out in the Approved Kent Structure Plan (see paragraph 5.4 of the Borough Plan Review). Emphasis will be placed on the need to husband the long term undeveloped urban land supply in the Borough without infringing the Green Belt (See Policy C0).

Policy S4

Retail Development

Retail development will be provided for based on assessments of future trade potentials, and in accordance with the following principles: (a) the requirements and potentials of different sectors of the retail trade (notably "food and convenience" trades, "retail warehousing" and "other comparison goods" trades); (b) the importance of improving the qualitative features, environment and range of services in existing town centres, in the interests both of their continued vitality and of the shopping public; (c) maintaining a balance between new forms of out-of-centre developments and the viability and vitality of existing town centres, particularly in respect of "comparison goods" retailing developments in view of their wide trade draw; (d) the support given to economic growth and new investment set out in Policy S1.

Policy S6

Policy for Local Centres and Villages

The Borough Council will generally resist applications which will result in the loss of shopping units in the local centres and villages. Some non-office services and offices, particularly where they require a shop window frontage or occupy upper floors and serve the needs of the locality, will be acceptable, provided that the role of shopping in the local centre is not undermined. Minor increases in shopping floorspace will be acceptable

Policy S7

Policy for Hot Food Shops and Restaurants and other A3 uses

Changes of use of existing retail shops to Class A3 uses will be considered according to the following criteria:- (i) They should not cluster with other similar uses to create a dead frontage. (ii) They should not have a detrimental effect on the amenity of any nearby residential accommodation. (iii) There should be adequate parking space available which will not interfere with the free flow of traffic along the highway. (iv) It should be possible for ventilation trunking to be discreetly located on the building. Where such uses are found to be acceptable in principle, conditions will be imposed in any planning permission granted to ensure that environmental disturbance is kept within suitable limits.

Policy TR1

New Serviced Accommodation

Proposals for new serviced accommodation will normally be permitted in the following circumstances, provided there is no overriding conflict with conservation policies, and subject to siting, design and access considerations: (i) development of an appropriate scale or character in towns and villages, including conversions of existing buildings; (ii) conversions of buildings of historic and architectural importance in rural areas when this would contribute to conservation of the building; and (iii) new motels and hotels to serve transit traffic and cater for locally generated demands, located where there are major gaps in the network of existing facilities on or close to primary distributor roads, preferably close to main road intersections and grouped with established development.

Policy TR2

Static and Touring Caravan and Camping Sites at the Coast

Proposals for new static and touring caravan or camping sites, or extensions to existing sites, at or near the undeveloped coast will normally be refused, except for limited extensions or infill development in the Hythe/New Romney coastal area where the normal siting, design, access and landscaping considerations will apply.

Policy TR3

Holiday Chalet Sites at the Coast

Proposals for new holiday chalet sites or the extension of existing sites, at or near the undeveloped coast will normally be refused, except for a limited amount of new chalet or similar development in the Hythe/New Romney coastal areas as extensions to existing sites or as small-scale infill, in order to upgrade and diversify the stock of unserviced tourist accommodation, subject to siting, design, access and landscaping considerations. The conversion of existing static caravan sites to holiday chalet sites and upgrading of existing holiday chalet sites will normally be acceptable, provided this brings about significant improvement in the appearance of and facilities on the site, and contributes to the overall stock of tourist accommodation, rather than "second homes".

Policy TR4

Static Caravan and Holiday Chalet Sites Inland

Proposals for a limited number of static caravan and holiday chalet sites inland will normally be permitted, providing there is no overriding conflict with conservation policies and subject to siting, design, access and landscaping considerations, to services being available, and to such provision contributing to an overall increase in tourist accommodation rather than "second homes".

Policy TR5

Touring Caravan and Camping Sites Inland

Proposals for new touring caravan and camping sites inland, or extensions to existing sites, will normally be permitted in the following circumstances, providing there is no overriding conflict with conservation policies and subject to siting, design, access and landscaping considerations, and to services being available: (i) in locations close to primary distributor routes, well related to and with good access to the main urban areas, (grouped where possible with other established development); (ii) inland from the ports and close to urban areas; or (iii) close to main countryside and heritage attractions.

Policy TR6

New Tourism Attractions and Facilities

Proposals for new tourism attractions and facilities will normally be permitted, subject to no overriding conflict with conservation policies, to siting, design, access and landscaping considerations and to services being available, and provided they will: (a) contribute significantly to local income and employment; or (b) make an important contribution to diversifying and up-grading the tourism attractions in the County in keeping with changing demands; or (c) attract staying visitors.

Proposal PM1

Horn Yard, Bull Yard and the Open Market

The Borough Council will promote the redevelopment of the Horn Yard, Bull Yard and Open Market site for a mixed use scheme containing offices, residential, shopping and public car parking. The Saturday Open Market will be retained on the site in or close to its present position. In considering detailed proposals, the Borough Council will have particular regard to its townscape and conservation policies and will give an opportunity for archaeological investigation on the site prior to development. In the short term the Borough Council will rationalise the existing car park use and carry out environmental improvements. The Borough Council will seek to make proper provision for access to the site in conjunction with the Two Way Northern Route.

Proposal PM14

Wingfield Bank, Northfleet

Land at Wingfield Bank Farm, Northfleet will be developed as a food superstore, subject to suitable safeguards on design, traffic, retail impact and local environmental matters and for employment development within Use Class B1.

Transport

Policy LT8

Public Rights of Way

The Borough Council will aim to maintain and improve the existing public rights of way network and as opportunities arise, it will seek to provide new recreational footpaths, cycleways and bridleways in the Borough.

Policy P1

Public Car Parking in Central Gravesend

The Borough Council will seek to maintain an adequate supply of publicly controlled off-street parking spaces within Central Gravesend through the Plan period and will promote new parking spaces, as the need and opportunities arise, either temporarily or permanently, so far as this is consistent with the other policies and proposals of this Plan. The Borough Council will also encourage schemes for the use of private non-residential car parking spaces by the public, at appropriate times, and will, in association with Kent County Council, examine the scope for parking on-street within the Plan area.

Policy P3

Policy for Vehicle Parking Standards

The Borough Council will expect development to make provision for vehicle parking, in accordance with the Kent County Council Vehicle Parking Standards, as interpreted by Gravesham Borough Council, unless justified as an exception. All vehicle parking provision should normally be made on the development site. In the case of proposals for development in Class B1, as defined in the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987, the Borough Council will expect car parking provision to be made at the standard for offices and will also require lorry parking and manoeuvring areas to be provided, unless the applicant is willing to enter into an agreement to restrict the uses to which the permission relates.

Policy P5

Exceptions to the Vehicle Parking Standards - Change of Use of Buildings

In considering application for the change of use of buildings, the sub-division of existing dwellings or minor extensions, the Borough Council will seek to ensure that the Vehicle Parking Standards are met. However, where this would probably be prejudicial to the townscape or likely to lead to the building being unused or underused, the Borough Council may be prepared to consider a relaxation of the standards, provided this does not unduly exacerbate on-street parking problems in the area.

Policy T0

General Policy for Transport

The Borough Council will seek to achieve:- (i) The most effective use of the existing highway network and the promotion of new or improved roads for the benefit of residents and to facilitate development opportunities in the Borough. (ii) Better facilities for public transport users, pedestrians and cyclists. (iii) Highway safety and environmental improvement measures for the benefit of all transport users and residents of the Borough.

Policy T1

Motorway and Primary Route Network

(i) The motorway and primary route network comprises the following roads insofar as they fall within the county of Kent: M2, M20, M25, M26, A2 (between the Bexley boundary and Junction 1 of the M2), A2 (between Junction 7 of the M2 and Dover Harbour), A20 (Swanley Bypass Section), A20 (between Junctions 8 and 9 of the M20), A20 (between Junction 13 of the M20 and Dover), A21, A26 (between the A228 at Mereworth and the A21 at Tonbridge), A28 (between Margate and Ashford), A228 (between Junction 2 of the M2 and the A26 at Mereworth), A229 (between Junction 3 of the M2 and East Sussex), A249, A253, A256 (between the A253 at Cliffs End and the A2 at Whitfield, (Dover)), A282, A299, A2070. (ii) The following motorway and trunk road improvements are proposed by the Department of Transport: Under construction: M20 Maidstone to Ashford A2 London Boundary to M2 Improvement A282 Dartford to Thurrock Crossing and Approach Roads A282 Junction with A2 Schemes in preparation: M2 Widening between Junctions 1 and 3 M2 Widening between Junctions 3 and 4 M20 Widening between Junctions 3 and 5 M20 Widening between Junctions 5 and 8 M25 London Orbital Widening of dual 3 lane sections A2/A282 Dartford Improvements A2 Lydden (B2060) - Dover Improvement A20 Folkestone to Dover Stage 1 (Folkestone to Court Wood) A20 Folkestone to Dover Stage 2 (Court Wood to Dover) A21 Tonbridge Bypass to Pembury Bypass Dualling A21 Kippings Cross to Lamberhurst Improvement A21 Lamberhurst Bypass A21 Lamberhurst Bypass to Chingley Wood Improvement A21 Flimwell Improvement A249 A2 Junction to M2 Junction Dualling A249 Iwade Bypass A249 Iwade Bypass to Queenborough - Corridor Improvements A249 Brielle Way (Sheerness) Improvement A259 Folkestone to Eastbourne - Corridor Improvements A259 New Romney Bypass A259 St Mary's Bay Dymchurch Bypass A259 Dymchurch - M20 (Junction 11) A259 Brookland Diversion A259 Walland Marsh Improvement (iii) The following county schemes on the defined primary route network are proposed to start by 1991: Under construction: A2070 Beaver Road Diversion, Ashford A249 Albion Place to Mote Road, Maidstone A299 Thanet Way Dualling Schemes in preparation: A28 Sturry Road Widening A229 Maidstone Spine Road A253/A256 Lord of the Manor A26 Somerhill Park Link A2070 Ham Street to Ashford A256 Eastry Bypass (iv) The following county road schemes on the defined primary route network are proposed to start by 1996: A256 Whitfield to Eastry A256 Whitfield Bypass A253 Dualling - Monkton Roundabout to A256 A28 Sturry Bypass A249 Diversion (Chiltern Hundreds) Maidstone A2070 Stockbridge to Brenzett A26 Forge Farm - Phase 2 - Goose Green Diversion A229 Maidstone Southern Approach

Policy T10

Public Transport

Appropriate provision will be made for continued bus operations in the Town Centre following pedestrianisation. The Borough Council will continue to press for the ferry service to Tilbury to be retained in the public interest.

Policy T11

Parking Provision for New Development

All new development will normally be required to provide parking in accordance with the County Council's Vehicle Parking Standards or a local town centre standard where this has been agreed between County and District Councils. Developers of sites in town centres and their environs will be encouraged to enter into appropriate agreements with District Councils for the provision of their non-operational parking in publicly controlled car parks.

Policy T12

Facilities Related to the A2 Trunk Road

In the Green Belt the Borough Council will resist the creation of new facilities related to the A2 and will generally resist the expansion of existing facilities. In the urban area, the Borough Council will judge such proposals on their merits but will expect any such scheme to be:- (i) Well related to an existing A2 junction, to avoid the need for A2 traffic to use local roads. (ii) To minimise any impact on existing adjacent development, particularly where that is residential.

Policy T13

M2 Widening and A2 Study

The Borough Council will resist any development which would prevent or impede schemes for the proposed widening of the M2 or improvements arising from the A2 study.

Policy T14

Channelling Traffic in Urban Areas

As far as possible all long-distance traffic in urban areas will be channelled onto primary distributor roads and traffic between and within residential, industrial, and principal business districts of the same town, will be channelled onto district distributors.

Policy T15

Facilities for Pedestrians and Cyclists

Facilities designed to encourage journeys to be made on foot or by bicycle will be provided.

Policy T16

Heavy Goods Vehicle Restrictions

Traffic regulation orders will be made where practicable to prohibit or restrict the use of heavy goods vehicles in sensitive environmental areas, or on such roads where it is considered expedient to preserve or enhance the amenities of the County.

Policy T17

Pedestrianisation of Streets

Streets will pedestrianised or partially pedestrianised where it can be shown that sufficient benefits would result and provided alternative routes can be made available for diverted traffic. Access to affected properties must be adequately maintained and the accessibility of the area to public transport passengers must not be seriously affected.

Policy T2

Impact of Development on Highway Network

The Local Planning and Highway Authorities will seek to channel all traffic travelling through Gravesham on to the primary road network and to channel traffic between and within residential, industrial and principal business districts of the Borough onto the district distributors.

Policy T3

Local Access to Economic Development Sites

New and improved local access to economic development sites will be provided where: (i) existing access is constraining development to sites which would otherwise be available for development; and (ii) the number of jobs expected to be created is sufficient to justify the highway investment; and (iii) no other suitable site with adequate highway access exists in the area. This policy will be implemented in conjunction with Policy T8.

Policy T4

Impact of Development on Highway Network

The Local Planning and Highway Authorities will not normally permit any proposed development outside the confines of the built up area that generates significant vehicular or pedestrian traffic.

Policy T5

Access to the Identified Highway Network

The formation of new accesses or the intensification of use of existing accesses to the roads forming the highway network shown on the Proposals Map, will not normally be permitted, except where no danger would arise and where a properly formed access can be created in a location and to a standard acceptable to the Local Planning and Highway Authorities.

Policy T6

Access onto Primary and Secondary Routes

Exceptional circumstances will be needed to justify proposed development which involves construction of new accesses onto the defined inter-urban primary or secondary route network or increased use of existing accesses onto primary or secondary routes or the continuation of these routes into urban areas where local plan policies for these routes have not yet been formulated. There will normally be a presumption that new development should have access via an access road onto a local route.

Policy T7

Development Generating Significant Traffic Volumes

Exceptional circumstances will be needed to justify proposed development that generates significant volumes of traffic, especially commercial vehicles, if it is not well related to the defined inter-urban primary or secondary route network or the continuation of these routes into urban areas where local plan policies for these routes have not yet been formulated.

Policy T8

Traffic Management

Traffic management measures will be introduced as appropriate to realise the best use of the highway network in terms of safety, traffic capacity and environmental conditions. Where suitable alternative routes exist, the use of heavy commercial vehicles will be discouraged in areas of sensitive environment or on such roads where it is considered expedient to preserve or improve the amenities of the locality.

Policy T9

Service Areas on Primary Routes and Motorways

The County Council will seek to ensure the establishment of facilities to meet the demands of all road users on primary routes, and of service areas on motorways at appropriate locations and spacing, providing there is no overriding conflict with conservation policies, and subject to siting, design, access and landscaping considerations. Particular encouragement will be given to the concentration of facilities together on one site, either by adding to an existing service or through developing a comprehensive range on a new site.

Policy TC11

Policy Concerning Forecourt Parking

The Borough Council will survey the extent of forecourt parking in its area and seek to reduce it in consultation with landowners and occupiers and through programmes of environmental improvements. Proposals which involve the use of forecourt parking will be resisted, unless it can be demonstrated that:- (i) There are no environmental disadvantages. (ii) There is a properly constructed crossover. (iii) Vehicles can be physically separated from pedestrians using public footways. (iv) Their use does not create danger for pedestrians or traffic or obstruct the free flow of vehicles.

Proposal PP1

Public Car Parking in Central Gravesend

The Borough Council will seek to achieve the optimum level of public car parking provision, consistent with other objectives of this Plan, as developments take place, in accordance with the Proposals Map by requiring development at each of the following sites to incorporate public car parking facilities, in addition to parking required under Policy P3: (i) Horn Yard, Bull Yard and the Open Market (ii) Milton Place (iii) Parrock Street (iv) Eden Place

Proposal PT1

Medway Towns Northern Relief Road

A route for that part of the Medway Towns Northern Relief Road which lies within the Borough and for the associated alterations to the existing junction of the M2 and A2 at Three Crutches is shown on the Proposals Map. Development which would prevent or impede the implementation of these road proposals will be resisted.

Proposal PT2

Road Improvements Associated with Development Sites

It is likely that the following road proposals shown on the Proposals Map will be implemented within the Plan period:- (i) Gyratory system at New Road/Darnley Road/Garrick Street/Barrack Row, Gravesend. (ii) West Street widening (Bath Street to Clifton Marine Parade). (iii) Gravesend Town Centre two-way northern route. Development which would prejudice the implementation of these schemes will be resisted.

Proposal PT3

Road Improvements Associated with Development Sites - North East Gravesend

Kent County Council intends to carry out improvements to the Lion Roundabout, Denton (on the A226), to provide a fifth leg which will facilitate in part the development of the land indicated in Proposal PM9 and the further relocation of the North West Kent College to its Denton site.

Proposal PT4

Improvement of A227

The Borough Council will seek improvements to the A227 in the rural area, involving widening and some realignment in a number of places between Meopham Green and Culverstone Green.

CIL charging schedule

Gravesham has not adopted a CIL charging schedule.

Related