Planning in Lincoln

Community Facilities

All development proposals should recognise that community facilities such as, but not limited to, leisure facilities, libraries, public houses, places of worship and community halls, or any registered asset of community value, or a community facility identified in a neighbourhood plan, are an integral component in achieving and maintaining sustainable, well integrated and inclusive development. Existing facilities. The redevelopment or expansion of an existing facility to enhance, extend or diversify the level of service provided will be supported. In most instances, the loss of an existing community facility will not be supported. The loss, via redevelopment, of an existing community facility to provide an alternative land use which is not that of a community facility will only be permitted if it is demonstrated that: a) The facility is demonstrably no longer fit for purpose and the site is not viable to be redeveloped for a new community facility; or b) The service provided by the facility is met by alternative provision that exists within reasonable proximity: what is deemed as reasonable proximity will depend on the nature of the facility and its associated catchment area; or c) The proposal includes the provision of a new community facility of similar nature and of a similar or greater size in a suitable on or offsite location. New stand-alone facilities. Proposals for new community facilities will be supported in principle, and should: d) Prioritise and promote access by walking, cycling and public transport. Community facilities may have a local or wider catchment area: access should be considered proportionately relative to their purpose, scale and catchment area; e) Be accessible for all members of society; f) Be designed so that they are adaptable and can be easily altered to respond to future demands if necessary; and g) Where applicable, be operated without detriment to local residents: this especially applies to facilities which are open in the evening, such as leisure and recreation facilities. New facilities as part of wider development proposals. Where new community facilities are deemed necessary as part of a wider development proposal (such as a residential development scheme which generates demand for new facilities), and acceptable within the guidance set out in Policy S45, then developers will be expected to provide such relevant facilities either directly on-site and/or off site, through a financial contribution, either alone or cumulatively with other developments. Opportunities to incorporate community facilities within or adjacent to the development site should be sought in the first instance. Offsite provision may be acceptable as an alternative if: h) There is insufficient space available onsite/ adjacent to the site; or i) Incorporation of the facility onsite/ adjacent would not be financially viable; or j) It would be more appropriate to contribute (in whole or part) to the establishment or expansion of a facility elsewhere in order to meet wider demand or combine facilities. Whether on or off-site, community facilities required as part of wider development proposals should, in addition to criteria (d) – (g) above: k) Be implemented, as appropriate, at an early stage of the phasing of development; l) Have a robust business plan and governance arrangements in place, prepared by the applicant, including any funding arrangement, to ensure the facility is financially sustainable in the longer term.

Creation of New Open Space, Sports and Leisure Facilities

The Central Lincolnshire Authorities will seek to: a) reduce deficiency in publicly accessible open space, sports and leisure facilities; b) ensure new development provides an appropriate amount of new open space, sports and leisure facilities to meet need; and c) improve the quality of, and access to, existing open spaces, sports and leisure facilities. Part A New Open Space In all new residential developments of 10 dwellings or more, development proposals will be required to provide new or enhanced publicly accessible open space, sports and leisure facilities to meet the needs of their occupiers in accordance with this policy, the standards set out in Appendix 3, and in compliance with the latest Central Lincolnshire Developer Contributions SPD (or similar subsequent document). On-site Provision The preference is for on-site provision in a suitable location where this is practicable and would be the most effective way of meeting the needs generated by the development. The precise type of on-site provision that is required will depend on the nature and location of the proposal and the quantity and type of open space needed in the local area. This should ideally be the subject of discussion and negotiation with the Council at the pre-application stage and where relevant with the input of the parish council. In accordance with part 6 of Policy S53, new open space, sports and leisure provision created on-site as part of the development should: d) be of an appropriate size and quality in accordance with the standards in Appendix 3; e) be designed to be safe and accessible to all potential users; f) be designed to maximise green infrastructure benefits and functions, and in particular, take opportunities to link into the wider green and blue infrastructure network and deliver a biodiversity net gain (see Policy S59 and S61); g) consider the context of any existing provision and maximise any opportunities for improvement within the wider area where these are relevant to the development of the site; h) have a clear funding strategy and appropriate mechanisms secured which will ensure the future satisfactory maintenance and management of the site. Off-Site Provision In certain circumstances, as directed by Appendix 3, the criteria set out in the Central Lincolnshire Developer Contributions SPD and subject to legislation, it may be acceptable for a developer to make a financial or in-kind contribution towards open space provision off-site. Such proposals, which should ideally be agreed at pre-application stage, will only be considered if: i) the provision of open space on-site is not feasible or suitable due to the nature of the proposed development, by virtue of its size and/or other site specific constraints; and/or j) the open space needs of the proposed residential development can be met more appropriately by providing either new or enhanced provision off-site. Part B Playing Pitches To secure the level of playing pitch provision and associated changing room facilities required to meet the scale of additional demand generated from development when considered against the criteria within Appendix 3, contributions sought will be based on an assessment of existing facilities, including the distance to these facilities and their remaining capacity. The scale of development, informed by Table A3.2 in Appendix 3, and the site specific context will inform whether provision should be based on site or would be more appropriate to deliver through contributions to improvements existing sites or other sites elsewhere.

Universities and Colleges

In principle, development proposals will be supported where they support the ongoing development of higher and further education establishments in Lincoln, provided that these are well integrated with and contribute positively to their surroundings. University / College related development proposals will be supported in principle if the development would facilitate their continued growth and assist in maximising the economic benefits the Universities / Colleges bring to Central Lincolnshire. Support will be given to deliver more efficient and flexible academic buildings and high-quality urban design on the existing Brayford Pool Campus in accordance with Lincoln University's adopted masterplan. In respect of the University Campus at Riseholme, as identified on the Policies Map, proposals for education, teaching and research buildings and other associated uses will be supported in principle (subject to wider planning policies, including detailed policy requirements for the Campus in any Made Neighbourhood Plan for Riseholme).

Health and Wellbeing

The potential for achieving positive mental and physical health outcomes will be taken into account when considering all development proposals. Where any potential adverse health impacts are identified, the applicant will be expected to demonstrate how these will be addressed and mitigated. The Central Lincolnshire authorities will expect development proposals to promote, support and enhance physical and mental health and wellbeing, and thus contribute to reducing health inequalities. This will be achieved by: a) Seeking, in line with the Central Lincolnshire Developer Contributions SPD, developer contributions towards new or enhanced health facilities from developers where development results in a shortfall or worsening of provision, as informed by the outcome of consultation with health care commissioners; b) In the case of development of 150 dwellings or more, or 5ha or more for other development, developers submitting a fit for purpose Health Impact Assessment (HIA) as part of the application or master planning stage where applicable, and demonstrating how the conclusions of the HIA have been taken into account in the design of the scheme. The HIA should be commensurate with the size of the development; c) Development schemes safeguarding and, where appropriate, creating or enhancing the role of allotments, orchards, gardens and food markets in providing access to healthy, fresh and locally produced food; and d) Ensuring quality green infrastructure provides adequate access to nature for its benefits to mental and physical health and wellbeing and potential to overcome health inequalities. Proposals for new health care facilities should relate well to public transport services, walking and cycling routes and be easily accessible to all sectors of the community. Proposals which utilise opportunities for the multi-use and co-location of health facilities with other services and facilities, and thus co-ordinate local care and provide convenience for the community, will be particularly supported.

Advertisements

All proposals for the display of advertisements must comply with relevant national regulations and guidance. Where advertisement consent is required, such consent will be permitted if the proposal respects the interests of public safety and amenity, subject to the following criteria: a) The design (including any associated lighting and illumination), materials, size and location of the advertisement respects the scale and character of the building on which it is situated and the surrounding area, especially in the case of a listed building or within a conservation area; and b) The proposal would not result in a cluttered street scene, excessive signage, or a proliferation of signs advertising a single site or enterprise; and c) The proposal would not cause a hazard to pedestrians or road users; and d) The proposal would not impede on any surveillance equipment and would contribute positively to public perceptions of security.

City and Town Centre Frontages

This policy applies to all proposals for town centre uses within defined city and town centres including shops, banks, restaurants, leisure uses or all uses within areas identified as Primary Shopping Areas in tiers 1 and 2 of the retail hierarchy in Policy S35. Proposals for new frontages or alterations to existing frontages within an identified centre will be permitted provided the proposal: a. is of a high quality design and is sympathetic in scale, proportion and appearance to the building of which it forms part, and to the character of the surrounding street scene; and b. protects, and where possible enhances, traditional or original frontage or features that are of architectural or historic interest, particularly if the building is listed or within a conservation area; and c. is designed to allow equal access for all users. Where a proposal includes the provision of external security shutters, permission will only be granted where: d. it is demonstrated that there is a persistent problem of crime or vandalism affecting the property which cannot be satisfactorily and reasonably addressed by an alternative measure; and e. the property is not a listed building or situated in a conservation area; and f. the security shutter is transparent or heavily perforated to an extent that the area behind is highly visible; and g. the shutter is designed to a high standard and is in keeping with the character and appearance of the building and its surroundings.

Resilient and Adaptable Design

Heat resilience In order to prevent and minimise the impacts of overheating in the built environment, applicants must demonstrate, commensurate with the scale and location of the proposal, consideration of: 1. How the design of the development minimises overheating and reduces demand on air conditioning systems, including considering: a) orienting buildings to maximise the opportunities for both natural heating and ventilation and to reduce wind exposure; and b) measures such as solar shading, thermal mass and appropriately coloured materials in areas exposed to direct and excessive sunlight; In considering the above, the balance between solar gain versus solar shading will need to be carefully managed. 2. The potential to incorporate a green roof and/or walls to aid cooling, add insulation, assist water management and enhance biodiversity, wherever possible linking into a wider network of green infrastructure; unless such roof space is being utilised for photovoltaic or thermal solar panels; or on a whole life cycle basis, it is demonstrated that a lower specification roof has a significantly lower carbon impact than a green roof; or the nature of the development makes it impracticable to incorporate a green roof. Adaptable design Applicants should design proposals to be adaptable to future social, economic, technological and environmental requirements in order to make buildings both fit for purpose in the long term and to minimise future resource consumption in the adaptation and redevelopment of buildings in response to future needs. To meet this requirement, applicants should undertake the following, where applicable: 3. Allow for future adaptation or extension by means of the building's internal arrangement internal height, detailed design and construction, including the use of internal stud walls rather than solid walls to allow easier reconfiguration of internal layout. Residential proposals which meet, as a minimum, Building Regulations M4(2) (accessible and adaptable dwellings) standard would be deemed to have complied with this criterion; 4. Identification on floor plans of internal space with potential to accommodate 'home working': this may include bedrooms where there is more than 1 bedroom proposed; 5. Provision of electric car charging infrastructure (see Policy NS18); 6. Infrastructure that supports car free development and lifestyles; 7. Having multiple well-placed entrances on larger non-residential buildings to allow for easier subdivision; and 8. Is resilient to flood risk, from all forms of flooding (see Policy S21).

Design and Amenity

All development, including extensions and alterations to existing buildings, must achieve high quality sustainable design that contributes positively to local character, landscape and townscape, and supports diversity, equality and access for all. Good design will be at the centre of every development proposal and this will be required to be demonstrated through evidence supporting planning applications to a degree proportionate to the proposal. Design Codes may be produced for parts of Central Lincolnshire or in support of specific developments. The approach taken in these Design Codes should be informed by the National Model Design Code and where these codes have been adopted, developments will be expected to adhere to the Code. Proposals for new buildings should incorporate the Design Principles for Efficient Buildings in Policy S6 at the centre of design. All development proposals will be assessed against, and will be expected to meet the following relevant design and amenity criteria. All development proposals will: 1. Context a) Be based on a sound understanding of the context, integrating into the surroundings and responding to local history, culture and heritage; b) Relate well to the site, its local and wider context and existing characteristics including the retention of existing natural and historic features wherever possible and including appropriate landscape and boundary treatments to ensure that the development can be satisfactorily assimilated into the surrounding area; c) Protect any important local views into, out of or through the site; 2. Identity a) Contribute positively to the sense of place, reflecting and enhancing existing character and distinctiveness; b) Reflect or improve on the original architectural style of the local surroundings, or embrace opportunities for innovative design and new technologies which sympathetically complement or contrast with the local architectural style; c) Use appropriate, high quality materials which reinforce or enhance local distinctiveness; d) Not result in the visual or physical coalescence with any neighbouring settlement nor ribbon development; 3. Built Form a) Make effective and efficient use of land that contribute to the achievement of compact, walkable neighbourhoods; b) Be appropriate for its context and its future use in terms of its building types, street layout, development block type and size, siting, height, scale, massing, form, rhythm, plot widths, gaps between buildings, and the ratio of developed to undeveloped space both within a plot and within a scheme; c) Achieve a density not only appropriate for its context but also taking into account its accessibility; d) Have a layout and form that delivers efficient and adaptable homes in accordance with Policy S6 and Policy S20. 4. Movement a) Form part of a well-designed and connected travel network with consideration for all modes of transport offering genuine choices for non-car travel and prioritising active travel and where relevant demonstrate this through evidence clearly showing connectivity for all modes and a hierarchy of routes (also see Policy S47 and Policy S48); b) Maximise pedestrian and cycle permeability and avoid barriers to movement through careful consideration of street layouts and access routes both within the site and in the wider context contributing to the delivery of walkable and cyclable neighbourhoods in accordance with Policy S48; c) Ensure areas are accessible, safe and legible for all including people with physical accessibility difficulties; d) Deliver well-considered parking, including suitable electric vehicle charging points, with appropriate landscaping provided in accordance with the parking standards set out in Policy NS18 and Policy S49; e) Deliver suitable access solutions for servicing and utilities; 5. Nature a) Incorporate and retain as far as possible existing natural features including hedgerows, trees, and waterbodies particularly where these features offer a valuable habitat to support biodiversity, aligned with policies in the Natural Environment chapter of the Local Plan; b) Incorporate appropriate landscape and boundary treatments to ensure that the development can be satisfactorily assimilated into the surrounding area, maximising opportunities to deliver diverse ecosystems and biodiverse habitats, strengthening wildlife corridors and green infrastructure networks, and helping to achieve wider goals for biodiversity net gain, climate change mitigation and adaptation and water management; 6. Public Spaces a) Ensure public spaces are accessible to all, are safe and secure and will be easy to maintain with clear definition of public and private spaces; b) Form part of a hierarchy of spaces where relevant to offer a range of spaces available for the community and to support a variety of activities and encourage social interaction; c) Be carefully planned and integrated into the wider community to ensure spaces feel safe and are safe through natural surveillance, being flanked by active uses and by promoting activity within the space; d) Maximise opportunities for delivering additional trees and biodiversity gains through the creation of new habitats and the strengthening or extending wildlife corridors and the green infrastructure network in accordance with policies in the Natural Environment chapter; 7. Uses a) Create or contribute to a variety of complementary uses that meet the needs of the community; b) Be compatible with neighbouring land uses and not result in likely conflict with existing uses unless it can be satisfactorily demonstrated that both the ongoing use of the neighbouring site will not be compromised, and that the amenity of occupiers of the new development will be satisfactory with the ongoing normal use of the neighbouring site; c) Not result in adverse noise and vibration taking into account surrounding uses nor result in adverse impacts upon air quality from odour, fumes, smoke, dust and other sources; 8. Homes and Buildings a) Provide homes with good quality internal environments with adequate space for users and good access to private, shared or public spaces; b) Be adaptable and resilient to climate change and be compatible with achieving a net zero carbon Central Lincolnshire as required by Policies S6, S7 and S8; c) Be capable of adapting to changing needs of future occupants and be cost effective to run by achieving the standards set out in Policy S20; d) Not result in harm to people's amenity either within the proposed development or neighbouring it through overlooking, overshadowing, loss of light or increase in artificial light or glare; e) Provide adequate storage, waste, servicing and utilities for the use proposed; 9. Resources a) Minimise the need for resources both in construction and operation of buildings and be easily adaptable to avoid unnecessary waste in accordance with Policies S10 and S11; b) Use high quality materials which are not only suitable for the context but that are durable and resilient to impacts of climate change in accordance with the requirements of Policy S20; 10. Lifespan a) Use high quality materials which are durable and ensure buildings and spaces are adaptive; and b) Encourage the creation of a sense of ownership for users and the wider community with a clear strategy for ongoing management and stewardship. Development proposals will be expected to satisfy requirements of any adopted local design guide or design code where relevant to the proposal.

Protecting Lincoln, Gainsborough and Sleaford's Setting and Character

All development proposals should contribute to the realisation of the following key principles: Lincoln a) Protect the dominance and approach views of Lincoln Cathedral, Lincoln Castle and uphill Lincoln on the skyline; b) Protect Lincoln's distinct built heritage and townscape character as set out in the Lincoln Townscape Character Assessment; c) Respect Lincoln's unique character and setting and relationship with surrounding villages by maintaining and enhancing a strategic green infrastructure network around and into the City, including Green Wedges (see Policy S63) to protect the City's green character and to maintain the setting and integrity of surrounding villages; d) Proposals within, adjoining or affecting the setting of the 11 Conservation Areas and 3 historic parks and gardens within the built up area of Lincoln, should preserve and enhance their special character, setting, appearance and respect their special historic and architectural context; e) Support the development of art, cultural and leisure assets and facilities, such as the Collection, the Theatre Royal, the Engine Shed, Arboretum and Whisby Nature Park, and improve access to such assets and facilities; and f) Do not detract from the open character of Lincoln's Brayford Pool and waterways, protecting and enhancing them as a major focal points in and through the City. Gainsborough g) Take into account the Gainsborough Town Centre Conservation Area Appraisal and Gainsborough Town Centre Heritage Masterplan; h) Protect and enhance the landscape character and setting of Gainsborough and the surrounding villages by ensuring key gateways are landscaped to enhance the setting of the town, minimise impact upon the open character of the countryside and to maintain the setting and integrity of surrounding villages. Sleaford i) Take into account the Sleaford Masterplan, Sleaford Town Centre Conservation Area Appraisal, Sleaford Town Centre Regeneration SPD and any subsequent guidance; j) Protect, conserve and, where appropriate, enhance the Castle Site, Market Place, the Bass Maltings, Money's Mill and Yard, Handley Monument and Northgate, through sensitive development and environmental improvement; k) Protect important local views of Sleaford, including the Bass Maltings complex and its setting, from both within and outside the town; l) Support the development of art, cultural and leisure assets and facilities within or close to the town centre, and improve access to such assets and facilities, such as The Hub (the National Centre for Craft and Design); m) Protect and enhance the River Slea Navigation Corridor as a major focal point for the town, optimising its use and value for recreation, tourism and biodiversity, and taking into account the opportunities identified in the Sleaford Urban Opportunities Study; n) Support the development of the Sleaford East West Leisure Link as the key component of the Sleaford Urban Green Grid in accordance with the Sleaford Masterplan and Central Lincolnshire Green Infrastructure Study and take opportunities to deliver improvements to the wider Green Infrastructure network.

Spatial Strategy for Employment

In principle, employment related development proposals should be consistent with meeting the following overall spatial strategy for employment. The strategy is to strengthen the Central Lincolnshire economy offering a wide range of employment opportunities focused mainly in and around the Lincoln urban area and the towns of Gainsborough and Sleaford, with proportionate employment provision further down the Settlement Hierarchy (see Policy S1). Aligned to the Greater Lincolnshire Local Industrial Strategy, and as a key component of the Midlands Engine, there will be significant growth in a number of sectors, most notably agri-food, manufacturing, business services and the visitor economy, including accommodation and food services. Land has been made available in appropriate locations in this plan to meet the strategic needs identified in Central Lincolnshire. Strategic Employment Sites (SES), and existing Important Established Employment Areas (IEEA) will be protected for their importance to the economy. Employment development will mainly be directed to these SES and IEEA and at Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUEs) as part of mixed use communities being created. Elsewhere, policies will seek to protect Local Employment Areas (LEA) to help ensure there are jobs and services available to meet the local needs of the community and to allow enterprises to flourish at suitable sites across Central Lincolnshire. Outside of existing employment areas and allocated sites, economic development will typically be limited to small-scale proposals which satisfy the requirements of Policy S33 or Policy S34.

Strategic Employment Sites (SES)

Part 1: SES will meet large scale investment needs that requires significant land take. Proposals for the development of SES should be progressed through an agreed masterplan which includes a travel plan and associated infrastructure to promote sustainable modes of travel for the site as a whole wherever possible prior to or alongside a planning application. Small scale, ancillary and/or piecemeal development that prevents or otherwise detracts from the delivery of large scale investment on an SES will be refused. SES will primarily be developed for B2 and B8 Use Classes. Other business development under E(g) Use Class (i.e. for offices, research and development, or other industrial processes) will also be acceptable, though the local planning authority may seek to apply conditions limiting the ability to change use to other uses within Use Class E without the need for planning permission. Part 2: Where planning permission is required, proposals which would result in the loss of business uses under B2, B8 and E(g) Use Classes will not be permitted, unless: a) The proposed use will generate employment; and b) The proposed use, either alone or combined with other existing or proposed uses, would not adversely affect the role of the employment area or introduce conflict between uses; and c) The proposal will have adequate parking provision and will not result in any other unacceptable impact upon amenity; and d) Evidence is provided clearly demonstrating that the site has been appropriately marketed for a continuous period of 12 months or more without successful conclusion on terms that reflect the lawful use and condition of the premises – this evidence will be considered in the context of local market conditions and the state of the wider national economy. Development under other E Use Classes, beyond E(g), will only be acceptable where the sequential test against the network and hierarchy of town centres as defined in Policy S35 is passed or where the proposed use can be shown to be clearly ancillary to existing uses on the site and will not prevent or otherwise detract from the delivery of large scale investment at the site. Other employment generating uses, beyond those described above, will only be acceptable where the proposed use can be shown to be clearly ancillary to existing uses on the site and the proposal will not result in an unacceptable impact on the functioning of the SES. In the event that the Use Classes Order changes during the life of this Plan, then the closest new Use Classes to those previously categorised as B2, B8, E(g) and E Use Classes as a whole will apply for the purpose of applying the above policy, provided such new Use Classes are reasonably similar to the ones being replaced. Should no similar replacement new Use Classes arise, then the description of B2, B8 and E Use Classes as at the date of the adoption of this plan will apply for the purpose of applying this policy, and appropriate conditions or similar mechanisms will be used to enforce such provisions.

Employment Allocations on Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUEs)

The following SUEs will make significant contributions to employment land in accordance with the specific SUE Policies S69-S71. COL/ABB/001 Lincoln North East Quadrant 5ha; COL/BOU/001 Lincoln Western Growth Corridor 20ha; NK/CAN/003 Lincoln South East Quadrant 7ha; NK/NHYK/001 Lincoln South West Quadrant 5ha; WL/GAIN/015 Gainsborough Southern Neighbourhood 4ha; WL/GAIN/001 Gainsborough Northern Neighbourhood 7ha; NK/SLEA/015 Sleaford West Quadrant 3ha.

Important Established Employment Areas (IEEA)

Part 1: In IEEA, employment floor space will primarily remain in B2 and B8 Use Classes and other business development under E(g) Use Class (i.e. offices, research and development, or other industrial processes). Proposals for additional floorspace in B2 and B8 Use Class will be supported in principle. Other business development under E(g) Use Class will also be acceptable and the local planning authority may seek to apply conditions limiting the ability to change use to other uses within Use Class E without the need for planning permission. Part 2: Where permission is required, proposals which would result in the loss of business uses under B2, B8 and E(g) Use Classes will not be permitted, unless: a) The proposed use will generate employment; and b) The proposed use, either alone or combined with other existing or proposed uses would not adversely affect the role of the employment area or introduce conflict between uses; and c) The proposal will have adequate parking provision and will not result in any other unacceptable impact upon amenity; and d) Evidence is provided clearly demonstrating that the site has been appropriately marketed for a continuous period of 12 months or more without successful conclusion on terms that reflect the lawful use and condition of the premises – this evidence will be considered in the context of local market conditions and the state of the wider national economy. Development of other E Use Classes, beyond E(g), will only be acceptable where the sequential test against the network and hierarchy of town centres as defined in Policy S35 is passed or where the proposed use can be shown to be clearly ancillary to existing uses on the site.

Local Employment Areas (LEA)

Local Employment Areas (LEA) are defined as sites sized 0.5ha or more, at least 2,500sqm of existing floor space and with 3 or more units occupied by separate businesses, within Tiers 1-6 of the Settlement Hierarchy as defined in Policy S1 (Small Villages and above). Part 1: Proposals for employment generating uses including B2, B8 and E(g) Use Classes within or adjacent to a LEA will be supported, provided that the proposal will not: a) Compromise the function of the existing LEA; and b) Conflict with neighbouring land uses; and c) Harm the character of the locality and/or the amenities of neighbouring occupiers; and d) Impact unacceptably on the local and/or strategic highway network; and In the case of a proposed extension to a LEA, will not: e) Be disproportionate in scale to the existing LEA; and f) Detract from the role of any SES or IEEA within the same settlement; and g) Result in a poorly defined boundary to the LEA. Where the proposal is for business development under E(g) Use Class (i.e. offices, research and development, or other industrial processes), the local planning authority may seek to apply conditions limiting the ability to change use to other uses within Use Class E without the need for planning permission. Where permission is required, development of or changes of use to other uses under E Use Classes beyond E(g) will only be acceptable where the sequential test against the network and hierarchy of town centres as defined in Policy S35 is passed or where the proposed use can be shown to be clearly ancillary to existing uses on the site. Other employment generating uses beyond those described above will only be acceptable where the proposed use can be shown to be clearly ancillary to existing uses on the site. Non-employment generating proposals will not be acceptable in LEA. Part 2: Where permission is required, proposals that will result in the loss of uses under B2, B8 or E(g) Use Classes in a LEA will be acceptable where the proposed use: a) Will generate a commensurate level of employment to the most recent use of the premises to which they relate; and b) Either alone or in combination with other uses will not adversely affect the role of the LEA; and c) Will not introduce conflict with uses on the LEA or with other neighbouring uses; and d) Will not impact unacceptably on the local and/or strategic highway network; and e) Evidence is provided clearly demonstrating that the site has been appropriately marketed for a continuous period of 12 months or more without successful conclusion on terms that reflect the lawful use and condition of the premises – this evidence will be considered in the context of local market conditions and the state of the wider national economy. Proposals for the loss of business uses under B2, B8 or E(g) Use Classes where the proposed use will not generate employment will be considered on their merits against bullets a-e of Part 2 above and in relation to the anticipated impacts of the loss of employment use on the community it serves and the suitability of the site for the proposed use in accordance with other policies in this plan.

Non-designated Employment Proposals within Identified Settlements

Part 1: Other employment proposals not within SES, IEEA, SUE and not defined as a LEA, but that are within a settlement named in the Settlement Hierarchy in Policy S1, will be supported, provided: a) There is a clear demonstration that there are no other suitable appropriate sites or buildings within designated employment areas or LEA within the same settlement or within 5km of the site; and b) the scale of the proposal is commensurate with the scale and character of the existing settlement; and c) there is no significant adverse impact on the character and appearance of the area, and/or the amenity of neighbouring occupiers; and d) there are no significant adverse impacts on the local highway network; and e) there is no significant adverse impact on the viability of delivering any allocated employment site; and f) the proposals maximise opportunities for modal shift away from the private car. In the case of the expansion of an existing employment use, proposals will be acceptable where they satisfy criteria b-f above. Part 2: Proposals that will result in the loss of non-designated employment will be supported providing that: a) the loss of land or buildings will not adversely and significantly affect the employment opportunities or services available in the area that the site or building would likely serve; and b) the proposal will not harm the character of the locality and/or the amenities of neighbouring occupiers; and c) the proposal will not impact unacceptably on the local and/or strategic highway network.

Non-designated Employment Proposals in the Countryside

In locations outside of the settlements named in the Settlement Hierarchy in Policy S1, proposals for employment generating development will be limited to the expansion of an existing employment use and development proposals that support the growth of the agri-food sector or other land-based rural businesses and buildings in accordance with relevant parts of Policy S5, and only where the following criteria are satisfied: a) It would be consistent in scale with its rural location, without unacceptable environmental and/or visual impacts; and b) It would not adversely affect existing local community services and facilities; and c) It is designed to be compatible with the landscape in which it would be situated; and d) It would not cause undue harm to the open nature of the countryside or any site protected for its natural or heritage qualities, including designated and non-designated sites; and e) It will not impact unacceptably on the local and/or strategic highway network; and f) In the case of a conversion, the building is not in such a state of dereliction or disrepair that significant reconstruction would be required.

Embodied Carbon

All development should, where practical and viable, take opportunities to reduce the development's embodied carbon content, through the careful choice, use and sourcing of materials. Presumption against demolition: To avoid the wastage of embodied carbon in existing buildings and avoid the creation of new embodied carbon in replacement buildings, there is a presumption in favour of repairing, refurbishing, re-using and re-purposing existing buildings over their demolition. Proposals that result in the demolition of a building (in whole or a significant part) should be accompanied by a full justification for the demolition. For non-listed buildings demolition will only be acceptable where it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the local planning authority that: 1. the building proposed for demolition is in a state of such disrepair that it is not practical or viable to be repaired, refurbished, re-used, or re-purposed; or 2. repairing, refurbishing, re-using, or re-purposing the building would likely result in similar or higher newly generated embodied carbon than if the building is demolished and a new building is constructed; or 3. repairing, refurbishing, re-using, or re-purposing the building would create a building with such poor thermal efficiency that on a whole life cycle basis (i.e. embodied carbon and in-use carbon emissions) would mean a lower net carbon solution would arise from demolition and re-build; or 4. demolition of the building and construction of a new building would, on an exceptional basis, deliver other significant public benefits that outweigh the carbon savings which would arise from the building being repaired, refurbished, re-used, or re-purposed. Applications within the countryside relating to the re-use or conversion of existing buildings will only be acceptable where they also meet the requirements of Policy S5, S34, or S43 as applicable. Major development proposals: All major development proposals should explicitly set out what opportunities to lower a building's embodied carbon content have been considered, and which opportunities, if any, are to be taken forward. In the period to 31 December 2024, there will be no requirement (unless mandated by Government) to use any specific lower embodied carbon materials in development proposals, provided the applicant has at least demonstrated consideration of options and opportunities available. From 1 January 2025, there will be a requirement for a development proposal to demonstrate how the design and building materials to be used have been informed by a consideration of embodied carbon, and that reasonable opportunities to minimise embodied carbon have been taken. Further guidance is anticipated to be issued by the local planning authorities on this matter prior to 1 January 2025.

Reducing Energy Consumption in Existing Buildings

For all development proposals which involve the change of use or redevelopment of a building, or an extension to an existing building, the applicant is encouraged to consider all opportunities to improve the energy efficiency of that building (including the original building, if it is being extended)*. Proposals which do consider and take such viable opportunities will, in principle and subject to other material considerations, be supported. In particular, residential properties which, following an extension or conversion, will achieve an improved EPC rating overall will, in principle, be supported. To gain this in principle support, a pre-development EPC should be provided as part of the application, together with evidence as to how a completed development EPC is likely to be rated. More generally, for any work on a residential property, the use of the PAS 2035:2019 Specifications and Guidance (or any superseding guidance) is encouraged. *Note: for any heritage asset, improvements in energy efficiency of that asset should be consistent with the conservation of the asset's significance (including its setting) and be in accordance with national and local policies for conserving and enhancing the historic environment.

Renewable Energy

The Central Lincolnshire Joint Strategic Planning Committee is committed to supporting the transition to a net zero carbon future and will seek to maximise appropriately located renewable energy generated in Central Lincolnshire (such energy likely being wind and solar based). Proposals for renewable energy schemes, including ancillary development, will be supported where the direct, indirect, individual and cumulative impacts on the following considerations are, or will be made, acceptable. To determine whether it is acceptable, the following tests will have to be met: i. The impacts are acceptable having considered the scale, siting and design, and the consequent impacts on landscape character; visual amenity; biodiversity; geodiversity; flood risk; townscape; heritage assets, their settings and the historic landscape; and highway safety and rail safety; and ii. The impacts are acceptable on aviation and defence navigation system/communications; and iii. The impacts are acceptable on the amenity of sensitive neighbouring uses (including local residents) by virtue of matters such as noise, dust, odour, shadow flicker, air quality and traffic; Testing compliance with part (i) above will be via applicable policies elsewhere in a development plan document for the area (i.e. this Local Plan; a Neighbourhood Plan, if one exists; any applicable policies in a Minerals or Waste Local Plan); and any further guidance set out in a Supplementary Planning Document. In order to test compliance with part (ii) above will require, for relevant proposals, the submission by the applicant of robust evidence of the potential impact on any aviation and defence navigation system/communication, and within such evidence must be documented areas of agreement or disagreement reached with appropriate bodies and organisations responsible for such infrastructure. In order to test compliance with part (iii) above will require, for relevant proposals, the submission by the applicant of a robust assessment of the potential impact on such users, and the mitigation measures proposed to minimise any identified harm. For all matters in (i)-(iii), the applicable local planning authority may commission its own independent assessment of the proposals, to ensure it is satisfied what the degree of harm may be and whether reasonable mitigation opportunities are being taken. Where significant adverse effects are concluded by the local planning authority following consideration of the above assessment(s), such effects will be weighed against the wider environmental, economic, social and community benefits provided by the proposal. In this regard, and as part of the planning balance, significant additional weight in favour of the proposal will arise for any proposal which is community-led for the benefit of that community. In areas that have been designated for their national importance, as identified in the National Planning Policy Framework, renewable energy infrastructure will only be permitted where it can be demonstrated that it would be appropriate in scale, located in areas that do not contribute positively to the objectives of the designation, is sympathetically designed and includes any necessary mitigation measures. Additional matters for solar based energy proposals Proposals for solar thermal or photovoltaics panels and associated infrastructure to be installed on existing property will be under a presumption in favour of permission unless there is clear and demonstrable significant harm arising. Proposals for ground based photovoltaics and associated infrastructure, including commercial large scale proposals, will be under a presumption in favour unless: • there is clear and demonstrable significant harm arising; or • the proposal is (following a site specific soil assessment) to take place on Best and Most Versatile (BMV) agricultural land and does not meet the requirements of Policy S67; or • the land is allocated for another purpose in this Local Plan or other statutory based document (such as a nature recovery strategy or a Local Transport Plan), and the proposal is not compatible with such other allocation. Proposals for ground based photovoltaics should be accompanied by evidence demonstrating how opportunities for delivering biodiversity net gain will be maximised in the scheme taking account of soil, natural features, existing habitats, and planting proposals accompanying the scheme to create new habitats linking into the nature recovery strategy. Additional matters for wind based energy proposals Proposals for a small to medium single wind turbine, which is defined as a turbine up to a maximum of 40m from ground to tip of blade, are, in principle, supported throughout Central Lincolnshire (i.e. the whole of Central Lincolnshire is identified as a broad area potentially suitable for such a single turbine), subject to meeting the above criteria (i)-(iii) and the requirements of national planning policy. Under this paragraph, no dwelling or other operation (e.g. a farm or a business) may have more than one turbine at any one time in the curtilage of that dwelling or other operation. Proposals for medium (over 40m from ground to tip of blade) to large scale wind turbines (including groups of turbines) will, in principle, be supported only where they are located within an area identified as a 'Broad Area Suitable for Larger Scale Wind Energy Turbines' as identified on the Policies Map and (indicatively) on Map 2. Such proposals will be tested against criteria (i)-(iii) and the requirements of national planning policy. Medium to large scale wind turbines must not be within 2km of a settlement boundary of a settlement identified in the Settlement Hierarchy. However, where a proposal is within 2km of any residential property, the following matters will need careful consideration as to the potential harm arising: • Noise • Flicker • Overbearing nature of the turbines (established by visual effects from within commonly used habitable rooms) • Any other amenity which is presently enjoyed by the occupier. In this regard, no medium to large scale wind turbine within 700m of a residential property is anticipated to be supported, and proposals between 700-2,000m will need clear evidence of no significant harm arising. For the avoidance of doubt, any medium to large scale wind turbine proposals outside of the identified Broad Area Suitable for Larger Scale Wind Energy Turbines should be refused. Decommissioning renewable energy infrastructure Permitted proposals will be subject to a condition that will require the submission of an End of Life Removal Scheme within one year of the facility becoming non-operational, and the implementation of such a scheme within one year of the scheme being approved. Such a scheme should demonstrate how any biodiversity net gain that has arisen on the site will be protected or enhanced further, and how the materials to be removed would, to a practical degree, be re-used or recycled.

Protecting Renewable Energy Infrastructure

Development should not significantly harm: a) the technical performance of any existing or approved renewable energy generation facility; b) the potential for optimisation of strategic renewable energy installations; c) the availability of the resource, where the operation is dependent on uninterrupted flow of energy to the installation.

Wider Energy Infrastructure

The Joint Committee is committed to supporting the transition to net zero carbon future and, in doing so, recognises and supports, in principle, the need for significant investment in new and upgraded energy infrastructure. Where planning permission is needed from a Central Lincolnshire authority, support will be given to proposals which are necessary for, or form part of, the transition to a net zero carbon sub-region, which could include: energy storage facilities (such as battery storage or thermal storage); and upgraded or new electricity facilities (such as transmission facilities, sub-stations or other electricity infrastructure. However, any such proposals should take all reasonable opportunities to mitigate any harm arising from such proposals, and take care to select not only appropriate locations for such facilities, but also design solutions (see Policy S53) which minimises harm arising.

Design Principles for Efficient Buildings

When formulating development proposals, the following design expectations should be considered and in the following order: 1. Orientation of buildings – such as positioning buildings to maximise opportunities for solar gain, and minimise winter cold wind heat loss; 2. Form of buildings – creating buildings that are more efficient to heat and stay warm in colder conditions and stay cool in warmer conditions because of their shape and design; 3. Fabric of buildings – using materials and building techniques that reduce heat and energy needs. Ideally, this could also consider using materials with a lower embodied carbon content and/or high practical recyclable content; 4. Heat supply – net zero carbon content of heat supply (for example, this means no connection to the gas network or use of oil or bottled gas); 5. Renewable energy generated – generating enough energy from renewable sources on-site (and preferably on plot) to meet reasonable estimates of all regulated and unregulated total annual energy demand across the year. Energy statements, as required by Policies S7 and S8, must set out the approach to meeting each of the above principles.

Reducing Energy Consumption – Residential Development

Unless covered by an exceptional basis clause below, all new residential development proposals must include an Energy Statement which confirms in addition to the requirements of Policy S6 that all such residential development proposals: 1. Can generate at least the same amount of renewable electricity on-site (and preferably on-plot) as the electricity they demand over the course of a year, such demand including all energy use (regulated and unregulated), calculated using a methodology proven to accurately predict a building's actual energy performance; and 2. To help achieve point 1 above, target achieving a site average space heating demand of around 15-20kWh/m2/yr and a site average total energy demand of 35 kWh/m2/yr, achieved through a 'fabric first' approach to construction. No single dwelling unit to have a total energy demand in excess of 60 kWh/m2/yr, irrespective of amount of on-site renewable energy production. (For the avoidance of doubt, 'total energy demand' means the amount of energy used as measured by the metering of that home, with no deduction for renewable energy generated on site). The Energy Statement must include details of assured performance arrangements. As a minimum, this will require: a) The submission of 'pre-built' estimates of energy performance; and b) Prior to each dwelling being occupied, the submission of updated, accurate and verified 'as built' calculations of energy performance. Such a submission should also be provided to the first occupier (including a Non-Technical Summary of such estimates). Weight will be given to proposals which demonstrate a deliverable commitment to on-going monitoring of energy consumption, post-occupation, which has the effect, when applicable, of notifying the occupier that their energy use appears to significantly exceed the expected performance of the building, and explaining to the occupier steps they could take to identify the potential causes of such high energy use. Exceptional Basis Clauses: Clause 1 (technical or policy reasons): Where, on an exceptional basis, points 1-2 cannot be met for technical (e.g. overshadowing) or other policy reasons (e.g. heritage), then the Energy Statement must demonstrate both why they cannot be met, and the degree to which each of points 1-2 are proposed to be met. A lack of financial viability will not be deemed either a technical or policy reason to trigger this exceptional basis clause. Where Clause 1 is utilised, and where the proposal is of 10 units or more (or, for development proposals of less than 10 units but more than a combined total of 1,000sq m or more, as measured by CIL regulations if such regulations remain in force), then the applicant must either: a) enter into an appropriate legal agreement which will either provide renewable energy infrastructure offsite equivalent to at least offsetting the additional energy requirements not achieved on site; or, b) enter into an appropriate legal agreement to provide a financial contribution to the applicable LPA of a value sufficient to enable that LPA to offset (via off site renewable energy...

Reducing Energy Consumption – Non-Residential Buildings

All new non-residential development proposals must include an Energy Statement which confirms that all such non-residential development proposals: 1. Can generate at least the same amount of renewable electricity on-site (and preferably on-plot) as they demand over the course of a year, such demand including all energy use (regulated and unregulated), calculated using a methodology proven to accurately predict a building's actual energy performance; and 2. To help achieve point 1 above, target achieving a site average space heating demand of around 15-20kWh/m2/yr and a site average total energy demand of 70 kWh/m2/yr. No unit to have a total energy demand in excess of 90 kWh/m2/yr, irrespective of amount of on-site renewable energy production. (For the avoidance of doubt, 'total energy demand' means the amount of energy used as measured by the metering of that building, with no deduction for renewable energy generated on site). The Energy Statement must include details of assured performance arrangements. As a minimum, this will require: a) The submission of 'pre-built' estimates of energy performance; and b) Prior to each building being occupied, the submission of updated, accurate and verified 'as built' calculations of energy performance. Such a submission should also be provided to the first occupier (including a Non-Technical Summary of such estimates); Weight will be given to proposals which demonstrate a deliverable commitment to on-going monitoring of energy consumption, post occupation, which has the effect, when applicable, of notifying the occupier that their energy use appears to exceed significantly the expected performance of the building, and explaining to the occupier steps they could take to identify the potential causes of such high energy use.

Decentralised Energy Networks and Combined Heat and Power

Where an existing decentralised energy network exists in the locality, and such a network is likely operational in the long term (i.e. minimum 30 years), then development proposals in the vicinity can consider connection to such an existing energy network provided that in doing so it does not require the network as a whole to increase its fossil fuel consumption (i.e. it should be demonstrated that the network either has spare and wasted capacity, or demonstrate that the energy in the decentralised network is sourced from renewable sources). Any proposal for a new or extended combined heat and power network will only be supported if the power source of such a network is renewable or very low carbon based.

Supporting a Circular Economy

The Joint Committee is aware of the high energy and material use consumed on a daily basis, and, consequently, is fully supportive of the principles of a circular economy. Accordingly, and to complement any policies set out in the Minerals and Waste Development Plan, proposals will be supported, in principle, which demonstrate their compatibility with, or the furthering of, a strong circular economy in the local area (which could include cross-border activity elsewhere in Lincolnshire).

Water Efficiency and Sustainable Water Management

Water efficiency To minimise impact on the water environment all new dwellings should achieve the Optional Technical Housing Standard of 110 litres per day per person for water efficiency as described by Building Regulation G2. Proposals which go further than this (to, for example, 85 litres per day per person) would be particularly supported. Water management In addition to the wider flood and water related policy requirements (Policy S21), all residential development or other development comprising new buildings: • with outside hard surfacing, must ensure such surfacing is permeable (unless there are technical and unavoidable reasons for not doing so in certain areas) thereby reducing energy demand on the water recycling network; • should consider the potential to incorporate a green roof and/or walls in accordance with Policy S20; and • which is residential and which includes a garden area, must include a rain harvesting water butt(s) of minimum 100l capacity.

Carbon Sinks

Existing carbon sinks, such as peat soils, must be protected, and where opportunities exist they should be enhanced in order to continue to act as a carbon sink. Where development is proposed on land containing peat soils or other identified carbon sinks, including woodland, trees and scrub; open habitats and farmland; blanket bogs, raised bogs and fens; and rivers, lakes and wetland habitats, the applicant must submit a proportionate evaluation of the impact of the proposal on either the peat soil's carbon content or any other form of identified carbon sink as relevant and in all cases an appropriate management plan must be submitted. There will be a presumption in favour of preservation of peat and other carbon sinks in-situ. Proposals that will result in unavoidable harm to, or loss of, peat soils or other identified carbon sinks will only be permitted if it is demonstrated that: a) the site is allocated for development; or b) there is not a less harmful viable option to development of that site. In any such case, the harm caused must be shown to have been reduced to the minimum possible and appropriate, satisfactory provision will be made for the evaluation, recording and interpretation of the peat soils or other form of carbon sink before commencement of development. For peat soils that are to be removed, the soils must be temporarily stored and then used in a way that will limit carbon loss to the atmosphere. Proposals to enhance peat soils and protect its qualities will be supported. Proposals to help strengthen existing, or create new, carbon sinks will be supported. The demonstration of meaningful carbon sequestration through nature based solutions within a proposal will be a material consideration in the decision-making process. Material weight in favour of a proposal will be given where the net situation is demonstrated to be a significant gain in nature based carbon sequestration as a consequence of the proposal. Where a proposal will cause harm to an existing nature based carbon sequestration process, weight against such a proposal will be given as a consequence of the harm, with the degree of weight dependent on the scale of net loss.

Flood Risk and Water Resources

Flood Risk All development proposals will be considered against the NPPF, including application of the sequential and, if necessary, the exception test. Through appropriate consultation and option appraisal, development proposals should demonstrate: a) that they are informed by and take account of the best available information from all sources of flood risk and by site specific flood risk assessments where appropriate; b) that the development does not place itself or existing land or buildings at increased risk of flooding; c) that the development will be safe during its lifetime taking into account the impacts of climate change and will be resilient to flood risk from all forms of flooding such that in the event of a flood the development could be quickly brought back into use without significant refurbishment; d) that the development does not affect the integrity of existing flood defences and any necessary flood mitigation measures have been agreed with the relevant bodies, where adoption, ongoing maintenance and management have been considered and any necessary agreements are in place; e) how proposals have taken a positive approach to reducing overall flood risk and have considered the potential to contribute towards solutions for the wider area; and f) that they have incorporated Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)/ Integrated Water Management into the proposals unless they can be shown to be inappropriate. Protecting the Water Environment Development proposals that are likely to impact on surface or ground water should consider the requirements of the Water Framework Directive. Development proposals should demonstrate: g) that water is available to support the development proposed; h) that adequate mains foul water treatment and disposal already exists or can be provided in time to serve the development. Non mains foul sewage disposal solutions should only be considered where it can be shown to the satisfaction of the local planning authority that connection to a public sewer is not feasible; i) that they meet the Building Regulation water efficiency standard of 110 litres per occupier per day or the highest water efficiency standard that applies at the time of the planning application (see also Policy S12); j) that water reuse and recycling and rainwater harvesting measures have been incorporated wherever possible in order to reduce demand on mains water supply as part of an integrated approach to water management (see also Policy S11); k) that they have followed the surface water hierarchy for all proposals: i. surface water runoff is collected for use; ii. discharge into the ground via infiltration; iii. discharge to a watercourse or other surface water body; iv. discharge to a surface water sewer, highway drain or other drainage system, discharging to a watercourse or other surface water body; v. discharge to a combined sewer; l) that no surface water connections are made to the foul system; m) that surface water connections to the combined or surface water system are only made in exceptional circumstances where it can be demonstrated that there are no feasible alternatives (this applies to new developments and redevelopments) and where there is no detriment to existing users; n) that no combined sewer overflows are created in areas served by combined sewers, and that foul and surface water flows are separated; o) that development contributes positively to the water environment and its ecology where possible and does not adversely affect surface and ground water quality in line with the requirements of the Water Framework Directive; p) that development with the potential to pose a risk to groundwater resources is not located in sensitive locations to meet the requirements of the Water Framework Directive; q) how Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)/ Integrated Water Management to deliver improvements to water quality, the water environment and to improve amenity and biodiversity net gain wherever possible have been incorporated into the proposal unless they can be shown to be impractical; r) that relevant site investigations, risk assessments and necessary mitigation measures for source protection zones around boreholes, wells, springs and water courses have been agreed with the relevant bodies (e.g. the Environment Agency and relevant water companies); s) that suitable access is safeguarded for the maintenance of watercourses, water resources, flood defences and drainage infrastructure; and t) that adequate provision is made to safeguard the future maintenance of water bodies to which surface water and foul water treated on the site of the development is discharged, preferably by an appropriate authority (e.g. Environment Agency, Internal Drainage Board, Water Company, the Canal and River Trust or local Council). In order to allow access for the maintenance of watercourses, development proposals that include or abut a watercourse should ensure no building, structure or immovable landscaping feature is included that will impede access within 8m of a watercourse, or within 16m of a tidal watercourse. Conditions may be included where relevant to ensure this access is maintained in perpetuity and may seek to ensure responsibility for maintenance of the watercourse including land ownership details up to and of the watercourse is clear and included in maintenance arrangements for future occupants.

Green and Blue Infrastructure Network

The Central Lincolnshire Authorities will safeguard green and blue infrastructure in Central Lincolnshire from inappropriate development and work actively with partners to maintain and improve the quantity, quality, accessibility and management of the green infrastructure network. Proposals that cause loss or harm to the green and blue infrastructure network will not be supported unless the need for and benefits of the development demonstrably outweigh any adverse impacts. Where adverse impacts on green infrastructure are unavoidable, development will only be supported if suitable mitigation measures for the network are provided. Development proposals should ensure that existing and new green and blue infrastructure is considered and integrated into the scheme design from the outset. Where new green infrastructure is proposed, the design and layout should take opportunities to: a) incorporate a range of types and sizes of green and blue spaces, green routes and environmental features that are appropriate to the development and the wider green and blue infrastructure network to maximise the delivery of multi-functionality; b) deliver biodiversity net gain and support ecosystem services; c) respond to landscape/townscape and historic character; d) support climate change adaptation and resilience including through use of appropriate habitats and species; and e) encourage healthy and active lifestyles. Development proposals must protect the linear features of the green and blue infrastructure network that provide connectivity between green infrastructure assets, including public rights of way, bridleways, cycleways and waterways, and take opportunities to improve and expand such features. Development will be expected to make a contribution proportionate to their scale towards the establishment, enhancement and on-going management of green and/or blue infrastructure by contributing to the development of the strategic green infrastructure network within Central Lincolnshire, in accordance with the Developer Contributions SPD.

Protecting Biodiversity and Geodiversity

All development should: a) protect, manage, enhance and extend the ecological network of habitats, species and sites of international, national and local importance (statutory and non-statutory), including sites that meet the criteria for selection as a Local Site; b) minimise impacts on biodiversity and features of geodiversity value; c) deliver measurable and proportionate net gains in biodiversity in accordance with Policy S61; and d) protect and enhance the aquatic environment within or adjoining the site, including water quality and habitat. Part One: Designated Sites The following hierarchy of sites will apply in the consideration of development proposals: 1. International Sites The highest level of protection will be afforded to internationally protected sites. Development proposals that will have an adverse impact on the integrity of such areas, will not be supported other than in exceptional circumstances, in accordance with the NPPF. Development proposals that are likely to result in a significant adverse effect, either alone or in combination with other proposals, on any internationally designated site, must satisfy the requirements of the Habitats Regulations (or any superseding similar UK legislation). Development requiring Appropriate Assessment will only be allowed where it can be determined, taking into account mitigation, that the proposal would not result in significant adverse effects on the site's integrity. 2. National Sites (NNRs and SSSIs) Development proposals should avoid impact on these nationally protected sites. Development proposals within or outside a national site, likely to have an adverse effect, either individually or in combination with other developments, will not normally be supported unless the benefits of the development, at this site, clearly outweigh both the adverse impacts on the features of the site and any adverse impacts on the wider network of nationally protected sites. 3. Irreplaceable Habitats Planning permission will be refused for development resulting in the loss, deterioration or fragmentation of irreplaceable habitats, including ancient woodland and aged or veteran trees, unless there are wholly exceptional reasons and a suitable compensation strategy will be delivered. 4. Local Sites (LNR, LWS and LGS) Development likely to have an adverse effect on locally designated sites, their features or their function as part of the ecological network, will only be supported where the benefits of the development clearly outweigh the loss, and the coherence of the local ecological network is maintained. Where significant harm cannot be avoided, the mitigation hierarchy should be followed. Part Two: Species and Habitats of Principal Importance All development proposals will be considered in the context of the relevant Local Authority's duty to promote the protection and recovery of priority species and habitats. Development should seek to preserve, restore and re-create priority habitats, ecological networks and the protection and recovery of priority species set out in the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, Lincolnshire Biodiversity Action Plan, Lincolnshire Geodiversity Strategy and Local Nature Recovery Strategy. Where adverse impacts are likely, development will only be supported where the need for and benefits of the development clearly outweigh these impacts. In such cases, appropriate mitigation or compensatory measures will be required. Part Three: Mitigation of Potential Adverse Impacts Development should avoid adverse impact on existing biodiversity and geodiversity features as a first principle, in line with the mitigation hierarchy. Where adverse impacts are unavoidable they must be adequately and proportionately mitigated. If full mitigation cannot be provided, compensation will be required as a last resort where there is no alternative. Development will only be supported where the proposed measures for mitigation and/or compensation along with details of net gain are acceptable to the Local Planning Authority in terms of design and location, and are secured for the lifetime of the development with appropriate funding mechanisms that are capable of being secured by condition and/or legal agreement. If significant harm to biodiversity resulting from development cannot be avoided, adequately mitigated, or, as a last resort, compensated for, then planning permission will be refused.

Biodiversity Opportunity and Delivering Measurable Net Gains

Following application of the mitigation hierarchy, all development proposals should ensure opportunities are taken to retain, protect and enhance biodiversity and geodiversity features proportionate to their scale, through site layout, design of new buildings and proposals for existing buildings with consideration to the construction phase and ongoing site management. Development proposals should create new habitats, and links between habitats, in line with Central Lincolnshire Biodiversity Opportunity and Green Infrastructure Mapping evidence, the biodiversity opportunity area principles set out in Appendix 4 to this Plan and the Local Nature Recovery Strategy (once completed), to maintain and enhance a network of wildlife sites and corridors, to minimise habitat fragmentation and provide opportunities for species to respond and adapt to climate change. Proposals for major and large scale development should seek to deliver wider environmental net gains where feasible. All qualifying development proposals must deliver at least a 10% measurable biodiversity net gain attributable to the development. The net gain for biodiversity should be calculated using Natural England's Biodiversity Metric. Biodiversity net gain should be provided on-site wherever possible. Off-site measures will only be considered where it can be demonstrated that, after following the mitigation hierarchy, all reasonable opportunities to achieve measurable net gains on-site have been exhausted or where greater gains can be delivered off-site where the improvements can be demonstrated to be deliverable and are consistent with the Local Nature Recovery Strategy. All development proposals, unless specifically exempted by Government, must provide clear and robust evidence for biodiversity net gains and losses in the form of a biodiversity gain plan, which should ideally be submitted with the planning application (or, if not, the submission and approval of a biodiversity gain plan before development commences will form a condition of any planning application approval), setting out: a) information about the steps to be taken to minimise the adverse effect of the development on the biodiversity of the onsite habitat and any other habitat; b) the pre-development biodiversity value of the onsite habitat; c) the post-development biodiversity value of the onsite habitat following implementation of the proposed ecological enhancements/interventions; d) the ongoing management strategy for any proposals; e) any registered off-site gain allocated to the development and the biodiversity value of that gain in relation to the development; and f) exceptionally any biodiversity credits purchased for the development through a recognised and deliverable offsetting scheme. Demonstrating the value of the habitat (pre and post-development) with appropriate and robust evidence will be the responsibility of the applicant. Proposals which do not demonstrate that the post-development biodiversity value will exceed the pre-development value of the onsite habitat by a 10% net gain will be refused. Ongoing management of any new or improved onsite and offsite habitats, together with monitoring and reporting, will need to be planned and funded for 30 years after completion of a development.

Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and Areas of Great Landscape Value

The Lincolnshire Wolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) is a nationally designated landscape and has the highest level of protection. Great weight should be given to conserving and enhancing the landscape and scenic beauty in this area. All development proposals within, or affecting the setting of, the AONB shall: a) be compatible with the special character of the area and have had regard to conserving and enhancing the special quality and scenic beauty of the landscape; and b) respect the landscape character, topography, and context in relation to the siting, design, scale and extent of development; and c) protect and enhance important views into, out of and within the AONB; and d) retain and enhance existing natural, historic and cultural features that contribute to the special quality of the landscape. Proposals which will result in an adverse impact on the AONB or which fail to demonstrate that they will not have an adverse impact taking into account any mitigation proposed, will not be supported. Areas of Great Landscape Value (AGLV) are locally designated landscape areas recognised for their intrinsic character and beauty and their natural, historic and cultural importance. A high level of protection will be afforded to AGLV reflecting their locally important high scenic quality, special landscape features and sensitivity. Development proposals within, or within the setting of, AGLV shall: e) conserve and enhance the qualities, character and distinctiveness of locally important landscapes; and f) protect, and where po

Green Wedges

Green Wedges, as identified on the Policies Map, have been identified to fulfil one or more of the following functions and policy aims: • Prevention of the physical merging of settlements, preserving their separate identity, local character and historic character; • Creation of a multi-functional 'green lung' to offer communities a direct and continuous link to the open countryside beyond the urban area; • Provision of an accessible recreational resource, with both formal and informal opportunities, close to where people live, where public access is maximised without compromising the integrity of the Green Wedge; • Conservation and enhancement of local wildlife and protection of links between wildlife sites to support wildlife corridors. Within the Green Wedges planning permission will not be granted for any form of development, including change of use, unless: a) it can be demonstrated that the development is not contrary or detrimental to the above functions and aims; or b) it is essential for the proposed development to be located within the Green Wedge, and the benefits of which override the potential impact on the Green Wedge. Development proposals within a Green Wedge will be expected to have regard to: c) the need to retain the open and undeveloped character of the Green Wedge, physical separation between settlements, historic environment character and green infrastructure value; d) the maintenance and enhancement of the network of footpaths, cycleways and bridleways, and their links to the countryside, to retain and enhance public access, where appropriate to the role and function of the Green Wedge; and e) opportunities to improve the quality and function of green and blue infrastructure within the Green Wedge with regard to the Central Lincolnshire Green Infrastructure network and Biodiversity Opportunity Mapping. Development proposals adjacent to the Green Wedges will be expected to demonstrate that: f) they do not adversely impact on the function of the Green Wedge, taking into account scale, siting, layout, design, materials and landscape treatment; and g) they have considered linkages to and enhancements of the adjacent Green Wedge.

Local Green Space

An area identified as a Local Green Space on the Policies Map or within an adopted Neighbourhood Plan will be protected from development in line with the NPPF, which rules out development on these sites other than in very special circumstances.

Important Open Space

An area identified as an Important Open Space on the Policies Map is safeguarded from development unless it can be demonstrated that: a. there are no significant detrimental impacts on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, ecology and any heritage assets; and b. in the case of publicly accessible open space, there is an identified over provision of that particular type of open space in the community area and the site is not required for alternative recreational uses or suitable alternative open space can be provided on a replacement site or by enhancing existing open space serving the community area. Some areas of Important Open Space are protected by their type, and are not shown in the Policies Map. These Important Open Spaces are: • Churchyards; • Cemeteries; • School Playing Fields (in use as such); • Sports Centres/Recreation Grounds; • Local Authority owned allotments; They will be safeguarded from development, and any proposal for their loss will be considered against the criteria above and against national policy.

Trees, Woodland and Hedgerows

Development proposals should be prepared based on the overriding principle that: • the existing tree and woodland cover is maintained, improved and expanded; and • opportunities for expanding woodland are actively considered, and implemented where practical and appropriate to do so. Existing Trees and Woodland Planning permission will only be granted if the proposal provides evidence that it has been subject to adequate consideration of the impact of the development on any existing trees and woodland found on-site (and off-site, if there are any trees near the site, with 'near' defined as the distance comprising 12 times the stem diameter of the off-site tree). If any trees exist on or near the development site, 'adequate consideration' is likely to mean the completion of a British Standard 5837 Tree Survey and, if applicable, an Arboricultural Method Statement. Where the proposal will result in the loss or deterioration of: a) ancient woodland; and/or b) the loss of aged or veteran trees found outside ancient woodland, permission will be refused, unless and on an exceptional basis the need for, and benefits of, the development in that location clearly outweigh the loss. Where the proposal will result in the loss or deterioration of a tree protected by a Tree Preservation Order or a tree within a Conservation Area, then permission will be refused unless: c) there is no net loss of amenity value which arises as a result of the development; or d) the need for, and benefits of, the development in that location clearly outweigh the loss. Where the proposal will result in the loss of any other tree or woodland not covered by the above, then the Council will expect the proposal to retain those trees that make a significant contribution to the landscape or biodiversity value of the area, provided this can be done without compromising the achievement of good design for the site. Mitigating for loss of Trees and Woodland Where it is appropriate for higher value tree(s) (category A or B trees (BS5837)) and/or woodland to be lost as part of a development proposal, then appropriate mitigation, via compensatory tree planting, will be required. Such tree planting should be on-site wherever possible and should: e) take all opportunities to meet the six Tree Planting Principles (see supporting text); and f) unless demonstrably impractical or inappropriate, provide the following specific quantity of compensatory trees: Trunk diameter(mm) at 1.5m above ground of tree lost to development | Number of replacement trees required, per tree lost* 75 - 200 | 1 210 - 400 | 4 410 - 600 | 6 610 - 800 | 9 810 - 1000 | 10 1000+ | 11 * replacement based on selected standards 10/12 cm girth at 1m New Trees and Woodland Where appropriate and practical, opportunities for new tree planting should be explored as part of all development proposals (in addition to, if applicable, any necessary compensatory tree provision). Where new trees are proposed, they should be done so on the basis of the five Tree Planting Principles. Proposals which fail to provide practical opportunities for new tree planting will be refused. Planting schemes should include provision to replace any plant failures within five years after the date of planting. Planting of trees must be considered in the context of wider plans for nature recovery which seeks to increase biodiversity and green infrastructure generally, not simply planting of trees, and protecting / enhancing soils, particularly peat soils. Tree planting should only be carried out in appropriate locations that will not impact on existing ecology or opportunities to create alternative habitats that could deliver better enhancements for people and wildlife, including carbon storage. Where woodland habitat creation is appropriate, consideration should be given to the economic and ecological benefits that can be achieved through natural regeneration. Any tree planting should use native and local provenance tree species suitable for the location. Management and Maintenance In instances where new trees and/or woodlands are proposed, it may be necessary for the council to require appropriate developer contributions to be provided, to ensure provision is made for appropriate management and maintenance of the new trees and/or woodland. Hedgerows Proposals for new development will be expected to retain existing hedgerows where appropriate and integrate them fully into the design having regard to their management requirements. Proposals for new development will not be supported that would result in the loss of hedges of high landscape, heritage, amenity or biodiversity value unless the need for, and benefits of, the development clearly outweigh the loss and this loss can be clearly demonstrated to be unavoidable. Development requiring the loss of a hedgerow protected under The Hedgerow Regulations will only be supported where it would allow for a substantially improved overall approach to the design and landscaping of the development that would outweigh the loss of the hedgerow. Where any hedges are lost, suitable replacement planting or restoration of existing hedges, will be required within the site or the locality, including appropriate provision for maintenance and management.

Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land

Proposals should protect the best and most versatile agricultural land so as to protect opportunities for food production and the continuance of the agricultural economy. With the exception of allocated sites, significant development resulting in the loss of the best and most versatile agricultural land will only be supported if: a) The need for the proposed development has been clearly established and there is insufficient lower grade land available at that settlement (unless development of such lower grade land would be inconsistent with other sustainability considerations); and b) The benefits and/or sustainability considerations outweigh the need to protect such land, when taking into account the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land; and c) The impacts of the proposal upon ongoing agricultural operations have been minimised through the use of appropriate design solutions; and d) Where feasible, once any development which is supported has ceased its useful life the land will be restored to its former use (this condition will be secured by planning condition where appropriate). Where proposals are for sites of 1 hectare or larger, which would result in the loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, an agricultural land classification report should be submitted, setting out the justification for such a loss and how criterion b has been met.

Development on Land Affected by Contamination

Development proposals must take into account the potential environmental impacts on people, biodiversity, buildings, land, air and water arising from the development itself and any former use of the site, including, in particular, adverse effects arising from pollution. Where development is proposed on a site which is known to be or has the potential to be affected by contamination, a preliminary risk assessment should be undertaken by the developer and submitted to the relevant Central Lincolnshire Authority as the first stage in assessing the risk of contamination. Proposals will only be permitted if: • it can be demonstrated that the site is suitable for its proposed use; • layout and drainage have taken adequate account of ground conditions, contamination and gas risks arising from previous uses and any proposed sustainable land remediation and • there are no significant impacts on future users, neighbouring users, groundwater or surface water.

The Historic Environment

Development proposals should protect, conserve and seek opportunities to enhance the historic environment of Central Lincolnshire. In instances where a development proposal would affect the significance of a heritage asset (whether designated or non-designated), including any contribution made by its setting, the applicant will be required to undertake and provide the following, in a manner proportionate to the asset's significance: a) describe and assess the significance of the asset, including its setting, to determine its architectural, historical or archaeological interest; and b) identify the impact of the proposed works on the significance and special character of the asset, including its setting; and c) provide a clear justification for the works, especially if these would harm the significance of the asset, including its setting, so that the harm can be weighed against public benefits. Development proposals will be supported where they: d) protect the significance of heritage assets (including where relevant their setting) by protecting and enhancing architectural and historic character, historical associations, landscape and townscape features and through consideration of scale, design, architectural detailing, materials, siting, layout, mass, use, and views and vistas both from and towards the asset; e) promote opportunities to better reveal significance of heritage assets, where possible; f) take into account the desirability of sustaining and enhancing non-designated heritage assets and their setting. Proposals to alter or to change the use of a heritage asset, will be supported provided: g) the proposed use is compatible with the significance of the heritage asset, including its fabric, character, appearance, setting and, for listed buildings, interior; and h) such a change of use will demonstrably assist in the maintenance or enhancement of the heritage asset; and i) features essential to the special interest of the individual heritage asset are not harmed to facilitate the change of use. Development proposals that will result in substantial harm to, or the total loss of, a designated heritage asset will only be granted permission where it is necessary to achieve substantial public benefits that outweigh the harm or loss, and the following criteria can be satisfied: j) the nature of the heritage asset prevents all reasonable uses of the site; and k) no viable use of the heritage asset itself can be found in the medium term through appropriate marketing that will enable its conservation; and l) conservation by grant-funding or some form of not for profit, charitable or public ownership is demonstrably not possible; and m) the harm or loss is outweighed by the benefit of bringing the site back into use. Where a development proposal would result in less than substantial harm to a designated heritage asset, permission will only be granted where the public benefits, including, where appropriate, securing its optimum viable use, outweigh the harm. Where a non-designated heritage asset is affected by development proposals, there will be a presumption in favour of its retention, though regard will be had to the scale of any harm or loss and the significance of the heritage asset. Any special features which contribute to an asset's significance should be retained and reinstated, where possible. Listed Buildings Permission to change the use of a Listed Building or to alter or extend such a building will be granted where the local planning authority is satisfied that the proposal is in the interest of the building's conservation and does not involve activities or alterations prejudicial to the special architectural or historic interest of the Listed Building or its setting. Development proposals that affect the setting of a Listed Building will, in principle, be supported where they make a positive contribution to, or better reveal the significance of the Listed Building. Conservation Areas Significant weight will be given to the protection and enhancement of Conservation Areas. Development within, affecting the setting of, or affecting views into or out of, a Conservation Area should conserve, or where appropriate enhance, features that contribute positively to the area's special character, appearance and setting, including as identified in any adopted Conservation Area appraisal. Proposals should: n) retain buildings/groups of buildings, existing street patterns, historic building lines and ground surfaces and architectural details that contribute to the character and appearance of the area; o) where relevant and practical, remove features which have a negative impact on the character and appearance of the Conservation Area; p) retain and reinforce local distinctiveness with reference to height, massing, scale, form, materials and plot widths of the existing built environment; q) assess, and mitigate against, any negative impact the proposal might have on the townscape, roofscape, skyline and landscape; and r) aim to protect trees, or where losses are proposed, demonstrate how such losses are appropriately mitigated against. Archaeology Development affecting archaeological remains, whether known or potential, designated or undesignated, should take every practical and reasonable step to protect and, where possible, enhance their significance. Planning applications for such development should be accompanied by an appropriate and proportionate assessment to understand the potential for and significance of remains, and the impact of development upon them. If initial assessment does not provide sufficient information, developers will be required to undertake field evaluation in advance of determination of the application. This may include a range of techniques for both intrusive and non-intrusive evaluation, as appropriate to the site. Wherever possible and appropriate, mitigation strategies should ensure the preservation of archaeological remains in-situ. Where this is either not possible or not desirable, provision must be made for preservation by record according to an agreed written scheme of investigation submitted by the developer and approved by the planning authority. Any work undertaken as part of the planning process must be appropriately archived in a way agreed with the local planning authority.

Sleaford West Quadrant SUE

Development at Sleaford West Quadrant, as identified on the Policies Map, will result in the creation of comprehensively planned, new sustainable neighbourhood to the West of Sleaford of 1,400 dwellings. The first phases of development are likely to include the provision of an appropriate, limited scale (informed by traffic modelling) of residential development served from Covel Road, Stokes Drive and St Deny's Avenue. The provision of a new roundabout off the A15 will be required to deliver subsequent phases of the development. In addition to the requirements for SUEs in Policy S68, proposals for this area should: a) deliver a new local centre to meet the day-to-day needs of Sleaford West Quadrant new community and nearby residents, incorporating provision of local retail facilities, services and community uses; b) provide a new healthcare facility adjoining the local centre; c) provide approximately 3ha of mainly use class E(g) employment land including a range of premises to complement the existing employment offer in the Sleaford area; d) support the delivery of the Sleaford East West Leisure Link to connect the town centre to adjacent green spaces and improve connectivity, as identified in the Sleaford Masterplan; e) ensure access is provided via The Drove for pedestrians, cyclists, buses, existing residents and businesses, allotment holders and a limited number of new dwellings; f) provide, in line with the aims of the Sleaford Transport Strategy, primary vehicular access for the development via a new junction with the A15 with secondary accesses to be provided from Covel Road, Stokes Drive, St Deny's Avenue and The Drove; g) prevent vehicular access to the A15 from or through the development via routes other than those set out in e and f above; h) provide, in line with the aims of the Sleaford Transport Strategy, appropriate transport infrastructure measures to encourage walking, cycling and use of public transport in order to maximise opportunities for sustainable modes of travel, with a particular emphasis on maximising opportunities associated with the proximity to the River Slea and connections to the Town Centre and provide appropriate mitigation of impact on the Holdingham Roundabout; i) provide on-site green infrastructure and public open space, which links into the wider green infrastructure network for the Sleaford area and includes multifunctional, dual use of the school playing fields; j) incorporate the relevant Principles for Development within Biodiversity Opportunity Areas set out in Appendix 4 as this site is within or adjacent to an area of Biodiversity Opportunity; k) ensure that the development is safe from flooding from the River Slea through the application of the sequential approach to inform the site layout, ensuring that vulnerable land uses are, where possible, directed to lower areas of risk or are appropriately mitigated; l) preserve the setting of the historic settlement of Holdingham; and m) incorporate a site for the provision of a secondary school facility to meet the needs of Sleaford's growing population.

Custom and Self-build Housing

Part 1: Individual plots Proposals for self and custom build dwellings consistent with the policies of this local plan, to be built and occupied by the applicant or to be built on behalf of the applicant, will be supported in principle. Part 2: Multiple plots on a site When outline permission or permission in principle is sought for plots for custom and self-build homes and where details of each plot will be secured via a custom/self-builder at a later date, a plot passport is required. As a minimum, all plots are required to include a plot passport that summarises the main marketing details and specifications of the plot to include: a) the site location; b) the plot size (m²); c) the ratio of built footprint to overall plot size; d) the indicative developable footprint; e) permissible building lines; f) side spacing requirements; and g) building heights. Additional specifications, such as but not limited to materials, landscaping details, and access arrangements may be required on each plot where local context, a planning permission, or a permission in principle indicates this is necessary. Detailed applications for custom and self-build homes on plots with a plot passport will be expected to adhere to the parameters of the plot passport and clearly demonstrate how the criteria have been satisfied. Applications which satisfy the requirements of the plot passport will be supported in principle. Any variations on the plot passport parameters in a detailed application will require full justification for the changes to demonstrate that they are suitable for the plot if they are to be supported. Part 3: Provision of plots on large sites Proposals for 100 or more dwellings will provide serviced plots to deliver at least 5% of the total number of dwellings on the site as self-build or custom build homes. All plots set aside for self-build or custom build housing (secured via a legal agreement or planning condition) must include: a) legal access onto a public highway; b) water, foul drainage, broadband connection, and electricity supply available at the plot boundary; c) sufficient space in order to build without compromising neighbouring properties and their amenity and the amenity of future occupiers; and d) an agreed design code or plot passport for the plots. If plots remain unsold after a thorough and proportionate marketing exercise which: e) includes making details available to people on the custom and self-build register at the Central Lincolnshire Districts; and f) covers a period of at least 18 months from the date at which the plots are made available (with the 18 month time frame not commencing until (i) thorough and appropriate marketing is in place and (ii) criteria (a)-(d) have been implemented); these plots may be built out as conventional market housing subject to detailed permission being secured and the relevant District being satisfied that e) and f) have been satisfactorily concluded.

Residential Annexes

Where permission is required, development proposals for the creation of a residential annexe will only be supported where: a) the annexe is clearly ancillary to and subservient in size and scale to the host dwelling, and of a design which, taken as a whole, complements the host dwelling; b) the annexe is within the residential curtilage and situated near to the host dwelling such that future separation from the host dwelling will not be achievable; c) there is a clear functional relationship between the occupant(s) of the annexe and the original dwelling, including; i. sharing access, garden and parking areas; ii. sharing services such as electricity, water and broadband; and iii. occupation of the annexe being limited to those providing formal or informal care or support to the occupants of the host dwelling, or those employed for other services primarily within the curtilage of the host dwelling; and d) the proposal does not cause any other harm, such as, but not limited to, amenity (including on occupiers of the annexe, the original dwelling and neighbours), heritage and biodiversity assets, highways, parking, flood risk or character of the locality. Development proposals not meeting these criteria will be considered as a new dwelling and will be assessed against relevant policies as such. Development of detached residential annexes within the defined property boundary will only be permitted where it is demonstrated that the accommodation cannot reasonably be provided through extension to the original dwelling. Where permission is required, development of residential annexes within the countryside will only be permitted where they are an extension to the existing dwelling or the conversion of an existing outbuilding where there is a close physical relationship to the main dwelling. The Central Lincolnshire Authorities will impose a planning condition that restricts an approved annexe to be used solely for accommodation ancillary to the host dwelling and the conversion of annexes to independent dwellings will rarely be acceptable.

Growth Levels and Distribution

The housing requirement for Central Lincolnshire is 1,102 dwellings per year, and 24,244 dwellings over the plan period of 2018-2040. This baseline will be used for Five Year Housing Land Supply calculations, Housing Delivery Test purposes and any other such similar calculations. The economic vision and strategy of this plan is to seek to facilitate the creation of 24,000 new jobs over the plan period, 2018-2040. To help facilitate that target, and ensure the provision of new homes is in balance with job creation, this plan aims to facilitate the delivery of 1,325 dwellings per year, or 29,150 dwellings over the Plan period. In order to facilitate all of the above, this Plan identifies a sufficient supply and mix of sites to not only meet its identified housing requirement and its economic vision jobs growth target, but also sufficient supply to meet the housing needed should the economic vision be successfully delivered. Such a supply and mix of housing and employment sites have been provided in this Plan to broadly meet the following spatial strategy: a. Lincoln Strategy Area – around 64% of the supply, delivered through a combined strategy of (and in priority order): i. urban regeneration; ii. sustainable urban extensions to Lincoln; and iii. growth at settlements which serve, and are serviced by, Lincoln. b. Gainsborough - around 12% of the supply, delivered through a combined strategy of urban regeneration, sustainable urban extensions and sites at nearby and well-connected villages. c. Sleaford – around 12% of the supply, delivered through, primarily, a strategy of sustainable urban extensions and on other urban sites and sites at nearby and well-connected villages. d. Elsewhere – around 12% of the supply will come forward in settlements elsewhere, primarily located at the market towns and in well-connected villages and villages with a good range of services present.

Affordable Housing

Part One: Affordable Housing The strategic aim will be to deliver the c.12,000 affordable dwellings that are needed during the plan period to meet the needs of residents unable to meet their own housing need through the open market, though it is recognised that for viability reasons not all this need will be met through the planning system alone. The affordable housing needs of the most vulnerable groups will be prioritised wherever possible. To help maximise what the planning system can contribute to meeting affordable housing need, affordable housing will be sought on all qualifying housing development sites: a) of 10 or more dwellings or 0.5 hectares or more; or b) within a designated rural area within North Kesteven District, of 5 or more dwellings. Where a site qualifies for affordable housing under a) and b), the percentage sought will be based on the value zones indicated on Map 3: c) Value Zone A 25%; d) Value Zone B 20%; e) Value Zone C 15%; and f) Value Zone D 10% Of the affordable dwellings provided, the exact tenure mix should be identified through discussions with the local authority and informed by the latest Government guidance and up-to-date local Housing Need Assessment (HNA). The starting point for discussions will be based on delivery of 25% of all affordable housing delivered through planning obligations as First Homes, after which priority will be for delivery of affordable rent, subject to satisfying national policy requirements for 10% all housing being for affordable home ownership. This will form the basis of a S106 Agreement to accompany the planning permission. First Homes are homes priced at least 30% below full market value at a maximum value of £160,000 after the discount has been applied. This maximum value price cap is valid up to 31 March 2023. Thereafter, the price cap will be adjusted on 1st April each year, rounded to the nearest £1,000, in line with the % increase or decrease in house prices as established by the preceding September ONS East Midlands House Price Index data. The updated price cap will be published on the Central Lincolnshire website. A Planning Obligation agreement will confirm both: (a) the total % or quantity of First Homes to be delivered on the site; and (b) a trigger mechanism clause to enable an up to date price cap to be confirmed close to the point of housing delivery (rather than date of consent). Such a clause may include a number of trigger points, if the development is be built out in phases. The Central Lincolnshire Authorities will seek the level of affordable housing on the basis of the above targets, but will negotiate with developers if an accurate viability assessment which reflects the recommended approach in the national Planning Practice Guidance demonstrates these cannot be met in full. Affordable housing shall be provided on-site, unless it can be demonstrated that exceptional circumstances exist which necessitate provision on another site within the control of the applicant, or the payment of a financial contribution to the relevant local planning authority (equivalent in value to it being provided on-site as specified in the latest Developer Contributions SPD), to enable the housing need to be met elsewhere. Affordable housing should integrate seamlessly into the site layout amongst the private housing. If a development scheme comes forward which is below these thresholds and thus does not require the provision of affordable housing, but the scheme is followed by an obviously linked subsequent development scheme at any point where the original permission remains extant, or up to 5 years following completion of the first scheme, then, if the combined total of dwellings or site size provided by the first scheme and the subsequent scheme/s exceed the thresholds in a) or b) as appropriate, then all of part one of this policy will be applied as a whole, with the precise level of affordable housing to be provided being 'back dated' to include the earlier scheme(s). Part Two: Specialist housing for older people Where specialist housing for older people is provided as private provision, including within a residential care home setting and including dwellings falling within Use Class C2, an affordable housing contribution will be sought in line with the requirements set out above. Part Three: Rural affordable housing In the countryside, immediately adjacent to an existing settlement, where through an assessment of local needs there is an identified need for affordable housing, permission for rural affordable housing may be permitted as an exception to policies in this Local Plan. To facilitate delivery of such schemes, the local planning authority may consider whether allowing a limited amount of market housing would be appropriate, taking into account the location of the site, the degree of need for affordable homes and the quantity of affordable homes delivered on the site. Proposals for First Home exception sites will be supported in line with Policies S3 and S4. A small proportion of market housing will only be considered acceptable on First Home exception sites where they will deliver a proportion of affordable rent properties on the site. The exact proportion of market housing acceptable on a scheme will be considered against the amount of affordable rented properties to be delivered and will be informed by a PPG-compliant viability assessment agreed in discussion with the local planning authority. Additional affordable housing in rural areas can be delivered through site allocations in neighbourhood plans. Part Four: Affordable housing requirements for MOD housing Affordable housing will not be sought on MOD housing development schemes provided the proposal is to meet the needs of service personnel and their families (for example housing development within military bases) and the homes will not be available to purchase or rent on the open market. Should the homes be subsequently sold (freehold or leasehold) or rented on the open market, a proportion should be provided as affordable housing, the details of which will be set out within a Section 106 agreement.

Meeting Accommodation Needs

Developers are expected to provide housing solutions that contribute to meeting the housing needs of the housing market area, as identified in the latest Central Lincolnshire Housing Needs Assessment and in any other appropriate local evidence. This means new residential development should maintain, provide or contribute to a mix of housing tenures, types and sizes to help support the creation of mixed, balanced and inclusive communities. Proposals which deliver housing at the higher access standards of Part M Building Regulations (Access to and use of buildings) to M4(3) standard will be encouraged. Residential care accommodation, which is designed to accommodate those who need some form of on-site assistance, should be located in a settlement in levels 1 to 4 of the Settlement Hierarchy. If a demonstrable need is identified away from these settlements, then the proposal must demonstrate that access to a range of services and facilities is possible, taking account of the likely occupants of such accommodation. Isolated accommodation in the countryside will not be permitted.

Sub-division and Multi-occupation of Dwellings within Lincoln

The conversion or change of use of existing dwellings and buildings in other uses to self-contained flats or shared accommodation including houses in multiple occupation will be supported only where: a) the existing building is capable of conversion without causing harm to the amenities of future occupants, neighbours and the wider area or would result in safety issues; b) in the case of an existing dwelling, it can be demonstrated there is an established lack of demand for the single family use of the property concerned; c) the development will not lead to or increase an existing over-concentration of such uses in the area; d) adequate provision is made for external communal areas, bin storage and collection, and on-site parking and cycle storage unless it can be demonstrated that the site is sustainably located on a regular bus route or within walking distance of the City Centre; and e) for student accommodation, university/college facilities are accessible by walking, cycling and public transport. Purpose built shared accommodation will be granted within appropriate locations where the criteria set out in c) to e) above are satisfied.

Houseboat Moorings and Caravans

Houseboat moorings Proposals for new residential houseboat moorings, or extensions to existing moorings, within or immediately adjacent to a settlement named in the Settlement Hierarchy in Policy S1 will be supported where they satisfy relevant policies in this Local Plan and where: a) they have connection to appropriate water supply, sewerage system, and electricity supply; b) there is adequate car parking taking into account the number of moorings and the location of the site; and c) it will not obstruct or otherwise detract from any right of way or waterway and not result in any adverse impact on navigational safety. Caravan pitches and park homes Proposals for the delivery of new caravan pitches or park homes, or extensions to existing caravan or park home sites, will be supported where they are located on sites which would be acceptable for permanent dwellings and satisfy the policies in the Local Plan.

Housing in the Lincoln Urban Area, Main Towns and Market Towns

Within the developed footprint* of the Lincoln Urban Area and Main Towns and Market Towns, development proposals at appropriate locations** not specifically identified as an allocation or an area for change in this plan will be supported in principle. To further bolster supply at the top three tiers of the settlement hierarchy, proposals on sites outside of but immediately adjacent to the developed footprint will be considered on their individual merits and will: • Be fully policy compliant, including meeting in full the affordable housing provisions set out in Policy S22; • Result in no significant harm (such as to landscape, townscape, heritage assets and other protected characteristics of the area); • Be suitably serviced with infrastructure; • Be subordinate in size and scale to the community they adjoin and will not harm the settlement form, character or appearance of the area; • Integrate successfully with the community they adjoin having regard to the mix of uses proposed and the design, layout and accessibility of the scheme; and • Promote active travel patterns including access by walking, cycling and public transport. Any such proposal must not compromise the delivery of any other site allocations in the settlement. Proposals for a First Homes exception site in accordance with the NPPF requirements and definition of such sites will be supported in principle where they accord with any adopted local design policies.

Housing Development in or Adjacent to Villages

1. Large, Medium and Small Villages, as defined in the Settlement Hierarchy in Policy S1, will experience limited growth to support their role and function through allocated sites of 10 or more dwellings in the Local Plan, sites allocated in neighbourhood plans, or on unallocated sites in appropriate locations* within the developed footprint** of the village that are typically: • up to 10 dwellings in Large Villages and Medium Villages; and • up to 5 dwellings in Small Villages. Proposals on unallocated sites not meeting these criteria will not generally be supported unless there are clear material planning considerations that indicate otherwise. 2. Residential development proposals for unallocated sites within the size thresholds set out in part 1 of this policy and within the developed footprint of the village will only be supported where it would: a) preserve or enhance the settlement's character and appearance; b) not significantly harm the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside or the rural setting of the village; and c) be consistent with other policies in the development plan. 3. Proposals for residential development on unallocated land immediately adjacent to the developed footprint will only be supported where this is: a) a First Homes exception site in accordance with the NPPF and provided it is outside of the Lincolnshire Wolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and not within a location that is subject of a Designated Rural Area as defined in Annex 2 of the NPPF; or b) exclusively for a rural affordable housing exception site. Any proposals for First Homes exceptions sites or rural affordable housing exception sites will also be subject to the requirements of Policy S22. The consideration of proportionality of a proposal for a First Home exceptions site will be considered on a site basis informed by consideration of the impact on landscape, village character and the historic environment, topography, overall built footprint, visual impact, and intensity of use of the site. Evidence supporting the planning application will need to robustly examine and illustrate why the proposal is proportionate in size to the existing settlement. Whilst not a cap, it is unlikely that a proposal that would result in an increase in the overall area of the developed footprint of the village, or an increase in dwelling numbers, of more than 5% would be considered proportionate, and potentially considerably less (especially if any exception sites have already been provided or planned for at that settlement).

Development in the Countryside

Part A: Re-use and conversion of non-residential buildings for residential use in the countryside Where a change of use proposal to residential use requires permission, and where the proposal is outside the developed footprint of a settlement listed in the Settlement Hierarchy or the developed footprint of a hamlet, then the proposal will be supported provided that the following criteria are met: a) Comprehensive and proportionate evidence is provided to justify either that the building can no longer be used for the purpose for which it was originally built, or the purpose for which it was last used, or that there is no demand (as demonstrated through a thorough and robust marketing exercise) for the use of the building for business purposes; and b) The building is capable of conversion with minimal alteration, including no need for inappropriate new openings and additional features; and c) The building is of notable architectural or historic merit and intrinsically worthy of retention in its setting. Part B: Replacement of a dwelling in the countryside The replacement of an existing dwelling outside the developed footprint of a settlement will be supported provided that: a) The residential use of the original dwelling has not been abandoned; b) The original dwelling is not of any architectural or historic merit and it is not valuable to the character of the settlement or wider landscape; c) The original dwelling is a permanent structure, not a temporary or mobile structure; d) The replacement dwelling is of a similar size and scale to the original dwelling; e) It is located on the footprint of the original dwelling unless an alternative position within the existing residential curtilage would provide notable benefits and have no adverse impact on the wider setting; and f) It satisfies the requirements of Policy S11: Embodied Carbon. Part C: Mobile homes within the countryside Applications for temporary and mobile homes will be considered in the same way as applications for permanent dwellings. The exception to this is cases when a temporary or mobile home is needed during the construction of a permanent dwelling on site or on a nearby site: in such cases more flexibility will be applied. Permission granted in such instances will be subject to time restrictions. Part D: New dwellings in the countryside Applications for new dwellings will only be acceptable where they are essential to the effective operation of existing rural operations listed in tier 8 of Policy S1. Applications should be accompanied by evidence of: a) Details of the rural operation that will be supported by the dwelling; b) The need for the dwelling; c) The number of workers (full and part time) that will occupy the dwelling; d) The length of time the enterprise the dwelling will support has been established; e) The commercial viability of the associated rural enterprise through the submission of business accounts or a detailed business plan; f) The availability of other suitable accommodation on site or in the area; and g) Details of how the proposed size of the dwelling relates to the needs of the enterprise. Any such development will be subject to a restrictive occupancy condition. Part E: Non-residential development in the countryside Proposals for non-residential development will be supported provided that: a) The rural location of the enterprise is justifiable to maintain or enhance the rural economy or the location is justified by means of proximity to existing established businesses or natural features; b) The location of the enterprise is suitable in terms of accessibility; c) The location of the enterprise would not result in conflict with neighbouring uses; and d) The development is of a size and scale commensurate with the proposed use and with the rural character of the location. Part F: Agricultural diversification Proposals involving farm based diversification to non-agricultural activities or operations will be permitted, provided that the proposal will support farm enterprises and providing that the development is: a) In an appropriate location for the proposed use; b) Of a scale appropriate to its location; and c) Of a scale appropriate to the business need. Part G: Agricultural, forestry, horticultural or other rural land-based development Proposals which will help farms modernise and/or adapt to funding changes or climate change will be supported in principle and any such proposals will be considered against relevant design, landscape and natural environment policies in this plan. Where permission is required, development proposals for buildings required for agriculture or other rural land based development purposes will be supported where: a) It is demonstrated that there is a functional need for the building which cannot be met by an existing, or recently disposed of, building; b) the building is of a scale that is proportionate to the proposed functional need; c) the building is designed specifically to meet the functional need identified; d) the site is well related to existing buildings in terms of both physical and functional location, design and does not introduce isolated structures away from existing buildings; and e) significant earthworks are not required, and there will be no harm to natural drainage and will not result in pollution of soils, water or air.

Gainsborough Sustainable Urban Extensions

In addition to the generic requirements for SUEs in Policy S68, development will be required to meet the following specific requirements: WL/GAIN/015 – Gainsborough Southern Neighbourhood SUE The Gainsborough Southern Neighbourhood SUE, as identified on the Policies Map, is allocated for approximately 2,500 dwellings. Development of this SUE is likely to come forward in accordance with the planning consents issued. However, should an alternative permission be sought for the site then in addition to the generic requirements for SUEs in Policy S68, development will be required to meet the following specific requirements: a) Approximately 4ha of land for employment (E(g)/B1 Use Classes) to accommodate uses such as small offices and start-up business premises; b) Open Space and 'green corridors' to integrate the development with the surrounding countryside and woodland to enhance connectivity and reduce habitat fragmentation of Warren Wood, Lee Wood and Bass/Park Springs Wood Ancient Woodlands while also avoiding or mitigating any risk of wildlife disturbance; c) As this SUE is within or includes an area of Biodiversity Opportunity proposals on this site should incorporate the relevant Principles for Development within Biodiversity Opportunity Areas set out in Appendix 4; and d) A new Local Centre of an appropriate scale, providing for retail, services and community uses to support the new community. WL/GAIN/001 – Gainsborough Northern Neighbourhood SUE The Gainsborough Northern Neighbourhood SUE, as identified on the Policies Map, is allocated for approximately 2,500 dwellings. In addition to the generic requirements for SUEs in Policy S68, development will be required to meet the following specific requirements: a) Approximately 7ha of land for employment (E(g)/B1 Use Classes). Employment premises provided must include start-up and small business premises; b) Open Space and 'green corridors' to integrate the development with the surrounding countryside and woodland to enhance connectivity and reduce habitat fragmentation of Blybro Spring Woods, Birch Woods and Wharton Woods Ancient Woodlands while also avoiding or mitigating any risk of wildlife disturbance; c) As this SUE is within or includes an area of Biodiversity Opportunity proposals on this site should incorporate the relevant Principles for Development within Biodiversity Opportunity Areas set out in Appendix 4; and d) A new Local Centre of an appropriate scale, providing for retail, services and community uses of a local nature.

Sleaford Sustainable Urban Extensions

The growth and regeneration of the Sleaford area will be delivered through a co-ordinated and sustainable approach to planning and development, linking housing and economic growth with infrastructure improvements, whilst protecting and enhancing Sleaford's natural environment, heritage assets and local distinctiveness. In addition to the generic requirements for Sustainable Urban Extensions in Policy S68, development at the following strategic sites will be required to meet the following specific requirements: NK/SLEA/014 – Sleaford South Quadrant SUE (Handley Chase) Development at Handley Chase, as identified on the Policies Map, should result in the creation of a comprehensively planned, new sustainable neighbourhood to the South of Sleaford, comprising around 1,450 dwellings. The first phase of development should take place on the land immediately adjoining the existing built up area of Sleaford and include the provision of the new Local Centre. Development of this SUE is likely to come forward in accordance with the outline planning permission granted for the site in 2015. However, should an alternative permission be sought for the site, then in addition to the requirements for SUEs in Policy S68, proposals for this area should: a) deliver a new Local Centre of a sufficient scale to meet the day-to-day needs of the Sleaford South new community and nearby residents, and to include: i. a community centre; ii. retail units; iii. a public house; iv. a care home site; and v. provision for small start-up offices. b) provide vehicular access via London Road only, but incorporate cycle and pedestrian connections into the adjoining Southfields Estate; c) provide appropriate transport mitigation measures, having particular regard to measures to mitigate any adverse transport impacts on Holdingham Roundabout, Silk Willoughby, Quarrington, King Edward Street and Castle Causeway, the junction between London Road and Grantham Road and minor roads linking London Road to Grantham Road; d) deliver an extension of a shared footpath and cycleway along London Road; e) maximise the opportunities associated with the proximity of the site to the Sleaford Railway Station and include measures to encourage rail travel; f) provide on-site a network of green infrastructure and public open space which links into the wider green infrastructure network for the Sleaford area, maximising the potential (and mitigating the impacts) associated with Moor Drain, and which achieves strong, though carefully planned, connections to Mareham Pastures Local Nature Reserve; g) provide on-site sports pitches, a site for a pavilion/changing facility and allotments. NK/SLEA/015 – Sleaford West Quadrant SUE (Land to the west of Drove Lane and to the east of the A15) Development at Sleaford West Quadrant, as identified on the Policies Map, will result in the creation of comprehensively planned, new sustainable neighbourhood to the West of Sleaford of 1,400 dwellings. The first phases of development are likely to include the provision of an appropriate, limited scale (informed by traffic modelling) of residential development served from Covel Road, Stokes Drive and St Deny's Avenue. The provision of a new roundabout off the A15 will be required to deliver subsequent phases of the development. In addition to the requirements for SUEs in Policy S68, proposals for this area should: a) deliver a new local centre to meet the day-to-day needs of Sleaford West Quadrant new community and nearby residents, incorporating provision of local retail facilities, services and community uses; b) provide a new healthcare facility adjoining the local centre; c) provide approximately 3ha of mainly use class E(g) employment land including a range of premises to complement the existing employment offer in the Sleaford area; d) support the delivery of the Sleaford East West Leisure Link to connect the town centre to adjacent green spaces and improve connectivity, as identified in the Sleaford Masterplan; e) ensure access is provided via The Drove for pedestrians, cyclists, buses, existing residents and busines

Residential Development on Sustainable Urban Extensions

The following sites, as identified on the Policies Map, are allocated as SUEs for mixed use development in accordance with the SUEs Policies in Chapter 12. COL/ABB/001 North East Quadrant, Land at Greetwell area, Lincoln 82.9 ha, Expected dwellings during plan period 2018-2040: 1,400, Indicative total dwellings: 1,400 COL/BOU/001 Western Growth Corridor, Lincoln 355 ha, Expected dwellings during plan period 2018-2040: Up to 3,200, Indicative total dwellings: 3,200 NK/CAN/003 South East Quadrant Canwick Heath 469.9 ha, Expected dwellings during plan period 2018-2040: Up to 3,400, Indicative total dwellings: 6,000 NK/NHYK/001 South West Quadrant, Land at Grange Farm, Lincoln 133.5 ha, Expected dwellings during plan period 2018-2040: Up to 1,300, Indicative total dwellings: 2,000 WL/GAIN/001 Gainsborough Northern Neighbourhood SUE 128.9 ha, Expected dwellings during plan period 2018-2040: Up to 750, Indicative total dwellings: 2,500 WL/GAIN/015 Gainsborough Southern Neighbourhood SUE 143 ha, Expected dwellings during plan period 2018-2040: Up to 1,500, Indicative total dwellings: 2,500 NK/SLEA/014 Sleaford South Quadrant ("Handley Chase") 59.8 ha, Expected dwellings during plan period 2018-2040: 1,450, Indicative total dwellings: 1,450 NK/SLEA/015 Sleaford West Quadrant, The Drove 72.9 ha, Expected dwellings during plan period 2018-2040: Up to 900, Indicative total dwellings: 1,450

Housing Sites in the Lincoln Urban Area

The following sites, as identified on the Policies Map, are allocated primarily for residential development within the Lincoln Urban Area: COL/ABB/002 Former Main Hospital Complex, St Anne's Road, Lincoln 0.98 ha, Planning status: None, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 50 COL/BIRCH/001 Land to the rear of Birchwood Centre, Lincoln 3.21 ha, Planning status: Has planning permission, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 49 COL/BOU/002 Monson Arms Skellingthorpe Road Lincoln 0.27 ha, Planning status: Has planning permission, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 10 COL/BOU/003 Former Victory Public House, Boultham Park Road, Lincoln 0.27 ha, Planning status: Has planning permission, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 14 COL/CAR/004 Church at Long Leys Road, Lincoln 0.46 ha, Planning status: Has planning permission, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 10 COL/CAS/001 Land North of Ermine West (Queen Elizabeth Road), Lincoln 13.52 ha, Planning status: Has planning permission, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 303 COL/GLE/001 Land off Wolsey Way, Lincoln 1.08 ha, Planning status: Has planning permission, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 14 COL/MIN/001 Roman Gate 2, Land off Flavian Road, Lincoln 2.17 ha, Planning status: None, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 60. Site specific requirements: Within a Limestone Mineral Safeguarding Area COL/MIN/003 Romangate Development, land at Nettleham Road, Lincoln 6.36 ha, Planning status: Under construction, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 159 (124 remaining) COL/MIN/005 Land at Cathedral Quarry, Riseholme Road, Lincoln 2.74 ha, Planning status: None, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 70. Site specific requirements: Whilst not a requirement to retain the bunds on site, any proposal should ensure visual and physical separation and landscape screening from neighbouring properties, and biodiversity net gain is delivered on site. Development of the site will need to assess drainage and surface water flood risk on the site. Contaminated land assessment required. Any planning application will be required to satisfy the requirements of the County Council mineral planning conditions and satisfactorily address the Site Specific Minerals Safeguarding Area. COL/MIN/006 Land at Nettleham Road, (Junction with Searby Road), Lincoln 1.14 ha, Planning status: None, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 39 COL/MOOR/001 Land North of Hainton Road, Lincoln (known as Rookery Lane site) 1.14 ha, Planning status: Has planning permission, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 40 NK/AUB/001A Land at Thorpe Lane, South Hykeham Fosseway 5.2 ha, Planning status: Has planning permission, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 144 NK/WAD/004a Land south of Station Road, Waddington Low Fields 10.7 ha, Planning status: None, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 321. Site specific requirements: Development of the site will need to assess drainage and surface water flood risk on the site. A Transport Assessment and Travel Plan will be required. Development to be sensitive to views into/out of/across the AGLV to CA in Waddington Cliff. NK/WAD/025 Land off Palm Road, Brant Road, Waddington Low Fields 1.06 ha, Planning status: Has planning permission, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 20. Site specific requirements: Within or includes an area of Biodiversity Opportunity – whilst this site has permission, proposals to amend this permission or any future replacement applications or reserved matter applications on this site should incorporate the relevant Principles for Development within Biodiversity Opportunity Areas set out in Appendix 4. WL/NHAM/001 Land West of Nettleham Road, Lincoln (Romangate) 3.78 ha, Planning status: Under construction, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 97 (76 remaining) WL/NHAM/033 Land off Wolsey Way (Nettleham Fields), Lincoln 16.66 ha, Planning status: Under construction, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 243 (173 remaining) WL/RISE/001 Land off Millbeck Drive, Lincoln 1.34 ha, Planning status: None, Indicative dwellings during plan period (2018-2040): 46. Site specific requirements: Within a Limestone Mineral Safeguarding Area

Housing Sites in the Main Towns

The following sites, as identified on the Policies Map, are allocated primarily for residential development within the Main Towns: NK/KIRK/004 The Hoplands Depot, Boston Road, Sleaford - 1.84 ha, None, 37 dwellings NK/SLEA/002 Land to the East of CL1013, Poplar Farm, South of A17, Sleaford - 25.5 ha, Under construction, 315 dwellings NK/SLEA/016 Land west of London Road, Sleaford - 1.09 ha, Under construction, 187 dwellings NK/SLEA/017 Land off Grantham Road, Sleaford - 14.84 ha, Under construction, 377 dwellings WL/GAIN/003 Land south of the Belt Road, Gainsborough - 3.39 ha, Under construction, 80 dwellings WL/GAIN/005 Riverside North Housing Zone, Japan Road, Gainsborough - 4.29 ha, Under construction, 138 dwellings WL/GAIN/007 Land west of The Avenue, Gainsborough - 2.87 ha, Has planning permission, 43 dwellings WL/GAIN/008 Land west of Horsley Road, Gainsborough - 2.03 ha, Has planning permission, 49 dwellings WL/GAIN/013 Former Middlefield School, Middlefield Road, Gainsborough - 7.26 ha, Under construction, 95 dwellings WL/GAIN/014 Former Environment Agency Office, Corringham Road, Gainsborough - 1.15 ha, None, 34 dwellings WL/GAIN/019 Gateway Riverside Housing Zone, Gainsborough - 6.12 ha, Has planning permission, 220 dwellings WL/GAIN/020 AMP Rose Housing Zone, Gainsborough - 2.28 ha, Planning application submitted, 78 dwellings WL/GAIN/021 Former Castle Hills Community College Site, Gainsborough - 7.64 ha, Has planning permission, 112 dwellings WL/GAIN/022 Former Ropery Inn, 202 Ropery Road, Gainsborough - 0.11 ha, Has planning permission, 14 dwellings WL/GAIN/023 The Maltings, 2b Lea Road, Gainsborough - 0.16 ha, Under construction, 15 dwellings WL/GAIN/024 Land to the rear of 227 - 257 Lea Road, Gainsborough - 0.52 ha, Has planning permission, 16 dwellings WL/GAIN/025 The Beckett School, Whites Wood Lane, Gainsborough - 0.65 ha, Under construction, 25 dwellings WL/GAIN/026 Land at Marshalls Rise, off Spring Gardens, Gainsborough - 0.66 ha, Under construction, 39 dwellings

Housing Sites in the Market Towns

The following sites, as identified on the Policies Map, are allocated primarily for residential development within the Market Towns: WL/CAI/001 Land to the South of North Kelsey Road, Caistor - 5.9 ha, None, 135 dwellings WL/CAI/002 Land at Sunnyside, west of Tennyson Close, Caistor - 2.7 ha, None, 60 dwellings WL/CAI/007 Caistor Hospital Site, North Kelsey Road, Caistor - 5.48 ha, Under construction, 151 dwellings (51 remaining) WL/CAI/008 Land adjacent and to the rear of Roman Ridge on Brigg Road, Caistor - 2.21 ha, Has planning permission, 69 dwellings WL/MARK/001 Land adjacent to Davens Court, Legsby Road, Market Rasen - 1.84 ha, None, 55 dwellings WL/MARK/002 Land off Linwood Road & The Ridings, Market Rasen - 5.91 ha, Has planning permission, 131 dwellings WL/MARK/003 Land to the east of Gordon Field & south of Chapel Street, adjoining Market Rasen Railway Station - 1.39 ha, None, 36 dwellings WL/MARK/008A Land north of Willingham Road, south-west of Glebe Farm, Market Rasen - 4.42 ha, Has planning permission, 48 dwellings WL/MARK/010 Field between properties known as "Mayfield" & "Wodelyn Cottage", Linwood Road, Market Rasen - 1.82 ha, Has planning permission, 45 dwellings WL/MARK/011 Land west of Linwood Road, Market Rasen - 1.14 ha, Under construction, 32 dwellings WL/MIDR/016 Land north of Gallamore Lane, Market Rasen - 3.45 ha, Planning application submitted, 71 dwellings WL/MIDR/018 Land east of Caistor Road, Market Rasen - 16.67 ha, Has planning permission, 300 dwellings

Housing Sites in Large Villages

The following sites, as identified on the Policies Map, are allocated primarily for residential development within Large Villages: NK/BBH/003 Land South of Bracebridge Heath - 11.82 ha, Has planning permission, 241 dwellings NK/BBH/005 St Johns Hospital, Bracebridge Heath - 6.9 ha, Under construction, 130 dwellings (123 remaining) NK/BIL/002 Land to the East of Mill Lane, Billinghay - 2.88 ha, Under construction, 65 dwellings (46 remaining) NK/BIL/003 Billinghay Field, Mill Lane, Billinghay - 6.86 ha, None, 154 dwellings NK/BIL/004 Land to the south of the Whyche, Billinghay - 4.35 ha, None, 98 dwellings NK/BIL/005 Land off Park Lane, Billinghay - 2.9 ha, None, 65 dwellings NK/BIL/006a Land to the rear of 79 & 79a Walcott Road, Billinghay - 1.52 ha, None, 33 dwellings NK/BIL/007 Land to the Rear and South of 27-45 High Street, Billinghay - 2.07 ha, Has planning permission, 33 dwellings NK/BIL/012 Land off West Street, Billinghay - 5.03 ha, Has planning permission, 128 dwellings NK/BRAN/007 Land to the west of Station Road and north of Nettleton Close, Branston - 1.64 ha, None, 35 dwellings NK/BRAN/012 Land to West of Station Road Branston - 4.56 ha, Under construction, 109 dwellings NK/HEC/004 Land off Sleaford Road, Heckington - 2.05 ha, None, 38 dwellings NK/HEC/007 Land east of Kyme Road, Heckington - 1.06 ha, Under construction, 33 dwellings NK/MET/003 Land Northwest of village, Metheringham - 15.33 ha, Under construction, 329 dwellings NK/NAV/005a Land at Winton Road and off High Dyke, Navenby - 3.53 ha, Under construction, 77 dwellings (62 remaining) NK/RUSK/005a Land east of Lincoln Road, Ruskington - 7.24 ha, Under construction, 190 dwellings NK/RUSK/007 Land North of Ruskington - 7.63 ha, None, 172 dwellings NK/RUSK/018 Land North of Whitehouse Road, Ruskington - 3.24 ha, Has planning permission, 73 dwellings NK/SKEL/001 Land south of Woodbank, Skellingthorpe - 4.23 ha, Has planning permission, 94 dwellings NK/SKEL/007 Land east of Lincoln Road, Skellingthorpe - 10.52 ha, Has planning permission, 280 dwellings

Housing Sites in Medium Villages

The following sites, as identified on the Policies Map, are allocated primarily for residential development within Medium Villages: [detailed in table with specific sites and requirements]

Housing Sites in Small Villages

The following sites, as identified on the Policies Map, are allocated primarily for residential development within Small Villages:

Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople Accommodation

Part One: Existing Sites Proposals that result in the loss of an authorised and permanent site for residential use by Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople will not be permitted unless: a) suitable alternative provision is made for the use on a site which satisfies the criteria in part three of this policy; or b) it has been determined that the site is no longer needed for this use. Appropriate, detailed and robust evidence will be required to satisfy the above criteria. Planning conditions or legal obligations may be necessary to ensure that any replacement sites are provided. Any replacement site should be available before the original site is lost. Proposals to extend existing sites or to provide additional pitches within an existing site will be supported in principle, provided that, when considered against the criteria in part three of this policy, the proposal will not result in unsafe or unsustainable development. Part Two: Allocated Sites The following sites are identified on the Policies Map for the provision of Gypsy and Traveller pitches and are safeguarded for such use: Ref Site name/address Indicative no. of pitches Comments or specific requirements COL/GT/001 Washingborough Road, Lincoln 5 Only land within flood zone 1 should be developed. Proposals should avoid significant adverse impact on the Cow Paddle East, Cow Paddle Railway Embankment, and Canwick Road and St Swithin's Cemetery Local Wildlife Sites. To be developed with consideration for existing Washingborough Road site – site should be delivered without compromising the amenities of the occupants of the existing site. Within or includes an area of Biodiversity Opportunity – proposals on this site should incorporate the relevant Principles for Development within Biodiversity Opportunity Areas set out in Appendix 4 WL/GT/001 Trent Port Road, Marton 3-6 Within or includes an area of Biodiversity Opportunity – proposals on this site should incorporate the relevant Principles for Development within Biodiversity Opportunity Areas set out in Appendix 4 Development of these sites for Gypsy and Traveller use will be supported where they satisfy the criteria in Part Three of this policy. Part Three: New Sites Proposals for new sites for Gypsies, Travellers or Travelling Showpeople will be considered on their merits against the following criteria: a) The proposal should not conflict with other local or national policies relating to flood risk, contamination, landscape character, protection of the natural and built environment, heritage assets or agricultural land quality; and b) The proposal must have adequate and safe vehicular access including for emergency vehicles, other large vehicles and towed loads likely to frequent the site; and c) The proposal must have sufficient space for vehicle manoeuvring and parking within the site; and d) The proposal should provide an acceptable standard of amenity for the site's occupants, and not have an unacceptable impact on the amenity of nearby residents (in accordance with Policy S53); and e) The proposal should be adequately serviced, or capable of being adequately serviced, preferably by mains connections; and f) For non-allocated sites, the proposal should be located within reasonable travelling distance to both primary health care facilities and schools, preferably by walking, cycling or public transport. In addition to a)-f) above, proposals for new sites for Travelling Showpeople will be considered on their merits against the following supplementary criteria: g) The proposal should make adequate provision for the storage of vehicles, trailers, plant and other equipment sufficient to meet the occupants' needs; and h) The proposal should be located with good access to the primary road network.

Former Bass Maltings Site

Within the area identified on the Policies Map as ROA8 a sensitive redevelopment of the site will be supported where it: a) Will preserve, enhance and secure the future of all the buildings at the former Bass Maltings complex through an appropriate residential-led mixed use scheme; b) Preserves and enhances the special setting of the buildings, emphasising their historic connection to the neighbouring agricultural land; c) Demonstrates that the proposals represent a viable use through a supporting viability assessment; and d) Ensures that any proposal that requires a form and scale of enabling development is fully justified having regard to the operative guidance at the time.

Former Hospital Buildings, Greylees

Within the area identified on the Policies Map as ROA9 a sensitive residential-led mixed use redevelopment of the site will be supported where it: a) Will retain and convert all the important buildings within the designated Rauceby Hospital Conservation Area and its setting including the Admin Block, all the 6 ward blocks, the nurses' quarters and conservatory; b) Improves connections to the adjacent areas of Greylees through delivering pedestrian and cycle links and the upgrade of Hine Avenue; c) Preserves and enhances the character, setting and significance of the Rauceby Hospital Conservation Area and Grade II Listed Registered Park and Garden as part of a heritage-led landscape scheme; and d) Protects and enhances existing green infrastructure within and adjacent to the site.

Lincoln Sustainable Urban Extensions

In addition to the generic requirements for Sustainable Urban Extensions in Policy S68, development at the following strategic sites will be required to meet the following locally specific requirements: COL/BOU/001 – Western Growth Corridor SUE (WGC) – Land at Swanpool, Fen Farm and Decoy Farm Proposals for the WGC area, as identified on the Policies Map, should provide: a) Approximately 3,200 houses; b) Approximately 20 ha of land for mixed employment (B Use Classes) and leisure (D2 Use Class) serving the wider Lincoln area for significant local growth and inward investment of strategic importance complimentary to that on the adjacent Lincoln Science and Innovation Park; c) A distinctive place to live that has its own identity and respects its local surroundings including key views and vistas of and from Lincoln Cathedral and the historic core of the City and the setting of Decoy Farm scheduled monument and Hartsholme Registered Park; d) Comprehensive solutions to drainage and flood risk, guided by an agreed flood risk assessment and water management plan; e) A direct route incorporating priority for public transport linking Skellingthorpe Road through to the city centre via the Beevor Street area with connection onto the A46 if required; f) Transport infrastructure, such as measures to encourage walking, cycling and use of public transport (which might include park and ride facilities) in order to maximise opportunities for sustainable modes of travel, in line with the aims of the Lincoln Integrated Transport Strategy; g) A wide range of community facilities including a new Local Centre; h) A wide range of open space, recreation and leisure uses, together with consideration of the provision of a regional leisure complex; i) A development that maximises the opportunities for low carbon and sustainable design including, if feasible, use of the heat from the Energy from Waste plant at North Hykeham; j) Comprehensive solutions to reclaim and remediate the former tip on the eastern part of the site; and k) Improved linkages, enhancement and support of green wedges and other green infrastructure. As this SUE is within or includes an area of Biodiversity Opportunity proposals on this site should incorporate the relevant Principles for Development within Biodiversity Opportunity Areas set out in Appendix 4. NK/CAN/003 – South East Quadrant SUE (SEQ) – Land at Canwick Heath Proposals for the SEQ area, as identified on the Policies Map, and which form part of the adopted Broad Concept Plan and Design Code SPD (2020) should provide: a) Approximately 6,000 houses in total, of which around 3,500 anticipated to be delivered within the plan period to 2040; b) A distinctive place to live that has its own character and physical identity and respects its local surroundings, including key views and vistas of and from Lincoln Cathedral and the historic core of the City, and across the Witham Valley including views of Lincoln from Heighington Road. It will contain different character areas and will have regard to the need to provide appropriate landscape setting for the existing villages of Bracebridge Heath and Canwick, together with the open area of South Common to the north; c) A development that protects and enhances the existing important open spaces within and adjacent to the site, as shown on an agreed concept plan, providing an appropriate buffer zone between the South Common and the International Bomber Command Centre memorial and the development; d) Extension of the existing green infrastructure network into multi-functional movement networks linking land uses, facilities and amenities which avoids the coalescence of the new community with Bracebridge Heath and Canwick villages; e) Transport infrastructure, such as measures to encourage walking, cycling and use of public transport (which might include park and ride facilities or mobility hubs) in order to maximise opportunities for sustainable modes of travel, in line with the aims of the Lincoln Integrated Transport Strategy (2020); f) Strong connectivity within the development and to the City Centre and adjacent communities through high quality, safe and effective pedestrian and cycling links; g) Introduction of bus priority measures from the site to the City Centre, which could be achieved through technological and/or physical infrastructure measures; h) No direct access onto the Lincoln Eastern Bypass for motor vehicles and does not prejudice its dualling, with the main road access points from the existing A15, the B1188 and B1131; i) A wide range of community / social facilities including a new District Centre which will provide shops, a community centre, and other uses such as a health centre, post office, banking facilities and places of worship, located towards the east of the SUE adjacent to Canwick Avenue; j) Development of a Local Centre towards the west of the SUE, close to and complementing the facilities of Bracebridge Heath; k) Approximately 7ha of land to provide a wide range of flexible employment opportunities (any job creating Use Classes), provided on-site at appropriate location(s) serving local employment needs to be agreed with the local planning authority; l) Development to take account of the relationship between the site and the Lincoln Eastern Bypass, including the provision of gateway features at key access points as well as ensuring that proposed residents are protected from noise, drainage and air quality issues that may be associated with the bypass; and m) Improved linkages, enhancement and support of green wedges and other green infrastructure. As this SUE is within or includes an area of Biodiversity Opportunity proposals on this site should incorporate the relevant Principles for Development within Biodiversity Opportunity Areas set out in Appendix 4. COL/ABB/001 – North East Quadrant SUE (NEQ) – Land at the Greetwell Area Proposals for the NEQ area, as identified on the Policies Map, should provide: a) Approximately 1,400 dwellings; b) A distinctive place to live that has its own identity and respects its local surroundings including protecting and creating view corridors of and from Lincoln Cathedral and other important buildings on the north escarpment that are integrated into the development as a contribution to its identity and form part of the design context; c) Development that protects and enhances the existing important open spaces within and adjacent to the site (including Greetwell Hollow) or provides adequate compensatory open space for any loss and which provides an appropriate buffer zone between the development and Greetwell Hollow and satisfactorily addresses access and any visitor management issues arising from the development; d) Development that protects and enhances the setting of the designated heritage assets at Greetwell and the designated SSSI at Greetwell Quarry and which ensures where practicable that the archaeology of ironstone mining is retained with appropriate interpretive material on site; e) Development which addresses the geotechnical issues such as ground stability and mining voids relating to the site and its development; f) Transport infrastructure, such as measures to encourage walking, cycling and use of public transport (which might include park and ride facilities) in order to maximise opportunities for sustainable modes of travel, in line with the aims of the Lincoln Integrated Transport Strategy; g) High quality, safe and effective pedestrian and cycling links both within and adjoining the development, including links to the National Cycle Route 1 and Sustrans Local Routes; h) No direct access onto the Lincoln Eastern Bypass and does not prejudice its dualling; i) Make provision for an access point to the south via a new junction onto the improved Greetwell Road and to the north via accesses onto Carlton Boulevard and St Augustine Road; j) A range of community / social facilities including a local centre that complements and does not compete with the nearby Carlton Centre; k) Approximately 5 ha of land to provide a wide range of flexible employment opportunities (any job creating Use Classes), provided on-site at appropriate location(s) serving local needs to be agreed with the local planning authority; l) Development to ensure that proposed residents are protected from noise, drainage and air quality issues that may be associated with the Lincoln Eastern Bypass; and m) Improved linkages, enhancement and support of green wedges and other green infrastructure.

RAF Scampton

RAF Scampton is identified as an opportunity area and is defined on the Policies Map as ROA10. This policy is in place to safeguard RAF Scampton in the event that the Ministry of Defence withdraw from the site and to provide a framework to help ensure any redevelopment is sustainable and holistically planned. The preparation of a masterplan with the status of a Development Plan Document, either through a single policy review of this Local Plan or as an Area Action Plan will be required prior to a planning application being submitted. Major development proposals on the site not detailed in a masterplan, or any proposals that will result in a conflict between uses, safety concerns in connection with the ongoing use of the site or the airspace, or which delivers substandard development will not be supported. The site masterplan will be expected to: a) Set out the layout, mix and scale of uses, including the relationship with existing uses; b) Establish design parameters in relation to building heights, materials, landscaping, circulation, key features and views, and the navigation and connectivity through the site; c) Assess impacts on the landscape and views and proposed mitigation to make any impacts acceptable; d) Detail the delivery of an adequate amount and range of infrastructure to support the community on the site to be delivered in tandem with or ahead of development; e) Provide a detailed transport assessment including the delivery of sustainable transport and active travel to be incorporated in the scheme linking the new settlement with other key settlements including Lincoln, that will ensure that reliance on the private car is minimised on the site; f) Evaluate and fully understand the significance and character of RAF Scampton, including both its historic layout and individual buildings and structures – with proposals for the site retaining and reflecting the historic character of the site, preserving and enhancing heritage assets and their settings as part of any scheme; g) Be supported by a site-specific energy and embodied carbon strategy for the site which investigates the opportunities on the site to deliver net zero carbon development including the potential to offset the energy use of existing homes on the site; h) Detail the engagement that has taken place with the community and necessary infrastructure providers and how any necessary mitigation identified has been incorporated in the masterplan; i) Demonstrate that adequate utilities provision can be achieved to support the scale of development proposed; j) Identify how the scheme will integrate with the existing community; k) Demonstrate any ongoing use or operation at the site or in the airspace and provide a full assessment of how this use will be compatible with the proposals and will not hinder its deliverability or sustainability or result in any safety or amenity concerns. This will include consultation with the Ministry of Defence; l) Set out details of phasing of development and infrastructure and construction management plans including assessment of the impact on the community; m) Provide a clear demonstration that the proposed scheme will be deliverable and viable; n) Detail how the scheme will satisfy the policies of the Development Plan; and o) Demonstrate how the scheme will protect and enhance the natural environment and ecological networks by achieving net gains in biodiversity. Development proposals on the site that are consistent with the approved masterplan will be supported.

Strategic Infrastructure Requirements

New Development should be supported by, and have good access to infrastructure. Infrastructure Planning permission will only be granted if it can be demonstrated that there is, or will be, sufficient infrastructure capacity to support and meet all the necessary requirements arising from the proposed development. Development proposals must consider all of the infrastructure implications of a scheme; not just those on the site or its immediate vicinity. Conditions or planning obligations, as part of a package or combination of infrastructure delivery measures, are likely to be required for many proposals to ensure that new development meets this principle. Consideration must be given to the likely timing of infrastructure provision. As such, development may need to be phased. Conditions or a planning obligation may be used to secure this phasing arrangement. Healthcare Facilities Proposals for new health care facilities should relate well to public transport services, walking and cycling routes and be easily accessible to all sectors of the community. Proposals which utilise opportunities for the multi-use and co-location of health facilities with other services and facilities, and thus co-ordinate local care and provide convenience for the community, will be particularly supported. Planning obligations are likely to require contributions to primary healthcare provision where there is a demonstrated shortfall in capacity. Education Provision Proposals for new or extended school facilities will be expected to relate well to the population that they are to serve, ensuring that they are easily accessible for all. Conditions or planning obligations are likely to require education provision where there is a demonstrated shortfall in capacity. Development Contributions Developers will be expected to contribute towards the delivery of relevant infrastructure, either through direct provision or contribution towards the provision of local and strategic infrastructure to meet the needs arising from the development either alone or cumulatively with other developments.

Safeguarded Land for Future Key Infrastructure

Development proposals on or near to the preferred route of the North Hykeham Relief Road, as indicated on the Policies Map, which will prejudice the efficient and effective delivery of the project will be refused.

Sustainable Urban Extensions

The spatial strategy for Central Lincolnshire includes the allocation of sustainable urban extensions at Lincoln, Gainsborough and Sleaford. Development of an urban extension must be planned and implemented in a coordinated way, through an agreed broad concept plan that is linked to the timely delivery of key infrastructure. With the exception of inconsequential development, proposals for development within the identified extensions which come forward prior to the production of, and agreement on, a broad concept plan will be refused. Development of a sustainable urban extension should also be drawn together and guided by a design code, consistent with the National Model Design Code and associated guidance. Working with the Central Lincolnshire authorities and other relevant stakeholders, a broad concept plan and design code should be prepared for each urban extension (in its entirety) and should clearly evidence the support of all significant landowners: the concept plan and design code should be submitted to the Council for approval. If one or more landowners are not supportive of the concept plan and design code, it will need to be demonstrated that the development of the considerable majority of the urban extension can be delivered without their involvement. The concept plan could be submitted alongside an outline application for the urban extension. Whilst phasing may be agreed, the local planning authority will need to be satisfied that the key aspects of the concept plan will be delivered. Therefore, to prevent the provision of appropriate infrastructure being either delayed or never materialising, appropriate safeguards will be put in place, normally through a Section 106 agreement, which ensure that specific aspects of the scheme are delivered when an appropriate trigger point is reached. Alongside the timely delivery of necessary infrastructure, key to the sustainable delivery of the urban extensions will be the requirement to minimise the need to travel, whilst maximising sustainable transport modes. This will be achieved by locating key facilities such as schools and local shops within easy walking and cycling distance of most properties, incorporating high quality walking and cycling networks linking to the wider area, and providing access to high quality public transport services and facilities, including bus priority corridors and, where appropriate, park and ride. In addition to the above, each new urban extension proposal must, where applicable: a) demonstrate availability and deliverability of the proposed scheme; b) provide a broad range of housing choice in terms of size and design; c) contribute to the provision of a wide range of local employment opportunities that offer a range of jobs in different sectors of the economy; d) incorporate appropriate pre-school(s), primary school(s), and a secondary school (potentially incorporating sixth-form provision), if the scale of the urban extension justifies any of these on-site, or, if not, contribute to provision offsite in order to meet the needs generated by the urban extension (subject to national regulations governing such contributions); e) make provision for an appropriate level of retail without having an unacceptable impact on the vitality and viability of existing retail centres; f) consider the Agricultural Land Classification of the site, and where higher quality agricultural land exists on one part of the site compared with another, then, if possible, utilise such land (or part of such land) for productive use, such as community orchards and allotments; g) demonstrate that the unnecessary sterilisation of minerals has been avoided; and h) demonstrate that impacts on the natural environment will be minimized through the enhancement of ecological networks and habitats by achieving net gains for biodiversity as part of extended and enhanced green infrastructure.

Lincoln Regeneration and Opportunity Areas

Development proposals that come forward within the Regeneration Opportunity Areas, as identified on the Policies Map, should take into account the following principles: ROA1 – Tentercroft Street Within the area identified on the Polices Map as ROA1 proposals for major development will preferably be progressed through a masterplan prior to, or alongside a planning application. Development proposals should recognise the edge of centre position of this site and proximity to the transport hub and primary shopping centre making the most of opportunities to strengthen the offer of the City Centre, whilst not undermining the role of the City Centre. ROA2 – Waterside North/Spa Road Within the area identified on the Polices Map as ROA2 proposals for major development will preferably be progressed through a masterplan prior to, or alongside a planning application. Particular support will be given to residential redevelopment either solely or as part of a mixed use scheme with E Class Uses or other uses that are appropriate in this edge of centre location. Any major development proposal shall take full advantage of the opportunities afforded by the riverside frontage and provide or contribute proportionately to the upgrading of Waterside North to incorporate footway/ cycleway provision to and from the City Centre. ROA3 – East of Canwick Road Within the area identified on the Polices Map as ROA3 proposals for major development will preferably be progressed through a masterplan prior to, or alongside a planning application. Particular support will be given to residential redevelopment either solely or as part of a mixed use scheme with E Class Uses or other uses appropriate for the location. Any development shall contribute proportionately to the upgrading of footway/ cycleway provision to encourage a modal shift for the short journeys to and from the City Centre. ROA4 – Firth Road Within the area identified on the Polices Map as ROA4 proposals for major development will preferably be progressed through a masterplan prior to, or alongside a planning application. Particular support will be given to residential redevelopment on the site either solely or as part of a mixed use scheme with E Class Uses or other uses appropriate for the location. Any development shall contribute proportionately to the upgrading of footway/ cycleway provision to encourage a modal shift for the short journeys to and from the City Centre. ROA5 – High Street South Mixed Use Area Within the area identified on the Polices Map as ROA5 development proposals for the following uses will be supported in principle: • Shops, financial and professional services, cafes and restaurants, offices, clinics, health centres and leisure uses falling under E Use Class; • Residential uses including dwellings, residential institutions and student accommodation; • Hotels or other visitor accommodation; and • Other community, leisure or recreation uses. The above in principle support on ROA5 is subject to: a) The development not resulting in the area in which it is located losing its mixed use character; b) Major developments including, or contributing to, a mixture of uses sufficient to add to the overall vitality of the area and to create a purpose and presence extending beyond normal shopping hours; c) The development not harming the local environment or the amenities which occupiers of nearby properties may reasonably expect to enjoy, such as causing unacceptable levels of disturbance, noise, smell, fumes, dust, grit or other pollution, or reducing daylight, outlook or privacy to an unacceptable degree; d) The development not resulting in levels of traffic or on-street parking which would cause either road safety or amenity problems; and e) Dwelling houses or other homes not being lost to non-residential uses unless: i. The level of amenity available in any particular instance is already so poor that continued residential use is not desirable and there is no realistic prospect of the problem(s) being remedied; or ii. The overall development will maintain or produce a net numerical gain in the number of dwellings on the site.

Gainsborough Riverside Regeneration Area

Development proposals within the Gainsborough Riverside Regeneration Area, shown on the Policies Map as ROA6, will be supported in principle. This in principle support will apply to existing uses and a range of uses which are appropriate in this location including office, leisure, or residential uses. Proposals should not undermine the achievement of the ambitions for this regeneration area, as set out in a)-g) below. Proposals will be viewed particularly favourably where they: a) Protect, enhance or restore the historic identity of the town; b) Strengthen the connection between the river and the town; c) Make the most of the riverside location enhancing; d) Deliver innovative design or design excellence which provides visual interest; e) Contribute positively to the Conservation Area; f) Expand leisure opportunities related to the riverside; and/or g) Enhance public spaces and green infrastructure.

Sleaford Regeneration and Opportunity Areas

Development proposals that come forward within the Regeneration Opportunity Areas, as identified on the Policies Map, should take into account the following principles: ROA7 – Advanta Seeds Site Within the area identified on the Policies Map as ROA7 development proposals will be supported in principle where: a) It is for uses appropriate in a town centre location, potentially including mixed use development and residential development; b) It creates a strong physical and functional link with Southgate and the town centre; c) The access to the site for motorised vehicles is from a new junction with Boston Road; d) Pedestrian and cyclist access is provided to Southgate; and e) It makes a reasonable and proportionate provision for a replacement sporting facility for the existing bowls club within the development unless it can be demonstrably shown that such a facility is no longer required. ROA8 – Former Bass Maltings Site Within the area identified on the Policies Map as ROA8 a sensitive redevelopment of the site will be supported where it: a) Will preserve, enhance and secure the future of all the buildings at the former Bass Maltings complex through an appropriate residential-led mixed use scheme; b) Preserves and enhances the special setting of the buildings, emphasising their historic connection to the neighbouring agricultural land; c) Demonstrates that the proposals represent a viable use through a supporting viability assessment; and d) Ensures that any proposal that requires a form and scale of enabling development is fully justified having regard to the operative guidance at the time. ROA9 – Former Hospital Buildings, Greylees Within the area identified on the Policies Map as ROA9 a sensitive residential-led mixed use redevelopment of the site will be supported where it: a) Will retain and convert all the important buildings within the designated Rauceby Hospital Conservation Area and its setting including the Admin Block, all the 6 ward blocks, the nurses' quarters and conservatory; b) Improves conne

The Spatial Strategy and Settlement Hierarchy

The spatial strategy will focus on delivering sustainable growth for Central Lincolnshire that meets the needs for homes and jobs, regenerates places and communities, and supports necessary improvements to facilities, services and infrastructure. Development should create strong, sustainable, cohesive and inclusive communities, making the most effective use of previously developed land and enabling a larger number of people to access jobs, services and facilities locally. Development should provide the scale and mix of housing types and a range of new job opportunities that will meet the identified needs of Central Lincolnshire in order to secure balanced communities. Decisions on investment in services and facilities, and on the location and scale of development, will be assisted by the Central Lincolnshire Settlement Hierarchy. The hierarchy is as follows: 1. Lincoln Urban Area To significantly strengthen the role of Lincoln, both regionally and within Central Lincolnshire, and to meet Lincoln's growth objectives and regeneration needs, the Lincoln urban area (defined as the current built up area of Lincoln, which includes the City of Lincoln, North Hykeham, South Hykeham Fosseway, Waddington Low Fields and any other developed land adjoining these areas) and the sites allocated in this Local Plan on the edge of the Lincoln urban area will be the principal focus for development in Central Lincolnshire, including housing, retail, leisure, cultural, office and other employment development. In addition to sites being allocated in the Local Plan or a neighbourhood plan, development proposals in accordance with Policy S3 and other relevant development plan policies will be viewed positively. 2. Main Towns To maintain and enhance their roles as main towns, and to meet the objectives for regeneration, Sleaford and Gainsborough will, primarily via sites allocated in this Local Plan and any applicable neighbourhood plan, be the focus for substantial housing development supported by appropriate levels of employment growth, retail growth and wider service provision. In addition to sites being allocated in the Local Plan or a neighbourhood plan, development proposals in accordance with Policy S3 and other relevant development plan policies will be viewed positively. 3. Market Towns To maintain and enhance their roles as market towns, Caistor and Market Rasen will be the focus for significant, but proportionate, growth in housing, employment, retail and wider service provision. This growth will primarily be through sites allocated in this Local Plan and any applicable neighbourhood plan. In addition to sites being allocated in the Local Plan or a neighbourhood plan, development proposals in accordance with Policy S3 and other relevant development plan policies will be viewed positively. 4. Large Villages Large villages are defined as those with 750 or more dwellings at 1 April 2018. To maintain and enhance their role as large villages which provide housing, employment, retail, and key services and facilities for the local area, the following settlements will be a focus for accommodating an appropriate level of growth via sites allocated in this plan. Beyond site allocations made in this plan or any applicable neighbourhood plan, development will be limited to that which accords with Policy S4: Housing Development in or Adjacent to Villages or other policies relating to non-residential development in this plan as relevant. Bardney, Heighington, Scotter, Billinghay, Keelby, Skellingthorpe, Bracebridge Heath, Metheringham, Waddington, Branston, Navenby, Washingborough, Cherry Willingham, Nettleham, Welton, Dunholme, Ruskington, Witham St Hughs, Heckington, Saxilby. 5. Medium Villages Medium villages are defined as those with between 250 and 749 dwellings at 1 April 2018. Well connected or well served medium villages may receive some limited growth through allocations in this plan in order to achieve a balance between ensuring the vitality of the village and protecting the rural character. Beyond site allocations made in this plan or any applicable neighbourhood plan, development will be limited to that which accords with Policy S4: Housing Development in or Adjacent to Villages or other policies relating to non-residential development in this plan as relevant. Bassingham, Greylees, Nocton, Blyton, Harmston, North Kelsey, Brant Broughton, Hawthorn Avenue ('Little Cherry'), Potterhanworth, Brookenby, Helpringham, Reepham, Burton Waters, Hemswell Cliff, Scampton (RAF), Cranwell RAF, Ingham, Scothern, Cranwell Village, Lea, Sturton By Stow, Digby, Leasingham, Sudbrooke, Dunston, Marton, Tealby, Eagle, Middle Rasen, Waddingham, Fiskerton, Morton, Welbourn, Great Hale, Nettleton, Wellingore. 6. Small Villages Small villages are defined as those with between 50 and 249 dwellings at 1 April 2018. Well connected or well served small villages may receive some limited growth, primarily through allocations in this plan in order to achieve a balance between ensuring the vitality of the village and the rural character. Beyond site allocations made in this plan or any applicable neighbourhood plan, development will be limited to that which accords with Policy S4: Housing Development in or Adjacent to Villages or other policies relating to non-residential development in this plan as relevant. Anwick, Hemswell, Scotton, Ashby de la Launde, Holton le Moor, Scredington, Aubourn, Kexby, Searby, Aunsby, Kirkby Green, Silk Willoughby, Beckingham, Kirkby La Thorpe, Snitterby, Bigby, Knaith Park, South Kelsey, Bishop Norton, Langworth, South Kyme, Boothby Graffoe, Laughterton, South Rauceby, Branston Booths, Laughton, Southrey, Burton, Leadenham, Spridlington, Canwick, Lissington, Springthorpe, Carlton, Le Moorland, Little Hale, Stow, Chapel Hill, Martin, Swallow, Claxby, New Toft, Swarby, Coleby, Newton On Trent, Swaton, Corringham, Normanby By Spital, Swinderby, Doddington, North Carlton, Tattershall Bridge, Dorrington, North Greetwell, Thorpe On The Hill, East Ferry, North Kyme, Threekingham, East Stockwith, North Owersby, Timberland, Ewerby, North Scarle, Torksey, Faldingworth, Norton Disney, Upton, Fenton, Osbournby, Walcott, Fillingham, Osgodby, Walesby, Glentham, Owmby By Spital, Wickenby, Glentworth, Rothwell, Willingham By Stow, Grasby, Rowston, Willoughton, Great Limber, Scampton village, Wilsford, Hackthorn, Scopwick. 7. Hamlets For the purposes of this Local Plan, a hamlet is defined as a settlement not listed elsewhere in this policy and with dwellings clearly clustered together to form a single developed footprint. Such a hamlet must have a dwelling base of at least 15 units (as at 1 April 2018). Within the developed footprint of such hamlets, development will be limited to single dwelling infill developments or development allocated through a neighbourhood plan. 8. Countryside Unless allowed by: a) policy in any of the levels 1-7 above; or b) any other policy in the Local Plan (such as Policies S4, S5, S34, or S43) or a relevant policy in a neighbourhood plan, development will be regarded as being in the countryside and as such restricted to: • that which is demonstrably essential to the effective operation of agriculture, horticulture, forestry, outdoor recreation, transport or utility services; • delivery of infrastructure; • renewable energy generation; and • minerals or waste development in accordance with separate Minerals and Waste Local Development Documents.

Lincolnshire Showground

The following development within the Lincolnshire Showground area, as defined on the Policies Map, will be supported in principle: • Facilities directly related to the functioning of shows on the showground itself; • Conference facilities (E, F1 and F2 Use Class) (up to 4,000 sqm); • Expansion of Agricultural College functions (C2 Use Class) (up to 10,000 sqm) in total including existing Agricultural College floorspace; • Employment related development (E Use Class) (up to 3,500 sqm); • A hotel (C1 Use Class) (up to 100 beds); • Other minor ancillary development linked to the above uses. All such proposals should demonstrate their compatibility to the main showground use. Proposals which would negatively impact on the scale of shows which could be accommodated on the showground will be refused. Particular attention should be given to: a) ensuring the proposals have no detrimental impact on the functioning of infrastructure; b) the careful design, layout, scale and height of buildings, taking account of the otherwise rural character in which the showground area is located; and c) improving linkages, by sustainable means, to the Lincoln urban area. A masterplan prepared in advance of any significant proposals would be welcomed and, if approved by West Lindsey District Council, it would become a material consideration in the determination of future planning applications.

Ministry of Defence Establishments

Part One: Development related to operational purposes Defence related non-residential development within or adjoining an operational MOD site that is required for operational purposes will be supported in principle. Development for housing or communal accommodation for MOD personnel connected to an operational MOD site will be supported provided that it satisfies relevant policy requirements in the Local Plan including but not limited to Policy S53 Design and Amenity, Policy S21 Flood Risk and Water Resources, and Policy S47 Accessibility and Transport. Part Two: Development affecting MOD establishments Development will not be supported where it would adversely affect military operations or capability unless those impacts can be appropriately mitigated in agreement with the MOD. Part Three: Development of MOD land and assets surplus to Defence requirements The redevelopment of RAF Scampton is addressed in Policy S75. The redevelopment or change of use of any other operational MOD land and facilities which are surplus to MOD requirements, whether for the whole or part of the MOD landholding in that area, will be supported provided that: a. where feasible the majority of the proposal is on brownfield land; b. any increase in traffic likely to arise as a result of the development can be safely accommodated on the local road infrastructure; c. the proposal would not conflict with the existing land uses on neighbouring land; and d. in cases where large scale redevelopment of a site is planned, a comprehensive masterplan is prepared which demonstrates how the site will be redeveloped to ensure the holistic planning of the site and avoid piecemeal development. Where the proposal is to create a civilian community, proposals must also: e. include appropriate infrastructure and community facilities for the new community and an

Network and Hierarchy of Centres

The following retail hierarchy will be used by the Central Lincolnshire authorities and their partners to guide investment and other activity to improve the vitality and viability of the identified centres, and in planning applications for retail and other town centre uses (as defined in the NPPF): Tier 1: Lincoln City Centre Lincoln City Centre Tier 2: Town Centres Gainsborough Sleaford Caistor Market Rasen Tier 3: District Centres Birchwood, Lincoln Nettleham Road, Lincoln Wragby Road/ The Carlton Centre, Lincoln The Forum, North Hykeham Hykeham Green, North Hykeham Tier 4: Local and Village Centres Local Centres in urban areas: Brant Road, Lincoln Burton Road, Lincoln Junction of Queen Elizabeth Road/ Trelawney Crescent, Lincoln Junction of Boultham Park Road and Skellingthorpe Road, Lincoln Junction of Lamb Gardens and Macauley Drive, Lincoln Junction of Rookery Lane and Newark Road, Lincoln Junction of Woodhall Drive and Sudbrooke Drive, Lincoln Manor Farm, North Hykeham Moorland Avenue, Lincoln Newark Road, Bracebridge, Lincoln Newark Road Crossroads, North Hykeham Newport, Lincoln Redwood Drive, Lincoln Village Centres: Bardney village centre Billinghay village centre Bracebridge Heath village centre Branston Beech Road Branston Station Road Burton Waters village centre Cherry Willingham village centre Heckington village centre Keelby village centre Keelby, Yarborough Road/South Street Metheringham village centre Navenby village centre Nettleham village centre Ruskington village centre Saxilby village centre Scotter village centre Sturton by Stow village centre Waddington village centre Corringham Road, Gainsborough Heapham Road, Gainsborough Queensway, Gainsborough Grantham Road, Sleaford Lincoln Road, Sleaford Washingborough village centre Welton village centre Welton, Ryland Bridge Witham St Hughs village centre The boundaries of Tier 1 to 4 centres referred to in this table, together with Primary Shopping Areas within Lincoln City Centre, and in Gainsborough, Sleaford and Market Rasen town centres are defined on the Policies Map and will be the focus for comparison shopping in Central Lincolnshire. For all other centres the Primary Shopping Areas are the same as the centre boundaries as shown on the Policies Map. In addition to these identified centres, new district and local centres will be delivered at the SUEs as detailed in Policies S69-S71. Such provision must be appropriate in scale and location to the need of the areas they serve. The development of new centres will be required to consolidate and enhance the existing network and hierarchy of centres and not harm their vitality and viability. Development proposals for retail and/or other town centre uses will be directed to the Tier 1 to 4 centres identified in this policy, and will be appropriate in scale and nature to the size and function of the relevant centre and to the maintenance of the retail hierarchy as a whole. Within local and village centres in Tier 4 of the hierarchy, the scale of provision should be proportionate and strengthen their roles in providing mainly convenience shopping and local services to meet local needs. Within the Primary Shopping Areas, development proposals for town centre uses as defined in the NPPF should wherever possible maintain an active frontage. Where an active frontage would not be appropriate or otherwise cannot be achieved, care should be taken to ensure that the frontage provides visual interest and would not be to the detriment of the character of the centre or to maintaining or enhancing footfall in the Primary Shopping Area. Proposals that would result in lengthy 'dead frontages' within a Primary Shopping Area will not normally be acceptable. Development proposals for main town centre uses in out-of-centre and edge-of-centre locations will be required to demonstrate their suitability through a sequential site test in line with the NPPF. In addition, a robust assessment of impact on nearby centres will be required for any edge-of-centre or out-of-centre proposal for retail and leisure use that is located: a) within 1km of the Lincoln, Gainsborough or Sleaford primary shopping area and is greater than 2,500m²; or b) within 500m of Market Rasen or Caistor Town Centre and is greater than 500m2; or c) within 500m of the boundary of a District Centre and is greater than 300m² gross; or d) within 500m of the boundary of a Local Centre and is greater than 200m² gross; or e) in any other location not covered by a-c above and is greater than 500m².

Lincoln's City Centre and Primary Shopping Area

Part one: Primary Shopping Area Where planning permission is required within the Primary Shopping Area, as defined on the Policies Map, proposals for non-retail use on ground floors will only be supported if they: a) are a recognised main town centre use under E Use Class; b) would not result in the over concentration of non-retail uses or 'dead' frontages that would undermine the primary shopping area's overall retail function and character; c) would have no demonstrable impact on the vitality and viability of the centre as a whole d) are of high quality design, responding to their surroundings and contributing positively to the streetscene and character of the City Centre; and e) enhance connectivity within, through and around the City Centre wherever possible. Proposals that do not positively contribute to the vitality and viability of the City Centre by satisfying the criteria in part one a)-e), will not be supported. Development proposals not under E Use Class will be considered on their merits subject to satisfying the criteria in part one b)-e) and providing that they will: f) not result in large gaps between town centre uses in frontages; g) not detract from or otherwise harm town centre uses; and h) be compatible with the goal of maintaining or enhancing Lincoln City Centre as a regional destination. Development proposals for residential or commercial development above town centre uses will be supported providing that the proposed use would not be likely to introduce conflict with existing town centre uses. Part two: Lincoln City Centre Within Lincoln City Centre area as defined on the Policies Map the following uses will be supported in principle: i) Town Centre Uses (E Class) including, but not limited to, shops, offices, restaurants, financial and professional and health services, and indoor sport and leisure activities j) Pubs, drinking establishments (sui generis) k) Houses and flats (C3) l) Residential Institutions (C2) m) Hotels (C1) n) Student halls of residence o) Theatres, cinemas, museums or other similar leisure uses or visitor attractions (sui generis) p) Transport facilities including public car, powered two wheeler and cycle parking which is in accordance with the Local Plan's transport Policies S47, S48 and S49 and the latest Lincoln Transport Strategy. The in-principle support in i)-p) is subject to: q) the development not detracting from the vitality and viability of the City Centre as defined on the Policies Map; r) the development complementing the City Centre character and the character of the vicinity of the proposal; s) the development not harming the local environment or the amenities which occupiers of nearby properties may reasonably expect to enjoy, such as causing unacceptable levels of disturbance, noise, smell, fumes, dust, grit or other pollution, or reducing daylight, outlook or privacy to an unacceptable degree; t) the development not resulting in levels of traffic or on-street parking which would cause either road safety or amenity problems; and u) the development being acceptable in terms of the uses proposed and any risk of flooding on the site; and v) dwelling houses or other homes not being lost to non-residential uses unless: i. The level of amenity available in any particular instance is already so poor that continued residential use is not desirable and there is no realistic prospect of the problem(s) being remedied; or ii. The overall development will maintain or produce a net numerical gain in the number of dwellings on the site. Part 1 and Part 2 note: In the event that the Use Classes Order changes during the life of this Plan, then the closest new Use Classes to those classified as Town Centre Uses by the NPPF will apply for the purpose of applying the above policy, provided such new Use Classes are reasonably similar to the ones being replaced.

Gainsborough Town Centre and Primary Shopping Area

Primary Shopping Area Within the Primary Shopping Area, identified on the Policies Map, proposals for non-retail use on ground floors will only be supported if they: a) are a recognised main town centre use under E Use Class; and b) would not result in the over concentration of non-retail uses or 'dead' frontages that would undermine the primary shopping area's overall retail function and character; and c) would have no demonstrable impact on the vitality and viability of the centre as a whole. Gainsborough Town Centre Where planning permission is required, proposals for main town centre uses under E Use Class, or for the development of cultural, social or leisure facilities suitable for a town centre location will be supported in principle within Gainsborough Town Centre, as identified on the Policies Map, where they: d) are of high quality design, responding to their surroundings and contributing positively to the streetscene; and e) enhance connectivity within, through and around the town centre wherever possible. Proposals that do not positively contribute to the vitality and viability of the town centre by satisfying the criteria in a)-e) will not be supported. Development proposals within Gainsborough Town Centre, not in E Use Class will be considered on their merits subject to satisfying the criteria in a)-e) where relevant and providing that they will: f) not result in large gaps between town centre uses in frontages; g) not detract from or otherwise harm or conflict with town centre uses; and h) be compatible with maintaining or enhancing Gainsborough Town Centre as a sub-regional shopping destination. Proposals for residential or commercial development above town centre uses will be supported providing that the proposed use would not be likely to introduce conflict with existing uses. Where possible and relevant, development proposals in Gainsborough Town Centre will assist in meeting wider regeneration and investment objectives for Gainsborough, including the most up to date Gainsborough Masterplan and in the Gainsborough Neighbourhood Plan, this can include: i) enhancing linkages between Marshall's Yard, Market Place, Market Street, and the Riverside; j) strengthening the existing retail area of the town centre, through increased and/or improved retail offer, together with some complementary uses as appropriate; and k) delivering improved public transport facilities and connections. Note: In the event that the Use Classes Order changes during the life of this Plan, then the closest new Use Classes to those classified as Town Centre Uses by the NPPF will apply for the purpose of applying the above policy, provided such new Use Classes are reasonably similar to the ones being replaced.

Sleaford Town Centre and Primary Shopping Area

Primary Shopping Area Within the Primary Shopping Area, identified on the Policies Map, proposals for non-retail use on ground floors will only be supported if they: a) are a recognised main town centre use under E Use Class; and b) would not result in the over concentration of non-retail uses or 'dead' frontages that would undermine the primary shopping area's overall retail function and character; and c) would have no demonstrable impact on the vitality and viability of the centre as a whole. Sleaford Town Centre Where planning permission is required, proposals for main town centre uses under E Use Class will be supported in principle within Sleaford Town Centre, as identified on the Policies Map, where they: d) are of high quality design, responding to their surroundings and contributing positively to the streetscene and the Conservation Area; e) make the most of opportunities to improve connectivity within, through and around the town centre; and f) would not result in an unacceptable impact on highway safety or would not have a severe impact on the road network. Proposals that do not positively contribute to the vitality and viability of the town centre by satisfying the criteria in a)-f) where relevant will not be supported. Development proposals not in E Use Class will be considered on their merits subject to satisfying the criteria in a)-f) as appropriate and providing that they will: g) not result in large gaps between town centre uses in frontages; h) not detract from or otherwise harm or conflict with town centre uses; and i) be compatible with maintaining or enhancing Sleaford Town Centre as a sub-regional shopping destination. Proposals for residential or commercial development above town centre uses will be supported providing that the proposed use would not be likely to introduce conflict with existing uses. Where possible and relevant, development proposals in Sleaford Town Centre should assist in meeting wider regeneration and investment objectives for Sleaford, including the most up to date Sleaford Masterplan, this can include: j) improving traffic circulation and reducing the number of vehicle movements in and around the town centre, including supporting the necessary highway infrastructure to deliver regeneration objectives for the town; k) opportunities, as identified in the Sleaford Masterplan, to deliver additional perimeter car parking which facilitates pedestrian access into the town centre; l) supporting projects associated with the implementation of the Sleaford Transport Strategy and the Sleaford Masterplan. Enhancements to connections for pedestrians and cyclists between the town centre and surrounding residential communities are particularly important, as well as through the town centre; m) supporting the development of the Sleaford East West Leisure Link as the key component of the Sleaford Urban Green Grid in accordance with the Sleaford Masterplan and Central Lincolnshire Green Infrastructure Study. Heart of Sleaford The heart of Sleaford is an area to the south of Market Place and which includes Money's Yard and Bristol Arcade. Development proposals in the Heart of Sleaford should take into account the following principles: • Contribute to the creation of the Heart of Sleaford as a destination within the town centre. • Maintain, or where possible enhance, connectivity along the East West Leisure Link identified in the Sleaford Masterplan • Where relevant, proposals should explore and wherever possible help deliver and not prevent: o the redevelopment of Money's Yard as a visitor attraction; o the creation of public open space beside the River Slea; o the delivery of a footbridge to connect Money's Yard to Market Place; and o the redevelopment of 18/19 Market Place and land to the rear and the historic Buttermarket with potential pedestrian links to Southgate via Market Place and Bristol Arcade. Riverside Retail Precinct The Riverside Retail Precinct is located to the west of Southgate. Development proposals in the precinct should take into account the following principles: • Explore opportunities to bring forward schemes that help strengthen and diversify the town's retail base and include provision for residential use, potentially live/work use, on the site; • Support proposals that make a positive contribution to and restore the river frontage and its setting; • Improve and upgrade pedestrian links to the main shopping street via Watergate and Riverside Shopping Centre; and • Make provision for any proposed development to be capable of mitigating any relevant flood risk. Southern Southgate Southern Southgate is the area around Sleaford Railway Station and up to the western end of Boston Road. Development proposals in this area should take into account the following principles: • Support improvements to Sleaford railway station, including proposals to improve the appearance and function of the transport hub and effective integration with the wider town; • Improve and upgrade pedestrian links from Station Road to the town centre; • Support initiatives and proposals to enhance the physical setting of the Handley Monument, by reducing the impact of vehicles on this space and taking advantage of the existing built heritage to formalise new public space. 26 Southgate 26 Southgate, located at the centre of the Primary Shopping Area, has an extant permission for a mixed use scheme including retail, office and residential uses and has recently been used as a temporary car park. The redevelopment of this site is an opportunity to enhance the town centre's offer. Proposals to develop this site for uses within E Use Class, for residential development or for a mix of uses suitable for the town centre will be supported in principle. The design, scale and massing of any development proposal should make best use of the town centre location whilst being sensitive to its location within the conservation area and nearby Listed Buildings.

Market Rasen and Caistor Town Centres

Where planning permission is required, proposals for main town centre uses under E Use Class will be supported in principle within the town centres of Market Rasen and Caistor, as identified on the Policies Map, where they: a) are of high quality design, responding to their surroundings and contributing positively to the streetscene; and b) make the most of opportunities to improve connectivity within, through and around the town centre. Proposals that do not positively contribute to the vitality and viability of the town centre by satisfying the criteria in part one a)-b) will not be supported. Development proposals not for E Use Class will be considered on their merits subject to satisfying the criteria in part one a)-b) and providing that they will: c) not result in large gaps between town centre uses in frontages; d) not detract from or otherwise harm town centre uses; and e) be compatible with maintaining or enhancing the centres as a shopping destination and service hub. Proposals for residential or commercial development above town centre uses will be supported providing that the proposed use would not be likely to introduce conflict with existing uses and provided adequate off-street parking can be provided.

District, Local and Village Centres

Development proposals for town centre uses under E Use Class including retail, leisure, health facilities and/or office development in or on the edge of a district, local or village centre as defined on the Policies Map will be supported in principle where it: a. contributes to the vitality and mix of uses in the centre and is compatible with the role of the centre; b. is appropriate in scale for the centre and the development is of an appropriate design relating well to the character of the setting; c. prioritises and promotes access by walking, cycling and public transport wherever possible; d. will not result in road safety issues from on-street parking; and e. will not harm the amenity which occupiers of nearby properties may reasonably expect to enjoy. Proposals for non-town centre uses under E Use Class within a district, local or village centre will not normally be supported unless it can be satisfactorily demonstrated through a thorough and proportionate marketing exercise lasting not less than 12 months that the existing use is no longer viable and that other uses under E Class are also likely to prove unviable. Proposals which would harm the role of the centre will not be acceptable. Where a proposal will result in the loss of a shop of under 280sqm selling essential goods, including food, and is located farther than 1km from a similar shop, defined as a local community use under F2 Use Class, permission will not normally be granted unless a suitable alternative provision of a similar shop is included within the proposal or where evidence is provided clearly demonstrating that the shop has been appropriately marketed for a continuous period of 12 months or more without successful conclusion on terms that reflect the lawful use and condition of the premises – this evidence will be considered in the context of local market conditions and the state of the wider national economy.

Sustainable Urban Tourism

Within the urban areas of Lincoln, Gainsborough, Sleaford and the Market Towns development and activities that will deliver high quality sustainable visitor facilities such as culture and leisure facilities, sporting attractions and visitor accommodation, including proposals for temporary permission in support of the promotion of events and festivals, will be supported. Such development and activities should be designed so that they: a) contribute to the local economy; b) benefit both local communities and visitors; c) respect the intrinsic natural and built environmental qualities of the area; and d) are appropriate for the character of the local environment in scale and nature. Development proposals which result in the loss of facilities or attractions that support the visitor economy, including hotels and guesthouses, will not be permitted unless: e) there are overriding sustainability and regeneration benefits from the proposal; or f) the existing use is demonstrated to be unviable and with no reasonable prospect of becoming viable; or g) the facility has been appropriately marketed for a continuous period of 12 months or more without successful conclusion on terms that reflect the lawful use and condition of the premises – this evidence will be considered in the context of the local market conditions and state of the wider national economy. Lincoln Within Lincoln the focus of tourism developments should be on the Cathedral and Cultural Quarters and the High Street and Brayford Waterfront areas in order to complement and support existing attractions. Proposals in other parts of the Lincoln Urban Area that satisfies criteria a)-d) above and will not detract from or otherwise harm existing tourism offer of the city will be supported.

Sustainable Rural Tourism

Development proposals within villages named in the Settlement Hierarchy in Policy S1 that will deliver high quality sustainable visitor facilities including (but not limited to) visitor accommodation, sporting attractions, and also including proposals for temporary permission in support of the promotion of events and festivals, will be supported where they: a) contribute to the local economy; b) benefit both local communities and visitors; c) respect the intrinsic natural and built environmental qualities of the area; d) are appropriate for the character of the local environment in scale, nature and appearance; and e) would not result in highway safety or severe traffic impacts. Development proposals for tourism uses, wildlife related tourism and visitor accommodation in the countryside will only be supported where it has been demonstrated that: f) part E of Policy S5 has been satisfied; or g) locations within settlements are unsuitable for the scale and nature of the proposal or there is an overriding benefit to the local, or wider, economy and/or community and/or environment for locating away from such built up areas and the proposal will not result in harm when considered against other policies in the plan; or h) it relates to an existing visitor facility which is seeking redevelopment or expansion and is of a scale, form and design appropriate to its location. New visitor accommodation in the countryside may be restricted by means of planning conditions or a legal agreement which permits holiday use only. The conversion or redevelopment of hotels and guest houses and any other forms of visitor accommodation to permanent residential accommodation will be resisted unless it can be demonstrated that the existing tourism use is no longer viable through a thorough and proportionate marketing exercise lasting not less than 12 months.

Electric Vehicle Charging

The location of charging points in development proposals should be appropriately located to allow for easy and convenient access from the charge point to the parking space/s, and be designed and located in a way which: a) minimises the intrusion of the charge point on the wider use and access of the land; b) minimises the risk of vehicle collision with the charge point; and c) has ease of access for maintenance and replacement of electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

Accessibility and Transport

Development proposals which contribute towards an efficient and safe transport network that offers a range of transport choices for the movement of people and goods will be supported. All developments should demonstrate, where appropriate, that they have had regard to the following criteria: a) Located where travel can be minimised and the use of sustainable transport modes maximised; b) Minimise additional travel demand through the use of measures such as travel planning, safe and convenient public transport, car clubs, walking and cycling links and integration with existing infrastructure; c) Making allowance for low and ultra-low emission vehicle refuelling infrastructure. Delivering Transport Related Infrastructure All development proposals should have regard to the IDP, and, where necessary contribute to the delivery of the following transport objectives, either directly where appropriate (such as the provision of infrastructure or through the contribution of land to enable a scheme to occur) or indirectly (such as through developer contributions as set out in Policy S45). For Strategic Transport Infrastructure: d) Improve and manage the strategic highway infrastructure for a range of users and increased capacity where appropriate and viable; e) Improve and manage the wider road infrastructure to benefit local communities including through the use of traffic management and calming initiatives where appropriate on rural roads, and key transport links in the towns and villages; f) Deliver opportunities for improved road and rail interaction, and avoiding impacts upon level crossings; g) Improve, extend and manage the strategic cycling network for a range of users; h) Support the enhancement of existing or proposed transport interchanges; i) Improve and manage the strategic highway infrastructure, wider road infrastructure and public rights of way network to deliver biodiversity net gain, including improved connectivity and extent of green infrastructure guided by local nature recovery strategy; and j) Explore opportunities to utilise waterways for transport, particularly freight. For Public and Community Transport Infrastructure and Services: k) Assist in the implementation of infrastructure which will help all communities in Central Lincolnshire, including people living in villages and small settlements, to have opportunities to travel without a car for essential journeys; l) Improve the integration, efficiency, accessibility, safety, convenience and comfort of public transport stations, including both rail and buses; m) Deliver flexible transport services that combine public and community transport, ensuring that locally based approaches are delivered to meet the needs of communities; n) Assist in bringing forward one or more mobility hubs in the Lincoln area. To demonstrate that developers have considered and taken into account the requirements of this policy, an appropriate Transport Statement/ Assessment and/ or Travel Plan should be submitted with proposals, with the precise form dependent on the scale and nature of development and agreed through early discussion with the local planning or highway authority and external bodies where relevant. Any development that has severe transport implications will not be granted planning permission unless deliverable mitigation measures have been identified, and arrangements secured for their implementation, which will make the development acceptable in transport terms.

Walking and Cycling Infrastructure

Development proposals should facilitate active travel by incorporating measures suitable for the scheme from the design stage. Plans and evidence accompanying applications will demonstrate how the ability to travel by foot or cycle will be actively encouraged by the delivery of well designed, safe and convenient access for all both into and through the site. Priority should be given to the needs of pedestrians, cyclists, people with impaired mobility and users of public transport by providing a network of high quality pedestrian and cycle routes and green corridors, linking to existing routes and public rights of way where opportunities exist, that give easy access and permeability to adjacent areas. Proposals will: a) protect, maintain and improve existing infrastructure, including closing gaps or deficiencies in the network and connecting communities and facilities; b) provide high quality attractive routes that are safe, direct, legible and pleasant and are integrated into the wider network; c) ensure the provision of appropriate information, including signposting and way-finding to encourage the safe use of the network; d) encourage the use of supporting facilities, especially along principle cycle routes; e) make provision for secure cycle parking facilities in new developments and in areas with high visitor numbers across Central Lincolnshire; and f) consider the needs of all users through inclusive design.

Parking Provision

Part A: Lincoln City Centre and Edge of Centre. Within 300m of Lincoln City Centre, as defined on the Policies Map, applications for residential development will be considered on a case by case basis, reflecting the varied nature of residential areas within the City. Considerations will take into account the proposal, its location, connectivity and parking issues in the surrounding area. For all other types of development, proposals will be required to make use of existing public car parks before the provision of additional car parking spaces will be considered. The council will only allow additional on-site or off-site spaces if the applicant has provided a full justification for such a need (for example on the basis of essential operational requirements which cannot be met by the use of existing spaces off-site). Within the area identified as the city centre on the Policies Map, all development proposals must demonstrate that careful consideration has been given to: • prioritising access for pedestrians; • improving accessibility for those with mobility issues; • encouraging cyclists to access the city centre; • reducing the need for vehicles to enter the city centre and particularly the city core policy area, with retail and other commercial development service vehicles being carefully controlled to minimise unnecessary disturbance to the public. Further details are intended to be provided in a Lincoln City specific Parking Standards SPD. Part B: All Other Locations. Parking Provision in Residential Development. Outside of areas covered by Part A, planning permission for new residential development will only be granted if the proposal makes appropriate and deliverable parking provision in accordance with the standards in Appendix 2. For all other development, the number and nature of spaces provided, and their location and access, should have regard to surrounding conditions and cumulative impact and set out clear reasoning in a note submitted with the application (whether that be in a Design and Access Statement / Transport Statement / Transport Assessment and/ or Travel Plan as appropriate, depending on the nature and scale of development proposed). Infrastructure relating to electric charging points should be included within garages and other appropriate locations in accordance with Policy NS18. Wherever possible, parking provision should be provided 'on plot'. Parking court style provision not associated with flatted development will only be acceptable in exceptional circumstances. Proposals must ensure that appropriate vehicle, powered two wheeler, cycle parking and disabled parking provision is made for residents, visitors, employees, customers, deliveries and for people with impaired mobility. Parking Provision Non-Residential Development. All other types of development should incorporate a level of car parking that is suitable for the proposed development taking into account its location, its size and its proposed use, including the expected number of employees, customers or visitors. Infrastructure relating to electric vehicle charging points should be provided in accordance with Policy NS18. Other considerations. In areas where there is a made Neighbourhood Plan containing residential parking standards, these will take precedent over the standards contained in Appendix 2.